Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Dr Qamar's Haqeeqat Hadith, Haqeeqat Salat and Haqeeqat Saum??

Dr Qamar's Haqeeqat Hadith, Haqeeqat Salat and Haqeeqat Saum??

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
199 Posts 20 Posters 7.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Ayisha
    wrote on last edited by
    #158

    You admit there is difference in watching and seeing. Yet you can not even see that the word used and underlined by me with red line is for watching not seeing. Watch is only when one focuses upon a thing. And Basr can be used only when one focuses and watches and is therefore also used to perceive and conceive the perception. Arabic is a precise language.

    And I had asked you to also see the plurality and mood of verb which only reflects that they did it openly and in group, everybody watching/focussing as is done in recording of porno movies. And if you see the conjunction "waw" in the beginning of the subordinate clause/sentence which is called it would have confirmed you that it is describing the state in which the described act they used to perform as habit.

    And I give you one more information about the sentence indicating the reason of my translation, object of the verb has been omitted.

    And remember this is not about the episode of last days when people had gathered at his door.

    How is that used for watching and not seeing when the same word is used in 28.72 as I pointed out, what is being 'watched' in that verse? 43.51 same, what is being watched? 51.21 same, what is being watched? None of these verses refer to watching something or even seeing something with the eyes but with the mind. One can 'focus' the mind as well as the eyes. Plainly 'do you not get it'

    What makes you say this is not the episode when people were gathered at Abrahams door? because its in a different verse? You did the same with Zakaraya asking for a child when it was 2 instances of the same event. This again is telling of the same event.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Raaajah
      wrote on last edited by
      #159

      Ayisha what makes you say that at the time of prophet Lut, there was no public sex. At least Mazhar has presented his evidence, you not agree with that, you seldom do, but I want to see any counter evidence, a historical or other wise. If you can that will help.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Ayisha
        wrote on last edited by
        #160

        Ayisha what makes you say that at the time of prophet Lut, there was no public sex. At least Mazhar has presented his evidence, you not agree with that, you seldom do, but I want to see any counter evidence, a historical or other wise. If you can that will help.

        Mazhar has presented evidence of public sex where exactly? he has presented his view of a translation that NO OTHER translator has come up with.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Offline
          R Offline
          Raaajah
          wrote on last edited by
          #161

          Mazhar has presented evidence of public sex where exactly? he has presented his view of a translation that NO OTHER translator has come up with.

          i am not sure, but let us say I agree with you. At least he has presented his translation, which he not made at once, it was already there on his site. What is your proof for negating that there wasn't any group or public sex at time of Prophet Lut?

          he presented following argument in his favor

          Mazhar

          You admit there is difference in watching and seeing. Yet you can not even see that the word used and underlined by me with red line is for watching not seeing. Watch is only when one focuses upon a thing. And Basr can be used only when one focuses and watches and is therefore also used to perceive and conceive the perception. Arabic is a precise language.

          And I had asked you to also see the plurality and mood of verb which only reflects that they did it openly and in group, everybody watching/focussing as is done in recording of porno movies. And if you see the conjunction "waw" in the beginning of the subordinate clause/sentence which is called it would have confirmed you that it is describing the state in which the described act they used to perform as habit.

          You do not agree but where is yours for not agreeing. Many same words are used with different meanings at different places.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Ayisha
            wrote on last edited by
            #162

            What is your proof for negating that there wasn't any group or public sex at time of Prophet Lut?

            You do not agree but where is yours for not agreeing. Many same words are used with different meanings at different places.

            I gave it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Offline
              R Offline
              Raaajah
              wrote on last edited by
              #163

              Ayisha

              I gave it.

              Ayisha

              doesn't say anything about doing it in groups in public. It is plural because he is saying it to a group of men outside his door.

              No! you just disagreed with his translation as usual. Where is your proof that there was no public or group sex at times of LUT?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Ayisha
                wrote on last edited by
                #164

                AyishaAyisha
                No! you just disagreed with his translation as usual. Where is your proof that there was no public or group sex at times of LUT?

