Perception and thought in 4:3-Polygamy for pleasure or obligation
-
Are you saying that peculiar situations which apparently include one man multiple wives scenarios due to various reasons here, apply in heaven as well? And why on earth or heaven would that be?
Earthly life has its own problems and situations. One is that of pairing for sex. Husband and Wife is the ideal pair.
Problem area emerges when men die and leave behind wives--now without a male partner. Number of women increase. What could be the best solution, let them re-marry. A widow may get an unmarried man, an ideal situation for her. However, if they are larger in number, they have but to opt marry already a married man. Why would a married man like to wed with a widowed woman? Only if he is made duty-bound. So the commdanding order-ordinance obliging them for it.
Paradise is something which is earned-purchased. Women win the race and get in the Paradise larger in number than the men who arrived in Paradise. What is the demand and solution of such situation.
Ordinary Men are wed with four wives. Information rather fascinating for men is that they all are made virgins when resurrected. So it is not obligation oriented but pleasure indicative. -
Peace Mazhar,
Would it not be possible for the widowed women to remain chaste? Must a nikah always constitute to sex? Is that momentary pleasure a reward for having taken on an additional financial responsibility? Is that momentary pleasure worth it when it stabs one's wife in the heart a thousand times over? Must we hurt one another so terribly and destroy our initial marriages.. in the name of justice? There must be other options...I do believe there are..
-
Earthly life has its own problems and situations. One is that of pairing for sex. Husband and Wife is the ideal pair.
Problem area emerges when men die and leave behind wives--now without a male partner. Number of women increase. What could be the best solution, let them re-marry. A widow may get an unmarried man, an ideal situation for her. However, if they are larger in number, they have but to opt marry already a married man. Why would a married man like to wed with a widowed woman? Only if he is made duty-bound. So the commdanding order-ordinance obliging them for it.
Paradise is something which is earned-purchased. Women win the race and get in the Paradise larger in number than the men who arrived in Paradise. What is the demand and solution of such situation.
Ordinary Men are wed with four wives. Information rather fascinating for men is that they all are made virgins when resurrected. So it is not obligation oriented but pleasure indicative.Women win the race? How? Where is this? If anything it's the men that are dying earlier in your scenarios so the gold should be theirs. Is there any statistic that shows there are way more women than men ever created? If not and there aren't any, then why is there some kind of time dependent clause? Do the women who lived in the 19th century get to heaven faster than the women in the 21st? Are the women who lived as multiple wives due to a war etc for example in these scenarios, be deliberately lumped with the same conditions in heaven when some other women in non war situations for example in these scenarios, got one man for the rest of their lives (which you claim and accept is ideal) and later on too? Why? Were the women in the former situation...different than the latter?
Then, there are apparently exceptional cases where men would be 'duty bound' to marry more than one woman i.e. not the norm as in your article...then why would men ordinarily be wed with four wives? Ordinary men even. Information that is fascinating to a woman as well, since it's a woman that feels the pain of virginity really...but why would being virgins after resurrection point towards pleasure?
I'm actually mesmerised by this pov tbh...I couldn't imagine such scenarios in heaven even if there was a pitchfork pointed at me.
-
Women win the race? How? Where is this?
We are advised to try taking lead in the race towards the Paradise.
And you people hasten emulously aiming at seeking protection and forgiveness, which is ensured subject to condition by the Elevated Messenger to you as promise from your Sustainer Lord, and towards the Paradise.
Her capaciousness-width is that of the Skies and the Earth.
The Paradise is prepared exclusively for those who endeavour for ultimate success remaining mindful and cautious, avoiding unrestrained conduct in reverence and fear of Allah the Exalted. -
Not necessarily if it is the marriage/Nikah of a she-doll and he-doll as some small girls in our villages play.
Peace Mazhar,
I hope you are not mocking me.
