Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Hafs or Warsh

Hafs or Warsh

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
99 Posts 7 Posters 3.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    imrankhawaja
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @ sister huruf

    calculations and mathematics is a fact and yeh God is the creator of mathematics and the formulas of all mathematical issues are generated by God for humans.

    But in all of it we need to understand the math of God is not = math of human
    when the followers of RK will understand this thing they will understand the real math

    so i agree with you the math of God is not only in quran but in everyfield of life math and calculations exist example if you try to built a building with wrong calculation the building will fell down same thing happen with the code believers prophet rk his wrong math took his life what a poor boy lol.

    about the versions of quran even the article on freeminds got discrepencies in it the first time i read the hafs/warsh bullshit i lost my interest in it coz he was saying the numbered bismillah is the method of checkin its hafs or warsh. but to b honest the person research is weak in very fields like we already knows the earliest manuscripts proved therez nothing like numbering and vocal and chap names there. so again i ll say bring all versions and see the difference in words and meanings and then compare all of them together to see how many different qurans we have. and if u add all those later version by diff publishers u ll have atleast 10000 versions ( but from one speech) who claimed to have that speech from the creator of universe.

    @ GL you need to read three four times to really understand what i was on about

    about real quran and real human we go back to time to see things how they get evolved.
    you are asking me about original copy sorry to say i dnt have an access to God supercomputer where that copy is saved in whatever language or communications style.

    about this quran what we reading today generated from a speech not from numbers so speech is to consider while finding a difference not numbers.

    now you tell me by erasing some parts of speech adding numbers in to make a statement on the behalf of secondary sources makes a quran original ?

    see my two years old post in which i told u how things get evolve quran also evolved by man made things and these man made made things are for every individual

    even in school we provided by a same book but every student book is different than others by their own addings and highlighting with the help of pencil/pen to make that book understand.

    silly questions always generate silly answers
    all code beleivers answers about real math is silly and their questions are silly too which make a real mathematician feel funny same what i feel.

    the only question from me is why your prophet(rk)never knew all aspects of his own miracle muscle and he change his pattern consistently.

    example look what he did with algebra elektro hail rotfl yay

    double multiple of 19 AKA square of 19 hahaha to fit the calaculation in a way he wanted wtf hahahaha

    he raped algebra by his stupidity

    God bless you always.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      good_logic
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      Imran. I understand you The number composition gets on your nerve.

      But I disagree with you. I do not follow RK or any human. I am checking everything myself.

      May be your maths is so advanced you probably think I will not understand it since you have not provided it.

      All I have seen in your posts is your opinion agreeing with others . Does that mean you follow others?

      I hope you see what I am saying to you also.
      GOD bless you.
      Peace.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H Offline
        H Offline
        huruf
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        There is proverb, portuguese, I think, which says

        God writes straight with twisted lines

        Which I find it is another way of saying "everything is for good", even bad is for good, it depends on what we do with it.

        And there is also a sufi tale whcih says a cheikh told a disciple to take a formidable stone and put it on the top of the mountain close by.

        Years spent the disciple and did not get the damned stone even beyond close to the bottom and he complained the cheikh about his powerlessness to do what he was told.

        The cheikh smiled (the bastard) and retorted
        And who needs that stone on top of that mountain? Nobody,
        But look at yourself, you were flimsy, without any stamina, no muscle no nothing. And look at yourself, you are strong, capable, disciplined, master of yourself...
        There is your mountain which you have conquered.

        More or less, that is the gist of it.

        Everything is for good. Even the useless is for good. Even mistakes are for good. We may be wrong but those wrongs are always the opportunity for something right we had not even imagined. Everywhere is God's kingdom, there is no where that it is not God's kingdom. Wherever we turn there is the face of God. God is the master teacher and wonder worker and shower.

        We should not refrain from doing what we consider a good idea for fear of not being right. We will get something right even if it is not what we expected. Those are the gifts of God for our trust in life, in existence, in the ONE MIRACLE which is everything.

        So numbers may be wrong, may be right, may be both, but if we trust that numbers will bring us something, God will give us our numbers, the lucky ones for us.

        Subhanallah and alhamdulillah

        Salaam

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          imrankhawaja
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          example look what he did with algebra

          @ GL

          please before passing the statements we should always look at the facts in hand
          i provide you something but i feel u dnt have any answer for that or you dnt know real algebra?

          thats why i already gave u hint in advance to read my posts three four times.

          thats why i said ?couple of years ago the debates were atleast worthy to read but now a days it looks funny. ?

          God bless you

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            imrankhawaja
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            So numbers may be wrong, may be right, may be both, but if we trust that numbers will bring us something, God will give us our numbers, the lucky ones for us.

            Subhanallah and alhamdulillah

            Salaam

            salam habibti, subhanAllah and mashAllah on your purposeful and meaningful words a lot for people who can ponder on every aspect of issue.

            i see people who ask questions about number 19 they ask about what Good a number 19 can possibly bring ? any benefit ?

            they dnt have the answer apart from same beating around the bush thats y i m bored to be honest.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Offline
              G Offline
              good_logic
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              Peace Imran.
              What benefit code 19 brought? I see you want an answer to this question!

