Hot/"ramadan" Answer

belH

Who said anything about no fighting? See 2217.

2217 is a fight to defend yourself, but 9-81 is an offinsive fight; thus no fight in the 4 restricted month unless for self defense purpose.

JUNE 11, 2006 (Skip as per 936)
JUNE 18, 2008 (Skip as per 936)

rotfl
You are a Cheater; do you thing God made a mistake and you are fixing by skiping? There is NO Solar Year, otherwise you will have to Cheat ;D

Now let's see you count EXACTLY 12 months every single solar year (936) according to whatever your definition of "month" is and automatically sync the timing with the seasons.

There is No Solar Year per Quran; IT IS A LUNAR YEAR brickwall

unknownuser

Peace Umm Tariq,

We look at that MARKER as the full moon, something apparent, obvious, easily seen.

As explained the moon is full momentarily at a specific time and looks full on different days with variance of .3 % lunminance. NOT easy.

Question still remains for you to prove how to 'witness' a month, with the way witness is used in the reading consistently, not mixing it's usages, considering no one knows if they will be alive the whole month to really say that they have witnessed it for sure?

2185 ...so who witnessed from you the month, so he should fast it

Who testifies/makes a conscious intention to fast the month, so he should fast it.

5111 ...they said "We believe and witness/testify with that we truly (are) submitters."

So when does this month begin?

2185 ...and who was sick or on (a) journey, so numbered/counted from other days.

Fasting is during days (dawn to sunset)

It does not say to fast a full moon which lasts a moment during days and nights.

I'm still researching the exact day to start.

unknownuser

Peace Ayman,

She would do the same thing that she does when she is counting her menstruations. Here are the choices

Stay in the bathroom all night and day and look to see if there is blood.
Wait 3 months.
None of the above. She actually counts three menstruation events in the same exact way as counting three full-moons events.

Clearly, 3 is the only correct answer.

Clearly you do not know about irregular menstruations and basic women's issues.

How can she count 3 menstruation events if she is having menstruation problems?

654 And those who became infertile from the menstruation from your women, if you became doubtful/suspicious, so their term/count (is) three months...

http//www.targetwoman.com/articles/irregular-menstrual-cycle.html

Typically a menstrual cycle ranges anywhere from 21 ? 35 days. Irregular menstrual cycle is a common complaint with about 20% of the women. Irregularity of menses can be either of short term or long term irregularity.

In rare cases, it can be as long as 40 days. Even menopause varies from woman to woman. For some, menopause doesn?t occur until they reach sixties.

Here is the count of the full moons from 2005 to 2010 (I can go as far in the past or in the future as you want)

2005 Summer Solstice

JUNE 22, 2005 (scorching full moon)
JULY 21, 2005
AUG 19, 2005
SEPT 18, 2005
OCT 17, 2005
NOV 16, 2005
DEC 15, 2005
JAN 14, 2006
FEB 13, 2006
MAR 14, 2006
APR 13, 2006
MAY 13, 2006
JUNE 11, 2006 (Skip as per 936)
2006 Summer Solstice
JULY 10, 2006 (scorching full moon)
AUG 9, 2006
SEP 7, 2006
OCT 7, 2006
NOV 5, 2006
DEC 5, 2006
JAN 3, 2007
FEB 2, 2007
MAR 3, 2007
APR 2, 2007
MAY 2, 2007
JUNE 1, 2007
Summer Solstice 2007
JUNE 30, 2007 (scorching full moon 2007)

Now let's see you count EXACTLY 12 months every single solar year (936) according to whatever your definition of "month" is and automatically sync the timing with the seasons.

1 ? 12 lunar cycle x 11 = 324.83649 days

How can you obliterate a whole month one year and not next year ? what happens to the time?

937 But the postponement an increase in the disbelief, those who disbelieved become misguided with it, they permit it a year and they forbid it a year, to agree to (the) term God prohibited...

The twelve months are continuous; no skipping or adding.

1 lunar month = 0.080852076 solar years
12 lunar month = 0.970224912 solar years

365.242199 x 19 solar years = 6 939.60178
29.53058867 x 235 lunar months = 6 939.68834

As stated earlier I'm working on it.

Peace

ayman

Peace Nun,

Clearly you do not know about irregular menstruations and basic women's issues.

Clearly you are bringing irrelevant issues to evade answering the reason for your inconsitancy.

How can she count 3 menstruation events if she is having menstruation problems?
654 And those who became infertile from the menstruation from your women, if you became doubtful/suspicious, so their term/count (is) three months...

654 is not about your irrelevant menstruation problems. It is about women who don't have menstruations all together. Hence, they have "given up" on menstruations. As I said, you are evading the issue by bringing up an irrelevant point.

1 ? 12 lunar cycle x 11 = 324.83649 days
How can you obliterate a whole month one year and not next year ? what happens to the time?

It is not my problem that you can't understand that we are counting events and not a time period.

