Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. New article: What is the meaning of "al masjid al haram"?

New article: What is the meaning of "al masjid al haram"?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
411 Posts 47 Posters 50.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    salaam Mazhar,

    Firstly, have you read the article? If you have, then you will have noted that I did not state nor imply the above. What you are saying would still be physical, as sister Ayisha pointed out.

    Rather than discussing what I did not say, let's rather discuss what I actually said. This will be more beneficial.

    Quotes from article

    You know I start only when I have read your article. Yousaid this

    The use of "bi" and "ila" in 171 suggest God took with/by His servant from A to B. Since we have ruled out a physical journey, this only leaves a spiritual journey and/or vision/dream or some other understanding. The use of "night" may indicate during sleep, i.e. a dream/vision.

    Spiritual journey, vision, dream or what Prince says astral projection, do not go by your words "God took his servant from A to B".
    Timing is also mentioned "during the Night". Preposition "bi" means with, along with; preposition "Min" means the departure location and Preposition "Ila" means towards a location which is the destination of the journey during the hours of night.

    Purpose is also mentioned "" "so that We might make him see with eyes".

    Qur'aan is very comprehensive, and worded very guarding, since Allah knew people will try play with His words.

    We are not discussing whether physical journey seems possible to someone or not according to one's present level of knowledge, but are discussing what is stated in the Arabic text.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      Ayisha
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      You know I start only when I have read your article. Yousaid this

      Spiritual journey, vision, dream or what Prince says astral projection, do not go by your words "God took his servant from A to B".
      Timing is also mentioned "during the Night". Preposition "bi" means with, along with; preposition "Min" means the departure location and Preposition "Ila" means towards a location which is the destination of the journey during the hours of night.

      Purpose is also mentioned "" "so that We might make him see with eyes".

      Qur'aan is very comprehensive, and worded very guarding, since Allah knew people will try play with His words.

      We are not discussing whether physical journey seems possible to someone or not according to one's present level of knowledge, but are discussing what is stated in the Arabic text.

      So if this was a physical journey Muhammed will have met God as the words imply/say God TOOK him, so God was WITH him physically and TOOK him physically, which is what you are saying.

      peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • WakasW Offline
        WakasW Offline
        Wakas
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        salaam all,

        Whether it refers to muhammed or moses thats another point of discussion.

        This issue is addressed in the article.

        Purpose is also mentioned "" "so that We might make him see with eyes".

        You seem to claim it is with physical eyes, and whilst this is correct generally, the exact same word is used for dream also

        When God shows them to you as being few in your dream...

        The likely reason for the usage is that even in our dreams, generally speaking we use the eyes to see, or at least I do, I dont know about others.

        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          You seem to claim it is with physical eyes, and whilst this is correct generally, the exact same word is used for dream also

          When God shows them to you as being few in your dream...

          Salamun Alaika,

          The likely reason for the usage is that even in our dreams, generally speaking we use the eyes to see, or at least I do, I dont know about others.

          The period of sleep relating to dreams is called Rapid Eye Movement sleep--supporting your using of eyes when dreaming.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            There is difference in both. When this verb is used not in real terms, it takes two objects as in 843-doubly transitive. When in real terms it is singly transitive.

            The period of sleep relating to dreams is called Rapid Eye Movement sleep--supporting your using of eyes when dreaming.

            Interesting claim, however...

            1. Can you provide evidence that dreams are only possible with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep?

            2. Can you provide evidence that the rapid eye movement is due to the sleeper using their eyes to "see" in their dream?

            3. Does your theory for when the verb is and is not "real terms" hold for ALL its occurrences?

            4. Does your theory only apply to this verb or others also? If so, can you elaborate.

            5. According to you, what are the two objects in 843 for this verb?

            6. According to you, what is the object of this verb in 171?

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              Interesting claim, however...

