Chapter - 02 complete translation for your thoughts...
-
If your understanding of verse 2259 is that the man literally went into a coma for 100 years and then woke up, then here is how I see it.
God is indeed all powerful and can do anything. But He has allowed this world to operate through systems, patterns, and relationships. Things do not just happen randomly. He allows life, death, suffering, healing ; all through means and processes. Just like He allows injustice in wars where innocent people are killed yet He does not intervene directly. That does not make Him absent though and it simply means He allows this world to run within certain boundaries. The wisdom of it all will become clear when we stand before Him.
That is why I see this verse as symbolic and not literal. A person cannot physically remain in a coma for 100 years without nourishment, hydration, or care. Medical science confirms this i.e a coma patient needs external support like IV fluids, feeding, and sometimes breathing assistance. Without that survival for even weeks would be impossible correct me any one from medical field.
G A Parwez interpreted this verse as referring to the revival of a community. After the destruction of Jerusalem, the people were scattered and felt hopeless. The death-like state refers to a long period of silence and despair and the awakening symbolizes the rebuilding of that nation. The mention of food not decaying or the donkey remaining is part of that symbolic storytelling meant to spark thought not to be taken as a physical detail.
This is just my personal understanding. I am not trying to oppose or reject your view. You are free to express what you believe. I am just sharing how I see it as part of a wider reflection on how divine messages often speak in layers.
-
If your understanding of verse 2259 is that the man literally went into a coma for 100 years and then woke up, then here is how I see it.
God is indeed all powerful and can do anything. But He has allowed this world to operate through systems, patterns, and relationships. Things do not just happen randomly. He allows life, death, suffering, healing ; all through means and processes. Just like He allows injustice in wars where innocent people are killed yet He does not intervene directly. That does not make Him absent though and it simply means He allows this world to run within certain boundaries. The wisdom of it all will become clear when we stand before Him.
That is why I see this verse as symbolic and not literal. A person cannot physically remain in a coma for 100 years without nourishment, hydration, or care. Medical science confirms this i.e a coma patient needs external support like IV fluids, feeding, and sometimes breathing assistance. Without that survival for even weeks would be impossible correct me any one from medical field.
G A Parwez interpreted this verse as referring to the revival of a community. After the destruction of Jerusalem, the people were scattered and felt hopeless. The death-like state refers to a long period of silence and despair and the awakening symbolizes the rebuilding of that nation. The mention of food not decaying or the donkey remaining is part of that symbolic storytelling meant to spark thought not to be taken as a physical detail.
This is just my personal understanding. I am not trying to oppose or reject your view. You are free to express what you believe. I am just sharing how I see it as part of a wider reflection on how divine messages often speak in layers.
I think you have not read 2259... So meaningless I respond to your concern..
-
Hi..
I have included Divinity - 04 of the Resolution / Al Quran..
Anyone willing can have a go...
https//rifkyy2020.wixsite.com/expressandlearntruth/blogThank you
May the Lord guide us, and let's practice what is truth from the Lord...Chapter 05 up to verse 63 I have translated, and if anyone is interested, can go through, I have halted for some time since I have some personal issues to attend.. Once I complete I will, In sha Allah add the complete chapter for anyone who is interested to refer..
Meanwhile, I am now available privately or publicly in the forum for any questions of concerned people until I step into translating chapter 05..here is the link
https//rifkyy2020.wixsite.com/expressandlearntruth/post/divinity-05 -
Chapter 05 up to verse 63 I have translated, and if anyone is interested, can go through, I have halted for some time since I have some personal issues to attend.. Once I complete I will, In sha Allah add the complete chapter for anyone who is interested to refer..
Meanwhile, I am now available privately or publicly in the forum for any questions of concerned people until I step into translating chapter 05..here is the link
https//rifkyy2020.wixsite.com/expressandlearntruth/post/divinity-05I like to share this beautiful experience with you.. Below is a common translation..
567 O Messenger! Deliver (balagh) what has been revealed to you from your Lord; and if you do it not, then you have not delivered (balaght) His message, and Allah will protect you from the people; surely Allah will not guide the unbelieving people.