                Oh get real! Where is the proof that there WAS? That is NOT proof there was. He made the claim and 'backed it up' with rubbish and has not even come back and answered what I have said AGAINST his perverted translation. the other verses I used against his argument were referenced to HIS translations of those verses. Now if you want to take his place and answer for him as opposed to answering anything for you, than please look at the verses I gave and tell me what is being WATCHED in them.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Raaajah
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #165

                  Now if you want to take his place and answer for him as opposed to answering anything for you, than please look at the verses I gave and tell me what is being WATCHED in them.

                  Sorry I can't answer you and you know this.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    hope4
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #166

                    Selam

                    I have recently read Haqeeqat Saum and find the arguments against saum not meaning fasting very plausible. Is there any other articles out there which argues against fasting?

                    Peace be apon you all.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • WakasW Offline
                      WakasW Offline
                      Wakas
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #167

                      peace all,

                      I only recently read his discussion on 56 and 443 and found it lacking. He only briefly utilised/mentioned Quran concordance, and committed some logical fallacies whilst he was at it.

                      That does not mean he is wrong however, it simply means based on what he said, it is far from proven.

                      His work is still on my reading list however.

                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Offline
                        I Offline
                        Ilyusha
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #168

                        Dear All,

                        Any body read the above books in which Dr Qamaruzzaman rejects Salat and Hadith as being against the Qur'an. You can download English PDF Versions of all three books at www.aastana.com.

                        Mubashir

                        Salam.

                        In my understanding, someone who rejects Salat and Fasting as being against Quran have lost their way, and don't even deserve to be read. That's what is good about the Criterion that we have.
                        Other similar self-styled deviant cases that called their whims Islam include at least Dr. Shabbir, and, Pervez (who is listed on this website for some strange reasons).

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • WakasW Offline
                          WakasW Offline
                          Wakas
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #169

                          peace,

                          In my understanding, someone who rejects Salat and Fasting as being against Quran have lost their way, and don't even deserve to be read. That's what is good about the Criterion that we have.

                          Firstly, no-one who follows Quran can reject "salat", so the way in which you phrased this part is incorrect. Perhaps you meant to say "prayer".
                          Secondly, "sawm" does not mean "fast" if you are using the conventional English definition

                          fast
                          verb (used without object)
                          1.
                          to abstain from all food.
                          2.
                          to eat only sparingly or of certain kinds of food, especially as a religious observance.
                          verb (used with object)
                          3.
                          to cause to abstain entirely from or limit food; put on a fast to fast a patient for a day before surgery.
                          noun
                          4.
                          an abstinence from food, or a limiting of one's food, especially when voluntary and as a religious observance; fasting.
                          5.
                          a day or period of fasting.

                          It means "abstinence", this is fairly clear from Quran. From aastana, the dispute seems to be abstaining from what.

                          Other similar self-styled deviant cases that called their whims Islam include at least Dr. Shabbir, and, Pervez (who is listed on this website for some strange reasons).

                          No-one is perfect, but the above two names you mention have made some solid points on some issues.

                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Shirley
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #170

                            Salaam hope4,

                            Selam

                            I have recently read Haqeeqat Saum and find the arguments against saum not meaning fasting very plausible. Is there any other articles out there which argues against fasting?

                            Peace be apon you all.

                            Reality of the Fasting Month of Ramadan

                            Please give us your thoughts on it. )

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • WakasW Offline
                              WakasW Offline
                              Wakas
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #171

                              peace all,

                              For anyone who has read or is considering reading Dr Zaman's Haqeeqat Salat, see

                              Critique of Dr Zaman (aastana) ?The Truth about ?Wudhu? (Ablution)? p67-87

                              Download PDF file

                              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H Offline
                                H Offline
                                hope4
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #172

                                Salaam hope4,

                                Reality of the Fasting Month of Ramadan

                                Please give us your thoughts on it. )

                                Selam

                                Thank you. It mentions that Saum is some sort of training program. My thoughts on this is that I find this idea more plausable than fasting.

                                I asked someone once why do we fast? His reply was we fast to see how people without food feel so that in return we can be more giving. However, does it make us more giving? Do we just give in the Ramadan? Shoudl we be thinking of the poor all year round?

                                When I read AQ I try and see or understand what the end product of Saum can be.

