Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Number of wives?

Number of wives?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
536 Posts 37 Posters 58.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    diamantinehoneybunch
    wrote on last edited by
    #515

    Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)

    The word 'man' (Rajul) is singular in this Ayah. That destroys your argument.

    Very gooooooooood at twisting God's words to fulfil your sex-maniac desires.

    The verses that you showed were not this verse.
    You lost your argument against Mazhar then you bring another verse that uses singular noun to support and suit your evil sexist mysogynist unjust desires. LOL

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Offline
      I Offline
      Israfeel
      wrote on last edited by
      #516

      Very gooooooooood at twisting God's words to fulfil your sex-maniac desires.

      The verses that you showed were not this verse.
      You lost your argument against Mazhar then you bring another verse that uses singular noun to support and suit your evil sexist mysogynist unjust desires. LOL

      I've reported this post to the mods for being a personal attack. Hopefully they will ban this person.

      Also like to make clear that the verse I quoted 334 is talking about man (Rajul) in the singular.

      Looks like Hadith-rejectors when they can't answer with arguments resort to personal attacks. How sad.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        al-amiyr
        wrote on last edited by
        #517

        Very gooooooooood at twisting God's words to fulfil your sex-maniac desires.

        The verses that you showed were not this verse.
        You lost your argument against Mazhar then you bring another verse that uses singular noun to support and suit your evil sexist mysogynist unjust desires. LOL

        salaam Yuliana

        This is a very bad thing to say. I do not think that you realize or have realized the implications of what you have said. I think that you should immediately apologize to brother Israfeel. Do not generalize nor personalize! Continue your arguments constructively!

        salaam

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          muslims
          wrote on last edited by
          #518

          Salamun alaikum,

          Not exception but command. For exceptions command verbs are not used. For advice, mood of verb is jussive; for discretion mood of verb is subjunctive.

          Polygamy as a Custom of having many spouses for pleasure is not allowed in the Grand Qur'aan

          Salamun alaikum,

          Try to find out what is a "legal exception/exemption".

          General Rule Exception
          Forbidden to eat -> Can eat flesh of swine
          flesh of swine (Emergency)
          (2173) (2173)

          Cannot kill -> Can kill
          a person (War)
          (22.39)

          One wife -> Multiple wives
          (3350) (orphans)
          (43)

          and so on..

          If fear of unjust to wives, Allah command for one wife, i.e. the reinstatement of the general rule in (3350), and even in the situation for the benefit of an orphan. One wife.

          Peace brother.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Offline
            D Offline
            diamantinehoneybunch
            wrote on last edited by
            #519

            Salaam Israfeel,

            I didn't say that you were wrong about the verse 334.

            But you used the verse to say that the verses (that contain the word women) you showed to Mazhar also talked to singular man.

            The Pure Quran talks about having multiple wives (polygamy) as being normal

            Permitted to you, on the night of the fasts, is the approach to your wives (2187)

            But do not associate with your wives while ye are in retreat in the mosques (2187)

            Your wives are as a tilth unto you (2223)

            For those who take an oath for abstention from their wives, a waiting for four months is ordained (2226)

            In what your wives leave, your share is a half (412)

            And those who pray, "Our Lord! Grant unto us wives and offspring who will be the comfort of our eyes (2574)

            **Why would Islam discourage polygamy when Muslims are taught by the Quran to pray for wives (plural)??

            Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)

            Enter ye the Garden, ye and your wives, in (beauty and) rejoicing. (4370)

            Erroneous way of reading texts. The pronoun for men is plural whereby the following word "wives" is plural. It denotes respective wife--respective wives if a man has married others to fulfill the obligation imposed upon him.

            You gave the verses that talked about WIVES. Then Mazhar responded to you that the verses talking about WIVES also used the plural PRONOUN (see what pronoun is, i.e. I, You, He, She, It, They, We) of man.

