Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Qur'an and Miracles

Qur'an and Miracles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
40 Posts 10 Posters 149 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    johan
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Miracles and Quran

    The issue I want to raise is whether Allah sticks to His Ways/Laws (By choice) or not. Does He chooses, sometimes, to change laws of nature?

    ...

    It is important that we establish what miracles are and if not with the Ministry of the blessed Rasool Muhammad, did they play an important role with Messengers before him?

    Would appreciate any input on this issue. Thanks in advance.

    Salam Mubashir,

    As usual D haven't read all the posts, and haven't read what Parwez and Dr. Shabbir wrote.. please bear with me..
    and maybe you could refer me to the book or link.. thank you..

    on the subject of miracles..what is your arabic for miracle?
    is it or is it ?
    if former then i would argue that no where in the Quran refers miracle as mu3jiza, oth the term 3ajaza would mean cripple rather than empowerment as what miracles of the prophets would suggest.

    if the latter is implied than it is no different than the creation of the world and the heavens, the humans and the jinns.. they are the law of Allah SWT.. it's non ammendable from the begining..i suppose that's why the secrecy..
    i come to realize that naskh doesn't necessarily mean amendment.. but rather exceptional laws; writing of laws on a special case basis..

    wallahua3lam,
    johan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      mubashir55
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      Salam Johan

      Please substitute miracles for Signs that relate to laws of nature suspended by Allah for various reasons. Please note none of these relate to the blessed Muhammad's ministry (who was not supported by any such signs) but are discussed in the Qur'an for previous Messengers.

      To read relevant verses, Dr Shabbir's QXP (Quran as it explains itself) can be read here.

      http//ourbeacon.com/?page_id=11605

      Parwez's exposition of the Qur'an can be read here.

      http//www.tolueislam.org/Parwez/expo/exposition.htm

      Both the above believe when Allah says He does not change His ways, there is no possibility of miracles/Signs. They try to explain them away in their best way as events that do not suggest any events in which nature laws are suspended. For instance for the birth of Jesus, they reject the possibility of a virgin birth and suggest Mary did get married and conceived in the usual manner.

      Argument against the above is made thus by a Quran based brother

      If God does not change a 'system', then what did God stop doing in the following verse which He did before?

      Something was clearly stopped ? What was it?

      017059
      "And We refrain from sending signs / miracles (Arabic bil-ayati), only because the former generations treated them as false We sent the she-camel to the Thamud to open their eyes, but they treated her wrongfully We only send the signs by way of a warning"

      This verse in one single stroke in my opinion, puts an end to the claims of those that deny portents ever being received by communities before Prophet Muhammad. Something 'was' clearly stopped by God as the previous people denied it. It cannot be 'verses' as the Quran came with verses.

      What was sent to the communities before which they denied and which God stopped from sending any more? This is a simple question.

      To anyone who clearly understands Arabic, the 'text' is clear. God says "wama mana'ana an nursila bil-ayati illa .." People can make up their own translations and interpolations all day long, but no one on Earth can change clear Arabic and sincere believers bear clear witness to God?s words.

      6101 is clearly negating the claim in 6100 i.e. How can God have sons and daughters when he has no consort? This has nothing to do with God's ability to suspend laws if He so wills! He doesn't beget - Yes, but if he wants a man to be born of a mother alone, He simply says 'kun'! This is no different from when he desired the creation of the first man, He simply said "Kun"! - and then the process simply began (359)

      Furthermore, 1064 talks about 'kalimati'. (i.e. that there is no changing (tabdeel) in the words of God). This once again has no connection with God's ability to suspend his laws if He so wills.

      The simple question remains. What did God suspend in 1759, if He does not alter His ways?

      But let us go back to the fundamental question. What did God stop / withhold / arrest / prevent / refrain / suspend (mana) in 1759 going forward that He had sent to previous communities? Secondly, how could He stop / arrest something if He did not alter His ways?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        Kaiokenred
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        Salam Johan

        Please substitute miracles for Signs that relate to laws of nature suspended by Allah for various reasons. Please note none of these relate to the blessed Muhammad's ministry (who was not supported by any such signs) but are discussed in the Qur'an for previous Messengers.

        To read relevant verses, Dr Shabbir's QXP (Quran as it explains itself) can be read here.

        http//ourbeacon.com/?page_id=11605

        Parwez's exposition of the Qur'an can be read here.

        http//www.tolueislam.org/Parwez/expo/exposition.htm

        Both the above believe when Allah says He does not change His ways, there is no possibility of miracles/Signs. They try to explain them away in their best way as events that do not suggest any events in which nature laws are suspended. For instance for the birth of Jesus, they reject the possibility of a virgin birth and suggest Mary did get married and conceived in the usual manner.

        Argument against the above is made thus by a Quran based brother

        If God does not change a 'system', then what did God stop doing in the following verse which He did before?

        Something was clearly stopped What was it?

