Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 162.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    herbman
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    Salam, Peace, Nun, Huruf, all,

    just a question that come to me, I don't know if you already looked at it or maybe discussed it before

    In the verses regarding inheritence, in the scenario where the husband die, and leave behind wife and children, the usual scenario is having one wife and children. Do we have any case where verses speak about 2, 3, 4 wives, is it 1/8 each etc...
    Does the verse say 3-"To the wife...1/8" or "To wives ...1/8"

    This can help to conclude if "polygamy" was the default or not.

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #260

      Salam, Peace, Nun, Huruf, all,

      just a question that come to me, I don't know if you already looked at it or maybe discussed it before

      In the verses regarding inheritence, in the scenario where the husband die, and leave behind wife and children, the usual scenario is having one wife and children. Do we have any case where verses speak about 2, 3, 4 wives, is it 1/8 each etc...
      Does the verse say 3-"To the wife...1/8" or "To wives ...1/8"

      This can help to conclude if "polygamy" was the default or not.

      Thanks

      Peace herbman,

      It cannot be confirmed since verses addresses the community as a whole (plural).

      412
      and for you (masculine plural) half what left your spouses
      and for them (feminine plural) the fourth from what you left (plural)

      Having multiple wives is clear since prohibition of marrying sisters is stated.

      423
      prohibited onto you ...
      and that you gathered between the two sisters only what hence passed

      This is basic logic...

      IF marrying multiple sisters = FALSE
      THEN marrying non-sisters = TRUE

      Distribution same any like category inheritors (e.g. sons) they all share evenly.

      2 wives, 2 sons

      1 - 1/8 wives (1/16 each) = 7/8 sons (7/16 each)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        Noon_waalqalami
        wrote on last edited by
        #261

        Peace herbman,

        Notice the switch " to them" with " to you" otherwise the math would not work.
        Example 4 wives, no child, each wife would get 1/4, leaves nothing for the parents.

        412
        and to you half what left your spouses if not was to them waladun/offspring/child
        so if kana/is (masculine) to them walad (if to deceased/wife a male child/born) so to you the fourth

        and to them the fourth from what you left if not was to you waladun/offspring/child
        so if kana/is (masculine) to you walad (if to deceased/husband a male child/born) so to them (feminine plural) the eight

        Few more examples...

        wife-1 (son)
        wife-2 (son)
        wife-3 (no child)
        wife-4 (no child)
        if son = true
        if no child = false
        wives share = 1/8 fixed
        parent share = 1/6 fixed
        1 - 1/3 parents - 1/8 wives = 13/24 sons

        wife-1 (daughter)
        wife-2 (no child)
        wife-3 (no child)
        wife-4 (no child)
        if son = false
        if no child = false
        wives share = variable
        1 - 1/2 daughter = 1/2 wives (1/8 each)

        wife-1 (son)
        wife-2 (daughter)
        wife-3 (no child)
        wife-4 (no child)
        if son = true
        if no child = false
        wives share = 1/8 fixed
        1 - 1/8 wives = 7/8 children (7/24 daughter + 7/12 son) 21 ratio male to female

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          herbman
          wrote on last edited by
          #262

          Thanks a lot Noon.

          It is very helpfull and instructive.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            Notexceling
            wrote on last edited by
            #263

            Hi guys,

            I think I finally worked out inheritance.

            https//drive.google.com/file/d/0B6KVs7S_G7YEQkN5Y3RlZmJzOFE/edit?usp=sharing

            Here is a simple questionnaire that highlights the respective ayat related to your situation.

            Answer the 5 questions, Get your answer.

            Let me know if there are any problems....Been testing it seems to work fine.

            Go to File and press download (doesnt work on the google drive, requires conditional formatting)

            I need all the feedback I can get. Test it and tell me if you find errors.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #264

              Hi guys,

              I think I finally worked out inheritance.

              https//drive.google.com/file/d/0B6KVs7S_G7YEQkN5Y3RlZmJzOFE/edit?usp=sharing

              Here is a simple questionnaire that highlights the respective ayat related to your situation.

              Answer the 5 questions, Get your answer.

              Let me know if there are any problems....Been testing it seems to work fine.

              Go to File and press download (doesnt work on the google drive, requires conditional formatting)

              I need all the feedback I can get. Test it and tell me if you find errors.