            Then you responded to Mazhar only by using the verse 334 that uses singular NOUN of man to prove that a man is normal for having multiple wives.

            You hope that I would be banned?
            Why don't you yourself read your own posts that may make people hate Islam?
            Because of people like you, Ali Sina and his buddies keep laughing at Islam.

            You want me to get banned?
            This forum is dedicated to God and study His scripture. This forum is a Qur'an-alone forum.
            You are angry with my words now?

            Why don't you re-read Mahar's response to your posts of verses that you higlighted in red the word wives?

            Instead of wishing me to get banned, why don't you yourself read your posts that ridicule your own religion Islam and the Qur'an?
            You breach rule no 2.
            I also have the right to report your posts that ridicule the Qur'an.

            I apologize for the 'insults' but why don't you yourself understand why I used the words? But it is true that you try your best to twist God's words to suit polygamy-without-exception?

            Anyway I was saying about your desires. Not yourself! Why are you even angry when I said such things? Why don't you look at countries like Afghanistan (some parts), Yemen, Mali, Saudi Arabia where women are treated like garbage because of male-dominated ideology?

            Regards,
            Yuliana

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              diamantinehoneybunch
              wrote on last edited by
              #520

              Permitted to you, on the night of the fasts, is the approach to your wives (2187)

              But do not associate with your wives while ye are in retreat in the mosques (2187)

              Your wives are as a tilth unto you(2223)

              For thosewho take an oath for abstention from their wives, a waiting for four months is ordained (2226)
              Wait, Isn't it even logical to use "their wife"?

              In what your wives leave, your share is a half (412)

              And those who pray, "Our Lord! Grant unto us wives and offspring who will be the comfort of our eyes (2574)
              Wait, it is not logical to use "unto us wife" right?

              Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom yedivorce by Zihar your mothers (334)
              Anyway, the phrase "Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body" has pwned and disproved your view on polygamy(polygamy-without-exception).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                diamantinehoneybunch
                wrote on last edited by
                #521

                salaam Yuliana

                This is a very bad thing to say. I do not think that you realize or have realized the implications of what you have said. I think that you should immediately apologize to brother Israfeel. Do not generalize nor personalize! Continue your arguments constructively!

                salaam

                I know that you support Israfeel's views.

                You should read Israfeel's posts that make Islam look bad.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  muslims
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #522

                  Peace.

                  And DO NOT APPROACH unlawful sexual intercourse
                  Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way.
                  (<a href="http//quran.com/17/32">1732</a&gt

                  "Do not approach" adultery means deeper than the words "Do not commit" adultery. "Do not approach" means do not approach whatever that can leads to adultery. The difference between lawful and unlawful sexual intercourse is marriage; ie. lawful or unlawful marriage.

                  Therefore this will bring us to a new question, what is unlawful marriage according to the Qur'an?

                  Sura (3350) describes what is unlawful to the Believers; ie. unlawful marriage.

                  (3350) = Unlawful marriage
                  = Unlawful sexual intercourse
                  = Adultery
                  = "DO NOT APPROACH"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    al-amiyr
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #523

                    I know that you support Israfeel's views.

                    You should read Israfeel's posts that make Islam look bad.

                    Dear Yuliana

                    It has nothing to do with any view I support. I even support some of your views. I was referring to the personal name calling. Do you disagree with what I said in the previous post?

                    Regards

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #524

                      Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)

                      Two sentences are independent clauses; these are compounded by a conjunction waw. Independent since the verb is repeated.

                      The first sentence needs a careful parsing. "Two hearts" is not there; instead it is a prepositional phrase with Min "something emanating from two hearts" and then is adjectival description for the dual noun by a prepositional phrase coupled with possessive phrase. The object of verb is elided.

                      The discourse is about not accepting the word of the Non-Believers and Muna'fi'qeen Imposter believers.

                      Now one has to research as to what is the relationship of uttering a word-expression with the heart and chest.