Yes, and I believe it could take place take this way, out of respect for the first wife's relationship with her husband. The issue here is not in taking in the orphans, managing their wealth, spending on them from one's own wealth and resources, or even sharing one's inheritance with them. The issue here is the nature of the relationship. It really just boils down to the sex and romantic aspect of it. In regard to this, I have the same feelings as Dawn
What has sex and romance got to do with the ultimate goal of helping the vulnerable? For this, I don't have an answer for her or even myself. This what gnaws at my heart.
-
Salaam Released, Savage Carrot, Dawngorgeous,
My wife and I have been married for 16 years now. I have two very simple questions
WHY do I have to marry a woman (young or old) in order to help her? In other words where is the explanation (in Quran or elsewhere) given that a man cannot help a woman unless he is married to her?
WHY can't I help a woman without marrying her? The financial situation DOES NOT change if I marry her. If I choose to pay her rent or mortgage for her, pay for her weekly groceries, utility bills and give her spending money, the money I am providing her remains the same whether I marry her or not. The financial situation itself does not change. So the question that begs an answer is why I cannot do those things for her without marrying her? How does it change financially if I marry her or not? Can everyone here see how ridiculous this whole thing is?
Released, you mentioned that you cannot and will not live in a polygamous marriage. Imagine how all of the other women feel who are forced to live that way against their will. The difference between you and those other women is that you are voicing your concerns and made up your mind that you will not live that kind of life. But you have to know that you are not the only woman who feels the way you do about this issue. I have seen with my very own eyes and on numerous occasions what polygamy does to a family. I am speaking about the FIRST wife and family and how their lives were destroyed due to the man taking on another Wife (cough, cough - Sex Partner - cough, cough). All of the polygamous lifestyles I've witnessed have ended and ended very badly. One woman who was a second wife in one situation I've seen would routinely beat the crap out of the first wife and the husband did nothing about it. This second wife was quite a "Looker" compared to his first wife and she also had quite a bit of money that the husband used to finance a restaurant he opened. Hhmmmm. There was another one who was my wife's friend at the time. She was a big woman and her pathetic excuse of a husband was a little guy (who has a thing for big girls by the way) and she beat the brakes off of him when he went and got a second wife and then she left him. These are just two of many cases I have seen where polygamy is concerned.
Just because a woman who is a co-wife is silent on the situation does not mean she's happy or okay with it. Some women have no choice in the matter in a lot of so-called Muslim Countries. But I can assure you that you are not the only woman who feels the way you do about the prospects of living a polygamous life. If you can't accept if for yourself (and I bear personal witness that most women ain't feeling this crap at all) then that should be an indication that something is terribly wrong with the idea of polygamy as it has shown me that it really, really hurts people and destroy families and relationships. It is a one-sided, unfair situation which does not offer any bigger solution than the welfare system that is in place in the Progressive, non Muslim Countries.
On a related note, some people may think that the men who believe in this and promote it are not necessarily chauvinist. I beg to differ. There are many, many, many marriages out there where the woman is either the sole bread winner or brings home more bacon than the husband. I wonder how those men would react to the idea of their wives taking on additional husbands in an effort to financially assist and support them. It is my understanding (and I base this solely on observations I have made over the years) that those men who promote, support and otherwise defend the idea of polygamy do so to let their wives and other people know that they will certainly consider taking another wife if they so choose and being that a man does not have to marry a woman in order to help her makes it obvious that he is marrying her for a different reason. They see that as an option for an extra sex partner.
My message to all women reading this; Please do not fool yourselves and please do not allow these...ummm...men...fool you either.
-
Peace Damon,
I get what you're saying and agree with you for the most part. Where I have reservations in my opinions regarding what the quran might mean is where it involves different ways of doing things for different people. Meaning keeping the options open. I am loath to say "this is the only way it's meant to be" when it might not have to be.
Thanks for the anecdotes...polygyny for example in Pakistan is an option which is taken with mixed results. Some are happy with the system and some aren't depending on how it's done. I knew a lawyer who chose to be in such a relationship because the other wife couldn't have kids and they all seemed and said they were happy as much as married people can be at the end of the day to an outsider. There were other women I knew as well, one of which actually pushed her husband to do it because she couldn't take the sexual attention and just wanted the security of marriage. People are crazy. Maybe things weren't rosy and maybe they were regardless of what they said...we wouldn't really know much of the factors unless we were living it. Such a thing would always be a rarity rather than the norm given free choice imo, unless it is being forced upon the populace in the form of cultural norms/pressure/dictates by groups/men/authorities etc.
