Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. 55:24, reference to icebergs?

55:24, reference to icebergs?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
7 Posts 6 Posters 11 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    055.024
    YUSUFALI And His are the Ships sailing smoothly through the seas, lofty as mountains
    PICKTHAL His are the ships displayed upon the sea, like banners.
    SHAKIR And His are the ships reared aloft in the sea like mountains.

    http//defiant.corban.edu/gtipton/net-fun/iceberg.JPG

    Any idea?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      TheNabi
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Peace

      That's as good a guess as any I suppose.

      Joe

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        explorer
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        That is the only natural object that fits the description.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • LaythL Offline
          LaythL Offline
          Layth
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Peace,

          Interesting theory. But the implications would make the passage completely incomprehensible to the old arabs, which would render the Quran not-so-clear, at least for them.

          Nadeem

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            Navid
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Peace,

            Interesting theory. But the implications would make the passage completely incomprehensible to the old arabs, which would render the Quran not-so-clear, at least for them.

            Nadeem

            Perhaps the Arabs had a different interpretation that was logical at that time. It can go more than one way.

            Also, why is Nadeem at the end of the post? Just curious

            Peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              nadeem
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Peace,

              That previous post was by me. I was doing some work for Brother Layth and I forgot I to log in to my own account when posting.

              Nadeem

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Would you say that those verses were intended for guidance, or were they knowledge of the unseen (to them, anyway)? The idea of "a clear Quran" applies to the guidance and such, not necessarily these things which would be beyond the majority of humans until naval expeditions took hold.

                Consider 5533 (SHAKIR O assembly of the jinn and the men! If you are able to pass through the regions of the heavens and the earth, then pass through; you cannot pass through but with authority), is there any doubt as to its meaning today? What about back in 6th century Arabia?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Users