Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Pork is HALAL

Pork is HALAL

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
354 Posts 24 Posters 36.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mahdi_Ibrahim
    wrote on last edited by
    #278

    two distinct consecutive definite nouns?
    what you wrote doesn't mean "swine flesh"

    e.g. below doesn't mean "human magic"
    2102 الناس the humankind السحر the magic

    that's my point...

    and I don't make the argument it mean "swine flesh", that's your argument.

    my argument it "doesn't mean" swine flesh

    Quote from Noon waalqalami on Yesterday at 051921 PM
    again, broken language which comes out weird
    incorrect missing ال

    Yes ...

    http//i63.tinypic.com/v6svhh.jpg

    likewise, no such word يرِ non-existent/gibberish

    https//dictionary.reverso.net/arabic-english/%D9%8A%D8%B1/forced

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #279

      that's my point...

      and I don't make the argument it mean "swine flesh", that's your argument.

      you have no point completely missed simple lesson keep suggesting broken language/gibberish.

      nonexistent gibberish missing "the" -- "and flesh" (definite noun) the stinky (definite adjective)

      again, post single example using any source ever written to support your gibberish argument?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mahdi_Ibrahim
        wrote on last edited by
        #280

        Does this make sense to you?

        والخىل and the horses المسومه the branded

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mahdi_Ibrahim
          wrote on last edited by
          #281

          and then...

          ال + لحم the flesh الخنز the maggoty

          http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg
          Lane Lexicon

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            Noon_waalqalami
            wrote on last edited by
            #282

            Does this make sense to you?

            yes perfectly what part of "the" is not clear? and the horses
            likewise, what part of no "the" is not clear? and flesh

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mahdi_Ibrahim
              wrote on last edited by
              #283

              What about "the flesh" + "the maggoty"?

              والخىل and the horses المسومه the branded

              ال + لحم the flesh الخنز the maggoty

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                Noon_waalqalami
                wrote on last edited by
                #284

                What about "the flesh" + "the maggoty"?

                yes that works (definite noun definite adjective)
                no "the" flesh and therefore cannot be adjective!

                53 walahmu/and flesh (noun) l-khinziri/the swine (noun)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mahdi_Ibrahim
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #285

                  therefore it is "broken language which comes out weird, incorrect missing ال "?

                  Quote from Noon waalqalami on Yesterday at 051921 PM
                  again, broken language which comes out weird
                  incorrect missing ال

                  Yes ...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mahdi_Ibrahim
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #286

                    PLUS after all that, and even you manage to argue on grammar alone...

                    you still have two or more areas to cover before you can call it the Quran (clear argument / clear proof / words of Allah NO NONSENSE, NO FALLACIES) ie.

                    1. Sunnatullah (Law of Nature) <- still no argument on this

                    2. Revelation (Natural Person) <- on grammar alone (disputed), no consistency on all verses and Books... where did Allah make haram maggoty and stinking foods etc? Is it HALAL?

                    3. Tawba/align to Natural Values (is Natural Law, 7156-157, Hablun Minallah + Hablun Minannas / EARTH JURISPRUDENCE) <- still no argument on this

                    So how do you explain all these?

                    How can you prove consistency (Muhkamat)?

                    https//scontent.fkul1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/51446552_2280568462159732_7714549042222465024_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul1-1.fna&oh=d3620462ec8546f06a48912fc9e71cf1&oe=5CB8C416

                    But those in whose hearts is a sickness (unnaturalist) — It (the revelation) will only add doubt to their doubt, and they will die in a state of unbelief. (9125)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #287

                      you keep mindlessly ranting posting dumb spam!

                      again this is basic stuff which you or anyone can look at every occurrence written in qur'an or any text ever written/spoken at anytime in history and there is no such broken language gibberish!

                      definite adjective is always/must be preceded by a definite noun!
                      showed numerous examples and asked you to provide only one?

                      stupid thread/topic although the above maybe useful to others.

                      bye!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mahdi_Ibrahim
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #288

                        Do you then believe in a part of the Book and disbelieve in the other? (285)

                        You reject verse 1117?