              Peace Notexceling,

              Incomplete, erroneous translation e.g. kalala, walad, etc., nor does it cover all combinations or give distributions.

              Perhaps as an exercise distribute parents die leave property jointly owned.
              3 children heirs; 2 sisters and 1 half-brother from father's first marriage

              CASE 1 father dies then later that same day the mother
              CASE 2 mother dies then later that same day the father
              CASE 3 parents perish simultaneously as in an accident

              Here are all the combinations that the calculator needs to consider ?

              Daughter/s
              Son/s
              Father
              Mother
              Wife/Husband
              Sister/s
              Brother/s

              Daughter/s, Son/s
              Daughter/s, Father
              Daughter/s, Mother
              Daughter/s, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father
              Son/s, Mother
              Son/s, Wife/Husband
              Son/s, Sister/s
              Son/s, Brother/s
              Father, Mother
              Father, Wife/Husband
              Father, Sister/s
              Father, Brother/s
              Mother, Wife/Husband
              Mother, Sister/s
              Mother, Brother/s
              Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Sister/s, Brother/s

              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother
              Daughter/s, Father, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Father, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Mother, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Mother, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Mother, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Mother
              Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband
              Son/s, Father, Sister/s
              Son/s, Father, Brother/s
              Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband
              Son/s, Mother, Sister/s
              Son/s, Mother, Brother/s
              Son/s, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Son/s, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Son/s, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Father, Mother, Wife/Husband
              Father, Mother, Sister/s
              Father, Mother, Brother/s
              Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Father, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Father, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s

              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband
              Son/s, Father, Mother, Sister/s
              Son/s, Father, Mother, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Son/s, Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Father, Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s

              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s

              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Son/s, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Daughter/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s
              Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s

              Daughter/s, Son/s, Father, Mother, Wife/Husband, Sister/s, Brother/s

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                Noon_waalqalami
                wrote on last edited by
                #265

                Perhaps as an exercise distribute parents die leave property jointly owned.
                3 children heirs; 2 sisters and 1 half-brother from father's first marriage

                CASE 1 father dies then later that same day the mother
                CASE 2 mother dies then later that same day the father
                CASE 3 parents perish simultaneously as in an accident

                Peace, here are distributions for reference.

                CASE 1 fathers? half property
                1/8 wife
                7/8 children (7/32 each daughter + 7/16 half-brother from fathers first marriage)
                Then mothers 1/2 property + 1/8 to daughters (half-brother zero, not his mother)

                CASE 2 mothers? half property
                1/4 husband
                3/4 daughters (half-brother zero, not his mother)
                Then fathers 1/2 property + 1/4 to 3 children (3/16 each daughter and 3/8 to son)

                CASE 3 parents perish simultaneously as in an accident
                ? mother?s half property to daughters (half-brother zero, not his mother)
                ? father?s half property to 3 children (1/8 to each daughter and 1/4 to son)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Noon_waalqalami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #266

                  Wanted to link threads; two ways to resolved the contradictions

                  1. using 1, 2, or 3+ female to male ratios for children and siblings
                  2. toggle meaning of walad as exampled in this thread and below

                  Peace NielsJacob

                  It has to do with definition of walad and we know from 411 that either sex is included.
                  411 directs you the god in awldikum/children yours

                  Likewise with cross-reference we know yakun can refer to either sex.
                  2196 ... to whom not yakun/that be family his present

                  Likewise with cross-reference we know that ? family his? includes females
                  2932 and family his except lady his be she (f/s) from the remain behind

                  Whereas kana/be he (m/s) always refers to masculine

                  Example Case 3 daughters, husband

                  411 so if kunna/be they (f/p) nisan/womenfolk above two (f)
                  so for them (f/p) third dual (1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3)

                  412 and for you half what left spouses yours
                  if not yakun/that be for them walad (if no child 1/2)
                  so if kana/be (m/s) for them walad so for you the fourth

                  Therefore husband share is left variable/undefined this particular case and gets 1/3 remainder.
                  1/2 if no child = false
                  1/4 if son = false

                  That?s only non-contradicting reading far as I know for all combinations without surplus/deficit.

