The Message - Second Edition
-
Peace mmouhammad,
Your reply does not address my questions. The core issue is whether the present order of the Quran text is the one dictated and authorised by God and how one can assuredly tell that the Quran has been preserved fully with no alteration or loss of portions of the original Quran.
Yours truly,
K.Vivekanandan
-
Salam,
How do you know Muhammad rearranged the Quran in the present order after it was fully revealed, that too, in accordance with instructions from God? What is your proof for this belief? If Muhammad received instructions from God after completion of revelation of the entire Quran, why are you not considering these instructions as God's revelations which in this case must have formed part of the Quran? You are only following the baseless tale of your forefathers that the Quran is fully preserved and that the present Quran order was made by Muhammad as instructed by God.
I know that the Quran was rearranged different from the sequence it was revealed in by the following verses
16101 And if We exchange a revelation in place of another revelation; and God is more aware of what He is revealing; they say ?You are making this up!? Alas, most of them do not know.
16102 Say ?The Holy Spirit has brought it down from your Lord with the truth, so that those who believe will be strengthened, and as a guidance and good news for those who have submitted.?
Therefore, the answer to your question is yes, the verse regarding the arrangement itself was made part of the Quran.
-
Peace mmouhammad,
Your reply does not address my questions. The core issue is whether the present order of the Quran text is the one dictated and authorised by God and how one can assuredly tell that the Quran has been preserved fully with no alteration or loss of portions of the original Quran.
Yours truly,
K.Vivekanandan
Peace vivek, all
My post might have not given you a direct reply to your inquiry, nonetheless, it is very much related and a reflection on the related verses of the Reading; read verse 482;
482
482 Do they not reflect on the Reading? If it was from any other than God they would have found in it many a discrepancy.However, in relation to your inquiry, I believe, heart and soul and accept what is said in verse 159 as the truth.
159
159 Indeed it is we who have sent down the Reminder, and indeed it is we who will preserve it.The reading is preserved in its arrangements and number of verses as it was gathered in the way The God deemed.
However, the plan " " Arabic alphabetic written version is the only true version of the Reading; all other currently accepted readings "recitations" and its translations are based on the man made understanding and grammatical rules.
I believe that the Quran does not and will not depend on any external proof; the Quran is sufficient by itself and it is the proof and the witness on itself. Read the following verses
7516 7517 7518 7519
7516 Do not move your tongue with it to expedite it. 7517 It is for us to gather it and read it. 7518 So when we read it, you shall follow its Reading. 7519 Then it is for us to explain it.I reflect, as we all should, on the Reading to learn more and more. We are told in very clear words that, if the reading was from any other than God, we would have found in it many discrepancies.
Anyway, for those who are not satisfied with verses 159, 482 and 7517-19, you can read for them verses 2849 & 50 and think about verse 4723 & 24.
2849 2850
2849 Say ?Then bring forth a book from God that is better in guidance so I may follow it, if you are truthful.? 2850 But if they fail to respond to you, then know that they follow only their desires. And who is more astray than he who follows his desire, without guidance from God? God does not guide the wicked people.
4723 4724
4723 These are the ones whom God has cursed and thus He made them deaf and blinded their sight. 4724 Do they not reflect on the Reading? Or are there locks on their hearts? -
Salam,
I know that the Quran was rearranged different from the sequence it was revealed in by the following verses
16101 And if We exchange a revelation in place of another revelation; and God is more aware of what He is revealing; they say ?You are making this up!? Alas, most of them do not know.
16102 Say ?The Holy Spirit has brought it down from your Lord with the truth, so that those who believe will be strengthened, and as a guidance and good news for those who have submitted.?
Therefore, the answer to your question is yes, the verse regarding the arrangement itself was made part of the Quran.
Peace Layth,
Can you address the points/questions that I had raised when debating with Pierre and others in the links below
http//19.org/forum/index.php/t/7554/0/
http//19.org/forum/index.php/t/7580/0/Hope you will answer my questions as a sincere believer but not hypocritically as Pierre did.