              You have to specify then?
              Benefit to the soul? benefit to the mind? benefit to enjoy this life? benefit to salvation? benefit to understand Qoran?
              Think properly before you answer!!!
              I can ask a similar question
              What benefit does the actual composition/arrangement of the surahs as we have them bring? Why do we have Qoran in this present arrangement?

              Look brother you say we have many versions, and some differ in spellings, some differ in words some in how many verses altogether in total.
              So did GOD send all these different versions? Did GOD finish sending the warsh version ,then carried on with a little more verses to complete the hafs?
              Or did GOD sent one verse at a time until the whole(1 book) was complete?
              If that is the case ,then GOD sent one version!

              Do we have the means to find out (This generation) or did all generations before us had the means?
              How do we find out? Would you agree about the three ways?
              1-Find all the versions(including the one circulating at the time of the prophet ) and do a comparison.

              2-Filter all the true history ,use this and logic to come up with the copy

              3-Use Mathematics (This generation have the means) . See if GOD has used mathematics to lock His scripture (This is the only fool proof way). The best way to write /dictate a book and make sure it is preserved totally for ever(every letter, every word, every chapter ) is to lock it mathematically.
              Brother, think about this kind of 100% preservation?

              Of course you may add other methods if you can think of some?

              Actually the number structure is just part of the arrangement of how the surahs have been ordered the way we have them today. So what benefit do you expect apart from the 100% way of preserving the text?
              Or are you expecting a new ritual called code 19 ?
              You see brother that question has no meaningin salvation terms. The benefit is in the message.

              Certainty about the message leads to following /taking the message seriously . This is the benefit being certain it is from GOD.
              Of course you will say some are certain without numbers. Then all of us work hard towards our salvation and the issue is not so important.
              But the argument of preservation is a very strong one/
              GOD bless you.
              Peace.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                Noon_waalqalami
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                My take is the witness is Rabbi Judah the Pious (11th Century A.D.), who discovered the same 19-based mathematical code in intact fragments of the Jewish scripture

                peace, poor reading comprehension; again use "context and "tense" not auto-insert future numerologist.

                3-Use Mathematics ... make sure it is preserved totally for ever(every letter, every word, every chapter ) is to lock it mathematically.

                THEN show example lock verse 201 ta ha?
                ELSE do not repeat false claim without proof!

                1. Don?t come back we discussed since you or anyone NEVER showed proof!
                2. Don?t divert with questions before simply answering, NO you can't is fine!

                BTW, in the oldest manuscripts it's consistently written as single verse 201-2

                201 ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an to thou discontent

                University of Birmingham Qur?an manuscript among world?s oldest
                https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-HDFiC2boQ

                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=56

                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1/handschrift/107

                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=141

                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=163

                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=173

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Offline
                  G Offline
                  good_logic
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  Peace Noon.
                  Are you aware of this
                  https//submission.org/verify_writing_of_Alif_Yaa_and_Taa.html

                  Which "T" is it in chapter 20? Or are you going to argue for both "T" and "H"?

                  All these anomalies have been discussed in numerous threads with you and others.

                  There is more to come with the perfection of Mathematics( Quantum computers will also play their part in the future).
                  My maths and yours are primitive compared to GOD s.
                  Brother Noon ,you are very insisting after all these years, but your expertise (Maths) that you are claiming will turn against you .
                  Wait ,we are also waiting!
                  GOD bless you.
                  Peace.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    Which "T" is it in chapter 20?

                    peace, use magnifier
                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=281

                    answer question use interlock/code or whatever to lock 201 ta ha?

                    it's ok to admit you don't know what you're talking about move on.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Offline
                      I Offline
                      imrankhawaja
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      peace, use magnifier
                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=281

                      answer question use interlock/code or whatever to lock 201 ta ha?

                      it's ok to admit you don't know what you're talking about move on.

                      hahahahaha rotfl exactly

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G Offline
                        G Offline
                        good_logic
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        Peace Noon.
                        Why do you want my count? You need to check it. Here is how I counted so you can do the same
                        https//submission.org/verify_how_to_count_Quranic_initials.html

                        Your question is not honest. You want to argue the case like you always do.
                        Besides you claim to know "19" better than anyone else. Are you stuck?
                        You do your count and I do mine.
                        I use hafs version and I am satisfied with my count.
                        GOD bless you.
                        Peace.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          Why do you want my count?

                          peace, didn't ask you to count letters or links to dumb websites.

                          it was asked show how it's locked to chapter verse 201 ta ha ?

                          is it combined single verse like in oldest manuscripts -- why not ?

                          201 ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an to thou discontent

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • I Offline
                            I Offline
                            imrankhawaja
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            it was asked show how it's locked to chapter verse 201 ta ha ?

                            is it combined single verse like in oldest manuscripts -- why not ?