              1. Can you provide evidence that dreams are only possible with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep?

              2. Can you provide evidence that the rapid eye movement is due to the sleeper using their eyes to "see" in their dream?

              3. Does your theory for when the verb is and is not "real terms" hold for ALL its occurrences?

              4. Does your theory only apply to this verb or others also? If so, can you elaborate.

              5. According to you, what are the two objects in 843 for this verb?

              6. According to you, what is the object of this verb in 171?

              Please study about REM sleep. Much reasearch has since been made on this. It will be available in all encylopedias on line.

              Rest, I incorrectly quoted about it but before I corrected it perhaps your response went up.

              The point was to indicate that when this form IV is used to see-expereince something during sleep it is specifically mentioned. It is same in 843 and 37102. Sorry for inconvenience.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #18
                1. According to you, what are the two objects in 843 for this verb?

                2. According to you, what is the object of this verb in 171?

                I was preparing reply for Ayisha, your querry will help.

                In 843 two objects are second person, masculine, singular, accusative state; first object and is the second object; third person; masculine; plural in accusative state. Allah the Exalted is the Subject of verb, and verb is form IV, masculine, singular, mood indicative.

                In 171 red is the first object, third person, masculine, singular, in accusative state referring back to sincere allegiant of Him the Exalted. Second Object of verb is elided as manifestly indicated by the following prepositional phrase.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  So if this was a physical journey Muhammed will have met God as the words imply/say God TOOK him, so God was WITH him physically and TOOK him physically, which is what you are saying.

                  peace

                  Salamun alaiki,

                  Strictly adhering to the accepted principles of translating a text, and rules of Arabic grammar-morphology and syntax laid by learned Grammarians, let me try.

                  Allah the Exalted the Infinitely Glorious, Whose approval is the focus of all effort, is the One Who arranged the travel along with His sincere Allegiant-Muhammad on a journey during some part of night from within Al Masjid al Haram-the Sacred Mosque around Ka'aba in Mecca, towards the Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque.
                  That Mosque is the One whose surroundings We have perpetuated and blessed.
                  The purpose of ascending him in the direction towards the Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque was that We might show him visually the biggest sign from the Miscellany of Our Demonstrative Signs-Physical realm.
                  This is a fact that He the Exalted is the One Who is eternally the Hearer and is of Vision .

                  is a transitive Verb. It needs an Object. It is elided-not mentioned. What was that object used to carry him, it is not yet known-UFO.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kaamil
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    There were so many contradiction in the notion of physical journey. The notion cannot sit down in the heart of critical minded people. If it denote a physical journey why at nihgt? Then will this notion not contradict verse 1793.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      There were so many contradiction in the notion of physical journey. The notion cannot sit down in the heart of critical minded people. If it denote a physical journey why at nihgt? Then will this notion not contradict verse 1793.

                      We are not discussing whether physical journey seems possible to someone or not according to one's present level of knowledge, but are discussing what is stated in the Arabic text.

                      One should also keep critically checking since it might have become atilted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • WakasW Offline
                        WakasW Offline
                        Wakas
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        salaam mazhar,

                        Thanks for answering questions 5 & 6. If you have time, you can try 1-4 also.

                        What are the two objects in 37102?

                        So readers can weight up the information, you are saying

                        God took His servant and went on a physical journey with him, on an unidentified object (UFO) to somewhere in space/heaven/sky, to show him "the biggest sign" which you have not identified/elaborated.

                        Actually, I just thought of something, if it were using physical eyes, then at night, one's vision would be much poorer, so I assume you'd have to assume that whatever he was shown was lit up somehow or something else.

                        In any case, readers can weigh up your rendition and answer compared to what I wrote in the article
                        http//mypercept.co.uk/articles/meaning-masjid-al-haram-Quran.html

                        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Ayisha
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Salamun alaiki,

                          Strictly adhering to the accepted principles of translating a text, and rules of Arabic grammar-morphology and syntax laid by learned Grammarians, let me try.

