Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. 3:7 A MATTER OF PUNCTUATION MARKS. WHICH IS CORRECT?

3:7 A MATTER OF PUNCTUATION MARKS. WHICH IS CORRECT?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
113 Posts 10 Posters 2.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Tony
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    37

    But none know its interpretation except God and those who are well founded in knowledge. They say ?We believe in it, all is from our Lord.? And none will remember except the people of understanding. -fm

    but none knows its interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do mind except those having understanding. -sHAKIR

    The free-minds translation, God and those who are well-founded in knowledge knows the meaning of the allegorical verses.

    In Shakir's translation, God (alone) knows the meaning. And those who are knowledgeable believe in it.

    Whow knows the interpretation? God (alone)? Or God AND those well-founded in knowledge?

    Thanks and Salam,

    Tony

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Peace be upon you Tony,

      This is indeed one of the most crucial points in this reading.

      When I approached this subject, I asked myself, why would the God give us a message to humanity while there were verses that only HE can understand? That doesn't make sense.

      Also, if we stop it there, the next sentence starts with "AND" which doesn't make much sense.

      So to clarify, the God is saying that He and those with knowledge will understand.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        Tony
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It is my thinking that the reason they said "We believe in it, it is all from our Lord" implies that even if they don't understand it, they accept it because it is all from God.

        I believe that if we don't understand certain things in the Quran at this time, God would reveal them in the future..one would be space travel which has been revealed to us. But stars as projectiles for devils really sound senseless to me but I believe in it...maybe God would reveal someday what this really means.

        Some sunnis actually believe that those who are well-founded in knowledge are their scholars.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Peace be upon you Tony,

          It is my thinking that the reason they said "We believe in it, it is all from our Lord" implies that even if they don't understand it, they accept it because it is all from God.

          Thats called Blind Faith. I don't understand what the people who call themselves "christains" teach, it wold be unwise to justaccept what they teach just because thier message is CLAIMED to be from the God. Those who have faith believe in the whole of it because there knowledge and life experiences confirm the entirety of the message.

          Some sunnis actually believe that those who are well-founded in knowledge are their scholars.

          Yes, but the God suffices as a witness. But what does that mean? It means , to me, that the God (The Whole) will PROVE it by showing you His signs in the horizons and within your mind until you KNOW it is the truth.

          (4153) We will show them/make them understand Our signs in the horizons and in their minds, until (it) becomes clear/explained for them that it (is) the truth . Is (it) not enough/sufficient with your Lord, that He truly is on every thing witnessing/testifying?

          The God is worthy of all appreciation.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            Tony
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Does that mean you won't accept something IN THE QURAN just because you cannot understand it?

            We are talking about the Quran, and not just some opinion of anybody.

            Peace.
            Tony

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Peace be upon you,

              Does that mean you won't accept something IN THE QURAN just because you cannot understand it?

              We are talking about the Quran, and not just some opinion of anybody.

              How do you know that? D

              Thats the point, the God has told us NOT to go after that which you have no KNOWLEDGE.

              (1736) And do not follow the tracks/accuse of evil deeds what knowledge is not for you with it (you have no knowledge of), that the hearing/listening, and the eye sight/knowledge, and the heart , all (of) those are/were about it questioned.

              There are MANY readings(quran's), but the God says that you can KNOW if it is from Him if there are no contradictions. So we should approach THIS reading(quran) in that manner, seeking to remove the contradictions.

              We are not authorized tgo give it a title "QURAN", it is only one of many "quran's". But from my experience, I see it just as the God describes it, the BEST story(hadith).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                Tony
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Peace Idolfree,

                It is not going after what we don't understand but merely accepting/believing it, especially if we know it is from the "best hadith".

                It is those who harbor doubts in their hearts who pursue those allegorical verses (37) from the "best hadith".

                Do you agree?D

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Peace be upon you,

                  It is not going after what we don't understand but merely accepting/believing it, especially if we know it is from the "best hadith".

                  Merely accepting/believing? Then why will our eyes and ears and hearts be questioned? Why are we told to ponder and reason? How do we know it is the best story? I am sure the chistians say thier story is the best, how do you know? Certainly we don't just accept things blindly, I cannot follow that path.

                  It is those who harbor doubts in their hearts who pursue those allegorical verses (37) from the "best hadith".

                  Do you agree?