Yes, root of ب ل غ is indeed you can take ‘deliver/convey’ fine.. and translators used them in various way like ‘deliver/convey/proclaim/announce etc.. I have no issues.. cus it is one of the root meanings.. But they have not deeply reflected the verse and what it states and simply took the root meaning and translated it for BOTH occurrences as the same root meaning.. if you read the above verse you would feel, Yes it is right.. But, when one deeply reflect this verse is beyond what they have translated.. same root ب ل غ but for the first instance of the root is different meaning and then only it makes perfect sense… here is my translation
567 O you, the dispatcher! Attain (balagh) what was originated unto you from your Lord, and if you are not able to do so, you would not have conveyed (balaght) His dispatch, still the Divine clings to you through the fluctuation (al nass). Indeed, the Divine does not guide the established of the rejected ones.
First appearance of Balagh in imperative verb form it is ‘attain’… then second use of Balaght is past tense and it can be taken as ‘conveyed’…
why not taken ‘convey/deliver and conveyed/delivered’ for both occurrences through their verb form? Yes, the Prophet being the Rasool of Allah was commanded by the Divine first to ‘ATTAIN’ what was in fact revealed to him and not ‘CONVEY’ all of a sudden.. once he attained what was originated to him only he is purely ready to ‘CONVEY’.. that’s why the Divine states ‘and if you are not able to so’ i.e. not able to ATTAIN what is revealed in full depth, you cannot CONVEY.. It says indirectly, you are not just a postman, you are a messenger of Allah, you are subjected to be questioned, debated, argued by others when you deliver these RISALA/Dispatches of Allah, so ‘O Messenger ATTAIN’ and not ‘CONVEY’ befits and that’s what indeed meant by Allah.. There is no logical point of saying ‘O Messenger! Deliver (balagh) what has been revealed to you from your Lord; and if you do it not, then you have not delivered (balaght) His message’.. That sounds begging.. isn’t it? but if the verse stands like this ‘O you, the dispatcher! Attain (balagh) what was originated unto you from your Lord, and if you are not able to do so, you would not have conveyed (balaght) His dispatch’.. So it is an instruction to prepare himself with the messages of Allah, so that he would be able to mechanically dispatch them and fully ready for queries on what he delivered.. Yet Allah is clinging to him through the fluctuations is so blessing.. yes fluctuations that he may face is met by Allah himself, you just attain with the risalah and then convey.. Fluctuations here whatever you don’t have answers, then in future verses Allah would reply, you just attain with what is revealed to you..
it is so easy to check the root and translate, but it should give the exact possible meaning what Allah meant.. for that the translator needs to prepare his mind purely..
It clearly indicates that Rasools of Allah whoever he was, indeed not a postman who deliver what he was placed, but Rasools of Allah are to ATTAIN what was placed in them so that they know what they CONVEY to people, in order to reply them if they raise question based on Risala/messages.. CONVEY is not mechanical but with intent and with knowledge… if you don’t prepare you won’t be able to reply them based on what the messengers delivered..
If a Risala/dispatch is received then not to convey unless you know what you convey is the key message here by Allah to the Messenger.. Thus ATTAIN what the Divine originated upon you then Deliver.. if not able then you have not delivered it.. So, clear, you have not delivered means, you yourself not aware what you delivered.. If the recipients are so clever and researching they would get what the messenger delivered.. fine.. But it was a community of various type of people, they would question what they won’t understand, or others who would sarcastically question or they would test whether this prophet know what he delivers or he is a parrot? so as a dispatcher/Rasool, you ATTAIN before mechanical dispatching.. So beautiful.. So, attainment is through reflection and guidance of Allah and not by just reading the verses. .. (if mechanical conveyance is what a messenger should have done, then no need a messenger, al quran could have been revealed as a book, like we have the Quran without a messenger.. but messengers were sent to communities to address them directly, so inevitably people would raise question.. So messenger be well prepared with what he received and not outside.. ‘Attain what has been originated upon you from your Lord’ .. that’s all within the message..) -
Holism is the right word and not Trinity in Quran.. Allah would have referred to a specific group of people, but when used the word ‘Thalazath’ did not refer to their own way but a universal concept of Holism..
Let me explain this..573 Certainly had already rejected the ones who assumed that the Divine is third of Holism, yet not beyond a divine except One divine. And if not, they refrain from what they were presuming, surely would be touching the ones who rejected among them a painful humiliation.
Contextually, the verse above refers to the Son of Mary. I agree, but the concept of Holism isn't unique to them. In fact, it was a practice and way of thinking that spanned many generations before them when it came to the Divine. Anyone who claims that the Divine is not one but can be divided into parts faces the concept of Holism. For example, if someone believes the Divine has taken a son (2116), they're accepting Holism. If someone believes the Divine has daughters(1657), they're also accepting Holism. Similarly, if people believe Jesus or Uzra is the son of God, or even God himself, they're accepting Holism. Take a look at chapter 4171 below.
