Who build "Masjdid Al Aqsa"? And who build "Masjid Al Haraam"?
-
Peace Layth.
Thank you for explaining your view.I believe that it was not a physical journey.
While The physical body of the prophet was asleep, the real person(soul) made the journey by GOD s leave. That makes more sense to me and explains the possible scenario of the travel undertaken by the prophet.The death of Jesus was similar , the body underwent the persecution/crucifixion, while the real person (the soul of Jesus) was taken up by GOD
Thank you and GOD bless you.
Peace.Peace,
I think this is the most logical definition, although again, only God knows.
also in regards to Anoushirvan, and your post on the possibility of al-masjid al-aqsa actualy being Al-Masjid Al-Afdha, this certainly seems possible, as i understand you are correct, and and originaly were not dotted, and for all purposes looked exactly the same, so there could be a misinterpretation, this should definately be investigated further to see if it is a possible fit for usage in the quran. Alhamdullilah for sharing.
Peace, and Gods mercy be with you all
-
Peace,
I think this is the most logical definition, although again, only God knows.
also in regards to Anoushirvan, and your post on the possibility of al-masjid al-aqsa actualy being Al-Masjid Al-Afdha, this certainly seems possible, as i understand you are correct, and and originaly were not dotted, and for all purposes looked exactly the same, so there could be a misinterpretation, this should definately be investigated further to see if it is a possible fit for usage in the quran. Alhamdullilah for sharing.
Peace, and Gods mercy be with you all
Removing dot's is not a smart idea?
We got the Quran and we know what the Quran is, verse by verse if we try to uphold it. If someone plays with it, the whole world knows what is being played with.
-
Removing dot's is not a smart idea?
The oldest Qur'an manuscripts (e.g. Sana'a) we have don't have dots on the letters, or they have clearly been added later (red dots and black letters).
The Sana'a manuscripts may be even older that the al-Masjid al-Aqsa in Jerusalem.And these manuscripts exhibit some verses that are partially different from those we know today, although their overall meaning is not very different.
We got the Quran and we know what the Quran is, verse by verse if we try to uphold it. If someone plays with it, the whole world knows what is being played with.
Well, the version of Qur'an we know today dates back from 1923 in Egypt and it was not done w.r.t. any historical account of Quranic manuscripts.
So less than 100 years ago, it was still possible to create one's own version of Qur'an.
But nobody dares to question that version now. -
The oldest Qur'an manuscripts (e.g. Sana'a) we have don't have dots on the letters, or they have clearly been added later (red dots and black letters).
The Sana'a manuscripts may be even older that the al-Masjid al-Aqsa in Jerusalem.And these manuscripts exhibit some verses that are partially different from those we know today, although their overall meaning is not very different.
Well, the version of Qur'an we know today dates back from 1923 in Egypt and it was not done w.r.t. any historical account of Quranic manuscripts.
So less than 100 years ago, it was still possible to create one's own version of Qur'an.
But nobody dares to question that version now."Although their overall meaning is not very different.."
So it comes to guesswork then?
-
"Although their overall meaning is not very different.."
So it comes to guesswork then?
https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sana%27a_manuscript#Variants
-
https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sana%27a_manuscript#Variants
References
Sadeghi, Behnam; Goudarzi, Mohsen (2012). "an?? 1 and the Origins of the Qur?n". Der Islam 87 (1-2) 1?129. doi10.1515/islam-2011-0025. Cite uses deprecated parameter |coauthors= (help)
Sadeghi, Behnam; Bergmann, Uwe (2010). "The Codex of a Companion of the Prophet and the Qurn of the Prophet". Arabica 57 (4) 343?436. doi10.1163/157005810X504518. Cite uses deprecated parameter |coauthors= (help)
Puin, Elisabeth (2011). "Ein fr?her Koranpalimpsest aus an'' (DAM 01-27.1) ? Teil IV". Die Entstehung einer Weltreligion II. Hans Schiller. ISBN 3899303458.
Puin, Elisabeth (2010). "Ein fr?her Koranpalimpsest aus an'' (DAM 01-27.1) Teil III Ein nicht-?umnischer Koran". Die Entstehung einer Weltreligion I von der koranischen Bewegung zum Fr?hislam. Hans Schiller. ISBN 3899303180.
Puin, Elisabeth (2009). "Ein fr?her Koranpalimpsest aus an'' (DAM 01-27.1) Teil II". Vom Koran zum Islam. Hans Schiller. ISBN 3899302699.
Puin, Elisabeth (200. "Ein fr?her Koranpalimpsest aus an'' (DAM 01-27.1)". Schlaglichter Die beiden ersten islamischen Jahrhunderte. Hans Schiller. ISBN 3899302249.
Hamdoun, Razan Ghassan (2004). The Qur'nic Manuscripts In an'' From The First Century Hijra And The Preservation Of The Qur'n.
Taher, Abul (2000-08-0. "Querying the Koran". Guardian. Retrieved 2014-11-25.
Lang, Jeffrey (2000). "Response on the article "What is the Koran"". The Atlantic Monthly. Archived from the original on March 1, 2001. Retrieved 2014-11-25.
Lester, Toby (1999-01-01). "What is the Koran?". The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved 2014-11-25.Have you confirmed all these references one by one, before trowing with a webpage which can be edited by everyone in the world. Including the biggest enemies of the Quran?
-
Have you confirmed all these references one by one, before trowing with a webpage which can be edited by everyone in the world. Including the biggest enemies of the Quran?
Being an enemy of the Qur'an is a subjective appreciation, I am certainly one of them by the standards of some FM members.
So I don't work on this basis, but on scientific theory corroboration/refutation process basis. I am not aware of any refutation of what is written on the page I cited. But if someone is aware this scholar work has found any refutation, I would be happy to hear of it.
-
Being an enemy of the Qur'an is a subjective appreciation, I am certainly one of them by the standards of some FM members.
So I don't work on this basis, but on scientific theory corroboration/refutation process basis. I am not aware of any refutation of what is written on the page I cited. But if someone is aware this scholar work has found any refutation, I would be happy to hear of it.
Yes, that's what i want.
Belief that is based upon Truth.
Not some guesswork that is attributed to the Prophet by people who didn't have that authority.
I hope you have researched all the references, because you have said now that you are not aware of this scholar work having any refutation.
And doesn't the Quran teach us to uphold something after having researched it?
So that's what i am trying to do at the moment. Maybe i am a little angry, but it's not easy to do that research. It's very easy to just swallow what is being told and follow that blindly.
-
without research nobody can attain truth behind the cover...
thats what abraham did, blind faith hold no water in the religion of submission to God... and moreover all religions are titles , submission to God alone is real mission...