The god told us that the "count"/"3idat" is 12 "shahr" (936) in a solar year (1712). The word "count"/"3idat" is different than "3adad"/number and the god doesn't use words haphazardly. The count is about counting. So we count exactly 12 each year and we skip counting the occasional 13th full-moon. This is what 936 is clearly saying, otherwise the god would have said the number/"3adad" is 12 and that the year is lunar.

The twelve months are continuous; no skipping or adding.

If they are continuous as you claim then they are in the billions since a few billion years have passed since the god created the heavens and the earth.

1 lunar month = 0.080852076 solar years
12 lunar month = 0.970224912 solar years
365.242199 x 19 solar years = 6 939.60178
29.53058867 x 235 lunar months = 6 939.68834

12/0.970224912 = 12.36826621 months NOT 12

So you are violating 1236-37 and instead of counting 12 as I am doing as per the god's command (which is the ONLY possible way) you are counting 12.36826621. This way you would allow the hunting restrictions to be violated. You don't believe in the hunting restrictions or in the god when he tells you that you have to count EXACTLY 12 "shahr" every year and not 12.36826621. The "restricted months" according to you will be violated every single year and not just every other year like the pagans did.

Peace,

Ayman

unknownuser

Peace Ayman,

Clearly you are bringing irrelevant issues to evade answering the reason for your inconsitancy.

654 is not about your irrelevant menstruation problems. It is about women who don't have menstruations all together. Hence, they have "given up" on menstruations. As I said, you are evading the issue by bringing up an irrelevant point.

NO, you are clearly evading the issue and not reading the verse correctly.

This same twisting fanatics use to condone sex with 9 year olds.

http//www.wikiislam.com/wiki/Pedophilia_in_the_Qur'an

654 And those who became despaired from the menstruation from your women, if you became doubtful/suspicious, so their term (is) three months, and those who did not menstruate, and of the pregnant, their term/time (is) that they give birth...

The verse covers

Those with irregular cycles, ?if you became doubtful/suspicious?
Those who do not menstruate (menopause)
Pregnant women

20% of women have irregular menstrual timing issues and are told to wait 3 months

It is not my problem that you can't understand that we are counting events and not a time period.

O? I see full moons are individual events -- what is the word for month or is there such a word in Quran?

2217 They ask you about the full moon the restricted, fighting in it...

Explain how one can fight/not fight in ?an event? of ONE full moon? How much time is that?

584 And he who finds not must fast two successive full moons...

Two successive full moon ?events? is exactly 1 lunar cycle 29.53059 days, right?

If they are continuous as you claim then they are in the billions since a few billion years have passed since the god created the heavens and the earth.

Yes a continuous count of 12...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12...

NOT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SKIP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

12/0.970224912 = 12.36826621 months NOT 12

So you are violating 1236-37 and instead of counting 12 as I am doing as per the god's command (which is the ONLY possible way) you are counting 12.36826621.

You are cheating by dropping a month.

Likewise one can also cheat by dropping .36826621

This way you would allow the hunting restrictions to be violated. You don't believe in the hunting restrictions or in the god when he tells you that you have to count EXACTLY 12 "shahr" every year and not 12.36826621. The "restricted months" according to you will be violated every single year and not just every other year like the pagans did.

52 ...when you have completed the Hajj, you are free to hunt.

I believe restriction on hunting is to preserve the game in the area during Hajj -- too many people.

Where does it say 12 months has to equal exactly a solar year?

1 lunar cycle = 29.53059 days
1 solar year = 365.242199 days

How can we have .242199 days?

I'm still researching although ruled out full moon ? it?s nonsensical.

Peace

ayman

Peace Nun,

NO, you are clearly evading the issue and not reading the verse correctly.
This same twisting fanatics use to condone sex with 9 year olds.
http//www.wikiislam.com/wiki/Pedophilia_in_the_Qur'an

It is again not my problem that you and the Christian missionaries that you are trying to apologize to are unable to read that the whole passage is talking about "nisa'a" which means women not girls. You are the only one on this thread who is talking about sex with a 9 year old. Where did you get such a perverted idea? You are obviously spending too much time reading baseless Christian missionary propaganda and it is clearly affecting your judgment. You are sounding just as pathetic and apolegetic as Sunnis who can't read the word "nisaa" because of their Hadiths which promote pedophilia.

654 And those who became despaired from the menstruation from your women, if you became doubtful/suspicious, so their term (is) three months, and those who did not menstruate, and of the pregnant, their term/time (is) that they give birth...
The verse covers

Those with irregular cycles, ?if you became doubtful/suspicious?

False. Those who have irregular cycles didn't "despair from the menstruation". They still get them no matter how irregular. When they stop getting them completely then they have despaired from getting them (gave up).

Also, besides being irrelevant since the passage is talking about "women", a 9 year old is far from "despaired". She still has a life full of menstruations to look forward to.