4171 O, embraced ones of the ordainment! Do not exaggerate through your commitment, and don’t state on behalf of the Divine except the truth. Verily, just the anointed one, Eisa, son of Maryam, dispatcher of the Divine, and His directive, He offered it up to Maryam, and life force from Him. So, concur with the Divine and His dispatchers. Yet, do not state Holism; refraining is prosperity for you. Verily, just the Divine, One divine. Immaculate is He that to be for Him a son. For Him, whatever through the assignments and whatever through the thriving. And be sufficed by the Divine as trustee.
That’s why the Divine replies, clarifying who He is. He claims ‘He is ONE’. One cannot have division or components, and every other number can have parts, or you can separate. Without One, there is no other number beyond it. Even half is not possible without ONE.
Holism is not part of the Divine nature, because He is ONE. Holism relates to other matters. People might assume that humans are made up of ‘Mind + Body + Soul’; that’s their idea of holism. Numbers can also have holism, like ‘100 = 50 + 25 + 25’. Certain philosophies or concepts can include holism, forming a whole where parts are essential. So, such people applied that Holism to Allah.. Allah doesn’t need such holism to be who He is. He is absolute and beyond holism. Before Him, nothing exists; after Him, nothing remains. So, there is no holism.5319-20 So, have you sensed Al Lat, and Al Uzza. And Mannat, the progression of the holism.
These systems portray divinity as evolutionary or dependent - which directly contradicts Divine transcendence. The "progression" implies God needs stages of dependency to manifest, while the Qur'an asserts Allah is beyond all sequences.
Yet the Divine states.. ‘Huwa al Awwal Wa al Akhir’ i.e. ‘He is the Source and the Progression’….
This phrase devastates Holism.. This is the ultimate nullification of human-made holisms on the Divine..
Holism is not a new thing, but from the beginning, people not only ASCRIBED to Allah but they made Him HOLISTIC..
NOTHING IS LIKE HIM.. so no way one can either ASCRIB or make Him HOLISTIC.. -
When I am translating chapter 05 and whenever I feel that I need to share about this verse with the concurred ones, I bring that verse.. Hope anyone benefits..
589 The Divine does not grip you, in the meanness through your oaths; however, He holds you with what you deliberated in the oaths. So, its vindication is, stirring effectiveness of stagnancies through sharpness of what you motivate your embracing, or shrouding them, or intensifying state of vigilance. So, whoever is not able to uncover, then rehabilitate, holistic episodes. Such is vindication of your oaths when you have sworn, thus sustaining your oaths. Like that, the Divine is manifesting for you His explications so that you may implement.
The Divine doesn’t hold you to account for careless words or habitual expressions. But if you deliberately bind yourself with an oath, you are held responsible.
The true vindication is not external; it’s the inner awakening of your dormant conscience. You must confront the truths your oath touches — by either embracing them, concealing them, or heightening your watchfulness.
If you can’t uncover what needs to be resolved, then undergo a holistic inner rehabilitation — let your being realign.
This is how you must restore the meaning of your oath when you’ve sworn it. Therefore, be mindful in how you speak and what you commit to.
Thus, God clarifies His signs — not just for outer action, but for deep inner implementation.
The Divine does not present solutions to spiritual failures with material responses. No point of feeding people or releasing slaves etc., for one’s oath and was spiritually wrong and well intended.. So, beautiful when one understands the Divine Stance..
for example, by breaking a deliberate oath or violating trust with the Divine — the true path to atonement or vindication must be internal, mental, and spiritual. Material actions (like feeding, clothing, freeing ) may have symbolic or social value, but they don't address the root spiritual breach unless accompanied by deep inner change. Anyway Allah has not informed feeding, clothing or freeing here or even fasting-leaving food and drink in the verse like everyone has translated.. The first three are good actions in life but Allah has not connected it with the verse..
I am really astonished by this verse. the Divine continuously explaining in His verses, spiritual path.. Spiritually awakened person would definitely do charity of any nature as he could, cus he knows its value.. Allah is not pressing on that as far as I get from Quran.. Charity etc are part of well balanced ethical life.. No need to teach to do charity on a broader level as if people won’t understand it, but spiritual guidance is always from Allah.. That’s a boost for life..
One's charities won't help at all if spiritually not aligned with the Divine.. -
When I am translating chapter 05 and whenever I feel that I need to share about this verse with the concurred ones, I bring that verse.. Hope anyone benefits..
