Oldest Qur?an manuscript MA VI 165
-
So, the Quran from Birmingham is the same as today? Now we have evidence that Quran never changed.
Peace, yes MA VI 165 as well (Birmingham is only two pages) which are same as today's except for verse numbering i.e. initials were not counted as separate verses and usage of alif mostly.
e.g. the other day thought there was consistency error with missing alif in 1942 said?
If we look carefully scribes had system to differentiate and applied consistently throughout manuscript...
no alif if address to one person
1942 when said to father his O father minealif if referring to many people
2152 when said to father his and folk hishttps//s27.postimg.org/wn1kjjhbn/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch19v33-v45.jpg
https//s27.postimg.org/6srrtrhbn/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch21v43-v57.jpg
-
Peace, yes MA VI 165 as well (Birmingham is only two pages) which are same as today's except for verse numbering i.e. initials were not counted as separate verses and usage of alif mostly.
No numbering, but we can still see the divisions on the pages
http//www.hazardlab.jp/contents/post_info/1/0/5/10504/quran.jpg -
No numbering, but we can still see the divisions on the pages
Peace, there was numbering i.e. dashes at end of verses and larger markings start/end of 10 verses which scribes used as reference and to keep count/checksum; although earliest manuscripts initials had no end verse marks thus not counted/combined into single verse, e.g.
191 kaaf ha ya ain saad (no end verse marks counted as one with next verse)
192 remembrance mercy lord your devotee his Zakariyyahttps//s26.postimg.org/jm1leh6p5/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch18v107-ch19v7.jpg
Here is another early 1st century AH Sana manuscript example end 9128-129 to 107
https//s26.postimg.org/qzurinuw9/Sana_Qur_an_ch9v127-ch10v7.jpg
-
Peace, a forum user noticed Tanzil web site, 9127, the word "yarakum" is spelled with 'ya' in the Uthmanic script spelling, and with an 'alif' in the simplified Imlaei script spelling and wanted to confirm with older manuscripts.
There should be no alif in 9127 yarkum/seeth you (plural) same as in examples below...
2440 yarh/seeth it
26218 yarka/seeth you (singular)https//s26.postimg.org/89glfarop/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch24v35-42.jpg
https//s26.postimg.org/ectklgskp/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch26v205-ch27v3.jpg
-
peace, thank you to Mazhar for pointing out likay l OR combined likayl
upon checking older manuscripts and usage within context...
(written as two separate words if referring to plural) OR (written as single word if referring to singular)
1670 needs to be consistent with 225 and likewise 3153 with 5723
not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(315314)
not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(57231)
3153 likay l tazan (plural)
5723 likay l tasaw (plural)not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(167011)
correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(22550)
1670 and among you whom (singular) intends to feeble the upkeep likayl
225 and among you whom (singular) intends to feeble the upkeep likayl
https//s7.postimg.org/wcrewdtqz/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch22v5-11.jpgcorrect http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(333732)
3337 likay l being upon the believers (plural) critical
https//s7.postimg.org/4qonbw5az/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch33v33-38.jpgcorrect http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(335054)
3350 likayl being upon you (singular) critical
https//s7.postimg.org/k1ygca557/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch33v50-53.jpgcorrect http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(59717)
597 kay l being circulation between the rich (plural) -
peace, correction found 1670 verse in old manuscript (Or 2165)
http//www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=or_2165_fs001r#
1670 and the god creation yours furthermore taketh of you and among you whom intends to feeble the upkeep likay/surely that may l/not knoweth after knowledge thing of indeed the god knower supreme
https//s7.postimg.org/n58ve3abf/Or_2165_Quran_manuscipt_ch16v65-75.jpg
-
Peace, a forum user noticed Tanzil web site, 9127, the word "yarakum" is spelled with 'ya' in the Uthmanic script spelling, and with an 'alif' in the simplified Imlaei script spelling and wanted to confirm with older manuscripts.
There should be no alif in 9127 ىركم yarākum/seeth you (plural) same as in examples below...
2440 ىرها yarāhā/seeth it
26218 ىرك yarāka/seeth you (singular)https//s26.postimg.org/89glfarop/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch24v35-42.jpg
https//s26.postimg.org/ectklgskp/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch26v205-ch27v3.jpg
The images are gone. You might wanna find it again.
-
peace, they're all here with other old manuscripts
https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/17/vers/36?handschrift=107
https//i.postimg.cc/RhBMNmQW/ch17v35-46.jpg
-
Thank you dear brother for the link.
