Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Wikipedia Quranism Page Vandalized

Wikipedia Quranism Page Vandalized

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
24 Posts 8 Posters 853 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reel
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Salaam MOF, most am aware of do not consider alcohol to be permissible. Besides, why would a Quranist start with alcohol of all subjects to introduce himself?

    That first paragraph gave away the writer completely. It appear the intent was to discourage the Muslim reader from inquiring further about Quranism. To state that we consider hadith, sunnah, madhab and sharia to be just "lies" undermines and oversimplify our discourse and renders us blind rejectors. I don't think a 'Quranist' will write such.

    Thanks Neptin for the explanation about alcohol. I was having trouble putting it into words. Alcohol shouldn't be the main concern. Hence, it shouldn't be in the table.

    Thanks MOF,
    I suppose someone is keeping an eye on that page. It seems to still have the disinfo.

    Dressing like a robber is out? No!

    rotfl

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Man_of_Faith
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Yes. Someone changed the information I changed back to the previous disinformation.

      But it appears that Wikipedia did revert back to a previous state and no one wrote again.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        reel
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Then I suppose waiting would be necessary.

        But once again, thank you for the work.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Offline
          R Offline
          reel
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Update Someone finally took care of the wiki page. That table is not there anymore.
          Thanks to the person who did it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Users