                        yes that works (definite noun definite adjective)

                        والخىل and the horses المسومه the branded

                        ال + لحم the flesh الخنز the maggoty

                        The #Strawman say, "We have iman." Say "You do not have iman." (4914)

                        On that Day, We shall ask Hell, Are you now full? Hell will answer, Are there any more? (5030)

                        #wishful_thinking_is_one_thing_reality_another

                        #The_Unlettered

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jkhan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #289

                          Deal believers peace...
                          This topic suddenly went silent without even echo...
                          I thought another proof to strengthen the claim that khinzeer laham. Is not flesh/meat of decayed meat/fruits...if that is the meaning of laham khinzeer then we cannot include URINE of animals to it.. Coz its not laham.
                          In India and un few other countries they consider the urine of vows etc is holi and also healthy for for body...
                          Does God restrict it? For example Does the urine or excretes look laham khinzeer or they are better than that so God didn't mention of it...
                          Does God need to say about cleanliness and purification in choice. Didn't God say that He loves those who keep clean? So don't we have common sense to know not to consume decayed fruits or meats or the urine or Shit of animals...

                          731-32 ?O children of Adam! wear your beautiful apparel at every place of prayer eat and drink but waste not by excess for God loves not the wasters. Say Who has forbidden the beautiful (gifts) of God, which He hath produced for his servants, and the things clean and pure (which He has provided) for sustenance? Say They are in the life of this world, for those who believe, (and) purely for them on the Day of Judgment. Thus do We explain the signs in detail for those who understand.?

                          2222 ?......... ...Surely God loves those who are most repenting, and loves those who keep themselves pure and clean.? could be mind and body....
                          Also 56 and 443
                          Point to note is... Those who say that meat of swine is lawful... Please tell me whether the urine of pigs lawful since laham khinzeer doesn't at all match for LIQUID? If urine and shits allowed then no point of making decayed / rotten meat /flesh of animal or fruits Haram....
                          Now at least think what is laham khinzeer....
                          God guide us...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mahdi_Ibrahim
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #290

                            if that is the meaning of laham khinzeer then we cannot include URINE of animals to it.. Coz its not laham.
                            In India and un few other countries they consider the urine of vows etc is holi and also healthy for for body...
                            Does God restrict it? For example Does the urine or excretes look laham khinzeer or they are better than that so God didn't mention of it...
                            Does God need to say about cleanliness and purification in choice. Didn't God say that He loves those who keep clean? So don't we have common sense to know not to consume decayed fruits or meats or the urine or Shit of animals...

                            ...

                            Point to note is... Those who say that meat of swine is lawful... Please tell me whether the urine of pigs lawful since laham khinzeer doesn't at all match for LIQUID? If urine and shits allowed then no point of making decayed / rotten meat /flesh of animal or fruits Haram....
                            Now at least think what is laham khinzeer....
                            God guide us...

                            It's your problem, not mine.. do you understand the issue!? brickwall


                            My interpretation is "maggoty" and "STINKING".. or even contaminated.

                            http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

                            So my Quran / interpretation covers that urine and shit are HARAM...

                            and flesh does not describe meat alone.. but the substance, and what is "considered/ seen/ given due consideration/ treated/ contemplated /aforethought/ thought-through/ examined/ advised etc"...


                            Those who say "pork only" can drink urine and eat shit .. there is nothing in your Quran that says it is HARAM.. therefore "Do not say about what your lying tongues describe This is halal and this is haram 16116"

                            https//www.dcclothesline.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/drinking-camel-urine-600x358.png

                            This is the i'tiqad for Quran Alone... and the hadith corroborates well with your interpretation... it is HALAL! rotfl

                            https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophagia#Humans

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              jkhan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #291

                              It's your problem, not mine.. do you understand the issue!? brickwall


                              My interpretation is "maggoty" and "STINKING".. or even contaminated.