                  Contradiction excess 2/3 + 1/4 = 0.9167
                  1/2 if no child = false
                  1/4 if child = true

                  Contradiction deficit 2/3 + 1/2 = 1.1667
                  1/2 if no son = true
                  1/4 if son = false

                  4176 ... shows the god for you lest stray yeh and the god in every thing knower

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #267

                    Peace ? needed to update definition of Kalala as also a person who leaves no daughters as heirs else there is a contradiction in 412 and key difference whether to apply 412 presence of son or 4176 no son.

                    Thus siblings only inherit together with mother and/or son/s and never with daughter/s, spouse, or father.

                    411 directs you the god in children yours to the male similitude apportion the two (feminine) so if be/are (f/p) nisan/womenfolk fawqa/above two (feminine) so for them (f/p) third dual (1/3*2=2/3) what left and if be she (f/s) one (f/s) so for her the half and to parents dual his to each one from them dual the sixth from what left if be (s/m) for him waladun/born (son) so if not that be for him waladun/born (child) and heirs parents dual his so to mother his the third so if be (s/m) for him ikh'watun/brother so to mother his the sixth from after will have made in it or judgment fathers yours and sons yours not thou knowing which of them closer to you benefit of obligation from the god surely the god be knowledge of wisdom of

                    412 and for you half what left spouses yours if not that be for them waladun/born (child) so if be (m/s) for them waladun/born (son) so for you the fourth from what left they from after will made they in it or judgment and for them the fourth from what left thou you if not that be for you waladun/born (child) so if be (s/m) for you waladun/born (son) so to them the eight from what left thou you from after will thou making in it or judgment and if be (m/s) rajulun/man inherited kallatan/fatherless spouse-less daughter-less (i.e. mother, son/s, and/or siblings are only heirs) or im'ra-atun/lady and to him brother or sister so to each one from them dual the sixth so if be they of (2+) more from such so they partners in the third from after will is recommended in it or judgment other than harmful will from the god and the god know-er forbear-er

                    4176 they seek ruling your say the god gives a ruling you in al-kallati/the fatherless spouse-less daughter-less (i.e. mother, son/s, and/or siblings are only heirs) if person perished not for him waladun/born (son) and for him sister so for her half what left and he inherits it if not that be for her waladun/born (son) so if be dual (f/d) two (f/d) so to them dual (f/d) the third dual (1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3) from what left and if be they of (2+) ikh'watan/siblings rijlan/menfolk of wanisan/and womenfolk so to the male similitude apportion the two (feminine) shows the god for you lest stray yeh of and the god in every thing know-er

                    Examples

                    If children mixed 21 male to female (411)

                    3 daughters 2/3 (no son/s), 1/3 (parent/s and/or spouse) share equally
                    2 daughters (no son/s, unstated), parent/s, spouse; they share equally
                    1 daughter 1/2 (no son/s), 1/2 (parent/s and/or spouse); share equally

                    1/3 parents, 2/3 son/s or children mixed 21 male to female
                    1/3 mother, 2/3 father

                    1/2 husband, 1/2 parent/s (412 if no child)
                    1/4 husband, 1/3 parents (1/6 each), 5/12 children mixed 21 male to female (412 if son)

                    1/4 wife, 3/4 parent/s (412 if no child)
                    1/8 wife, 1/3 parents (1/6 each), 13/24 son/s or children mixed 21 male to female (412 if son)

                    412 ... and if be (m/s) rajulun/man inherited kallatan/fatherless spouse-less daughter-less (i.e. mother, son/s, and/or siblings are only heirs) or im'ra-atun/lady and to him brother or sister so to each one from them dual the sixth

                    1/6 mother, 1/6 sibling, 2/3 son/s

                    412 ... so if be they of (2+) more from such so they partners in the third

                    1/6 mother, 1/3 siblings (share equally), 1/2 son/s

                    4176 they seek ruling your say the god gives a ruling you in al-kallati/the fatherless spouse-less daughter-less (i.e. mother, son/s, and/or siblings are only heirs) if person perished not for him waladun/born (son) and for him sister so for her half what left and he inherits it if not that be for her waladun/born (son)

                    1+ brothers 5/6, mother 1/6 (411)
                    1 sister 1/2, mother 1/2

                    4176 ... so if be dual (f/d) two (f/d) so to them dual (f/d) the third dual (1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3) from what left

                    2 sisters 2/3 (1/3 each), mother 1/3
                    3+ sisters unstated share equally
                    3 sisters (1/4 each), mother 1/4
                    4 sisters (1/5 each), mother 1/5
                    5 sisters (1/6 each), mother 1/6

                    4176 ... and if be they of (2+) ikh'watan/siblings rijlan/menfolk of wanisan/and womenfolk so to the male similitude apportion the two (feminine) shows the god for you lest stray yeh of and the god in every thing know-er

                    21 male to female ratio siblings mixed
                    1/6 mother (411), 5/6 siblings mixed 21 male to female

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #268

                      Peace,

                      This has been puzzling me for a long time ? where is distribution for exactly two daughters?