                                2183 Fast so you may be righteous
                                2184 Fasting is better for you
                                2187 during the night of fasting you can approach your women sexually. (I am so confused with this verse! Is fasting only for men? Also, "and do not approach them while you are devoted in
                                the temples". If you was in a temple would anyone approach their women sexually if thats what it means?)

                                2196
                                .... If you are secure,
                                then whoever goes to visit and continues until the Pilgrimage, then
                                he shall provide what is affordable of donation; but for he who
                                cannot find anything, then he must fast for three days during the
                                Pilgrimage and seven when he returns;..... (So, if you have no money to give you must fast? If someone could explain I am all ears)

                                492.... fasting of two months sequentially as a repentance from God. (Fasting for killing someone? Seems like a very easy get away?)

                                I haven't gone through all of the occurances but trying to make sense of it all at the moment requires more reading and research. I sometimes get fustrated I could not spend more time in trying to do the required research, but may Allah guide us in the right direction and help us with our endeavors for the truth.

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Shirley
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #173

                                  Salaam,

                                  You are welcome hope4.

                                  I first started rethinking the fasting issue after I had read This Article by Aidid Safar about two years ago.

                                  The answer that person gave you as to WHY we fast is sorely lacking.

                                  First of all fasting from sun up 'til sun down for 29 or 30 days does not compare to permanent hunger 365 days. And some of those days many people have to go days or even weeks without eating. The so-called Muslims get to eat at sundown, so no comparison.

                                  Second of all, if I have to fast in order to develop compassion for the poor and hungry, what does that say about me and the type of person that I really am?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    loxbox13
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #174

                                    why does Allah always when speaking about SAWM , always says KOULOU WA ACHRONOU (uduzlly trznslztes Eay and drink ? and never said STOP EATING AND DRINKING ?
                                    wgar does it have to do with talking, as MARYAM said , I devoted to Alrahman SAWMAN , so i won't talk to any human for days
                                    why miriam spoke about not speaking and didn't say i won't be eating for days .?
                                    Why did Zakariah do SAWM so he spoke with signs ? and not about eating and fasting ?
                                    why allah insists on eating and drinking is SAWM ?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jafar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #175

                                      why does Allah always when speaking about SAWM , always says KOULOU WA ACHRONOU (uduzlly trznslztes Eay and drink ? and never said STOP EATING AND DRINKING ?
                                      wgar does it have to do with talking, as MARYAM said , I devoted to Alrahman SAWMAN , so i won't talk to any human for days
                                      why miriam spoke about not speaking and didn't say i won't be eating for days .?
                                      Why did Zakariah do SAWM so he spoke with signs ? and not about eating and fasting ?
                                      why allah insists on eating and drinking is SAWM ?

                                      THanks loxbox you've highlighted an important point (that so far I've missed)..

                                      At the back of my head; I always suspected that the word SAWM are related towards 'restraint'.. it serves as a mean to practice control over yourselves.

                                      As a human grow older, he should possess more capabilities for restraining / controlling him/herself.

                                      This is something which even psychologist would agree.. take a look at how baby grew... in the beginning he can't control himself, he always cried when he feels any negative emotions. He then start to learn on how to control it as he grew...

                                      A sawm should be a mean to practice this 'self restraining' capabilities.. the better we are on controlling ourselves the better we are as a person... that's why in the Quran; Sawm is a mean to increase the 'taqwa'..

                                      The next question will be what is "Taqwa"?
                                      The word Taqwa (arabic) or Tiqwah (Hebrew) is from the semitic wa? ka? ya (meaning shield) and its verb is from the word ?Ittaki?. Ittaki means to be careful or to be protected or to be cautious. The broader meaning of Taqwa is to develop one?s behavior so as to be cautiously aware and in control (to do good deed and avoid bad deed).
                                      The opposite of 'in control' will be 'run amok' or 'wild' or 'behaving like a loose cannon'... (just like those who are involved in the London's riot few days ago)

                                      The more 'restraining' capability we have on ourselves the better person we will be...
                                      And SAWM should be a mean to improve and increase our capability of 'self-control'...
                                      SAWM is not a 'ritual' activity 'to please God'.. and the technicalities of the 'SAWM' could differ among people and/or cultures. Mary and Zachary does their SAWM by 'not talking' as it was told in the Quran.. However it doesn't mean that 'not eating and drinking' is not one of the many form of a SAWM.