                  Here's what I have

                  (37) He is who descended on you The Book , from it (are) perfected/tightened signs, they are (F) The Book's origin/mother , and others resembling/ambiguous/obscure , so but those who in their hearts (is) deviation from truth , so they follow what resembled from it, asking/desiring the treason and asking/desiring its interpretation/explanation , and none knows its interpretation/explanation except The God and the affirmed in the knowledge. They say "We believed with it, all/each (is) from at our Lord, and none remember except (those) of the pure minds/intelligence ."

                  I go after the WHOLE of the book, the literal and allegorical, using knowledge.

                  May the God increase me in knowledge

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Rahila
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Peace all...

                    Here is a word to word transliteration of 37

                    Huwa Allazi (He who it is) Anzala aleika al-kitaba ( sent down on you THE KITAB / DECREE/BOOK ) Minhu Ayatun Muhkamatun ( In it are Ayat / Signs/ verses decisive/clear) Hunna Ummu ul-kitabi ( they are the mother/ origin/essence of THE KITAB/DECREE/BOOK) Wa'kharu Mutashaabihatun (and some are similar/vague/not clear) Fa'amma allazeena fi quloobihim zaigun ( Then those of them in whose hearts is ZAigun/doubt/deviation) Fayyatabioona Ma tashabaha minha (Then follow / obey what is Similar/ Vague/ Not clear in IT) Abtighaa'al fitnata ( seeking Fitna/ discord/mischief) wa'abtighaa'a Taweelihi ( and following it's hidden ) Wama Ya'lamu Taweelahu Illa Allahu ( And who knows it's hidden except ALLAH) War-Rasikhoona Fil Ilmi Yaqooloona Aa'amanna bihi( And the Firmly grounded in Knowledge say we believe with/in it) Kullun Min Indi Rabbina ( All of it is from Our RABB/ GOD) Wama Yaz-zakkaru Illaa oolul albaabi ( And who remembers it except people of understanding)

                    It is very clear to me that the Hidden meaning is clear only to ALLAH..
                    And the people grounded in knowledge acknowledge the fact the whole ( Clear verses plus Mutashabihat) are all from ALLAH and part of the test of sorting out the believers from the disbelievers. As it is the ACTIONS / GOOD DEEDS of the believers which are enjoined on the believers which are the MOTHER of the BOOK, those people who want to find a way out of not doing what the CREATOR has enjoined on us in the BOOK, they base their arguments on the MUTASHABIHAT and try to justify their actions.

                    This , I believe , is a very basic Human fault. For example, here inthe Free minds Forum, the longest thread is "WHY IBLIS CANNOT BE AN ANGEL" which I think is not that vital to our salvation.

                    This does not mean that we do not seek Knowledge or verify things but my point is that our focus should be on the ACTIONS which are clearly set out as the DEEN in the Quraan.

                    FOR EXAMPLE

                    Surah 6

                    Say (O Muhammad SAW) "Come, I will recite what your Lord has prohibited you from Join not anything in worship with Him; be good and dutiful to your parents; kill not your children because of poverty - We provide sustenance for you and for them; come not near to Al-Faw?hish whether committed openly or secretly, and kill not anyone whom All?h has forbidden, except for a just cause .This He has commanded you that you may understand.
                    152.
                    "And come not near to the orphan's property, except to improve it, until he (or she) attains the age of full strength; and give full measure and full weight with justice. We burden not any person, but that which he can bear. And whenever you give your word (i.e. judge between men or give evidence, etc.), say the truth even if a near relative is concerned, and fulfill the Covenant of All?h, This He commands you, that you may remember.[]
                    153.
                    "And verily, this is my Straight Path, so follow it, and follow not (other) paths, for they will separate you away from His Path. This He has ordained for you that you may become Al-Muttaq?n (the pious - see V.22)."

                    Here the actions enjoined are clear..

                    regards

                    Rahila

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      marie
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Allah bless you Rahila )

                      Peace and best wishes

                      Marie

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Salaams,
                        might ineterst some

                        2943,
                        And these similtude we put forward for mankind;but none will understand them except those who have knowledge.

                        I say ,why would Allah tell us something no one will be able to understand?except him.

                        Salaams.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rahila
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Peace all...

                          2943 mentions "Amthal" i.e example.. This is totally different from "Mutashabihat".

                          I say ,why would Allah tell us something no one will be able to understand?except him.

                          To Test who follows the clear verses and who follows the Mutashabihat..