589 The Divine does not grip you, in the meanness through your oaths; however, He holds you with what you deliberated in the oaths. So, its vindication is, stirring effectiveness of stagnancies through sharpness of what you motivate your embracing, or shrouding them, or intensifying state of vigilance. So, whoever is not able to uncover, then rehabilitate, holistic episodes. Such is vindication of your oaths when you have sworn, thus sustaining your oaths. Like that, the Divine is manifesting for you His explications so that you may implement.
The Divine doesn’t hold you to account for careless words or habitual expressions. But if you deliberately bind yourself with an oath, you are held responsible.
The true vindication is not external; it’s the inner awakening of your dormant conscience. You must confront the truths your oath touches — by either embracing them, concealing them, or heightening your watchfulness.
If you can’t uncover what needs to be resolved, then undergo a holistic inner rehabilitation — let your being realign.
This is how you must restore the meaning of your oath when you’ve sworn it. Therefore, be mindful in how you speak and what you commit to.
Thus, God clarifies His signs — not just for outer action, but for deep inner implementation.
The Divine does not present solutions to spiritual failures with material responses. No point of feeding people or releasing slaves etc., for one’s oath and was spiritually wrong and well intended.. So, beautiful when one understands the Divine Stance..
for example, by breaking a deliberate oath or violating trust with the Divine — the true path to atonement or vindication must be internal, mental, and spiritual. Material actions (like feeding, clothing, freeing ) may have symbolic or social value, but they don't address the root spiritual breach unless accompanied by deep inner change. Anyway Allah has not informed feeding, clothing or freeing here or even fasting-leaving food and drink in the verse like everyone has translated.. The first three are good actions in life but Allah has not connected it with the verse..
I am really astonished by this verse. the Divine continuously explaining in His verses, spiritual path.. Spiritually awakened person would definitely do charity of any nature as he could, cus he knows its value.. Allah is not pressing on that as far as I get from Quran.. Charity etc are part of well balanced ethical life.. No need to teach to do charity on a broader level as if people won’t understand it, but spiritual guidance is always from Allah.. That’s a boost for life..
One's charities won't help at all if spiritually not aligned with the Divine..During my translation process I share these stunning facts.. pls bear with me..
Have you ever wondered why ‘Beware’ is placed soon after the general phrase of ‘Atheu Allah, wa’atheeu Rasul’ in the following verse.. it is simply mindblowing..
592 Therefore, abide by the Divine while abiding by the dispatcher, yet beware. So, if you constricted, then realize that merely on our dispatcher, is the conveyance of the manifestation.
To completely get the picture here, you need to read the preceding verses, and here they are through my translations..
590 O you, the ones who concurred! Merely the adulteration, and the misapplication, and the incitement, and the suppleness are echoes of vehemence from the conspirator, so turn it away, in order that you may succeed.
591 Merely, the conspirator intends to bring in the hostility and the hatred, manifesting to you through the adulteration and the misapplication, thus averting you from the Divine consideration, and from the obligation. So, are you refraining?Now read 592…
592's fused command ("Abide + Beware" reveals that conscious adherence to the Divine path creates an energetic shield against Satan's vehemence. Satan’s رِجْس (vehemence) collides with divine coherence..
Rijs min amal al satan = Echoes of vehemence from the conspirator
You can’t follow the message of Allah through ‘the Rasul’ or after his demise through ‘the Quran’ in order to abide by the Divine, unless you ‘beware’… Beware of what? Yes, beware of ‘ECHOES of VEHEMENCE generating through the Conspirator.. and they are mainly ‘adulteration plus misapplication’, thereby triggering ‘hostility and hatred’ and that can devastate a person..
Allah intently omitted a couple of echoes of vehemence from 591 cus ‘adulteration plus misapplication’ are ‘Mental corruption, i.e, clarity and justice’, meanwhile ‘Incitement and suppleness’ are ‘Emotional Hijacking’
Group 1 (mental tools) → causes division of thought, injustice, intellectual arrogance
Group 2 (emotional/ritual tools) → causes tribal conflict, blind following, spiritual numbness..
Mental corruption = Adulteration + Misapplication
• Adulteration (khamr) clouds judgment and perception.
• Misapplication (maysir) distorts justice, fairness, and rightful decision-making.
