Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. A Possible Oversight of 4:34???

A Possible Oversight of 4:34???

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
76 Posts 17 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Producer
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    Quran 2222 use the word nisa/

    the female Human menstruates. unless the verse is not about menstruation, a description of a female.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      KDC501
      wrote on last edited by
      #63

      I didn't know ?nisa? was both male and female wow . Maybe we should invent a new word call ?malfel? while we're at it.

      Malfel a human hybrid that is both male and female. rotfl

      Peace,

      Kevin

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W Offline
        W Offline
        WhereIsTheTruth
        wrote on last edited by
        #64

        http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/003.%20Aale%20Imran/3.36b.gif

        and the male is never like the female;

        Just see the sign under your avator and compare it with that of some male member of the forum. Even they do not match. So how Unsa could include man.

        You misunderstood me. I ment to say that since unsa is a gender it includes women and since zakr is a gender it includes men.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W Offline
          W Offline
          WhereIsTheTruth
          wrote on last edited by
          #65

          Quran 2222 use the word nisa/

          the female Human menstruates. unless the verse is not about menstruation, a description of a female.

          This verse is NOT about menstruation . It would also be silly since men don't have menstruation and nisa are weak men and women among the people in contradiction to the elite rijaal and qawm

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Offline
            P Offline
            Producer
            wrote on last edited by
            #66

            This verse is NOT about menstruation . It would also be silly since men don't have menstruation and nisa are weak men and women among the people in contradiction to the elite rijaal and qawm

            Please, further explain why, Quran 2222 not about Menstruation. Peace and Thanks.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              huruf
              wrote on last edited by
              #67

              and the male is never like the female;

              J

              Why "never"?

              "Never" does not appear in the Arabic, and it does change the meaning.

              Salaam

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #68

                peace,

                Possible oversight? Yes.

                Evidence for such oversight? Lacking.

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #69

                  Quote from Mazhar on October 12, 2011, 020203 PM

                  and the male is never like the female;

                  Why "never"?

                  "Never" does not appear in the Arabic, and it does change the meaning.

                  Salaam

                  Hitherto have you ever seen a male who is like a female? If not, "never", from commonsense point of view, what to say of the grammatical structure of the sentence and peculiar choice of words to depict this fact, is correct. Would you need its analysis?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • W Offline
                    W Offline
                    WhereIsTheTruth
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #70

                    Hitherto have you ever seen a male who is like a female? If not, "never", from commonsense point of view, what to say of the grammatical structure of the sentence and peculiar choice of words to depict this fact, is correct. Would you need its analysis?

                    Your socalled commonsense and all your complicated theories have zero importance. The fact is that the quran does not use the word 'never'. You can argue with God about why he didnt used the word 'never' in another place.
                    And by the way, yes I have seen many males like females. In fact every male I have seen is like a female he has two eyes, one nose, one mouth, one heart, two legs and two arms just like the female isn't that amazing and a surprise for you ?? rotfl rotfl bravo bravo bravo

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #71

                      Male and female are clearly defined boundaries.

                      Masculine and feminine exist on a continuum like the yin and yang.

                      The "man" referred to in quran is androgynous, so to speak. And you know exactly how I mean.

                      Peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #72

                        Your socalled commonsense and all your complicated theories have zero importance. The fact is that the quran does not use the word 'never'. You can argue with God about why he didnt used the word 'never' in another place.
                        And by the way, yes I have seen many males like females. In fact every male I have seen is like a female he has two eyes, one nose, one mouth, one heart, two legs and two arms just like the female isn't that amazing and a surprise for you ?? rotfl rotfl bravo bravo bravo

                        And pl find time to look at the avator and the sign under it and then compare it with some "male".

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H Offline
                          H Offline
                          huruf
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #73

                          Hitherto have you ever seen a male who is like a female? If not, "never", from commonsense point of view, what to say of the grammatical structure of the sentence and peculiar choice of words to depict this fact, is correct. Would you need its analysis?

                          There is a context to it and as it is, without the addition of "never" it is perfectly understandable, as much in English as in Spanish as in Arabic or any language I know. You may find it apropriate, but no matter how you find it, "never" is not there, and it may be your opinion that it might be there or that it is implied, but still IT IS NOT THERE. And you can analyse it, but you cannot analyse never, because it is not there. And also as far as I am concerned I have never understood you ranalisys or at least the way you set them forth, and it would be silly of me to ask for something which I have never been able to use. Explain whatever you want to explain without this analysis thing. Other analysis I understand, but not yours, I am sorry.

                          May be you are pointing to emphasis of some kind, but I very much doubt that that emphasis has anything to do with "never".

                          ?Could you put in Arabic the sentence

                          "And the male is not like the female" ?

                          Salaam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W Offline
                            W Offline
                            WhereIsTheTruth
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #74

                            And pl find time to look at the avator and the sign under it and then compare it with some "male".

                            I dont understand what You are saying. What has avator to do with anything ?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              aqua
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #75

                              I have written an article on verse 434 of the Qur'an, a verse which has commonly been misinterpreted to justify violence against women. I have created a website to publish this article www.quranverse434.com

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • WakasW Offline
                                WakasW Offline
                                Wakas
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #76

                                salaam aqua,
                                Your article suffers from multiple problems as highlighted here
                                http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599954.msg347142#msg347142

                                "withdraw/turn away / go away from them"
                                Requires the tashkeel of present day Arabic Quran to be incorrect
                                This alleged usage in 434 occurs in 435 with the preposition "Aan", thus making Quran seems inconsistent IF it did mean that in 434
                                No identical example of this DRB usage in Quran
                                No explanation of how the authority are notified
                                It is unclear to what extent one separates, how they can do so without being unjust etc
                                No supporting marital example in Quran
                                My view Impractical result when inserted into 4128-130 and somehow requires iAAradan to be a positive thing and potentially makes Drb/3rD similar

                                "cite them" www.Quran434.com
                                Works perfectly with the tashkeel in the present day Arabic Quran
                                Several identical examples of this DRB usage in Quran, including when humans are the direct object as in 434
                                Explains how the authority is notified by 435, and provides perfect logical/sequential coherence
                                DRB use is clear and simple to implement practically
                                581-4 provides perfect coherence in terms of marital example
                                When inserted into 4128-130 provides a complementary practical and coherent solution

                                In fact there were more issues in your article. If you begin your own thread for your article I'd be happy to highlight them for you to respond to.

                                Interestingly, in your work you do not reference www.Quran434.com where you clearly got a lot of information from.

                                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users