        017059
        "And We refrain from sending signs / miracles (Arabic bil-ayati), only because the former generations treated them as false We sent the she-camel to the Thamud to open their eyes, but they treated her wrongfully We only send the signs by way of a warning"

        This verse in one single stroke in my opinion, puts an end to the claims of those that deny portents ever being received by communities before Prophet Muhammad. Something 'was' clearly stopped by God as the previous people denied it. It cannot be 'verses' as the Quran came with verses.

        What was sent to the communities before which they denied and which God stopped from sending any more? This is a simple question.

        To anyone who clearly understands Arabic, the 'text' is clear. God says "wama mana'ana an nursila bil-ayati illa .." People can make up their own translations and interpolations all day long, but no one on Earth can change clear Arabic and sincere believers bear clear witness to Gods words.

        6101 is clearly negating the claim in 6100 i.e. How can God have sons and daughters when he has no consort? This has nothing to do with God's ability to suspend laws if He so wills! He doesn't beget - Yes, but if he wants a man to be born of a mother alone, He simply says 'kun'! This is no different from when he desired the creation of the first man, He simply said "Kun"! - and then the process simply began (359)

        Furthermore, 1064 talks about 'kalimati'. (i.e. that there is no changing (tabdeel) in the words of God). This once again has no connection with God's ability to suspend his laws if He so wills.

        The simple question remains. What did God suspend in 1759, if He does not alter His ways?

        But let us go back to the fundamental question. What did God stop / withhold / arrest / prevent / refrain / suspend (mana) in 1759 going forward that He had sent to previous communities? Secondly, how could He stop / arrest something if He did not alter His ways?

        Nothing was "clearly" changed. Those translations are mainstream and wrong. Use modern arabic as much as you want, without examining the lexicons you'll never get a good translations

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          johan
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          Salam Johan
          ...
          Both the above believe when Allah says He does not change His ways, there is no possibility of miracles/Signs. They try to explain them away in their best way as events that do not suggest any events in which nature laws are suspended. For instance for the birth of Jesus, they reject the possibility of a virgin birth and suggest Mary did get married and conceived in the usual manner.

          Brother, I believe that there is no suspension in Allah's law.
          What we see as a suspension is only a layered understanding that we haven't reached the point of comprehension.
          At the time of prophet 3eesa AS it might have been seen that the birth is something extraordinary(miracle/suspension of law) was observed, but now with the advent of modern medicine we have understood that it can be done with a proper procedures; and this what IMHO Allah SWT meant by the aya/sign; the aya/sign are the fundamentals of laws at work..
          I believe Alif Lam Meem, etc will lead us to the fundamentals of the structure of the world we live in that one day we will unlock based on guidance by Allah SWT to the believers..

          peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mmkhan
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            As Allah does not speak directly to non Messengers, people like us are forced to choose when faced with two or more conflicting meanings of certain key terms of the Qur'an.

            Salaam,

            Who said Allah does not speak to non-messengers and/or speak to messengers?

            As per 4251 Allah communicate with every bashar. Who is bashar? Bashar is any normal human being as per 1926.

            May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
            mmKhan

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mubashir55
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Dear MM Khan

              Mirza Qadiyani said the same thing yet the Muslim Ummah rejected him! Sufias say the same but many, who say Door of Wahi is closed, reject their claims. Two people can claim to be receipients of inspiration although they may be differing over a key Qur'anic concept. If that happens, who is to say who is right and who is wrong?

              Perhaps you need to explain the verses you quoted in a bit more detail!! You may want to keep the next verse in mind before commenting

              4252 And thus, too, have We revealed unto thee a life-giving message, at Our behest. thou didst not know what revelation is, nor what faith but We have caused this to be a light, whereby We guide whom We will of Our servants and, verily, thou, too, shalt guide onto the straight way ?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                Bender
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                Dear MM Khan

                Mirza Qadiyani said the same thing yet the Muslim Ummah rejected him! Sufias say the same but many, who say Door of Wahi is closed, reject their claims. Two people can claim to be receipients of inspiration although they may be differing over a key Qur'anic concept. If that happens, who is to say who is right and who is wrong?

                Perhaps you need to explain the verses you quoted in a bit more detail!! You may want to keep the next verse in mind before commenting

                4252 And thus, too, have We revealed unto thee a life-giving message, at Our behest. thou didst not know what revelation is, nor what faith but We have caused this to be a light, whereby We guide whom We will of Our servants and, verily, thou, too, shalt guide onto the straight way ?

                Salaam,

                I am sure it will help you to understand better if you delete everything that is in the brackets.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mubashir55
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  Dear Bender,

                  Mirza Qadiyani claimed to have received inspiration/revelation. Why do we then reject his claims as a Messenger of Allah?

                  There are many Evangelists who claim Jesus (who they regard as God) speaks to them. Should we believe them?

                  I think inspiration for matters of Deen comes to common people through Allah's Messengers only.

                  Thanks.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mmkhan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    Salaam,

                    I cannot dare to reject any aayat.