As far one of the understandings of multiple marriages in the quran goes, apparently marrying multiple women for any reason other than creating multiple families for orphans is a no no, so the above marriages shouldn't have taken place anyways.Would multiple marriages for the sake of creating real multiple families for orphans work? I don't know. I don't know of anyone who has done so. I can imagine the situation and am on the fence regarding it in theory. It could work depending on the type of people involved, the conditions and with free choice. If it doesn't, nothing stopping people from divorcing at the end of the day. So, yeah...maybe it's viable but like I said, I'd need to see realistic examples of it rather than theoretical "it's the best thing for all" or "it'll never work".
-
Peace Mazhar,
I hope you are not mocking me.
Yes, and I believe it could take place take this way, out of respect for the first wife's relationship with her husband. The issue here is not in taking in the orphans, managing their wealth, spending on them from one's own wealth and resources, or even sharing one's inheritance with them. The issue here is the nature of the relationship. It really just boils down to the sex and romantic aspect of it. In regard to this, I have the same feelings as Dawn
What has sex and romance got to do with the ultimate goal of helping the vulnerable? For this, I don't have an answer for her or even myself. This what gnaws at my heart.
No mocks, just ground realities.
Financial issues of father-orphan youngesters are dealt with separately. No denying that lot many people usurp such properties.
In Ayah under study, the apprehension is about relationship with father orphan children. It is about relational-sentiment-love-affection-attention care inequality between such and children of living fathers. Marriage which has inevitable sex aspect causes relationship of Man with womb of his wife. This helps and strenghens feelings of love and affection with her children also who were born of her earlier husband. Qur'aan tells that once intercourse is done with a woman, her daughter from first husband becomes non-permissible. If this is not done with her and she is divorced, her daughter on becoming mature remains permissible for marriage. This might indicate the delecacy of sex aspect in marriage.
-
Earthly life has its own problems and situations. One is that of pairing for sex. Husband and Wife is the ideal pair.
Problem area emerges when men die and leave behind wives--now without a male partner. Number of women increase. What could be the best solution, let them re-marry. A widow may get an unmarried man, an ideal situation for her. However, if they are larger in number, they have but to opt marry already a married man. Why would a married man like to wed with a widowed woman? Only if he is made duty-bound. So the commdanding order-ordinance obliging them for it.Paradise is something which is earned-purchased. Women win the race and get in the Paradise larger in number than the men who arrived in Paradise. What is the demand and solution of such situation.
Ordinary Men are wed with four wives. Information rather fascinating for men is that they all are made virgins when resurrected. So it is not obligation oriented but pleasure indicative.Salam Mazhar
hypno
These are typical thoughts of a man, "why would a married man to marry a widow??
---- this statement is like why should a cardealer buy a used car, if he can have one new?Apparently, in many men everything depends only on the virginity --- from where you get the information that women in paradise are created as virgins?
In the Quran it says PURE companions. - Both gender - then get the virgins also menvirgins??
The whole scenario is ridiculous - to pay for sex in heaven?We should not speculate about things, that only God knows.
My theory on this verse is that God knows exactly what is happening in the minds of most men in front of him and had to give this verse for the men as a sign that even widowed women have a right to get a loving man - for precisely that reason, because God knows that many men would equate women with used goods ....
Too bad that even men who study the Quran, have not yet grasped it...
Peace -
Apparently, in many men everything depends only on the virginity --- from where you get the information that women in paradise are created as virgins?
It is a fact that We have resurrected-revived them-the Wives, in the manner of anew creation.
Thereby, for reason We have made them virgins.They are coequal, delightful, devoted, eloquent of same species.
-
Peace Damon,
I've been reading through your post from the other thread. I've been slower than usual since I have my parents visiting and have been busy. I will post on the other thread soon, God willing.