                          Allah the Exalted the Infinitely Glorious, Whose approval is the focus of all effort, is the One Who arranged the travel along with His sincere Allegiant-Muhammad on a journey during some part of night from within Al Masjid al Haram-the Sacred Mosque around Ka'aba in Mecca, towards the Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque.
                          That Mosque is the One whose surroundings We have perpetuated and blessed.
                          The purpose of ascending him in the direction towards the Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque was that We might show him visually the biggest sign from the Miscellany of Our Demonstrative Signs-Physical realm.
                          This is a fact that He the Exalted is the One Who is eternally the Hearer and is of Vision .

                          is a transitive Verb. It needs an Object. It is elided-not mentioned. What was that object used to carry him, it is not yet known-UFO.

                          So God took Muhammed from Mecca to "Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque"

                          Have I lost the plot here?

                          The verse says Al Aqsa, whatever that means your translation is not saying that unless you refer to that as Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque, altitude is height so wherever this is by your translation is somewhere high in altitude.

                          So irrelevant as to whether it was physical, in your translation where is this Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque?

                          peace

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            So God took Muhammed from Mecca to "Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque"

                            Have I lost the plot here?

                            The verse says Al Aqsa, whatever that means your translation is not saying that unless you refer to that as Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque, altitude is height so wherever this is by your translation is somewhere high in altitude.

                            So irrelevant as to whether it was physical, in your translation where is this Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque?

                            peace

                            Salamun alaiki,

                            No fault of yours. Even some scholars do not care what the word is. It is not the name of some Mosque. It is description with Elative Noun.

                            Adjectival Phrase Location Noun Definite; singular; Masculine; genitive. It is modified by which is the masculine Superlative noun. When prefixed with definite article, it is used as Superlative, whereby it must be in agreement in gender and number between it and that which it describes. Here, it is used as adjectival portrayal of "The Mosque". One will find in almost all the translations that it is treated as a Superlative signifying its meanings as "the Remote; the Far distant; the Farthest; the Most distant; Remotest". This Superlative Noun is made from Root " ".

                            The basic perception infolded in the Root, in the words of Ibne Faris is

                            That, it leads to the perception of far distance and deportation to far away, utmost limit. Lane's Lexicon signified the perception of proceeding to extremities; with reference to drinking water it conveys meaning of drinking in the manner of exhausting the last drop, again reflecting extremity in any action. He emphasized its meanings as reaching and attaining the utmost by referring to various words made from it.
                            The fact of reaching or attaining the utmost has the built in perception of elevation and altitude. As mentioned earlier also, the Grand Qur'aan, for itself is the best Lexicon. It exposes the perception and meanings of most of its words in a picturesque manner by relationships and contrasts. The basic perception and meanings of the Root are unfolded at the very first place of its occurrence

                            when/that day you people were on the lower level corner, and they/the approaching army of infidels of Mecca were on far farther highest altitude corner, while the Merchant Caravan was relatively at lower level ground than you people.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              salaam mazhar,

                              Thanks for answering questions 5 & 6. If you have time, you can try 1-4 also.

                              Pl see Reply #16

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                So readers can weight up the information, you are saying

                                God took His servant and went on a physical journey with him, on an unidentified object (UFO) to somewhere in space/heaven/sky, to show him "the biggest sign" which you have not identified/elaborated.

                                Salamun alaika,

                                Sorry, I am not saying anything. I only translated the Arabic text adhering to basic and accepted rules of translation.

                                Salamun alaiki,

                                Strictly adhering to the accepted principles of translating a text, and rules of Arabic grammar-morphology and syntax laid by learned Grammarians, let me try.

                                Allah the Exalted the Infinitely Glorious, Whose approval is the focus of all effort, is the One Who arranged the travel along with His sincere Allegiant-Muhammad on a journey during some part of night from within Al Masjid al Haram-the Sacred Mosque around Ka'aba in Mecca, towards the Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque.
                                That Mosque is the One whose surroundings We have perpetuated and blessed.
                                The purpose of ascending him in the direction towards the Extreme Distant Altitude Mosque was that We might show him visually the biggest sign from the Miscellany of Our Demonstrative Signs-Physical realm.
                                This is a fact that He the Exalted is the One Who is eternally the Hearer and is of Vision .

                                is a transitive Verb. It needs an Object. It is elided-not mentioned. What was that object used to carry him, it is not yet known-UFO.

