Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. :: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

:: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
123 Posts 18 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mmkhan
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    For example

    Salaam SC,

    rotfl

    BTW, what mean tbh? Sorry, I am asking beside your example

    But I appreciate you taking the time out and explaining things for those of us who have no idea what your point is

    You are appreciating on wrong thing. He said he don't have a point.

    May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
    mmkhan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Oh! Thanks for accepting that you don't have any point. I was simply taking stress!

      I know that, where did I say KUM is not referring to HIS people?
      Now, here is the problem! How can you decide that people referred by this pronoun are same people mentioned in 267? This is what I was asking you for supporting aayat for your claim.

      When Allah used KUM in 267, to avoid confusion, He clearly mentioned by adding "li-qaumihi", so that you should not take it to yourselves unlike 255

      Otherwise, why it has not been clarified in 255 by adding the same or similar word? There are no assumptions in TheBook of Allah, everything has been made very clear. But you are assuming that 255 refers to same people mentioned in 267 without any support from other aayaats.

      Did you get my point? This was my point when I asked you to compare the construction and design of those two aayaats. ...

      The discourse of 255 starts from 247 by addressing the Nation of Musa alahissalam.

      In 254 are the same words--- . The conversations that took place in the past on various occassions are reported verbatem. The same people of his nation are talking to Musa alahissalam.

      I recall I had mentioned earlier about conjunction followed by adverb . One also need to study adverbs to understand a written text of any language.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        Yes sir. I'll get right on it.

        Tbh Mazhar, when you explain things normally, I learn a lot from your posts. It's when you start with the arcane grammar speak that people's eyes generally glaze over. For example 'broken feminine plural'...and a silence descends in which we absorb the awe of what has just been revealed. To most it's like yeah and? To some it's maybe I shouldn't say anything at this point because it obviously must mean something important but I don't know why and I won't ask because what if everyone else knows and I'm the only one who doesn't. A few ask for further clarification and get abused for it p

        But I appreciate you taking the time out and explaining things for those of us who have no idea what your point is

        'broken feminine plural'. The text comprises of words, phrases and sentence. Many people "understand" Qur'aan and base their "disertations" without working on any of three parts of text as they sanely do with all other texts of other languages and books.

        Such word has its own identity and meanings and effect upon other words in the Text. Unless one identifies individual words and knows their particularities, you tell me, what he is understanding could either be Heavens telling him or some whispers of Shaitan make him so understand.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          savage_carrot
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          You are appreciating on wrong thing. He said he don't have a point.

          Haha...oops, I'm being scolded now for abbreviating something so...I'll just sit in the corner and watch the fireworks.

          'broken feminine plural'. The text comprises of words, phrases and sentence. Many people "understand" Qur'aan and base their "disertations" without working on any of three parts of text as they sanely do with all other texts of other languages and books.

          Such word has its own identity and meanings and effect upon other words in the Text. Unless one identifies individual words and knows their particularities, you tell me, what he is understanding could either be Heavens telling him or some whispers of Shaitan make him so understand.

          I agree with you Mazhar. We look at whatever we need to look at to better understand. Most people have problems with arabic because that's not their native language and so need some extra help, is all. In as clear a way as possible. When I came to the forum, bro Ayman helped me out a lot patiently and still does with arabic etc, he's an awesome teacher (and he doesn't scold me p).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            Bender
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            Yes sir. I'll get right on it.

            Tbh Mazhar, when you explain things normally, I learn a lot from your posts. It's when you start with the arcane grammar speak that people's eyes generally glaze over. For example 'broken feminine plural'...and a silence descends in which we absorb the awe of what has just been revealed. To most it's like yeah and? To some it's maybe I shouldn't say anything at this point because it obviously must mean something important but I don't know why and I won't ask because what if everyone else knows and I'm the only one who doesn't. A few ask for further clarification and get abused for it p

            But I appreciate you taking the time out and explaining things for those of us who have no idea what your point is

            Salaam,

            I totally agree. It always costs me a lot of time just to translate his posts (the ones which are full of grammar terms) let alone understanding them. Even translators have trouble with some of those terms. When he explains normally it's more refreshing.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              Salaam,

              I totally agree. It always costs me a lot of time just to translate his posts (the ones which are full of grammar terms) let alone understanding them. Even translators have trouble with some of those terms. When he explains normally it's more refreshing.