Those who do not menstruate (menopause)

Yes those women are the ones who have despaired of menstruations. Last I checked no woman I know ever went through menopause and then sometime later suddenly restarted to menstruate. So she has truly "despaired" given up on menstruations.

Also, the women who have some reproductive problem and therefore never menstruated do not menstruate.

Pregnant women

Last I checked no woman I know got pregnant and despaired of menstruation ever again because she was pregnant.

20% of women have irregular menstrual timing issues and are told to wait 3 months

This is your nonsensical interpretation based on your lack of understanding of the word "despaired" and preconceptions from the Hadiths.

Irregular or not irregular they are told to wait for 3 menstruations. The word "irregular" is no where to be found in any of the passages that discuss this subject. Your apolegetic attitude towards the great reading is based entirely on Sunni preconceptions from Hadiths.

O? I see full moons are individual events -- what is the word for month or is there such a word in Quran?

There is no word for "month" in the great reading. Pre-quranic inscriptions often use the words "warkh" or "yarkh" as meaning "month". For example, see "yarkh" used below

http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/raqush.html

2217 They ask you about the full moon the restricted, fighting in it...

Explain how one can fight/not fight in ?an event? of ONE full moon? How much time is that?

2217 clearly says that this event has no bearing on stopping fighting or continuing to fight.

584 And he who finds not must fast two successive full moons...
Two successive full moon ?events? is exactly 1 lunar cycle 29.53059 days, right?

You are right. Full moons occur on average every 29.53059 day. So full-moon to full-moon is either going to be 29 or 30 days (see my table above).

Yes a continuous count of 12...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12...
NOT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SKIP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

This is false. You still can't understand the difference between count and number in the great reading. There is no such thing as a continuous count of 12. In order for you to count, you have to have some set that you are counting out of. This set is the solar year. The lunar cycle is not 12 units of anything. So in a solar year as a set that you are counting out of (not absolute number), it goes like this

SUMMER SOLSTICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (SKIP) SUMMER SOLSTICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SUMMER SOLSTICE...

This naturally, automatically and effortlessly adjusts the lunar cycle to make it in sync with the seasons so that hunting restrictions are not violated.

You are cheating by dropping a month.
Likewise one can also cheat by dropping .36826621

I am not cheating. I am putting my faith in the god and listening to his advice to count EXACTLY 12 full-moons in a solar year (even when I see 13).

You can try to drop .36826621 if you want and count only 12 "months" as the god told you. However, you will end up going out of sync with the lunar cycle and now your lunar cycle will be completely disconnected from your "months". You can only count in whole integer units if you want to maintain both the lunar and solar cycles in sync. This is indisputable.

52 ...when you have completed the Hajj, you are free to hunt.

The word "hajj" doesn't occur in 52. You are conjuring up your own scripture to justify your baseless position.

I believe restriction on hunting is to preserve the game in the area during Hajj -- too many people.

Another baseless belief.

Where does it say 12 months has to equal exactly a solar year?

Months are not even mentioned in the great reading, let alone say that they are equal anything.

1 lunar cycle = 29.53059 days
1 solar year = 365.242199 days
How can we have .242199 days?

We can't. This is why the western solar calendar has a leap year every four years. Otherwise the seasons would start to slowly shift.

On the other hand 1712 clearly tells us that the counting of the years is based on the time between the solstices. This is the perfect method of counting years and it doesn't require leap years or any other manmade devices.

I'm still researching although ruled out full moon ? it?s nonsensical.

Keep researching and you will see that it is not.

Peace,

Ayman

unknownuser

Peace Ayman,

Irregular or not irregular they are told to wait for 3 menstruations. The word "irregular" is no where to be found in any of the passages that discuss this subject. Your apolegetic attitude towards the great reading is based entirely on Sunni preconceptions from Hadiths.

Please answer simple questions without inferring about my preconceptions.

654 And those who became despaired from the menstruation from your women, if you became doubtful/suspicious, so their term (is) three months, and those who did not menstruate

HOW CAN A WOMAN WITH IRREGULAR/MISSED MENTRUATIONS KNOW TO WAIT 3 MENTRUATIONS?

Mentruations are not consistent like clocks or full moons and vary depending on the individual.

Secondary amenorrhea. no periods for three to six months or longer.

http//www.mayoclinic.com/health/amenorrhea/DS00581/DSECTION=causes

Secondary amenorrhea is much more common than primary amenorrhea. Many possible causes of secondary amenorrhea exist

Breast-feeding.
Stress.
Illness.
Hormonal imbalance.
Low body weight.
Excessive exercise.
Thyroid malfunction.
Pituitary tumor.
Premature menopause.

Therefore -- they wait 3 months!

2217 clearly says that this event has no bearing on stopping fighting or continuing to fight.

What does it say then, what's the event, and how long does it last, a full moon? Translate for us...