                                Wakas translates 171 in the article

                                171 Glory be to the One who took with/by His servant (at) night from al maSJD al haram ila/to al maSJD al aqsa which We have blessed around* it that We may show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Listener, the Seer.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  Actually, I just thought of something, if it were using physical eyes, then at night, one's vision would be much poorer, so I assume you'd have to assume that whatever he was shown was lit up somehow or something else.

                                  Negative style of thinking. Did astronauts carry lighting system, torches on the Moon?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • WakasW Offline
                                    WakasW Offline
                                    Wakas
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Dear Mazhar,

                                    Perhaps your style of reply works with others, but it is not working with me. Let us recap on the points you have avoided so far

                                    1. Can you provide evidence that dreams are only possible with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep?

                                    2. Can you provide evidence that the rapid eye movement is due to the sleeper using their eyes to "see" in their dream?

                                    3. Does your theory for when the verb is and is not "real terms" hold for ALL its occurrences?

                                    4. Does your theory only apply to this verb or others also? If so, can you elaborate.

                                    What are the two objects in 37102?

                                    You claim... to show him "the biggest sign" which you have not identified/elaborated - care to explain?

                                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Ayisha
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      Salamun alaiki,

                                      No fault of yours. Even some scholars do not care what the word is. It is not the name of some Mosque. It is description with Elative Noun.

                                      Adjectival Phrase Location Noun Definite; singular; Masculine; genitive. It is modified by which is the masculine Superlative noun. When prefixed with definite article, it is used as Superlative, whereby it must be in agreement in gender and number between it and that which it describes. Here, it is used as adjectival portrayal of "The Mosque". One will find in almost all the translations that it is treated as a Superlative signifying its meanings as "the Remote; the Far distant; the Farthest; the Most distant; Remotest". This Superlative Noun is made from Root " ".

                                      The basic perception infolded in the Root, in the words of Ibne Faris is

                                      That, it leads to the perception of far distance and deportation to far away, utmost limit. Lane's Lexicon signified the perception of proceeding to extremities; with reference to drinking water it conveys meaning of drinking in the manner of exhausting the last drop, again reflecting extremity in any action. He emphasized its meanings as reaching and attaining the utmost by referring to various words made from it.
                                      The fact of reaching or attaining the utmost has the built in perception of elevation and altitude. As mentioned earlier also, the Grand Qur'aan, for itself is the best Lexicon. It exposes the perception and meanings of most of its words in a picturesque manner by relationships and contrasts. The basic perception and meanings of the Root are unfolded at the very first place of its occurrence

                                      when/that day you people were on the lower level corner, and they/the approaching army of infidels of Mecca were on far farther highest altitude corner, while the Merchant Caravan was relatively at lower level ground than you people.

                                      So going by that this place whoever was taken was on a higher ground, like a mountain or hill, higher in altitude than Mecca? Or somewhere even higher, highest altitude as in up into space/heaven?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        So going by that this place whoever was taken was on a higher ground, like a mountain or hill, higher in altitude than Mecca? Or somewhere even higher, highest altitude as in up into space/heaven?

                                        Superlative is never in comparison to one. It is only about the Masjid, qualified as the one located at the highest altitutde. It can be beyond the frontiers of the Universe.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          Dear Mazhar,

                                          Perhaps your style of reply works with others, but it is not working with me. Let us recap on the points you have avoided so far

                                          1. Can you provide evidence that dreams are only possible with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep?

                                          2. Can you provide evidence that the rapid eye movement is due to the sleeper using their eyes to "see" in their dream?

                                          3. Does your theory for when the verb is and is not "real terms" hold for ALL its occurrences?

                                          4. Does your theory only apply to this verb or others also? If so, can you elaborate.

                                          What are the two objects in 37102?

                                          You claim... to show him "the biggest sign" which you have not identified/elaborated - care to explain?

                                          Salamun alaika,

                                          Sorry brother, whenever you wish to be evasive and turn away from the main subject such posts I quite often get. All above has since been replied.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users