                      When next wives are mentioned the pronoun for men is again plural.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #525

                        Deleted double uploading

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #526

                          Deleted, Strange, post went up thrice

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #527

                            Salamun alaikum,

                            Try to find out what is a "legal exception/exemption".

                            General Rule Exception
                            Forbidden to eat -> Can eat flesh of swine
                            flesh of swine (Emergency)
                            (2173) (2173)

                            Cannot kill -> Can kill
                            a person (War)
                            (22.39)

                            One wife -> Multiple wives
                            (3350) (orphans)
                            (43)

                            and so on..

                            If fear of unjust to wives, Allah command for one wife, i.e. the reinstatement of the general rule in (3350), and even in the situation for the benefit of an orphan. One wife.

                            Peace brother.

                            I am differing only to remain precise. In legal parlance, a command verb places obligation upon the subject. He has to do it.

                            Law provides saving clauses for meeting exigencies of situation or instances of impracticability in obeying the prescribed provision of law.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • H Offline
                              H Offline
                              hawk99
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #528

                              Two sentences are independent clauses; these are compounded by a conjunction waw. Independent since the verb is repeated.

                              The first sentence needs a careful parsing. "Two hearts" is not there; instead it is a prepositional phrase with Min "something emanating from two hearts" and then is adjectival description for the dual noun by a prepositional phrase coupled with possessive phrase. The object of verb is elided.

                              The discourse is about not accepting the word of the Non-Believers and Muna'fi'qeen Imposter believers.

                              Now one has to research as to what is the relationship of uttering a word-expression with the heart and chest.

                              When next wives are mentioned the pronoun for men is again plural.

                              Peace,

                              To quote Israfeel

                              "Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)

                              The word 'man' (Rajul) is singular in this Ayah. That destroys your argument."

                              To translate Mazhar's English into English "any man" 33/4 denotes "all men" (plural)

                              God bless

                              peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #529

                                Peace,

                                To quote Israfeel

                                "Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers (334)

                                The word 'man' (Rajul) is singular in this Ayah. That destroys your argument."

                                To translate Mazhar's English into English "any man" 33/4 denotes "all men" (plural) )

                                God bless

                                peace

                                Are you that poor in English too?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  hawk99
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #530

                                  Peace Mazhar,

                                  Did I understand you correctly yes/no?

                                  Two sentences are independent clauses; these are compounded by a conjunction waw. Independent since the verb is repeated.

                                  The first sentence needs a careful parsing. "Two hearts" is not there; instead it is a prepositional phrase with Min "something emanating from two hearts" and then is adjectival description for the dual noun by a prepositional phrase coupled with possessive phrase. The object of verb is elided.

                                  The discourse is about not accepting the word of the Non-Believers and Muna'fi'qeen Imposter believers.

                                  Now one has to research as to what is the relationship of uttering a word-expression with the heart and chest.

                                  When next wives are mentioned the pronoun for men is again plural.

                                  God bless

                                  peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    simonejamilla
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #531

                                    Nice to see the same old Hawky! How you doin' me old mucker! Long time dude! Way too long! jedi

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      good_logic
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #532

                                      Number of wives?
                                      This thread has got to number 531 posts! That is more than Soloman had as wives and concubines added together according to a certain source. By "certain source" I do not mean it is certain!!!

                                      And here is me having a complicated life with just one? And Yes,she will also say the same.

                                      And to think there will be "72" waiting for you up there? According to another source.

                                      Help!!! I do not want to go up there.
                                      GOD bless you all.
                                      Peace.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Man_of_Faith
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #533

                                        Scary people have actually answered anything else instead of "Yes 1".

                                        Be well
                                        Qarael Amenuel

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Muslimtruthrevealed
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #534

                                          Unbelievable!!!!

                                          Hard to believe people, the same people are still arguing about the same topic for almost TEN YEARS!

                                          This argument was done when the Quran was revealed.....

                                          sheesh, wow

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users