Yours truly,
K.Vivekanandan
-
I agree Vivek's original questions (re-ordering the chapters, etc.) are quite scholarly, and most Muslims do not introspect these because they are carried by the sheer momentum of 'faith', which is quite natural. But SCHOLAR-MUSLIMS throughout the history have indeed asked the same questions to themselves. Being scholar, they went on painstaking "Review of Literature," something every PhD student has to in his/her doctoral research. Unlike research in material sciences, historical research is much more difficult, but there are GREAT scholars, too, who have done it, e.g., Sir Jadunath Sircar of India, who. compiled data and founded the history of India.
The Companions of the Prophet (called the Generation of Sahabis), their followers (called the Generation of Tabeyeen), and the third generation (called Tabe-Tabeyeen) took great pains to transmit BOTH internal (The Qur'an as we know it) AND external aspects (the special instructions on ordering, etc.) and historical backgrounds (what we call "shaan-e-nuzool" of the REVELATIONS. All these have been transmitted down to us through innumerable scholars of Islam, mostly in Arabic, Persian, and Turkish languages, but modern scholars have produced their work in English based on the earlier works, of which there are many available on the internet, too.
Obviously, nobody needs to prove what is proven, but can only give directions. So if you're ready to seek answers to the questions you've posed, you've got to go to the LIBRARY. References? When I asked my professor at the Indian School of Mines in 1982 to give me the 'starting references' so I could begin my Senior Project Research, he said
"Go to the library!"
I sure was disappointed, but had to do what I must do, and now I tell my graduate students exactly that.
Allama Mawdudi, in his Tafheemul Qur'an (hard copy), has given a brief glimpse of the history of Qur'an compilation. You may check out the internet version at
http//www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Articles/quran/scriptq.htm
Another good ref. is the work of the German scholar, ahmad von Denfer, available at
http//www.quranicstudies.com/articles/history-of-the-quran/
There are so many printed books available through Amazon.com (http//www.amazon.com/Story-Quran-History-Place-Muslim/dp/1405122587), but for an INTEGRATED SOURCE IN ENGLISH, we have to wait a couple of years till a project currently underway is finished
http//www.iequran.com/
My personal view is that all MAN-MADE accounts of history can't be 100% error-free. Just think of the history of the World War 2, which is so recent, but who can say that there is ONE version which EVERYONE accepts???
Therefore, the authencity of the Qur'an, as Vivek has justly asked to know, must be found in the Qur'an itself, if and only if the Qur'an can answer it?
Can the Qur'an answer it?Taken scientifically, we've to collect different copies of Qur'an over space and time, put them to scrutiny, and see if there is any sensible difference (in meaning).
Then take another historical book of that era (or at least 1,300 years old), and subject it to same scrutiny as done with the Qur'an.
Finally, compare the error margin as observed in the Qur'an and the error margin as observed in the other Book.
Allama Mawdudi has alluded to such a test on Qur'an and reported zero difference. I do not know how authentic that report is.
But given the enormous wealth that the Muslim world possesses, such a major undertaking could be taken. May be that's what the above-mentioned project is about
http//www.iequran.comI suggest the 'other Book' be the Bible, which has comparable space-time spread as the Qur'an.
Note I can't resist chuckling at this stage, rotfl There are so many DIFFERENT AUTHENTIC VERSIONS of the Bible, that spending a dollar to the above-mentioned test can hardly be justified. Yet, a cursory look at the internet shows how many great Christian pundits have spent years to pinpoint 'discrepancies' at the Qur'an, all the while ignoring their fallacies shown to them....
And the very reason the Qur'an was revealed is precisely that, as the Qur'an says, i.e., man-made errors of omission and commission in the Bible, then the Qur'an declaring time and again that no such errors will be allowed in the Qur'an. On who is the onus of verifying this challenge of the Qur'an?
Rafiqul
-
Peace Rafiqul and everyone else,
The facts of Quran's alteration and loss of parts of it are presented in the link below which can be viewed by "copy and paste the URL"
F\2869295 Myth 1 the Quran is Preserved and Unchanged Revelation From Allah.htm
Yours truly,
K.Vivekanandan
-
Peace Layth,
congrats on the translation - it turned out very well. When is it coming to quranix.net or going to be on sale?
