Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. 53:15 Did Muhammed go up to heaven?

53:15 Did Muhammed go up to heaven?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
66 Posts 7 Posters 1.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    exodus
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    So from these verses, does that mean he saw the heaven we wil InshaAllah be goin to?

    In fact, 5315 refers to an average garden which surrounded and bordered with trees, rather than Heaven/Paradise of Herafter. We can admit that there is no any mention for Heaven/Paradise in chapter 53. But there is an extraordinary experiment which happened out of the World, also.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      exodus
      wrote on last edited by
      #57

      Salaam Mazhar,

      I already read your post and I have already responded to it. But seems you like to repeat the same things again and again.

      I did not find my answer in the references given. Please make it clear as you claim. Please don't try to twist or add in Allah's word.

      May Allah guide us all towards the truth pr
      Mohammed M. Khan

      mmkhan's approach is the right one in my opinion.

      Actually, lots of traditionalist interpreters can't feel comfort with chapter 53. Because there are a lot of questions related with it which requiring clear and absolute answers. One of the serious questions is, actually there is NO strong evidence for clarifying that Mohammad is the one who mentioned there.

      In my opinion, most important question is 5318. Traditionalist interpreters translate this verse as

      "He saw one/some of the greatest signs of his Lord" which is way wrong.

      The verse clearly says

      "Indeed, he saw THE GREATEST OF THE signs of his Lord" (531

      In this case, there should be an answer for "What is The Greatest one?" in particular, but there is no answer by anyone including Mohammad himself. Thus, interpreters and scholars choose "one of the greatest" or "(some of) greatest signs" as translation and covering the uncomfortable truth.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #58

        In my opinion, most important question is 5318. Traditionalist interpreters translate this verse as

        "He saw one/some of the greatest signs of his Lord" which is way wrong.

        The verse clearly says

        "Indeed, he saw THE GREATEST OF THE signs of his Lord" (531

        In this case, there should be an answer for "What is The Greatest one?" in particular, but there is no answer by anyone including Mohammad himself. Thus, interpreters and scholars choose "one of the greatest" or "(some of) greatest signs" as translation and covering the uncomfortable truth.

        Did you try to know what is the signification of preposition "Min" before passing the above judgment?

        And do you know the relationship of various elements of the sentence? Or even do you know the case ending of word "Alkubra"?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #59

          One of the serious questions is, actually there is NO strong evidence for clarifying that Mohammad is the one who mentioned there.

          It shows that basics of any language are not being kept in mind what to say of Arabic. Every pronoun denotes and refers to a specific person, in the context.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            exodus
            wrote on last edited by
            #60

            Did you try to know what is the signification of preposition "Min" before passing the above judgment?

            And do you know the relationship of various elements of the sentence? Or even do you know the case ending of word "Alkubra"?

            Yes I did/know. What about you?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              exodus
              wrote on last edited by
              #61

              It shows that basics of any language are not being kept in mind what to say of Arabic. Every pronoun denotes and refers to a specific person, in the context.

              I'm not about to declining that there is a specific person, actually there is. But we have NO strong evidence for proving that specific person is Mohammad.. is it clear now?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #62

                Yes I did/know. What about you?

                Had you known you may not have translated the way you translated that sentence.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #63

                  I'm not about to declining that there is a specific person, actually there is. But we have NO strong evidence for proving that specific person is Mohammad.. is it clear now?

                  It is like saying that in there is no strong evidence for proving that exodus is included in

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Offline
                    E Offline
                    exodus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #64

                    Had you known you may not have translated the way you translated that sentence.

                    I had quite known for admitting that you must work much more on this subject. Read and check carefully for 5318.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Offline
                      E Offline
                      exodus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #65

                      It is like saying that in there is no strong evidence for proving that exodus is included in

                      Are you about to show your Arabic skills or prove something serious in Quran? hmm

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O Offline
                        O Offline
                        Ozi_Kristi-lee
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #66

                        Can anyone refer me to someone with knowledge? I realy dnt understand much of wat has been said... I dnt no Arabic Eitha which makes it a little more difficult to no ur arguments

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Users