2217 They ask you about the full moon the restricted, fighting in it, say "Fighting/killing in it...

2194 The full moon, the restricted, with the full moon, the restricted, and the God's ordered prohibitions...

So full-moon to full-moon is either going to be 29 or 30 days (see my table above).

So that makes all verses which say 4 full moons really 3 months and 1 full moon 1 day.

The word "hajj" doesn't occur in 52. You are conjuring up your own scripture to justify your baseless position.

Another baseless belief.

Like full moon?

52 But when you finish the pilgramage (lets call it the "event&quot, you may hunt

It's not baseless and has to do with logistics, 100s of thousands of people will eat every animal in the visinity.

Keep researching and you will see that it is not.

I will?

Peace

ayman

Peace Nun,

Please answer simple questions without inferring about my preconceptions.

Your preconceptions are what is driving you. Why did you mention 9 year old girls as opposed to 10 or 11? It is called preconceptions. Why can't you get your ego to admit to the indisputable fact that "nisa'a" means women and not girls? Preconceptions.

654 And those who became despaired from the menstruation from your women, if you became doubtful/suspicious, so their term (is) three months, and those who did not menstruate
HOW CAN A WOMAN WITH IRREGULAR/MISSED MENTRUATIONS KNOW TO WAIT 3 MENTRUATIONS?
Mentruations are not consistent like clocks or full moons and vary depending on the individual.
Secondary amenorrhea. no periods for three to six months or longer.
http//www.mayoclinic.com/health/amenorrhea/DS00581/DSECTION=causes
Secondary amenorrhea is much more common than primary amenorrhea. Many possible causes of secondary amenorrhea exist
Breast-feeding.
Stress.
Illness.
Hormonal imbalance.
Low body weight.
Excessive exercise.
Thyroid malfunction.
Pituitary tumor.
Premature menopause.
Therefore -- they wait 3 months!

No they don't. This is your own conjecture. The only condition for waiting three full-moons is if they despaired from menstruation. There is nothing about irregular menstrution in the passage let alone that gives them any exemption. Show me the word "irregular" in 654. So even if they get a period every three months, they still have to count them because a period every three months is not "despaired from ever mensturating again".

As for those women who never menstruated (because of a biological problem) or are pregnant, their waiting period is the gestation period.

What does it say then, what's the event, and how long does it last, a full moon? Translate for us...
2217 They ask you about the full moon the restricted, fighting in it, say "Fighting/killing in it...
2194 The full moon, the restricted, with the full moon, the restricted, and the God's ordered prohibitions...

The god tells us that we have to count 4 restricted full-moons (936). This is the same like counting menstruations. When the woman counts a menstruation she can't remarry until the three are over. How come you are smart enough to figure the waiting period according to counting the event of the menstruation but you suddenly play dumb when it comes to figuring out the restricted period according to the event of the full-moon? According to your logic, a divorcee would not marry when she gets a menstruation but she can marry between say the first and second menstruation as long as she get divorced by the second one and so on. Come on Nun, surely you are smarter than this.

So that makes all verses which say 4 full moons really 3 months and 1 full moon 1 day.

No, the full moon is a marker. It is not a continuous month or even 1 day. This is the same as three menstruations are not continuous bleeding by the woman for three months. So the restricted full moon only signals the beginning of the restricted period but the full-moon itself doesn't last the whole month. So hunting is restricted all days between it and the next restricted full moon.

Like full moon?

Blame Classical Arabic dictionaries. They clearly said that "shahr" means "full-moon" long before I was born. Maybe you think it is baseless because you believe that somehow I traveled back in time and conspired with their authors and invented this meaning.

52 But when you finish the pilgramage (lets call it the "event&quot, you may hunt
It's not baseless and has to do with logistics, 100s of thousands of people will eat every animal in the visinity.

Can you read Arabic or even a transliteration? Can you show me where the word "pilgrimage" is in 52? You are going beyond baseless. You are now inventing your own scripture that says what you like to imagine.

I will?

Yes.

Notice that you are not contesting anymore that we have to count exactly 12 full-moons (936) in a solar year (1712) to maintain the lunar cycle in sync with the seasons and not violate the hunting restrictions. It is not because you suddenly started to like me or because you want to do me a favor. It is because this amazingly simple and elegant mechanism is indisputable. The only astonishing question in my mind is how come no one thought of this before.

Peace,

Ayman

Umm_Tariq

Peace Nun,

The discussion that has ensued between me, you and Ayman has more than clarified this issue for me.

2185 ...so who witnessed from you the month, so he should fast it

Who testifies/makes a conscious intention to fast the month, so he should fast it.

5111 ...they said "We believe and witness/testify with that we truly (are) submitters."