Your post does make me think. If the idea of polygamy disturbs me as much as it does, then there must be other women out there who feel the same. Perhaps, even most women feel the same way I do? Yes, I have a platform to voice my objections, plus I live in a country where polygamy is classified as bigamy and one can be prosecuted. As a result, I'm protected by law. Of course, I believe the women can be helped in a mulititude of ways aside from remarriage. To be honest with you, I never thought of this verse in any other way. I never thought nisa could mean anything other than women. Briefly, I had come in contact with some aastana members, and instantly rejected their claims without giving it a second glance. I felt like I had made my peace with this verse when I convinced myself that it will do the orphans a lot of good. However, questions arise again. Those questions that I did not dare to ask myself.
Questions like How would the families adjust with one another? What if they all have to live in the same house; how will they cope if the first wife is under distress and her kids notice their mother's unhappiness? What has sex got to do with any of this? Can one really bear even the thought of their spouse having sexual relations with another? Why hasn't God provided more details (instructions, guidance, rules) in regard to polygamy specifically, if it's perfectly permissible? Of course, He would understand the complications of it.
I've always been open to the idea of adoption and my profession requires that I work with children who are classified as "at-risk" or "disadvantaged". I have no problem with emptying out my pockets for someone (and I'm not trying to boast about myself, but just make a point), but to share one's spouse in such a way? Dear God. I feel sick. Yes, Dawn, I'm going to be candid about it, regardless of what I told you----this is how I really feel for myself. I suppose the difference between you and I was; I was trying to somehow justify this in my head (unsuccessfully), and you are outwardly questioning it without hesitation.
Damon, I've come across some polygamy situations that were both positive and negative. The positive ones involved the cooperation of the first wife (again, something I couldn't understand, but it stems from Mormon ideology revolving around celestial wives). The negative ones involved a bunch of unhappy, depressed, and angry women that were hell bent on destroying one another. Even most Sunni and Shia women living in western countries will turn their noses up in disgust at the mentioning of polygamy. I suppose we're not so different from you men. The sectarians like to say that women are of course naturally more jealous than men, but that we're not to bothered by their grievances. I suppose the psychology of women and men is similar in that they both demand a faithful spouse. So, then, where does polygamy fit in where the expectations are the same for both sexes?
Peace Savage Carrot,
See, I see things in a similar way to you. It's like a hypothesis that has rarely been tested, if at all. I like to use the logic of "different strokes for different folks". It's very rare that men actually prefer to marry destitute women with children, when they've got their own families and responsibilities. Most single men prefer to marry single women. So, could it work? I don't know. However, I can say this much, it won't work if the first wife is completely against it. Most likely, we may see a divorce resulting from a marriage. Though, with most women I've come across, the idea of their husband having sex with other women sounds horrific.
Peace Mazhar,
Quite obviously, I have not been reading the same translation as you. Paradise is something that my mind cannot conceive since I've never seen or experienced it. Regardless of the translation, it's all allegorical to me.
The relationship of the man to the womb of his wife? What about the relationship to the womb of his first wife? Isn't that the relationship that he should focus on protecting before he approaches yet another womb? Is it not negligent to approach another womb when you are in danger of losing the one that you have made the initial oath with? Wombs aside, I am referring to women, of course.
-
Peace Mazhar,
Quite obviously, I have not been reading the same translation as you. Paradise is something that my mind cannot conceive since I've never seen or experienced it. Regardless of the translation, it's all allegorical to me.