              Perhaps, I have to bring in the grammar with those posts where some friends of the forum handle Ayah at their own assigning them meanings by seeing similar looking words at some other places. I will try to make terms simpler by defining or giving their meanings and connotations they add to the sentences.

              But you just see that there are 58 pages discussion where our sister moderator is very active, discussion is going on and on without firt determining the meanings of words which is neither a noun nor an idiom but a complete sentence. Even for English word used making it the premises of the thread none cares to see whether it is abstract or a substantive noun.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                savage_carrot
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                Perhaps, I have to bring in the grammar with those posts where some friends of the forum handle Ayah at their own assigning them meanings by seeing similar looking words at some other places. I will try to make terms simpler by defining or giving their meanings and connotations they add to the sentences.

                But you just see that there are 58 pages discussion where our sister moderator is very active, discussion is going on and on without firt determining the meanings of words which is neither a noun nor an idiom but a complete sentence. Even for English word used making it the premises of the thread none cares to see whether it is abstract or a substantive noun.

                You wound me Mazhar, deeply p Discussion goes on for different reasons...in the case of that thread in particular I already have notes regarding the subject 'grammatically'; (neither did I read most of your posts or most of the other posters on that thread) I like discussing from different angles. Not only does it broaden my understanding, but it also helps me tear it down to basics via reasoning as opposed to myopic examinations when confronted with another pov regardless of it being 'crazy talk'. It's more rigid for you, I can appreciate that (mmkhan, this time I finally might be appreciating the right thing)...but don't think that other people should always discuss in ways that you'd heartily approve of.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mmkhan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  Well, I will try to give you some others aayaats to see how they are constructed.

                  4028
                  4028 And a believing man said who was from the family of Pharaoh who concealed his faith, "Do you kill a man because he says, 'My Lord is Allah ' while he has brought you clear proofs from your Lord? And if he should be lying, then upon him is his lie; but if he should be truthful, there will strike you some of what he promises you. Indeed, Allah does not guide one who is a transgressor and a liar.

                  4029
                  4029 O my people, sovereignty is yours today, dominant in the land. But who would protect us from the punishment of Allah if it came to us?" Pharaoh said, "I do not show you except what I see, and I do not guide you except to the way of right conduct."

                  4030
                  4030 And he who believed said, "O my people, indeed I fear for you like the day of the companies

                  4031
                  4031 Like the custom of the people of Nooh and of 'Aad and Thamud and those after them. And Allah wants no injustice for servants.

                  4032
                  4032 And O my people, indeed I fear for you the Day of Calling

                  When it is mentioned that the one who believed started saying in 4028, then what is use of repeating it by saying "the one who believed said" in 4030? Why no subject pronoun is used?

                  When already it is said in "yaa qaumi" in 4029, why is it necessary to use the same word in 4030 and 4032, where we already know whom this person is addressing.

                  What your grammar says on this?

                  Another example

                  3330
                  3330 O wives of the Prophet, whoever of you should commit a clear immorality - for her the punishment would be doubled two fold, and ever is that, for Allah , easy.

                  3331
                  3331 And whoever of you devoutly obeys Allah and His Messenger and does righteousness - We will give her her reward twice; and We have prepared for her a noble provision.

                  3332
                  3332 O wives of the Prophet, you are not like anyone among women. If you fear Allah , then do not be soft in speech , lest he in whose heart is disease should covet, but speak with appropriate speech.

                  Now, please educate me Mazhar with you grammar.

                  1- Who is mentioned in 3331, if you say, they are referring to wives of the prophet, then why 3332 again used "O wives of the prophet"?

                  2- If you say, they are referring not to wives of the prophet, but it is general for all, then why you are mixing up 255 and 267?

                  Other points we will discuss later after clarifying this first, inshaAllah. Other points also includes Bani Israel is different than Musa's qaum.

                  May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                  mmKhan

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    Well, I will try to give you some others aayaats to see how they are constructed.