                            noon bravo you smashed the idol name as code 19

                            theres a saying in my culture.

                            ?becoming FOOL is more entertaining then making someone FOOL?
                            about this saying FOOL need time to understand the proverb first then the purpose of proverb although its a deep saying got meanings in it...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I Offline
                              I Offline
                              imrankhawaja
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              I use hafs version and I am satisfied with my count.

                              peace GL

                              intresting to know HAFS version hmm ,,,
                              can i ask in your version there is any 128 and 129 verse in chapter 8/9?

                              provide evidence of oldest manuscript in which these two verses missing ?

                              if not then your and all code 19 claims are fake as it based on proven lie.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G Offline
                                G Offline
                                good_logic
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                Peace Noon.
                                The old manuscript has errors same as other manuscripts and you know that.
                                That old manuscript is not the original just like you are claiming other manuscripts with T H as a separate verse are not.

                                You provide evidence it is the original copy and you will have a point.
                                If on the other hand you are claiming T H are not initials then provide their meaning?

                                Are you sure you do not see the problem?
                                GOD bless you.
                                Peace.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  good_logic
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  Peace Imran.
                                  Should it not be the other way around?
                                  You provide ,with evidence, the original copy of the prophet with 128 and 129 in surah 9 in it and the matter will close.
                                  Much simpler for you.
                                  If on the other hand you say the high probability is that majority of mushafs contain 128 and 129,then I say the mathematical structure has a 100% probability that they do not.
                                  Yours against mine?
                                  GOD bless you.
                                  Peace.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Noon_waalqalami
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    The old manuscript has errors same as other manuscripts and you know that.

                                    peace, here are three of the oldest manuscripts -- show errors?

                                    201 ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an to thou discontent

                                    University of Birmingham radiocarbon dated 568-645 CE (95.4%)
                                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=281

                                    Ma VI 165 University of T?bingen radiocarbon dated 649-675 CE (95.4%)
                                    ~1800 verses 1735 - 3657 (~28% of total text)
                                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1/handschrift/107

                                    Berlin State Library radiocarbon dated 662-765 CE (95.4%)
                                    ~85% of total text Wetzstein II 1913 (Ahlwardt 305)
                                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=163

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      good_logic
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      Peace Noon.
                                      I could also ask you to show an error here

                                      Many other Mushafs show a clear pause. There are two verses.
                                      Old manuscript does not mean correct manuscript without errors. Unless of course one can bring evidence it is the original copy.
                                      Or are you assuming old manuscripts have no errors?
                                      This is one good reason why a mathematical structure will solve it 100%.
                                      GOD bless you.
                                      Peace.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Noon_waalqalami
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        Many other Mushafs show a clear pause. There are two verses.

                                        Peace, show one earlier than 200+ years after revelation? (BTW, posting for benefit of others)

                                        1. Birmingham, Cadbury Research Library dated 568-645 CE (95.4%)
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=281
                                          201-2 (single verse) ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an that thou agonize

                                        2. T?bingen, Universit?tsbibliothek Ma VI 165 dated 649-675 CE (95.4%)
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1/handschrift/107
                                          201-2 (single verse) ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an that thou agonize

                                        3. Berlin, Staatsbibliothek Wetzstein II 1913 (Ahlwardt 305) 662-765 CE (95.4%)
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1/handschrift/163
                                          201-2 (single verse) ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an that thou agonize

                                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/42/vers/1?handschrift=163
                                        421-3 (single verse) ha meem ayn seen qaf like such inspired to you and toward the ones from before you the god the mighty the wise

                                        1. Gotthelf-Bergstr??er-Archiv "Saray Medina 1a" Istanbul, Topkap Saray before 800 CE?
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=56
                                          201-2 (single verse) ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an that thou agonize

                                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/42/vers/1?handschrift=56
                                        421-3 (single verse) ha meem ayn seen qaf like such inspired to you and toward the ones from before you the god the mighty the wise

                                        1. Kodex Samarkand (Faksimiledruck Sankt Petersburg 1905) 700-850 CE
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=141
                                          201-2 (single verse) ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an that thou agonize

                                        2. Paris, Biblioth?que nationale de France Arabe 328 (b) before 750 CE
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/42/vers/1?handschrift=157
                                          421-3 (single verse) ha meem ayn seen qaf like such inspired to you and toward the ones from before you the god the mighty the wise

                                        3. Paris, Biblioth?que nationale de France Arabe 335 800 CE
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/42/vers/1?handschrift=37
                                          421-3 (single verse) ha meem ayn seen qaf like such inspired to you and toward the ones from before you the god the mighty the wise

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • I Offline
                                          I Offline
                                          imrankhawaja
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          peace Gl

                                          PLZ read my post 34.
                                          you missed something. ?

                                          you claimed you are satisfied on your count and you said HAFZ but on same time you are rejecting verses (128-129) which were present in the oldest manuscript (any hafz) found in earth YOU GET IT now.

                                          so its mean your theory hold no water.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users