Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. AlFathia

AlFathia

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
303 Posts 10 Posters 20.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • The_SardarT Offline
    The_SardarT Offline
    The_Sardar
    wrote on last edited by
    #154

    All current translation of Quran that everbody calls as the real Quran or word of god is based upon hearsay.

    I am not quite sure of that. I have never seen anyone say that their translation is the 100% correct.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      bkanwar2
      wrote on last edited by
      #155

      I am not quite sure of that. I have never seen anyone say that their translation is the 100% correct.

      First of all for traditional translations there is only one mother translation by Tabari, which is all hearsay based. All other translations are improvement with some changes of words used.

      Please share one translators name with his admission that his translation is not correct? Yes, I mean translation and not exegesis or tafseer.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • The_SardarT Offline
        The_SardarT Offline
        The_Sardar
        wrote on last edited by
        #156

        First of all for traditional translations there is only one mother translation by Tabari, which is all hearsay based. All other translations are improvement with some changes of words used.

        Please share one translators name with his admission that his translation is not correct? Yes, I mean translation and not exegesis or tafseer.

        Who is Tabari? Edit Nevermind i found a link about him https//en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Tabari Bold I don't know if you misread my last comment, i didn't say that the person saying their translation is correct, i said that i have never seen person saying that their translation is 100% correct. Unless i misread you then apologies for that.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          bkanwar2
          wrote on last edited by
          #157

          Who is Tabari? Bold I don't know if you misread my last comment, i didn't say that the person saying their translation is correct, i said that i have never seen person saying that their translation is 100% correct.

          So you don't think that current Quran is correct and it has errors? So if this is the case, how could it could be the words of god?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            bkanwar2
            wrote on last edited by
            #158

            You're wrong including about me. I'm not basing anything on any traditional interpretation.

            1.2. The letters Alef Lam Lam Heh are correct.

            Do you agree every Arabic word has a root? What is the root for these letters? Based upon any such root what is the meaning?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • The_SardarT Offline
              The_SardarT Offline
              The_Sardar
              wrote on last edited by
              #159

              So you don't think that current Quran is correct and it has errors? So if this is the case, how could it could be the words of god?

              Again i never said that. I was just showing Noon's post about the Birmingham manuscript.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                bkanwar2
                wrote on last edited by
                #160

                Again i never said that. I was just showing Noon's post about the Birmingham manuscript.

                What are you trying to say? When you says something is not 100% correct, doesn't it imply that it has some errors?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • The_SardarT Offline
                  The_SardarT Offline
                  The_Sardar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #161

                  What are you trying to say? When you says something is not 100% correct, doesn't it imply that it has some errors?

                  I was trying to say that i have not seen anyone saying that their translation is 100% correct. See my previous reply.

                  I am not quite sure of that. I have never seen anyone say that their translation is the 100% correct.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • The_SardarT Offline
                    The_SardarT Offline
                    The_Sardar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #162

                    Although i should have added that the reason they say that because they are trying to be unbiased. So my fault on being vague.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Offline
                      B Offline
                      bkanwar2
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #163

                      I was trying to say that i have not seen anyone saying that their translation is 100% correct. See my previous reply.

                      Who is "their" in your sentence? Are you referring to translators themselves as their? Or you are implying by saying "not seen anyone" (not a single person), saying that their (translators) translation is 100% correct?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • The_SardarT Offline
                        The_SardarT Offline
                        The_Sardar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #164

                        Who is "their" in your sentence? Are you referring to translators themselves as their? Or you are implying by saying "not seen anyone" (not a single person), saying that their (translators) translation is 100% correct?

                        If you want to be specific on "their" i am referring to Wakas, Noon, Mazhar, Manny_E, Mughal1 and a youtuber known as Quran Centric (He is Yousef Shaer in this forum https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9606314.msg348017#msg348017) I have not seen them saying their translation is without mistake. I hope this has answered your question.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          bkanwar2
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #165

                          If you want to be specific on "their" i am referring to Wakas, Noon, Mazhar, Manny_E, Mughal1 and a youtuber known as Quran Centric (He is Yousef Shaer in this forum https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9606314.msg348017#msg348017) I have not seen them saying their translation is without mistake. I hope this has answered your question.

                          If the current accepted Quran's translation/understanding is god's word and free of all errors. Why all these folks are translating it again? Did you ask them this, why are you all doing your own translations?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • The_SardarT Offline
                            The_SardarT Offline
                            The_Sardar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #166

                            If the current accepted Quran's translation/understanding is god's word and free of all errors. Why all these folks are translating it again? Did you ask them this, why are you all doing your own translations?