                      411
                      so if kunna/be (f/p) nisan/womenfolk fawqa/above ith'natayni/two
                      so for them (f/p) third dual (1/3*2=2/3) what left
                      and if knat/be she (f/s) widatan/one (f/s) so for her the half

                      Lane, An Arabic English Lexicon
                      ? thus one says, (Mgh, Msb) i. e. Ten is above nine; meaning ten exceeds nine
                      ... also, in the Kur iii. 12], (Mgh, Msb) exceeding two

                      Likewise puzzling, where is distribution for 3+ sisters?

                      4176
                      so if knat/be (f/d) ith'natayni/two
                      so to them dual the third each from what left

                      The answer I believe has been there the whole time 4176 which is not two sisters.
                      Read closely the part right after if no child which then gives case for two daughters!

                      4176
                      they seek ruling your say the god gives a ruling you in al-kallati/the fatherless spouseless
                      if im'ru-on/person perished not for him waladun/born (child)
                      and for him sister so for her half what left
                      and he inherits it if not that be for her waladun/born (child)

                      so if knat/be (f/d) ith'natayni/two (daughters!)
                      so to them dual the third each from what left

                      and if be they of ikh'watan/siblings rijlan/menfolk of wanisan/and womenfolk
                      so to the male similitude share the two (feminine)

                      Kalala case - fatherless spouseless, no child
                      1 sister 1/2, mother 1/2
                      2+ sisters, mother (share equally)

                      1+ brothers 5/6, mother 1/6 (411)

                      If siblings mixed 21 male to female (4176)
                      1/6 mother (411), 5/6 siblings mixed 21 ratio

                      Kalala case - fatherless spouseless, no son
                      3+ daughters 2/3 (411), sibling/s 1/3 (If siblings mixed 21 male to female 4176)
                      2 daughters 2/3 (4176), sibling/s 1/3
                      1 daughter 1/2 (411), sibling/s 1/2

                      3+ daughters 2/3 (411), (sister/s, mother) 1/3 share equally
                      2 daughters 2/3 (4176), (sister/s, mother) 1/3 share equally
                      1 daughter 1/2 (411), (sister/s, mother) 1/2 share equally

                      3+ daughters 2/3 (411), mother 1/6, brother/s 1/6
                      2 daughters 2/3 (4176), mother 1/6, brother/s 1/6
                      1 daughter 1/2 (411), mother 1/6, brother/s 1/3

                      3+ daughters 2/3 (411), mother 1/6, siblings mixed 1/6 (21 male to female 4176)
                      2 daughters 2/3 (4176), mother 1/6, siblings mixed 1/6
                      1 daughter 1/2 (411), mother 1/6, siblings mixed 1/3

                      412
                      and if be rajulun/man inherited kallatan (fatherless spouseless) or im'ra-atun/lady
                      and to him brother or sister so to each one from them dual the sixth
                      so if kn/be they of more from such so they partners in the third

                      Kalala case - fatherless spouseless, has son
                      1/6 sister/brother, 5/6 son/s or children mixed (21 male to female 411)
                      1/3 siblings, 2/3 son/s or children mixed

                      It needs to be resolved in 412 language to distinguish presence of son else contradicts if only daughters?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Noon_waalqalami
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #269

                        Kalala case - fatherless spouseless, has son
                        1/6 sister/brother, 5/6 son/s or children mixed (21 male to female 411)
                        1/3 siblings, 2/3 son/s or children mixed

                        It needs to be resolved in 412 language to distinguish presence of son else contradicts if only daughters?

                        Peace everyone,

                        Final notes to explain logic especially Kalala (fatherless spouseless daughterless).

                        Cannot say Kalala is fatherless spouseless with son then say in 4176 if no child.
                        That would be contradictory, like defining Kalala fatherless then say if no parent!