                                      And definitely for sure.. even 'women in her period' should be capable and 'allowed' to do her SAWM..

                                      PS I find it mind boggling for the sunnis to forbids women in her period to do SHALAT, SAWM. As it turns out it was one of the 'good old traditions from their pagan period.
                                      http//www.pantheon.org/articles/m/manaf.html
                                      Manaf One of the ancient heathen gods of Mecca, before Islam. The statue of this god was caressed by women, but when they had their periods they were not allowed to near it.

                                      Salam / Peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • WakasW Offline
                                        WakasW Offline
                                        Wakas
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #176

                                        peace all,

                                        For anyone who has read or is considering reading Dr Zaman's Haqeeqat Salat, see

                                        Critique of Dr Zaman (aastana) ?The Truth about ?Wudhu? (Ablution)? p67-87

                                        Download PDF file

                                        Summary review of 19 pages resulted in -

                                        30 errors/problems identified

                                        • (5 of which critical errors)
                                          3 logical fallacies noted
                                          16 instances requiring evidence/referencing

                                        Total = 49 issues to be resolved/clarified

                                        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          B_ob
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #177

                                          Summary review of 19 pages resulted in -

                                          30 errors/problems identified

                                          • (5 of which critical errors)
                                            3 logical fallacies noted
                                            16 instances requiring evidence/referencing

                                          Total = 49 issues to be resolved/clarified

                                          Please explain what Dr Qamar Mean by "?Kindly note that routine talk is not allowed during Namaaz.?" at page 69

                                          you said- -" but conveniently neglects to mention that immediately after the singular ?al ghaiti? reference it
                                          becomes plural, e.g. ?or you (plural) have touched the women? or ?and you (plural) could not find
                                          water?."

                                          Did dr Qamar say plural is NOT used AFTER al ghaiti? where did he say that?

                                          Please explain what this verse means when it say" or one of you cometh from offices of nature, or ye have been in contact with women, and ye find no water, then take for yourselves clean sand or earth"

                                          Do you rub your face with sand when you along with others have touched THE WOMEN AL NISA, or if ONE of you cometh from offices of nature? Or do you mean to say rubbing the face with sand is only a reference to those who touch THE women and not those who ,,no no ,I mean NOT "THE ONE OF YOU" who came from office of nature? So it means rubbing the face with sand is only mandatory for those who touch the women and not "If ye are ill, or on a journey, or one of you cometh from offices of nature" ?

                                          What is the command to "THE ONE OF YOU who come back from offices of nature"?

                                          why are all these things mentioned at all, if sand is ordered to use only if you (plural) have touched the women? THE WOMEN? who are they? And heyy, what about the private parts? you mean to say The Quran, Allah Paak Almighty,order people to walk around or participate Salaat with stinkydirty private parts, as long as they have a ...errrm ,,a sandy face?

                                          who use sand to clean his face anyway? you?

                                          "P71 ? claims ?would certainly smear the already clean faces? ? I never knew travellers, or those
                                          who had sex or are sick etc have clean faces by default! Erroneous.
                                          Claims ?sa?eedan? can mean ?height? ? NQE, NCADR. Although I do know it can mean ?elevated
                                          land?, but that is not the same as it meaning ?height? only"

                                          Please explain this, do you mean one have to clean the face with elevated land? Which is? If we use both the definitions, does it make sense? Rub your face with elevated land, or rub your face with high sand,,aeehhh, sand which is high ? drunk sand ? Please explain

                                          last part of the Aya- For Allah doth blot out sins and forgive again and again.

                                          so what's the "sin" here? Not to clean oneself after toilet ? Or to enter Salaat without cleaning oneself after the toilet? Sorry, it is not about al ghaiti, it is about touching THE women. so what's the sin, not to rub ones face and hands with elevate land/ high sand, or to enter Salaat without a sandy face? Allah's mercy and forgiveness is mentioned after issuing orders to rub ones face with sand (and you now why)...does it make sense at all?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users