                    4028
                    4028 And a believing man said who was from the family of Pharaoh who concealed his faith, "Do you kill a man because he says, 'My Lord is Allah ' while he has brought you clear proofs from your Lord? And if he should be lying, then upon him is his lie; but if he should be truthful, there will strike you some of what he promises you. Indeed, Allah does not guide one who is a transgressor and a liar.

                    4029
                    4029 O my people, sovereignty is yours today, dominant in the land. But who would protect us from the punishment of Allah if it came to us?" Pharaoh said, "I do not show you except what I see, and I do not guide you except to the way of right conduct."

                    4030
                    4030 And he who believed said, "O my people, indeed I fear for you like the day of the companies

                    4031
                    4031 Like the custom of the people of Nooh and of 'Aad and Thamud and those after them. And Allah wants no injustice for servants.

                    4032
                    4032 And O my people, indeed I fear for you the Day of Calling

                    When it is mentioned that the one who believed started saying in 4028, then what is use of repeating it by saying "the one who believed said" in 4030? Why no subject pronoun is used?

                    When already it is said in "yaa qaumi" in 4029, why is it necessary to use the same word in 4030 and 4032, where we already know whom this person is addressing.

                    What your grammar says on this?

                    Another example

                    3330
                    3330 O wives of the Prophet, whoever of you should commit a clear immorality - for her the punishment would be doubled two fold, and ever is that, for Allah , easy.

                    3331
                    3331 And whoever of you devoutly obeys Allah and His Messenger and does righteousness - We will give her her reward twice; and We have prepared for her a noble provision.

                    3332
                    3332 O wives of the Prophet, you are not like anyone among women. If you fear Allah , then do not be soft in speech , lest he in whose heart is disease should covet, but speak with appropriate speech.

                    Now, please educate me Mazhar with you grammar.

                    1- Who is mentioned in 3331, if you say, they are referring to wives of the prophet, then why 3332 again used "O wives of the prophet"?

                    2- If you say, they are referring not to wives of the prophet, but it is general for all, then why you are mixing up 255 and 267?

                    Other points we will discuss later after clarifying this first, inshaAllah. Other points also includes Bani Israel is different than Musa's qaum.

                    May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                    mmKhan

                    Please let me know what are you presuming from all these quotes that they refer to.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      You wound me Mazhar, deeply p Discussion goes on for different reasons...in the case of that thread in particular I already have notes regarding the subject 'grammatically'; (neither did I read most of your posts or most of the other posters on that thread) I like discussing from different angles. Not only does it broaden my understanding, but it also helps me tear it down to basics via reasoning as opposed to myopic examinations when confronted with another pov regardless of it being 'crazy talk'. It's more rigid for you, I can appreciate that (mmkhan, this time I finally might be appreciating the right thing)...but don't think that other people should always discuss in ways that you'd heartily approve of.

                      Sorry, you took it in that direction, it was just informative--prompt to read you there--- argumentative--away from baseless thread issue. I know you were busy on specific issues ignoring other posts. Never feel wound, even negative propaganda earns attention for the rightful person.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        savage_carrot
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #51

                        Sorry, you took it in that direction, it was just informative--prompt to read you there--- argumentative--away from baseless thread issue. I know you were busy on specific issues ignoring other posts. Never feel wound, even negative propaganda earns attention for the rightful person.

                        I was kidding with the wounding, no worries... and point well understood and completely agreed, I mentioned it on the thread a few times myself

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          mmkhan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #52

                          Please let me know what are you presuming from all these quotes that they refer to.

                          After aayaats quoted, there are some questions asked about your understanding. Didn't you read them? Please check again and get back with you answers.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #53

                            After aayaats quoted, there are some questions asked about your understanding. Didn't you read them? Please check again and get back with you answers.

                            I have seen those. I want what you intend to interpret finding those reiteration. It is the speakers choice to reiterate the qualitative trait of a person through relative pronouns or personal pronouns. Read about emphasis, rhetoric etc.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              mmkhan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #54

                              I have seen those. I want what you intend to interpret finding those reiteration. It is the speakers choice to reiterate the qualitative trait of a person through relative pronouns or personal pronouns. Read about emphasis, rhetoric etc.

                              But AlQuraan is not about speakers choice, it is The Book of guidance. Every letter/word has been specifically added.