                          Marie.. thank you for your blessing

                          regards

                          Rahila

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            marie
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Peace mz357,

                            I think this is not the same thing "al-amthalu" which is translated as the examples in 2943 and "ayat mutashabihat / similar verses"

                            Ahmad Shabir
                            2943 And so We cite examples for mankind, but men of Science will make best use of their intellect. (?Aalim = Scientist. (3022- 23], (3527-2).

                            FM
                            2943. Such are the examples We cite for the people, but none comprehend except the knowledgeable.

                            If you believe in the life after the death, Allah describes us the resurection and gives us some similar examples from our world life

                            1. He brings the living out of the dead, and He brings the dead out of the living. And He revives the land after its death. And similarly you will be brought out.

                            2. And he cites an example for Us, while forgetting his own creation! He says ?Who can resurrect the bones while they are dust??

                            3. Say ?The One who made them in the first place will resurrect them. He is fully aware of every creation.?

                            4. Say ?God gives you life, then He puts you to death, then He will gather you to the Day of Resurrection, in which there is no doubt. But most people do not know.?

                            Only Allah hold the whole truth on how we will be given the life after the death. I consider these verses like similar verses.

                            And who follow what is similar, it is another thing, through the quran we could see how one follow what is similar and not the true meaning of some verse.

                            Allah knows best

                            Marie

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Z Offline
                              Z Offline
                              Zlatan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Hello Tony, all!

                              Clearly, judging solely by arabic of that part of 3/7, only the god knows the interpretation, however this statement is not to be taken as an absolute statement or pushed to the extreme, but as is the case with all other sayings of the book, it is to be understood in the context of the passage and particularly in the context of the book as a whole....

                              the main point of the passage is division of the book into 2 categories of which one is decisive, representing mother/basis/prototype/stance of the book and the second which is ambiguous and consequently abused(literarly followed) by those in whose hearts is deviation seeking to interpret it and seeking to make discord or to mislead... and, it is only in that sense that the god has said that only He knows its interpretation....

                              That simply means that His precise words are to be considered as the representative of the books and the Gods stance on each topic and not the ambiguous ones (they are to be followed instead of ambiguous, cause they are the prototype of the book and not the ambiguous)... and not that people can not understand some parts of the book....

                              The decisive statements of the book are thus the judge over the meaning of the ambiguous ones and the qualifier or the only valid explanation of the ambiguous ones(only The God knows the interpretation!), and not the subjective human intepretations....

                              For better understanding of this topic make a comparative analysis with the topics of
                              1 intercession....
                              2 knowing of the unseen/unwitnessed...
                              4 guiding......
                              5 obeying.....

                              all these things are said to belong solely to the god in some places of the book, but in other places it is allowed that some humans can poarticipate in them(but only through the God`s words)..the same case is with the understanding of the book and knowing its intepretation...

                              Peace and best wishes, Zlatan

                              p.s. a shia scholar tabtabai has a very very insightful and comprehensive article on the topic in which he has made an overwiev of all the possible intepretations of 3/7..do check it it is accessible through the net...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Peace be upon you MZ,

                                2943,
                                And these similtude we put forward for mankind;but none will understand them except those who have knowledge.

                                I say ,why would Allah tell us something no one will be able to understand?except him.

                                Exactly my thoughts.

                                The God tels us there are straightfoward verses and othersthat are not so straightfoward, the ones that are not so straightfoward include the "prophetic" stories, which are symbolic.

                                I makes no sense to give someone a message they cannot understand, and if you think you cannot understand it, why even bother studying? We must realize that we CAN understand it, it is not for some people a long time ago, this is a message for US, right now.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  marie
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Peace all,

                                  I think we have not the same understanding of the similar verses. I'll gave an example in my last post.

                                  The question is

                                  How do we recognize these verses in the light of the quran ?

                                  I think Only Allah holds the true interpretation or the truth about several things which belong to the unseen "alghayb" (the life after the death the resurrection......

                                  Any thoughts?

                                  Marie

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Peace be upon you Marie,

                                    I think we have not the same understanding of the similar verses. I'll gave an example in my last post.

                                    The question is

                                    How do we recognize these verses in the light of the quran ?

                                    I think Only Allah holds the true interpretation or the truth about several things which belong to the unseen "alghayb" (the life after the death the resurrection......

                                    Any thoughts?

                                    Al ghayb means unseen, but it does not mean unknown. We cannot see electricity, but we know about it.

                                    Regarding the Ending time, I understand that to be the time of effect. Everything we do produces an effect, we are to have faith in the ENDING TIME, which is, that an effect will be coming.