I highlighted the key word in the verse that you bring and again, this way of using 'shaheda' is not consistent with how it's used in 2185 which is without 'that' nor 'against/upon'. Even if you are unable to read the arabic, those keys words are translated into English and this is why. The verse isn't, 'so whoever amongst you witnesses 'against/ upon' the shahr then let him fast it', NOR, 'so whoever amongst you witnesses 'that' the shahr then let him fast it'. As you see, this doesn't even make sense in English nor is it accepted since the corresponding words in arabic are not there. I gave these examples, please read them and tell me if it's allowed to interchange such verses, hence the meaning of witness?

If verses, w,y, and z used 'witness' with 'that or against' and verses t,u, and v don't, and thus they have a variance in meaning, CLEARLY, then how can you take how 'witness' is used in w, y and z and superimpose that onto t, u and v??? What you are really doing then, if you insist on looking at witness in 2185 like this, is ADDING WORDS to the god's, LAA YAJUUZ, NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THE LEAST, be warned.

Fasting is during days (dawn to sunset)

It does not say to fast a full moon which lasts a moment during days and nights.

I'm still researching the exact day to start.

This is also understood when one uses 'shahr' as 'full moon' since it's something to 'witness (see)' as a MARKER like a woman's menstruation, which is also known that you don't start and stop for the bleeding itself, but wait the whole time in between 3 menstruations.

Also, you're right, it doesn't say ONLY 'fast the 'shahr' but FIRST is the 'witnessing', 'so whoever shaheda the shahr then let him fast it'. If it only said 'fast the shahr' maybe using 'month' might have a case. However, since the 'witnessing' is mentioned, in the seeing sense (I brought my proof for this), this is the big clue for 'full moon' and against 'month'. Also, if you use, 'month', then it still needs a starting time. Most who use 'month' seem to say that the beginning is the 'new crescent', which is however not mentioned in this verse. ??? Can we just add that to the verse? Some do, I seek refuge with the god from such actions. It's also still something that needs to be 'witnessed' in the SIMPLEST sense, for those who can't calculate or don't use satellites and such. Since the god clearly says 'witness' the shahr, it must mean 'full moon', which makes sense, nothing is left out, it's a recognized arabic meaning of the word and it brings consistency in view of other verses and subjects. I am convinced walhamdulillah.

Umm Tariq

Samia

Peace truthseeker11,

I am sure Samia will give her comments and clarify this subject. Thanks to her in advance.

Salaam Tlepsh
Truthseeker is right. Adjectives in Arabic follow the noun they modify unlike Englis where they preceed it.

Tlepsh,

THis is incorrect. The root shahira means to be apparent, conspicuous, manifest, notorious notable, commonly known. The noun shahr means moon, full moon, crescent moon, or 29 Islamo-Judaic days.

The root ramada = to be constantly or intensely hot (felt internally or externally).

Haraam means forbidden, prohibited, restricted and holy.

I know that naturally you will argue me on this but I just wanted others to know that you are giving incorrect information. You can save your hands any effort if that is your intent. Secondly your defintion of shahru ramadan can be correct. But neither you nor anyone here understands Arabic grammar enough nor respects the letter of the Quran to know how some of what you claim can be understood by shahru ramadana no matter how incorrect contextually your meanings may be.

Godbless,
Anwar

Salaam Anwar
I am afraid that you too are not correct, but if we have to choose between a verbal noun and a verb as the original word/root, it will definitely be the verbal noun. Scholars of Basra have long settled this matter, arguing that the verb is dependent on time and subject (conjugation), unlike a noun/verbal noun, which is timeless and impersonal.

However, the root, literally, is three (occasionally two or four) letters that are the raw material from which new words, according to a definite pattern, can be derived such as verbs of different forms, adjectives, participles..etc. Moreover what you wrote is not a correct verb. The verb is "shahara", so no much difference between what Tlepsh or you say, since these short vowels do ot show in the root, but are just used to facilitate reading the group of three letters.

Tlepsh

Salaam Tlepsh
Truthseeker is right. Adjectives in Arabic follow the noun they modify unlike Englis where they preceed it.

Salam Samia,

Thank you for your clarification. That is right; in Arabic, the adjective follows the noun. As in ?alshahr al3eqaary?. 3eqaar defines shahr.

Here ?ramadhan? defines ?shahr?. Shahr means ?some thing obvious? and ramadhan means, ?suffering? So it is actually ?a suffering obvious thing?.

The form of ?Shahru Ramadan? is same as the form of ?Mu3allimu Saffin?

The meaning of Shahr is clear in ?alshahr al3eqaary?. I took this phrase ?alshahr al3eqaary? from one of your quotes.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Ramadhan has two primary meanings

mourning, feeling sad, suffering, bothering, concerning2. scorching heat

Lane?s Arabic English Lexicon says.