                    We have to think about ourselves. We are not to answer for Mirza Qadiyani or any Evangelist or whoever, we have to answer for our deed. There might be many messengers but we don't know them because AlQuraan did not confirm them by their names. So nothing to worry. Just believe in what Allah said in His Book.

                    When Allah said He communicates with any Bashar, how can you deny Him? Anyways, it is up to you either to believe it or not, but I cannot deny anything mentioned in AlQuraan inshaAllah, until and unless my Lord want it to be.

                    BTW, you did not bring up any aayat on your claim mentioned below!

                    I think inspiration for matters of Deen comes to common people through Allah's Messengers only.

                    May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                    mmKhan

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Offline
                      G Offline
                      GODsubmitter
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      Sometimes the questions looks like whether to follow people's opinions or God?
                      Some need rituals, some don't. Some need surrogate "mama" to lead them. rotfl
                      This scholar said so and that other so... ??? Is my papa right or yours? rotfl

                      BUT,
                      How to follow God?
                      Well, didn't He made us in His image? Meaning there is a part of Him in us probably the mind/conscience.

                      Do take responsibility for your own Str8 Path, and, after death God will inform us all what we did, because we shall all return to Him as He says in the Qur'an.

                      In the meanwhile, one of the best approaches and overall explanations can be found here
                      http//www.quransmessage.com/

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mirjamnur
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        Salam mubashir and all

                        Salam Johan

                        Please substitute miracles for Signs that relate to laws of nature suspended by Allah for various reasons. Please note none of these relate to the blessed Muhammad's ministry (who was not supported by any such signs) but are discussed in the Qur'an for previous Messengers.

                        To read relevant verses, Dr Shabbir's QXP (Quran as it explains itself) can be read here.

                        http//ourbeacon.com/?page_id=11605

                        Parwez's exposition of the Qur'an can be read here.

                        http//www.tolueislam.org/Parwez/expo/exposition.htm

                        Both the above believe when Allah says He does not change His ways, there is no possibility of miracles/Signs. They try to explain them away in their best way as events that do not suggest any events in which nature laws are suspended. For instance for the birth of Jesus, they reject the possibility of a virgin birth and suggest Mary did get married and conceived in the usual manner.

                        Argument against the above is made thus by a Quran based brother

                        If God does not change a 'system', then what did God stop doing in the following verse which He did before?

                        Something was clearly stopped ? What was it?

                        017059
                        "And We refrain from sending signs / miracles (Arabic bil-ayati), only because the former generations treated them as false We sent the she-camel to the Thamud to open their eyes, but they treated her wrongfully We only send the signs by way of a warning"

                        the camel was a sign
                        This verse in one single stroke in my opinion, puts an end to the claims of those that deny portents ever being received by communities before Prophet Muhammad. Something 'was' clearly stopped by God as the previous people denied it. It cannot be 'verses' as the Quran came with verses.
                        Perhaps the complete revelation?

                        What was sent to the communities before which they denied and which God stopped from sending any more? This is a simple question.

                        To anyone who clearly understands Arabic, the 'text' is clear. God says "wama mana'ana an nursila bil-ayati illa .." People can make up their own translations and interpolations all day long, but no one on Earth can change clear Arabic and sincere believers bear clear witness to God?s words.

                        6101 is clearly negating the claim in 6100 i.e. How can God have sons and daughters when he has no consort? This has nothing to do with God's ability to suspend laws if He so wills! He doesn't beget - Yes, but if he wants a man to be born of a mother alone, He simply says 'kun'! This is no different from when he desired the creation of the first man, He simply said "Kun"! - and then the process simply began (359)

                        Furthermore, 1064 talks about 'kalimati'. (i.e. that there is no changing (tabdeel) in the words of God). This once again has no connection with God's ability to suspend his laws if He so wills.

                        The simple question remains. What did God suspend in 1759, if He does not alter His ways?

                        But let us go back to the fundamental question. What did God stop / withhold / arrest / prevent / refrain / suspend (mana) in 1759 going forward that He had sent to previous communities? Secondly, how could He stop / arrest something if He did not alter His ways?

                        perhaps the revelation and not a miracle.? However, I have personally no problem with the statement, that God made or make again miracles. He does this all the time. Only we do not see any.

                        God is all-powerful beyond our understanding and comprehension-deny the possiblity of miracles, I find personally arrogant .Who says that God does not interfere in his creation?If a theorie is based only up one verse, it seems there is no ground for this claim.
                        but is this discussion really relevant for the belief in God?
                        Anyone who believe in God, confirm that God can make miracles IF HE WANTS.
                        The dispute is about the question wheter GOD REALLY DID MIRACLES.
                        is it so important?
                        salam

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H Offline
                          H Offline
                          huruf
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #39

                          In fact, looking at it objectively the only thing God does is miracles, or just one single inmense surprising, ashtonishing miracle. I at least am amazed.

                          Salaam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            mirjamnur
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #40

                            In fact, looking at it objectively the only thing God does is miracles, or just one single inmense surprising, ashtonishing miracle. I at least am amazed.

                            Salaam

                            yeah

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users