                                    Regarding ressurection, that is simply when one comes out of darkness of ignorance.

                                    Remember, the states of mind described as the "garden" and the "fire" start right here on Earth, so it is not something we don't know about, just because we cant see it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      ayman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Peace dear sister Marie, brother Kyle, all,

                                      I think that both views I see here on this thread are based on a wrong reading of 37.

                                      The first mistake comes from the wrong understanding of what the verb "ta'awiluh" is referring to.

                                      The verb "ta'awiluh" is referring to a singular masculine while "ayat mutashabihat" is plural feminine. The ONLY singular masculine object in the sentence is "al-kitab" (the book). Hence, "ta'awiluh" must refer to "al-kitab" and NOT to "ayat mutashabihat".

                                      The second mistake comes from the wrong understanding that verses means "ayat" as demonstrated here

                                      How do we recognize these verses in the light of the quran ?

                                      The word "ayat" means "signs" NOT "verses". Verses and associated numbering is not part of the original text. Hence, there is no way to tell, for example, how many verses are in any chapter, or where 91 or 9129 end or begin.

                                      Therefore, trying to find verses and map them to "ayat" is the wrong approach to begin with. We have all experienced instances where even a single word in the great reading when understood in the context can provide a sign for us to go in the right direction.

                                      The third problem with the understanding of 37 is demonstrated here

                                      Al ghayb means unseen, but it does not mean unknown. We cannot see electricity, but we know about it.

                                      The word "ta'awiluh" is not equivalent to "seeing it", "knowing it", "understanding it", or even "interpreting it". The word "ta'awiluh" comes from "awal" which has the meaning of primary/first/original. So what is being talked about here is not any "knowledge" or "interpretation" but it is the original 100% true meaning intended by The God.

                                      Hence, we know about electricity, as we know about many signs/"ayat" in nature, and we understand it to some degree but we will never 100% fully understand it and grasp its true 100% significance as a sign in this low life.

                                      Now, how many of us can claim to know the original 100% true meaning of the book intended by The God? None of the people here, despite the many years we spent studying the book would ever claim that. Related to this is our motivation to continuously improve our understanding of the book. On the other hand, those who have blurriness in their hearts desire ("ibtigha'a") the original 100% true meaning. The natural law of supply and demand takes over and this desire is satisfied by the clergy who claim that they, the prophet, or whoever knows the 100% true meaning intended by The God. Hence, they take their clergy's interpretation as the "ta'awil" and, as a result, they don't strive to continuously improve their understanding of the book.

                                      Now notice that those who have faith/trust say "amana bihi" (singular masculine) and then they say "kulun min 3indi Allah" ("kulun" is plural feminine/masculine). So they have faith/trust in the book as a whole. Now, I am sure each one of us can bring an example of some sign in the book that he/she was confused about. At that time, one can make three choices

                                      1. Take the easy way and just seek the interpretation of a Sheikh as the 100% true original intended meaning.
                                      2. Take another easy way and give up by not having faith anymore.
                                      3. Take the difficult path and say to oneself "I know that the other signs in the book that I understand more solidly come from The God and this sign is also in the book and hence comes from The God too. I will be patient and continue to gain knowledge to better understand this particular sign that, for now, confuses me."

                                      I apologize if my post is too long but I think that all of us experienced what 37 is saying. I feel that I must also share that when one takes the difficult path and then he/she reaches a better understanding and the sign is no longer confusing, this greatly increases one's faith.

                                      I hope this helps.

                                      Peace and all best wishes,

                                      Ayman.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Peace be upon you Ayman,

                                        Excellent analysis, I cant believe I missed the "ayat = signs" and Al kitaab instead of al quran.

                                        Thank you also for the clarification on the verb "ta'awiluh"

                                        I do have a problem with the following statement though;

                                        On the other hand, those who have blurriness in their hearts desire ("ibtigha'a") the original 100% true meaning.

                                        I disagree with that, why wouldn't we desire the 100% true meaning of anything?

                                        With that said, I take the beginning of this verse to mean;

                                        (37) He is who descended on you The Book

                                        Al Kitaab is the ever unfolding book of our lives which will be handed to us in either our right or left hands at the end of this test, it is not this reading(quran)**

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • WakasW Offline
                                          WakasW Offline
                                          Wakas
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          peace brother Ayman,

                                          Can you provide a trans. of 37 for me, so I can fully understand (and compare/verify etc.) what you meant.

                                          Wakas

                                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users