Means I was distressed and disquieted because of the thing or I grieved for it

Means He grieve for such a one

Another question to you Samia

Alhajju ashhurun ma3lumat

Please comment.
Here ?ma3lumat? defines ?ashhur?. ?Ashhurun ma3lumat? defines ?hajj?
?Ma3lumat? is the plural of ?ma3luma?, which means peace of information. Shahr means declaration as per your definition from ?alshahr al3eqaary?. Therefore ?Alhajju ashhurun ma3lumat? means Al hajj is declarations of information. Verse 2.197 continues and says ?Thus whoever decides to take the challenge in these declarations??

..

Thank you for your valuable comments.

Samia

Salaam Tlepsh

Another question to you Samia

Alhajju ashhurun ma3lumat

Please comment.
Here ma3lumat defines ashhur. Ashhurun ma3lumat defines hajj
Ma3lumat is the plural of ma3luma, which means peace of information. Shahr means declaration as per your definition from alshahr al3eqaary. Therefore Alhajju ashhurun ma3lumat means Al hajj is declarations of information. Verse 2.197 continues and says Thus whoever decides to take the challenge in these declarations

..

Thank you for your valuable comments.

This is an interesting rendition! The only problem is that "ma3luumaat" as "informations" is a modern meaning not found in any classical dictionary. "ma3luuma" means known in a definite way; known as marked, specified; and so here it is an adjective not a noun. Thus it will be the hajj is defined/marked ashhur.
The other thing is the different plurals for shahr ashhur and shuhuur. Maybe each of the two meanings of shahr is assigned a different plural. I do not know of such a rule, but there are examples.

anthonywallace

It is not my problem that you can't understand that we are counting events and not a time period.

The god told us that the "count"/"3idat" is 12 "shahr" (936) in a solar year (1712). The word "count"/"3idat" is different than "3adad"/number and the god doesn't use words haphazardly. The count is about counting. So we count exactly 12 each year and we skip counting the occasional 13th full-moon. This is what 936 is clearly saying, otherwise the god would have said the number/"3adad" is 12 and that the year is lunar.

12/0.970224912 = 12.36826621 months NOT 12

So you are violating 1236-37 and instead of counting 12 as I am doing as per the god's command (which is the ONLY possible way) you are counting 12.36826621. This way you would allow the hunting restrictions to be violated. You don't believe in the hunting restrictions or in the god when he tells you that you have to count EXACTLY 12 "shahr" every year and not 12.36826621. The "restricted months" according to you will be violated every single year and not just every other year like the pagans did.

Peace,

Ayman

Peace Ayman

So is this how the additional month is used, by not droping the . 37 ( the . 37 is almost 50% ( nearly half a month), thus every other year it would add up to close to a month ( the additional month/ or 13 months in one year )... If I am understandin this correctly. I dont know. And how do we only count 12 months and drop the .37

And I would like some straight answers from you... And not no too long explanations...If you can, tell me what is is that you are trying to say in a couple sentances....I know we learn by reading, but I dont like reading long posts and dont be havin the paitience especially with no proofs. And bring your proofs. Gather all your evedences together. Do this for me.( quranic evedence or the previous Scripyure, or some real facts, about your claims. And we take it from there.

peace

Tlepsh

Salaam Tlepsh

This is an interesting rendition! The only problem is that "ma3luumaat" as "informations" is a modern meaning not found in any classical dictionary. "ma3luuma" means known in a definite way; known as marked, specified; and so here it is an adjective not a noun. Thus it will be the hajj is defined/marked ashhur.
The other thing is the different plurals for shahr ashhur and shuhuur. Maybe each of the two meanings of shahr is assigned a different plural. I do not know of such a rule, but there are examples.

Salam Samia,

The plurals for shahr ashhur and shuhuur

Ashhur is mentioned in verses 2.197, 2.226, 2.234, 9.2, 9.5, and 65.4

Shuhuur is mentioned only once and it is in verse 9.36.

9.36

9.36 The count of the months with God is twelve months in God?s record the day He created the heavens and the Earth; four of them are restricted. This is the correct system; so do not wrong yourselves in them; and fight those who set up partners collectively as they fight you collectively. And know that God is with the righteous.

The above translation is from Progressive Muslims.
Here "3iddat? is translated to be ?count?. Mr. Ayman translates it to be ?count? too.

In Lanes Lexicon, it is as follows

3idda = a number collected together; a number collectively. You say ?raaytu 3iddata rijalin? I saw a number of men collected together.

It is very clear that ?3iddat? when used before a plural noun such as ?rijal? or ?shuhuur? it means ?a group of? or ?a collection of? or ?a number of? not ?the count?. For example (a group / a collection / a number) of men or (a group / a collection / a number) of shuhuur.

In the above translation it says ?four of them are restricted,? God says ?minha arba3atun hurum?
Minha does not mean ?from them? but means ?from it?. ?Minha? is singular because it represents a ?collection of shuhuur? which is singular.

This ?collection of shuhuur? is the correct system (deen al-qayyim) of God and it is in his record since he created the heavens and earth. This collection (system) is composed of twelve shuhuur. Four of it are hurum (forbidden, unlawful).