                            Because they are trying to uncover the traditional mistranslations like for example the so-called "hand cutting verse" Check this forum post https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9608169.msg382141#msg382141

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • The_SardarT Offline
                              The_SardarT Offline
                              The_Sardar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #167

                              I really hope we are not going off topic because this post is about AlFathia.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                bkanwar2
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #168

                                Because they are trying to uncover the traditional mistranslations like for example the so-called "hand cutting verse" Check this forum post https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9608169.msg382141#msg382141

                                So if the previous translators were able to introduce few new meanings? Why not more or all of it? This is exactly the point, I am highlighting by translating and showing linguistic rules for the translating. You can't cover up a stinking shit but spraying the perfume. You need to let all that shit go or it will keep stinking again and again. Which it has been for over 1200 years now.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • The_SardarT Offline
                                  The_SardarT Offline
                                  The_Sardar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #169

                                  So if the previous translators were able to introduce few new meanings? Why not more or all of it? This is exactly the point, I am highlighting by translating and showing linguistic rules for the translating. You can't cover up a stinking shit but spraying the perfume. You need to let all that shit go or it will keep stinking again and again. Which it has been for over 1200 years now.

                                  Woah. That is very unlike you because i have never seen you like that at all. And what do you mean a few? If you have checking other posts like Road of the Patriarch & The Search for Muhammad has Ended by brother Pazuzu. (https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9603245.0 https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9603126.0) There is more like these in this forum. I have seen a good bit of it and i am sure there are more of this. I hope you will be in a better mood because i think you may not have a good day.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    bkanwar2
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #170

                                    is a derivative used in , but you seem to have problems with linguistic comprehension because I've given you the answer. is grammatical and based on the letters which used to be words in themselves once upon a time. I said that is basically 4 different words in one, but morphologically and from grammatical semantics it is + + which is AL - LA - HEH in pronunciation, and this isn't even close to a traditional understanding and I'd be hearing cursing Muslims if I told that openly

                                    Manny, truth and knowledge needs above anything. No fear of any loss should impede one from it. I will leave you to ponder at this.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • The_SardarT Offline
                                      The_SardarT Offline
                                      The_Sardar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #171

                                      Manny, truth and knowledge needs above anything. No fear of any loss should impede one from it. I will leave you to ponder at this.

                                      On that i agree.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        bkanwar2
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #172

                                        Woah. That is very unlike you because i have never seen you like that at all. And what do you mean a few? If you have checking other posts like Road of the Patriarch & The Search for Muhammad has Ended by brother Pazuzu. (https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9603245.0 https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9603126.0) There is more like these in this forum. I have seen a good bit of it and i am sure there are more of this. I hope you will be in a better mood because i think you may not have a good day.

                                        Sardar, I mean every single word of it. I have spend 14 years of my life on it. I have been swimming against the stream during these years. Everyone, keeps asking me why do you continue to try translating Quran. The only reason is that the concepts of real Quran has potential of solving humanity's all illness. Only if we can clean all the shit they immersed on it. It is time to accept the mistakes of our ancestors. It is also okay to say they made mistakes and they were wrong. Based upon there mistake we have been wrong so far. But here is the pristine constitution that we followed before and here we bring it back by rejecting all that religious shit in the name of Islam has been heaped upon us for centuries. I can see this time is around the corner.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_Sardar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #173

                                          Sardar, I mean every single word of it. I have spend 14 years of my life on it. I have been swimming against the stream during these years. Everyone, keeps asking me why do you continue to try translating Quran. The only reason is that the concepts of real Quran has potential of solving humanity's all illness. Only if we can clean all the shit they immersed on it. It is time to accept the mistakes of our ancestors. It is also okay to say they made mistakes and they were wrong. Based upon there mistake we have been wrong so far. But here is the pristine constitution that we followed before and here we bring it back by rejecting all that religious shit in the name of Islam has been heaped upon us for centuries. I can see this time is around the corner.

                                          Bold 1 Well on this forum i haven't seen anyone asked that as of now. Bold 2 On that i agree, in fact i never denied of our ancestors mistakes. I agree that Islam is not a religion and not made up rituals. However i have not seen a verse saying anything against religion although Allah does criticizes ancestral tradition.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users