My interest is limited to portray the thought and idea obtaining in the Arabic text of the Book by remaining nearest to the perception infolded in the individual words and their relationship with others in the sentence. I don't know what could be allegorical in the word
describing a state which is obviously a physical one. -
Salaam Savage Carrot, Released,
To be honest with you, I have no problem if anyone (male or female, young or old) believes in polygamy and/or live in a polygamous relationship. I would tell such a person (again male or female) go for it. Whatever floats your boat. I will only voice my concerns when they try to say that it is mandated in The Quran. That's when I have a problem especially when enough evidence is available that a person can combine with logic and reasoning to show that it is not in the Quran and that the MALE translators, mullahs, scholars and imams are taking advantage of the non Arabs' lack of linguistic knowledge. And the native Arabs are Blinded by Ideology and a worldview that does not resonate with The Quranic worldview. Even knowing Arabic or possibly being an Arabic expert won't help a person if his minded is clouded by ideology and thinking that The Quran is saying something that it is not saying. And they think this (Arab and Non Arab alike) because they do not practice independent thinking, question things that should be questioned, question so-called "religious authority" and investigate The Quran Themselves. Nearly the entire Muslim world is taught what The Quran says. They do not investigate The Quran themselves and they do not think for themselves. They are content with allowing "religious authorities" tell them what it says and they do not go and verify it for themselves. Parrot fashion recitation (without understanding what one is reciting) does no one any good.
-
Believing that there is no problem if anyone believes polygamous way of life and allows a desirous person to go for it, is typical traditional Mullah's ruling. It is the way to live outside the fold of the Book in the manner one feels pleasureable living of full satisfaction. Thereby, the Book has restrictive role in their lives, they accept what pleases and avoid and interpret that which does not meet their "standards" the way it suits one's desires. Jews have been doing this all along their history. Muslims are following their tradition.
Marrying widows is mandated and allowed only under emergency conditions of presence of father orphans whom society can not look after exactly in the manner father living children are looked after.
-
It is a fact that We have resurrected-revived them-the Wives, in the manner of anew creation.
Thereby, for reason We have made them virgins.They are coequal, delightful, devoted, eloquent of same species.
Salam Mazhar
if you read the Quran without the implanted Sunna Context, then you can understand this Aya really
Ba-Kaf-Ra =Beginning of the day, first part of the day, early morning, between daybreak and sunrise
Possessing the quality of applying oneself early, or in hastening,Performing something at the commencement of it, or doing something early, Before it's time, preceding or took precedence, Youthful male camel, young one of a camel
A virgin male or female, or anything untouched, new, fresh, Virginity or maidenhead
A woman or female animal having delivered only onceFirst flush of anything (plant, tree, fruit, honey, rain, flowers)
First born or young children
First of anything, unique action
A want or need seeking to be fulfilled
A cutting blow or stroke that kills at once
A pulley (e.g. of a well)
Small ring or bead
An assembly, company, congregated body
All coming together without exceptionthe main meaning is clear new, fresh, pure, how the same word can mean a
, Virginity or maidenheadOR
A woman or female animal having delivered only once[/b????? hypnoThe out of context references to these verses is unfortunately abused by both Muslims and polemics of the Quran.
Read in context and carefully analysed, one notes that there is no reference to ?Hurs? in these verses and the complete purport of the message is a reference to all of the companions of the right hand, both male and female (Those that will inherit the kingdom of heaven) (56.27). These verses inform the reader, that the people of the right hand will be recreated as a new creation (56.35) as virgins untouched (56.36) and of similar age (56.37). All this is for the people of the right hand (56.37).Let us note the verses in context.
056.027-34
?The Companions of the Right Hand,- what will be the Companions of the Right Hand? (They will be) among Lote-trees without thorns. Among tall trees with flowers (or fruits) piled one above another. In shade long-extended, By water flowing constantly, And fruit in abundance. Whose season is not limited, nor (supply) forbidden, And on Thrones (of Dignity), raised high?056.035
?Lo? We have created them a (New Creation)?
There is no support from the verse for the often mistranslations that this is referring to the virgin wives of the believing men. The verse is clear that it is dealing with the companions of the right hand and it is them that are being recreated as a new creation.056.036
?And we have made them "virgins" (Arabic Abkaran - Root BKR)?=BKR - A virgin - anything untouched, new, fresh.
056.037
Devoted (Arabic Uruban) Equal in age / well matched (Arabic Atraban)
056.038
For the companions on the right hand (Arabic Ashab-ul-ameen)complete articlehttp//quransmessage.com/articles/sexy%20female%20virgins%20for%20men%20in%20heaven%20FM3.htm
Thank you and salams