                              http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

                              So my Quran / interpretation covers that urine and shit are HARAM...

                              and flesh does not describe meat alone.. but the substance, and what is "considered/ seen/ given due consideration/ treated/ contemplated /aforethought/ thought-through/ examined/ advised etc"...


                              Those who say "pork only" can drink urine and eat shit .. there is nothing in your Quran that says it is HARAM.. therefore "Do not say about what your lying tongues describe This is halal and this is haram 16116"

                              https//www.dcclothesline.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/drinking-camel-urine-600x358.png

                              This is the i'tiqad for Quran Alone... and the hadith corroborates well with your interpretation... it is HALAL! rotfl

                              https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophagia#Humans

                              Peace all...

                              Hey strawman?.

                              First of all I didn?t address to you in my previous thread specifically to you to break your head on the wall and to say what you said ?It's your problem, not mine.. do you understand the issue!? I addressed to everyone who still believe that Pork is lawful? I wonder there is anyone who likes to eat pork and drink pig milk if he is a believer..?be exemplary to others..? or in addition to that urine

                              Okay .. let me turn to you this time exclusively to you with an answer?

                              YOUR INTERPRETATION WILL NOT INCLUDE URINE OR SHIT OF ANIMALS? Let me explain the URINE? Remember I explain this not to convince you but to expose you and your hypocrisy to those who have knowledge and those who are believers and still probably feel inclined and motivated to what you say without knowing to them? coz of your fancy spam posts?

                              Don?t change what you have already mentioned in your threads? Just go back and see what you have posted in your Very first thread? Unless you change that also? Screenshot will work?

                              Your First thread

                              You only came up with the meaning for

                              Laham = Meat.. meanwhile for Khinzeer = Maggoty / Stinking

                              Then later?

                              Laham (became)= Meat +Flesh(of plants)

                              Now (it turned to)

                              Laham = Meat + Flesh(plants) + Urine + etc..+ etc..+ etc.. + ++ and all covered.. lol

                              So initiated the meaning of Laham al Khinzeer = MAGGOTY / STINKING MEAT? that was your claim first..

                              Now Laham al Khinzeer = Maggoty / Stinking / contaminated Meat + (flesh of plants) + Urine + shits

                              Now as per your hypocrisy

                              So to make these things to be restricted by God, you say God used the wording of Laham al Khinzeer?.You think God doesn?t know how to explain a simple things? simply God would have said All decayed/rotten/ polluted foods/things (solid+liquid) haram or in much better way than anyone can even grasp?

                              since Laham is included in the verse to express the meaning which is a solid thing then it must include LIQUID as well? food is after all SOLID+LIQUID = FOOD

                              At least if your claim is Maggoty / stinking / contaminated foods (solid+liquid) THEN which can include (decayed meat, contaminated water, contaminated milk and juice + wastes of animals-urine +shits etc etc..) ?.then claim is meaningful.. But your claim is not that?your interpretation doesn?t include LIQUID? LIQUID is not a part of the phrase of God in which He prohibited by saying ??Laham al Khinzeer????

                              Since God only has mentioned Laham and the other word is only Khinzeer which doesn?t say liquid but only maggoty/stinking .. God didn?t use the Arabic word for LIQUID to explain this particular restriction? but only laham which is not liquid by any means? unacceptable..

                              So your claim cannot be included urine here..Fallacy exposed..

                              As per your all alterations from the beginning to now? it stands as under..

                              Laham al Khinzeer is Maggoty / Stinking / contaminated Meat + (flesh of plants) AND NOT LIQUIDS such as urine?.So as per your claim urine should be considered halal? Your interpretation cannot include urine which is liquid..