-
I suggest the 'other Book' be the Bible, which has comparable space-time spread as the Qur'an.
Note I can't resist chuckling at this stage, rotfl There are so many DIFFERENT AUTHENTIC VERSIONS of the Bible, that spending a dollar to the above-mentioned test can hardly be justified. Yet, a cursory look at the internet shows how many great Christian pundits have spent years to pinpoint 'discrepancies' at the Qur'an, all the while ignoring their fallacies shown to them....
Peace,
You are kidding, right?
The books of the bible were penned over a period stretching several hundreds of years, in three languages, and by multiple authors. The Quran was penned by one man over the course of his lifetime, and in one language.
Please explain to me how the bible and the quran have a comparable space-time spread.
-Joel
-
Salaam, will this be available as an actual book to purchase?
-
pls inform me y there no "ALIF" added in surah 1Ayat #1 "Alhamdollillahey" ?.
-
I've just ordered the 1st edition of The Message in hardback after searching for modern translations without distracting notes of explanation etc and hope it doesn't differ too much from the 2nd edition!
I think intelligent personal interpretation of the translation is the right way to go about reading the Qur'an & not to be misguided by someone's own explanations.
A lot of the Qur'an is quite clear but I've noticed in some parts you have to think deeper and make up your own mind what God is saying sun -
sallam,
make sure there is no perfect translation of Quran ( even this word should be mean as my thought as "mind" ) on face of the earth. word like 'Allah" (taken as lord where as word "RAB" fulfils all catagory if c chapter 1 verse # 2. word "Alhamdollillah" "alif" (A) is missing ), "Muhammed", "Quran", "Arabic" need futher examination 2 our new finding word "arabic" means "mother tounge" & word like "yahood" taken as "jews" by corrupt islamic religion makers whereas it should be "knowledge" ............ more later.
-
The 1st edition was out of stock so I got the 2nd, delivered yesterday!
MashAllah. Respect to Amazon & more importantly Free Minds for a beautiful book! -
salam brothers.
i would strongly state that it is up to Allah to show you of the Quran what is intended for you to see.
although i agree with explaining the quran with what is there in it ,nothing else.
i also support that it only be explained while we directly read it,
if it is a teacher then let it teach ,if we jump to make meaning of it then we dont need a quran ,code would of sent down a numbered code as was with teh old testament.
but with the quran it is different.
i think it is fine to think about it,but reading it and reflecting as we read is the major thing we are after.
dont forget that we do this in service of Allah,then all our out comes are nullified ,yes we might understand soemthing that is clear today but in the future it will have its disputes for changes in understanding happens.
remmember that the book is what will help us,refer to it.
and since this book is in arabic the quran is in arabic ,it surpasses the language in so many many ways.i do strongly suggest that we dont take things literaly from the quran,we need to follow as we read,
then we would go astray ,
only in reading it and reflecting on it,is there guidance.be aware that if we need to put down the meaning as logical numbered meanigs ,then ALLah would of done that already/
dont make the mistake of sunnis and shi3as.
they have left the book for some kind understanding,please there is more in this book then rules.dont miss understand it.
i dont like to explain it,dont try to explain it,just read and reflect.
that is all.
salam alaykum
i dont like to see this happen to you guys now or in the future. -
Hello,
I just want to notice something confused me in Sura 53. Current translation below is far away from real meaning of the words.
Current
5314 At the ultimate point.
5315 Near it is the eternal Paradise.
5316 The whole place was overwhelmed.
5317 The eyes did not waver, nor go blind.
5318 He has seen from the great signs of his Lord.Should be
5314 Near the tree of boundary.
5315 Near it is the garden of abode.
5316 When the tree was surrounded with what surrounded it,
5317 His eye turned not aside, nor did it wander.
5318 He saw the greatest of the signs of his Lord.Peace..
-