The system of God is ?sunnatullah?. There is no change in sunnatullah as in 33.62.
The question is
Is the collection of shuhuur the sunnatullah composed of twelve declarations of which four is forbidden such as ?shirk?, ?killing a self unlawfully?, ?fowahish? and ?taking orphan?s money??

Please compare ?alshahr al3eqaary? to ?alshahr alharam?

Please comment. Thank you.

unknownuser

Peace Umm,

If verses, w,y, and z used 'witness' with 'that or against' and verses t,u, and v don't, and thus they have a variance in meaning, CLEARLY, then how can you take how 'witness' is used in w, y and z and superimpose that onto t, u and v??? What you are really doing then, if you insist on looking at witness in 2185 like this, is ADDING WORDS to the god's, LAA YAJUUZ, NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THE LEAST, be warned.

Please write clearly and logically not in garbled cryptology.

Example...

2185...so who witnessed from you the full moon, so he should fast it...

How do we fast the full moon?

Peace Ayman,

Your preconceptions are what is driving you. Why did you mention 9 year old girls as opposed to 10 or 11? It is called preconceptions. Why can't you get your ego to admit to the indisputable fact that "nisa'a" means women and not girls? Preconceptions.

This is what I wrote...

This same twisting fanatics use to condone sex with 9 year olds.

Why do you preconceive I agree with FANATICS who twist verses?
Of course the verse is about woman; one can only divorce a woman.

So even if they get a period every three months, they still have to count them because a period every three months is not "despaired from ever mensturating again".

You completely missed it!

Waalla-ee ya-isna mina almaheedi min nisa-ikum ini irtabtum faAAiddatuhunna thalathatu ashhurin waalla-ee lam yahidna waolatu al-ahmali ajaluhunna an yadaAAna hamlahunna waman yattaqi Allaha yajAAal lahu min amrihi yusran

654 And those (F) who became infertile/despaired from the menstruation from your women, if you became doubtful/suspicious, so their term/count (is) three months, and those (F) who did not menstruate, and (those) of the pregnant...

How many ?and those? (waalla-ee) are in the above verse?
How many different groups of women?

According to you (women who do not menstrate)...
IF divorced day before a full moon she waits 2 months
IF divorced day after a full moon she waits 3 months

How can the same woman wait 2 or 3 months?

According to you how long should women with irregular menses wait...

IF menses is every 3 to 5 weeks?

92 So travel in the earth four full moons
IF day before a full moon 3 months
IF day after a full moon 4 months

How absurd contradictive and inconsistent.

Blame Classical Arabic dictionaries. They clearly said that "shahr" means "full-moon" long before I was born.

What else do they say "shahr" means?

You are now inventing your own scripture that says what you like to imagine.

Exactly describes the "fantasies" you love to imagine.

Notice that you are not contesting anymore that we have to count exactly 12 full-moons (936) in a solar year (1712) to maintain the lunar cycle in sync with the seasons and not violate the hunting restrictions. It is not because you suddenly started to like me or because you want to do me a favor. It is because this amazingly simple and elegant mechanism is indisputable. The only astonishing question in my mind is how come no one thought of this before.

There you go presuming again. You are right; futile to discuss any longer.

Full moon, so nonsensical -- who wouda thunk it!

Peace

ayman

Peace Tlepsh,

In Lanes Lexicon, it is as follows
3idda = a number collected together; a number collectively. You say ?raaytu 3iddata rijalin? I saw a number of men collected together.

What does Lane say about "3iddat AL-rijjal", if anything?

Can you tell Samia, Truthseeker and me what you think the difference is between "3iddat AL-shuhoor" and "3iddat shuhoor"?

Peace,

Ayman

ayman

Peace Anthony,

So is this how the additional month is used, by not droping the . 37 ( the . 37 is almost 50% ( nearly half a month), thus every other year it would add up to close to a month ( the additional month/ or 13 months in one year )... If I am understandin this correctly. I dont know. And how do we only count 12 months and drop the .37

If you count "months" then things will never add up. If you drop .37 then you are out of sync with the lunar cycle and your "months" are not based on the moon anymore. The .37 is almost .33 or 1/3 of a lunar month NOT half. So to add up to a whole of a month you would need to intercalate every three years (not every other year). However, even this will be inacurate over a longer period since it is .37 and not .33 so you will eventually be out of sync again. More importantly, you would be violating 936 TWO out of THREE years (where you are counting 12.37 "months" until you accumulate the approximate "1" in year 3).

THE ONLY WAY you can have a solar year with a lunar cycle that is in sync with the seasons is if you count EXACTLY 12 full-moons EVERY SINGLE year (936) and not "months". It is amazingly simple. Please see my earlier post above where I list the actual full-moons from 2005-2010 and see how simple it is to count 12 full-moons every single year and automatically sync with the solar year as per 936 and 1712

http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9188.msg178453#msg178453

And I would like some straight answers from you... And not no too long explanations...If you can, tell me what is is that you are trying to say in a couple sentances....I know we learn by reading, but I dont like reading long posts and dont be havin the paitience especially with no proofs. And bring your proofs. Gather all your evedences together. Do this for me.( quranic evedence or the previous Scripyure, or some real facts, about your claims. And we take it from there.