                              Btw that?s a very hilarious picture for those who are deep rooted with hadith? post it in any Hadith forums? that would help you? meantime your interpretation is also matching with the hadith which commands to drink camel urine?try it out?be the man of what he speaks.. without knowing to you, you have interpreted the Laham al Khinzeer as such?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • I Offline
                                I Offline
                                imrankhawaja
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #292

                                its simple case = ignorance of language/tonge as per rules of text.

                                1 if arabic is not his native language then we can solve it by saying a person is highly foolish/weakest minds in learning language.

                                2 if arabic is his native language then we can solve it by saying a person instead of having knowledge of language still not understand language becoz hez clearly insane/retard/weird/feakish = ( majnu) arabic word for that catagory.

                                hadith is gateway for lot of people where people can find whatever they wish.and if it was not in hadith anything (specific) they will make/create it.whatever was required for a political/religious group they already inserted it and thats what happened with every nation.

                                a set of 7 persian news after 200 years of muhamad death is not a law to be follwed. not even authorised. its enough to understand what was going on in between 200 years for publishing a biography of that main figure of islam.

                                logically bukahri and company are not even ?hadith?
                                as far i see a first hand report example by abu bakar about muhammad we can say its a report called ?hadith?/saying.

                                and that report must have a stamp/sign/thumb of abubakar dated back to 630-635 ad.

                                with two witnesses from same era that abu baker write this report from his own hand.thats what we say authentic/geneuine/sahih ( authorised )

                                with bukhari & co thats not the case we should say it NEWS instead of hadith. they did not qualified as ?AUTHENTIC? sahih .

                                they are unathentic/fake/plagarised/flukes with touch of little common sense truth like sky is blue. its not even history even historical revords have a fix pattern.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mahdi_Ibrahim
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #293

                                  Peace all...

                                  Hey strawman�.

                                  First of all I didn�t address to you in my previous thread specifically to you to break your head on the wall and to say what you said �It's your problem, not mine.. do you understand the issue!? I addressed to everyone who still believe that Pork is lawful� I wonder there is anyone who likes to eat pork and drink pig milk if he is a believer..�be exemplary to others..� or in addition to that urine

                                  Okay .. let me turn to you this time exclusively to you with an answer�

                                  YOUR INTERPRETATION WILL NOT INCLUDE URINE OR SHIT OF ANIMALS� Let me explain the URINE� Remember I explain this not to convince you but to expose you and your hypocrisy to those who have knowledge and those who are believers and still probably feel inclined and motivated to what you say without knowing to them� coz of your fancy spam posts�

                                  Don�t change what you have already mentioned in your threads� Just go back and see what you have posted in your Very first thread� Unless you change that also� Screenshot will work�

                                  Your First thread

                                  You only came up with the meaning for

                                  Laham = Meat.. meanwhile for Khinzeer = Maggoty / Stinking

                                  Then later�

                                  Laham (became)= Meat +Flesh(of plants)

                                  Now (it turned to)

                                  Laham = Meat + Flesh(plants) + Urine + etc..+ etc..+ etc.. + ++ and all covered.. lol

                                  So initiated the meaning of Laham al Khinzeer = MAGGOTY / STINKING MEAT� that was your claim first..

                                  Now Laham al Khinzeer = Maggoty / Stinking / contaminated Meat + (flesh of plants) + Urine + shits

                                  Now as per your hypocrisy

                                  So to make these things to be restricted by God, you say God used the wording of Laham al Khinzeer�.You think God doesn�t know how to explain a simple things� simply God would have said All decayed/rotten/ polluted foods/things (solid+liquid) haram or in much better way than anyone can even grasp�

                                  since Laham is included in the verse to express the meaning which is a solid thing then it must include LIQUID as well� food is after all SOLID+LIQUID = FOOD

                                  At least if your claim is Maggoty / stinking / contaminated foods (solid+liquid) THEN which can include (decayed meat, contaminated water, contaminated milk and juice + wastes of animals-urine +shits etc etc..) �.then claim is meaningful.. But your claim is not that�your interpretation doesn�t include LIQUID� LIQUID is not a part of the phrase of God in which He prohibited by saying ��Laham al Khinzeer����

                                  Since God only has mentioned Laham and the other word is only Khinzeer which doesn�t say liquid but only maggoty/stinking .. God didn�t use the Arabic word for LIQUID to explain this particular restriction� but only laham which is not liquid by any means� unacceptable..

