Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. 53:15 Did Muhammed go up to heaven?

53:15 Did Muhammed go up to heaven?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
66 Posts 7 Posters 1.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    the Paradise/Garden of the Abode is near by it
    This verse doesn't say paradise, because paradise iscalled FIRDAWS , but it only says jannat maawa, the garden of abode, could be his house where he lived after hijra, jannah doesn't mean the paradise of the hearafter, because jannah is mentionned many times in the quran as sabaa Sheeba who had jannatan on the righ t and on the left

    There was indeed a sign for Sheba in their dwelling-place Two gardens on the right hand and the left (as who should say) Eat of the provision of your Lord and render thanks to Him. A fair land and an indulgent Lord 3415

    "The Garden of Abode" and gardens on right and left of their dwelling is not one and the same thing. Is it not so apparent from your quote? And one does not "descend" from a place at ground level.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      loxbox13
      wrote on last edited by
      #54

      "The Garden of Abode" and gardens on right and left of their dwelling is not one and the same thing. Is it not so apparent from your quote? And one does not "descend" from a place at ground level.

      The main thing is maawa, it means the shelter, or living place , paradise, hell or home or any place

      Did He not find you an orphan and sheltered you?

      what i meant is, it sounds like the garden of the hearafter, the next world, but how can the prophet see the garden of the next world, while this world is still exist ? remember, the earth will be a different earth.

      On the day when the earth will be changed to other than the earth, and the heavens (also will be changed) and they will come forth unto Allah, the One, the Almighty 1448

      So , it sounds to me more like the house where he dwell in his lifetime

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #55

        Quote from Mazhar on Yesterday at 014028 AM
        "The Garden of Abode" and gardens on right and left of their dwelling is not one and the same thing. Is it not so apparent from your quote? And one does not "descend" from a place at ground level.

        The main thing is maawa, it means the shelter, or living place , paradise, hell or home or any place

        Did He not find you an orphan and sheltered you?

        what i meant is, it sounds like the garden of the hearafter, the next world, but how can the prophet see the garden of the next world, while this world is still exist ? remember, the earth will be a different earth.

        On the day when the earth will be changed to other than the earth, and the heavens (also will be changed) and they will come forth unto Allah, the One, the Almighty 1448

        So , it sounds to me more like the house where he dwell in his lifetime

        You are perceiving this, red quote, because you are overlooking the context of the said word- hinted by me "And one does not "descend" from a place at ground level".

        How can you perceive the aforesaid conclusion from these Arabic quotes?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          exodus
          wrote on last edited by
          #56

          So from these verses, does that mean he saw the heaven we wil InshaAllah be goin to?

          In fact, 5315 refers to an average garden which surrounded and bordered with trees, rather than Heaven/Paradise of Herafter. We can admit that there is no any mention for Heaven/Paradise in chapter 53. But there is an extraordinary experiment which happened out of the World, also.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            exodus
            wrote on last edited by
            #57

            Salaam Mazhar,

            I already read your post and I have already responded to it. But seems you like to repeat the same things again and again.

            I did not find my answer in the references given. Please make it clear as you claim. Please don't try to twist or add in Allah's word.

            May Allah guide us all towards the truth pr
            Mohammed M. Khan

            mmkhan's approach is the right one in my opinion.

            Actually, lots of traditionalist interpreters can't feel comfort with chapter 53. Because there are a lot of questions related with it which requiring clear and absolute answers. One of the serious questions is, actually there is NO strong evidence for clarifying that Mohammad is the one who mentioned there.

            In my opinion, most important question is 5318. Traditionalist interpreters translate this verse as

            "He saw one/some of the greatest signs of his Lord" which is way wrong.

            The verse clearly says

            "Indeed, he saw THE GREATEST OF THE signs of his Lord" (531

            In this case, there should be an answer for "What is The Greatest one?" in particular, but there is no answer by anyone including Mohammad himself. Thus, interpreters and scholars choose "one of the greatest" or "(some of) greatest signs" as translation and covering the uncomfortable truth.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #58

              In my opinion, most important question is 5318. Traditionalist interpreters translate this verse as

              "He saw one/some of the greatest signs of his Lord" which is way wrong.

              The verse clearly says

              "Indeed, he saw THE GREATEST OF THE signs of his Lord" (531

              In this case, there should be an answer for "What is The Greatest one?" in particular, but there is no answer by anyone including Mohammad himself. Thus, interpreters and scholars choose "one of the greatest" or "(some of) greatest signs" as translation and covering the uncomfortable truth.

              Did you try to know what is the signification of preposition "Min" before passing the above judgment?

              And do you know the relationship of various elements of the sentence? Or even do you know the case ending of word "Alkubra"?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #59

                One of the serious questions is, actually there is NO strong evidence for clarifying that Mohammad is the one who mentioned there.

                It shows that basics of any language are not being kept in mind what to say of Arabic. Every pronoun denotes and refers to a specific person, in the context.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Offline
                  E Offline
                  exodus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #60

                  Did you try to know what is the signification of preposition "Min" before passing the above judgment?

                  And do you know the relationship of various elements of the sentence? Or even do you know the case ending of word "Alkubra"?

                  Yes I did/know. What about you?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Offline
                    E Offline
                    exodus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #61

                    It shows that basics of any language are not being kept in mind what to say of Arabic. Every pronoun denotes and refers to a specific person, in the context.

                    I'm not about to declining that there is a specific person, actually there is. But we have NO strong evidence for proving that specific person is Mohammad.. is it clear now?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #62

                      Yes I did/know. What about you?

                      Had you known you may not have translated the way you translated that sentence.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #63

                        I'm not about to declining that there is a specific person, actually there is. But we have NO strong evidence for proving that specific person is Mohammad.. is it clear now?

                        It is like saying that in there is no strong evidence for proving that exodus is included in

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          exodus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #64

                          Had you known you may not have translated the way you translated that sentence.

                          I had quite known for admitting that you must work much more on this subject. Read and check carefully for 5318.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E Offline
                            E Offline
                            exodus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #65

                            It is like saying that in there is no strong evidence for proving that exodus is included in

                            Are you about to show your Arabic skills or prove something serious in Quran? hmm

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Ozi_Kristi-lee
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #66

                              Can anyone refer me to someone with knowledge? I realy dnt understand much of wat has been said... I dnt no Arabic Eitha which makes it a little more difficult to no ur arguments

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Users