If you are looking for real facts without much reading then see the real full-moons from 2005-2010 here and see how based on 936 and 1712 the lunar cycle is perfectly in sync with the seasons

http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9188.msg178453#msg178453

I hope this helps.

Peace,

Ayman

Samia

Salaam Tlepsh

Thank you for bringing up this difference in the two ways "3idda" is used. I think it will help know the difference between "ashhur" and "shuhuur".

First of all, 3idda is a verbal noun ( ) of the verb "3adda" which means to count.
There's a difference in meaning between "3iddat rijaal" and "3iddat ar-rijaal" where the second part of the construction is definite or indefinite (rijaal and arrijaal). The first means "a counted number of men" and the second means "the count of men". Notice how one construction is indefinite and the other is definite as a whole.

Analogically, we say "3iddata ashhur" meaning a counted amount/number (usually not a big number) of ashhur, and "3iddatul shuhuur" which means the count of shuhuur. I can say that I understand from these two differences that shuhuur is of a bigger amount than ashhur, or shuhuur is the collective plural, whereas ashhur is a countable plural. Example of "baqara a cow" From 3 to ten cows we say "baqaraat", but we also have the collective plural "baqar" without a definite count/amount/number.

Minha It can correctly mean "from them" if it refers to non-human plural. The plural of non humans is treated like a singular feminine according to the Arabic rules. But you are also right, if we consider that the pronoun refers to the "3idda" counting four restricted ashhur out of the count of shuhuur.

I would not say "aldeenul qayyem" is the same as "sunnatullaah"

Please compare ?alshahr al3eqaary? to ?alshahr alharam?

Only when "shahr" is in the singular. When it's "ashhur" or "shuhuur", it can only mean full moon.

truthseeker11

Peace everyone,

I think there is a misunderstanding of 654. It is describing two categories of women, not three.

A woman who has been menstruating before and stopped menstruating (secondary amenorrhea) could be for two reasons

Pregnancy
Reasons other than pregnancy

The first interim (3 full-moons) is for women who stopped menstruating but there is doubt whether they are pregnant or not. They will wait for 3 full-moons before divorce is finalized.

The second interim is for women who have stopped menstruating because of pregnancy, i.e. they definitely know they are pregnant. Their interim is until they give birth.

654 As for the women who have despaired from menstruation, if you have any doubts, their interim shall be three months. And for those whose menstruation has ceased, and those who are pregnant, their interim is until they give birth. And anyone who reverences God, He makes his matters easy for him.

If "those whose menstruation has ceased" is a group separate from "those who are pregnant", then it would lead to the nonsensical interpretation that those who are not menstruating without being pregnant will wait until they give birth ??? "Wa" in Arabic does not always separate two different categories but can also link two attributes of the same category. The context will clarify the usage.

The above bolded part is referring to the same category, i.e. women who have stopped menstruating because of pregnancy. It should be read as "those whose menstruation has ceased THAT IS those who are pregnant".

Umm_Tariq

Peace Nun,

Sorry if it was over simplified for you.

If verses, w,y, and z used 'witness' with 'that or against' and verses t,u, and v don't, and thus they have a variance in meaning, CLEARLY, then how can you take how 'witness' is used in w, y and z and superimpose that onto t, u and v??? What you are really doing then, if you insist on looking at witness in 2185 like this, is ADDING WORDS to the god's, LAA YAJUUZ, NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THE LEAST, be warned.

Here it is again

If several verses use the verb 'witness' with the words, 'that or against' and other verses use 'witness' without 'that or against', which shows a difference in meaning, then how can you take 'witness' as used in the verses with the additional 'that or against' and superimpose that meaning onto verses that use 'witness' without 'that or against???
For example, some verses say 'bear witness against (something)', OR, 'bear witness that (such and such)'. In verse 2185 and those similar it's just 'witness (as in seeing) something'. Please tell me that you see the difference. If you insist on looking at 'witness (as in seeing) something' as in 2185 the same as it's used in the first examples, with an additional 'that' or 'against', then you are ADDING WORDS to the god's! I hope this is clear enough now. If you claim that what you are doing is allowed, to interchange the usage of this word as you feel like, then prove it with the god's book. As for now, His words are refuting you.

As far as how to fast a full moon, we've shown what is meant and I can't be anymore clear. If you can't understand this, then ask yourself how does a woman wait 3 menstrual cycles when they start and stop as well? I hope that you can understand what it means to use a MARKER for a starting period and ending period and you are not just being stubborn about this.

Umm Tariq