                                  So your claim cannot be included urine here..Fallacy exposed..

                                  As per your all alterations from the beginning to now� it stands as under..

                                  Laham al Khinzeer is Maggoty / Stinking / contaminated Meat + (flesh of plants) AND NOT LIQUIDS such as urine�.So as per your claim urine should be considered halal� Your interpretation cannot include urine which is liquid..

                                  Btw that�s a very hilarious picture for those who are deep rooted with hadith� post it in any Hadith forums� that would help you� meantime your interpretation is also matching with the hadith which commands to drink camel urine�try it out�be the man of what he speaks.. without knowing to you, you have interpreted the Laham al Khinzeer as such�

                                  You're so DESPERATE, and/or too stupid! rotfl

                                  https//thelogicofscience.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/strawman.png

                                  and....

                                  ير

                                  https//dictionary.reverso.net/arabic-english/%D9%8A%D8%B1/forced

                                  and what is "considered/ seen/ given due consideration/ treated/ contemplated /aforethought/ thought-through/ examined/ advised etc"...

                                  • flesh (substance)
                                  • maggoty and stinking
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mahdi_Ibrahim
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #294

                                    its simple case = ignorance of language/tonge as per rules of text.

                                    wake up! elektro

                                    QXPvi (THE QUR&#039AN AS IT EXPLAINS ITSELF, 6th edition) February 2015
                                    By Dr. Shabbir Ahmed, Florida

                                    The First Dilemma The Persian ?Imams? received strong support from the Abbasid monarchs for political reasons. While the text of the Qur&#039an remained untouched, its words and terminology were, gradually, given alien, culturally and politically biased meanings to the extent that they lost the splendor and the magnificence so beautifully conveyed in the original, revealed Arabic ‘Mubeen&#039. Simply put, the Qur&#039anic terms were dressed up with the erroneous philosophies prevalent in the Zoroastrian culture of Persia, and they became widely accepted even among the Arabs! This staggering tragedy explains why, how and where, even the Arabic speaking people lose their touch with the Qur&#039an!

                                    Now The Third Dilemma The later generations of translators and commentators have uncritically followed the men of old and this tendency has been consistently taking its noxious toll. They have been taking the Ajami Arabic as the proper language of the Qur&#039an. By Ajami Arabic I mean applying the Zoro-Persian or any alien concepts to the Arabic words and terms of the Qur&#039an.

                                    http//drshabbir.com/library/qxp_vi_english.pdf

                                    https//scontent.fkul1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/50903680_2280855775464334_5969985166842527744_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul1-1.fna&oh=2c20ffc9fdb61a171e9dcd440a1c7236&oe=5CB4D786

                                    The fallacies of arabic grammar...

                                    Is it a lie, false LordLaws other than Allah/Sunnatullah, that you want? (3786)

                                    fresh meat

                                    https//images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81MNLH0rFiL.SX355.jpg

                                    is HALAL.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • I Offline
                                      I Offline
                                      imrankhawaja
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #295

                                      mahdi is this you in the display picture of your ID ?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mahdi_Ibrahim
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #296

                                        nope, my avatar.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • I Offline
                                          I Offline
                                          imrankhawaja
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #297

                                          whos he ?

                                          i think i ve seen him.

                                          either hez the DRUG lord from ?breaking-bad? who created some fire stuff lol.
                                          or hez looking like charlie chaplan in his early 30s lmao.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users