                        4176 siblings mixed no child (21 male to female) and father ? unsolvable! Father cannot inherit with siblings.
                        412 wife 1/4 no child, 1/2 sister (4176 no child) ? 1/4 too much! Spouse cannot inherit with siblings.
                        411 daughter 1/2, sibling 1/6 (412) ? 1/3 too much! Daughters cannot inherit with siblings.

                        411
                        directs you the god in awldikum/children yours
                        lildhakari/to the male similitude share al-unthayayni/the two (feminine)

                        If children mixed 21 male to female ratio

                        so if kunna/be (f/p) nisan/womenfolk fawqa/above two so for them (f/p) third dual (1/3*2 = 2/3) what left

                        3 daughters 2/3 (2/9 each), parent/s and/or spouse 1/3

                        Lane, An Arabic English Lexicon
                        ? thus one says, (Mgh, Msb) i. e. Ten is above nine; meaning ten exceeds nine
                        ... Kur iii. 12], (Mgh, Msb) exceeding two.

                        2 daughters 2/3 (4176), parent/s and/or spouse 1/3

                        and if knat/be she (f/s) widatan/one (f/s) so for her the half

                        1 daughter 1/2, parent/s and/or spouse 1/2

                        and to parents dual his to each one from them dual the sixth from what left if kna/be (m/s) for him waladun/born (son)

                        1/6 mother, 1/6 father, 2/3 son/s or if children mixed 21 male to female

                        so if not yakun/that be for him waladun/born (child) and heirs parents dual his so to mother his the third

                        1/3 mother, 2/3 father

                        so if kna/be (s/m) for him ikh'watun/brother so to mother his the sixth

                        1/6 mother, 5/6 brother/s

                        from after a will have made in it or judgment fathers yours and children/sons yours not thou knowing which of them closer to you benefit of obligation from the god surely the god kana/be knowledge of wisdom of

                        412
                        and for you half what left azwjukum/spouses yours if not yakun/that be for them (f/p) waladun/born (child)

                        1/2 husband, 1/2 parent/s

                        so if kna/be (m/s) for them waladun/born (son) so for you the fourth from what left they (f/p) from after will made they (f/p) in it or judgment

                        1/4 husband, 1/3 parents (1/6 each), 5/12 son/s or if children mixed 21 male to female

                        and for them the fourth from what left thou you if not yakun/that be for you waladun/born (child)

                        1/4 wife, 3/4 parent/s

                        so if kna/be (s/m) for you waladun/born (son) so to them the eight from what left thou you from after will thou making in it or judgment

                        1/8 wife, 1/3 parents (1/6 each), 13/24 son/s or if children mixed 21 male to female

                        and if kna/be (m/s) rajulun/man inherited kallatan/fatherless spouseless daughterless (i.e. possible heirs are son, mother, and siblings) or im'ra-atun/lady and to him brother or sister so to each one from them dual the sixth

                        1/6 sister/brother, 5/6 son/s
                        1/6 sister/brother, 1/6 mother (411), 2/3 son/s

                        so if kn/be they of more from such so they partners in the third

                        1/3 siblings (share equally), 2/3 son/s
                        1/3 siblings (share equally), 1/6 mother (411), 1/2 son/s

                        from after will is recommended in it or judgment other than harmful will from the god and the god knower forbearer

                        4176
                        they seek ruling your say the god gives a ruling you in al-kallati/the fatherless spouseless daughterless if im'ru-on/person perished not for him waladun/born (child) and for him sister so for her half what left and he inherits it if not yakun/that be for her waladun/born (child)

                        Kalala case - (no child)
                        1 sister 1/2, mother 1/2
                        2+ sisters, mother (share equally)
                        1+ brothers 5/6, mother 1/6 (411)

                        so if knat/be (f/d) ith'natayni/two (daughters!) so to them dual (f/d) the third each (1/3 + 1/3 = /3) from what left

                        2 daughters 2/3 (see 411)

                        and if kn /be they of ikh'watan/siblings rijlan/menfolk of wanisan/and womenfolk falildhakari/so to the male similitude share al-unthayayni the two (feminine)

                        If siblings mixed 21 male to female ratio
                        1/6 mother (411), 5/6 siblings mixed 21 male to female ratio

                        shows the god for you lest stray yeh of and the god in every thing knower

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Offline
                          T Offline
                          taalibul_ilm
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #270

                          SubhaanAllah, 27 pages of confusion. As with any topic, in-depth discussion requires that you know the topic being discussed.