                              OK, please tell me who is mentioned in 3331?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #55

                                I have seen those. I want what you intend to interpret finding those reiteration. It is the speakers choice to reiterate the qualitative trait of a person through relative pronouns or personal pronouns. Read about emphasis, rhetoric etc.

                                But AlQuraan is not about speakers choice, it is The Book of guidance. Every letter/word has been specifically added.

                                OK, please tell me who is mentioned in 3331?

                                Dear, what is wrong with you, you do not let even simple things enter your mind and keep circling around what thoughts have veiled your intellect about a certain issue like pronouns here.

                                Every book, including Qur'aan is a spoken word of a speaker. It was His choice how he selected relative pronouns or personal pronouns. For that you need to know minimum emphasis aspect, rhetoric.

                                In 3331 are solely and exclusively the honourable wives of the Elevated Messenger of Allah the Exalted.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  mmkhan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #56

                                  Dear, what is wrong with you, you do not let even simple things enter your mind and keep circling around what thoughts have veiled your intellect about a certain issue like pronouns here.

                                  Every book, including Qur'aan is a spoken word of a speaker. It was His choice how he selected relative pronouns or personal pronouns. For that you need to know minimum emphasis aspect, rhetoric.

                                  In 3331 are solely and exclusively the honourable wives of the Elevated Messenger of Allah the Exalted.

                                  I think you always forget that AlQuraan is a guidance for MANKIND, not only for scholars or the ones having good command on language. How is it a guidance for the naas? All aayaats are set on patterns and designs for lay man to compare and understand the usage of different aayaats.

                                  It is not a choice simply to fill the Book, but it has been purposely set in that pattern to show you something and guide you, etc.

                                  Now, if 3331 is about Messenger's wives, then why again 3332 used "yaa nisaa alnabiyyi" when it is already in context as per your understanding? There is surely a reason for such usage. When you make your mind blank , inshaAllah, you will see what I am trying to say.

                                  May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                                  mmKhan

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #57

                                    I think you always forget that AlQuraan is a guidance for MANKIND, not only for scholars or the ones having good command on language. How is it a guidance for the naas? All aayaats are set on patterns and designs for lay man to compare and understand the usage of different aayaats.

                                    It is not a choice simply to fill the Book, but it has been purposely set in that pattern to show you something and guide you, etc.

                                    Now, if 3331 is about Messenger's wives, then why again 3332 used "yaa nisaa alnabiyyi" when it is already in context as per your understanding? There is surely a reason for such usage. When you make your mind blank , inshaAllah, you will see what I am trying to say.

                                    May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                                    mmKhan

                                    Dear, the day you understand how the text of Arabic of Qur'aan flows, where the discourse ends, and where a new discourse starts not to be linked with the earlier statements, you might know the beauty of Ayah 3232 starting with a fresh call seeking attention of them and then breaking the news about their status and position amongst the woman folk of all times.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Maha
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #58

                                      Did you try to explain me your point? NO!
                                      Did you try to give me an example? NO!
                                      Did you try to show me an aayat to explain your point? NO!
                                      Then what you were doing? You know exactly what you were doing already.

                                      Anyways, as per my understanding

                                      Mazher always try to convince mmKhan without bringing forward any proof. He always do that to me.

                                      As per the above sentence, "Mazher" is Subject and "mmKhan" is Object. And "He" is subject pronoun and "me" is object pronoun.

                                      Am I correct sir? If not, please correct me and then put forward your point. If I am right, then what is your point?

                                      May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                                      mmKhan

                                      Just want to thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought. I never really considered this issue before reading your post, but i will now definately check your references up and make up my mind, because you have discussed some very important things. It really seems like either that it wasnt muhammed who came with the quran as per the traditional islamic belief, and/or muhammed is a title and not a name.

                                      And please dont limit yourself due to Mazhars (sunni) agenda. Please keep posting about the issue.

                                      Peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #59

                                        Just want to thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought.

                                        Kindly share that food with us so that we could also benefit intake

                                        (1)
                                        (2)..., if more
                                        (3)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Maha
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #60

                                          Kindly share that food with us so that we could also benefit intake

                                          (1)
                                          (2)..., if more
                                          (3)

                                          Read my whole post, and you will see that I explained it further. I dont have time enough to repeat myself.

                                          Peace

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users