                          No need for such discussion when the `ulamaa' have already explained everything.

                          Please visit this site to learn ilmul faraa'idh in-depth http//inheritancelawsblog.wordpress.com/

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Offline
                            J Offline
                            JavaLatte
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #271

                            No need for such discussion when the `ulamaa' have already explained everything.

                            Bold To be honest, I dislike this statement.

                            So, how do you know that 'the ulamaa' have already explained everything?

                            Are they "gods"?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Offline
                              T Offline
                              taalibul_ilm
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #272

                              Bold To be honest, I dislike this statement.

                              So, how do you know that 'the ulamaa' have already explained everything?

                              Are they "gods"?

                              To be honest, I saw this comment coming from a mile away.

                              Never said they were gods, but they know the deen better than us. You guys like to play the mantra of "Qur'an only", right? How about when Allah says, "Ask the people of knowledge if you do not know".

                              When you follow a madhab, you are following a group of scholars. Its the safe road. And honeslty speaking, the question of madhabs does not even really come up when talking about inheritance, as there is very little ikhtilaaf in inheritance laws. All scholars agree on almost every ruling when it comes to inheritance.

                              Entire volumes have been written on this topic by the `ulamaa in great detail, masha'Allah. And here you are, 27 pages, still as confused as ever.

                              Make your life easy, and take the deen from people who know more than you. If you try to figure out every ruling for yourself, you'll end up with a headache, and still have no understanding of the issue.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Offline
                                T Offline
                                taalibul_ilm
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #273

                                The site will explain the concept of `awl and Radd. Only when these two concepts are understood will theconfusion subside, at least a little.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Noon_waalqalami
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #274

                                  SubhaanAllah, 27 pages of confusion. As with any topic, in-depth discussion requires that you know the topic being discussed.

                                  No need for such discussion when the `ulamaa' have already explained everything.

                                  Please visit this site to learn ilmul faraa'idh in-depth http//inheritancelawsblog.wordpress.com/

                                  Peace -- the site is full of errors and contradictions which were parroted from long ago.

                                  The site will explain the concept of `awl and Radd. Only when these two concepts are understood will theconfusion subside, at least a little.

                                  Using al-awl or algebra to normalize or increase/decrease evenly all shares to new values that are never mentioned in Qur'an can be used to wrongly "fix" surplus/shortfall any combinations.

                                  Case which supposedly occurred during caliphate of Umar ibn Khattab.
                                  A woman left husband, mother, 2 uterine brothers & 2 full brothers.

                                  Umar initially gave 1/2 husband + 1/6 mother + 1/3 two uterine brothers which left nothing to the two full brothers.

                                  The two full brothers argued that even if their father was a donkey or a stone cast into the sea and they had no paternal relationship, they still had the same and equal relationship with the deceased as the uterine brothers through the same mother.

                                  Umar reconsidered allowed the two full brothers to inherit equally with uterine brothers the 1/3.

                                  Please ask ulamaa' explain husband, mother, 2 uterine sisters, 2 full sisters & 2 full brothers?

                                  Please state which verses you are using for all cases above and where Qur'an differentiates full and uterine siblings?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    taalibul_ilm
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #275

                                    Peace -- the site is full of errors and contradictions which were parroted from long ago.

                                    Using al-awl or algebra to normalize or increase/decrease evenly all shares to new values that are never mentioned in Qur'an can be used to wrongly "fix" surplus/shortfall any combinations.

                                    Case which supposedly occurred during caliphate of Umar ibn Khattab.
                                    A woman left husband, mother, 2 uterine brothers & 2 full brothers.

                                    Umar initially gave 1/2 husband + 1/6 mother + 1/3 two uterine brothers which left nothing to the two full brothers.

                                    The two full brothers argued that even if their father was a donkey or a stone cast into the sea and they had no paternal relationship, they still had the same and equal relationship with the deceased as the uterine brothers through the same mother.

                                    Umar reconsidered allowed the two full brothers to inherit equally with uterine brothers the 1/3.

                                    Please ask ulamaa' explain husband, mother, 2 uterine sisters, 2 full sisters & 2 full brothers?

                                    Please state which verses you are using for all cases above and where Qur'an differentiates full and uterine siblings?

                                    Nope, no contradictions. You are only saying that because you reject Hadith, which are HALF of Islam.

                                    The case which you've brought up is quite interesting. This is actually one of the few instances in inheritance law where there is disagreement among the scholars.

                                    The Shafi'i scholars accept the ruling of 'umar.

                                    According to the Hanafi madhab, however, the two full brothers will simply not inherit.

                                    There is consensus of the 'ulamaa that verse 4176 refers to full and consanguine siblings, while 412 refers to uterine siblings. This si mentioned in the books of tafseer. Of course, you guys wouldn't understand this because you only go by the Qur'an.

                                    'Awl has been proves through narrations where umar applied it. Even if you dont accept that, its been proven through qiyaas (analogy) for when the shares of creditors is proportionally decreased when the assets care not enough to pay them all off. Agian, these are narrations, NOT in the Qur'an, so you guys will obviously dismiss them all. Even though the Qur'an tells us to follow the example of Rasulullah (sallAllaahu alayhi wasallama) MANY TIMES and he (sallallaahu `alayhi wasallam) tells us to follow his sahaabah.

                                    Now since you claim you don't need ahadeeth or narrations from the sahaabah, here is a question for you.

                                    What happens when only a spouse is inheriting? Where does the residue go?

                                    May Allah guide you all. Ameen.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      taalibul_ilm
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #276

                                      Where did you derive this ruling "When there is a spouse the siblings dont inherit"?

                                      Incorrect. Siblings DO inherit in the presence of a spouse. Only when a Father (or fathers' father etc..) or son (or sons son etc..) is inheriting are the siblings deprived.

                                      You are claiming contradiction in rules which have already been established for 1400 years by the true scholars of Sunni Islam, yet you dont even know the basics of the rules of exclusion!

                                      I can see this will be a waste of time. Insha'Allah, will take my leave now. No point in conversing with hadith-rejectors.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        JavaLatte
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #277

                                        To be honest, I saw this comment coming from a mile away.

                                        I think you still don't understand why I dislike that statement.

                                        And, could you answer these

                                        How do you know that 'the ulamaa' have already explained everything?

                                        And why you choose Hanafi madhab?

                                        Do you also follow another madhab? Or perhaps only Hanafi?

                                        Never said they were gods, but they know the deen better than us.

                                        How do you know that they follow the right path?

                                        You guys like to play the mantra of "Qur'an only", right?

                                        I think you still don't understand about us.

                                        How about when Allah says, "Ask the people of knowledge if you do not know".

                                        Do you think that the famous of 'the ulamaa/scholars' are the people of knowledge?

                                        When you follow a madhab, you are following a group of scholars.

                                        I do not want to follow a path that may put me in big trouble in the hereafter.

                                        Those scholars are not my guardians.

                                        Its the safe road.

                                        I don't think so. The safe road is to follow the truth, and the truth is from God.

                                        Entire volumes have been written on this topic by the `ulamaa in great detail, masha'Allah.

                                        I don't care whether it has 'great' detail or not. I am not impressed with the teachings that mix between right and wrong, because something like that is potentially misleading.

                                        And here you are, 27 pages, still as confused as ever.

                                        I suppose you could use this 27 pages as materials to study if you want, but if you feel confused, then... perhaps you could check these pages at another time, such as if one day you decide to study Qur'an without the influence of scholars.

                                        Make your life easy, and take the deen from people who know more than you.

                                        Well, if what you mean is to take the deen from the people who follow madhab/s, then I think the above sentence sounds like persuasion to enter the Hell.

                                        What I want is following the path that God teaches me. I do not want to follow madhab/s.

                                        If you try to figure out every ruling for yourself, you'll end up with a headache, and still have no understanding of the issue.

                                        Headache if we study the Qur'an? No, inshaAllah.

                                        If we are patient and constantly regard Allah as our Teacher, then inshaAllah we can improve our understanding and gain wisdom without headache.

                                        Salm.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Man_of_Faith
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #278

                                          It is quite apparent that the so-called hadith of Muhammad follow interpretation errors of Quran. One can always wonder why.

                                          Hundreds of invented religious rules, just like the Jews. Oh, by the way they are the same, just took the name Muslim after the prophet of Quran came around.

                                          Be of one with God

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users