These aren't just behaviors — they are cognitive distorters. They poison how people
• Think
• Interpret
• Judge
• React
Once mental clarity is hijacked, hostility and hatred are natural outcomes.People are blinded thinking ‘Obey Allah and obey the messenger’ is some fancy hadiths, but look at what Allah states incorporating the same phrase of ‘Atheeu Allah Wa atheeu Rasul’ i.e. Abide by Allah while abiding by the Dispatcher…
-
A dispatcher is a communications worker who receives and transmits information to coordinate operations of other personnel and vehicles carrying out a service.
وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَٱحْذَرُوا۟ۚ فَإِن تَوَلَّيْتُـمْ فَٱعْلَمُوٓا۟ أَنَّمَا عَلَـىٰ رَسُولِنَا ٱلْبَلَٟغُ ٱلْمُبِيـنُ ٩٢
592 Therefore, abide by the Divine while abiding by the dispatcher, yet beware. So, if you constricted, then realize that merely on our dispatcher, is the conveyance of the manifestation.أَطِيعُوا۟ abide by----
"Abide by" means to follow or obey a rule, law, agreement, or principle. It implies accepting and acting in accordance with something established or expected. Essentially, it means to comply with and not deviate from the established terms or conditions.This corresponds not to أَطِيعُوا۟ but to ٱتَّبِعُوا۟
-
I thought well before choosing the word.. And it is so simple to choose Messenger.. I saw the flaw in the word..
"الرَّسُول" (Ar-Rasūl) as "the Dispatcher" is not only linguistically valid but theologically profound …
Lexical Justification Root ر-س-ل (R-S-L)
The root ر س ل fundamentally means- To send/direct toward a purpose (أَرْسَلَ = he sent)
- To release/liberate for a mission (رَسَلَ = he set free to move)
- A fluid, unimpeded flow (مُرْسَلٌ = unfettered, like water)
"Dispatcher" captures this essence better than "Messenger"
"Messenger" "Dispatcher"
Passive carrier Active director
Delivers information Orchestrates action
Focus on message Focus on mission
رَسُول = Active "agent who dispatches" (focus on function).
أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ (Sync with Command)
أَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ (Execute Dispatcher’s directives)
أَطِيعُوا (aṭīʿū) - "Abide/Yield"
Root ط و ع
Meaning Conscious, willing submission
Not blind obedience, but alignment through understanding
Implies inner resonance with the command
Volitional surrender to cosmic harmony
You "hear" the Divine frequency → attune your actions…Meanwhile أَطَّبِعُوا (aṭṭabiʿū) - "Forcibly Conform"
Root ط ب ع
Meaning To stamp/imprint against one's nature
Coercive compliance … comply with is either by force and by command/order or even gently.. even if one take it as ‘follow’ all are coercive (gentle /compelled) no issue.. never Atheeu
Nullifies free will → robotic submission
It is hard to grip the nuances unless you choose to do what it takes.. In my opinion ‘atheeu’ cannot be taken ‘comply with or follow’ but ‘abide by’ but ‘aththabiu’ is comply with or follow’ and still be used as abide by as well.. no harm.. -
(لسان العرب)
الطَّوْعُ نَقِيضُ الكَرْهِ.That it signifies contra, to external pressure, compulsion, coercion, dislike of heart.
The basic perception infolded in Root "ط و ع" is to accept an idea, or word, command, direction, injunction, saying, or verbal and written communication, wholeheartedly and affectionately by will and personal choice without external pressure/force/fear/compulsion/coercion.
The perception and meanings infolded in Root "ت ب ع" are distinct and absolutely different from that infolded in the Root "ط و ع" which is translated by English word "obey"; and Root "ت ب ع" by English word "follow" by most of the writers. This is how both the Roots are inadvertently/incorrectly brought closer and at par, as if they both convey similar meanings. English word "Obey" means and conveys the perception "to do as told; be controlled by somebody or something" and the word "follow" means "to obey something, act in accordance with something or instructions and directions given by somebody else". It is thus evident that English word "obey" and "follow" are in proximity of synonymous and both refer to an act while Arabic Roots "ت ب ع" and "ط و ع" are not synonymous and are distinct from each other.
The basic perception infolded in the Root "ت ب ع" is to practically follow by will, design and affection in such manner that one moves or walks behind remaining adjacent to the one being followed/pursued so that there is no third in between the follower and who is being followed. "تبيع" is a calf walking behind his mother. The striking feature, individuality and peculiarity of this Root is the practical and physical aspect of following in action.
Arabic language is a scientific language and its Roots enfold all physical/scientific realities and facts relating both to matter and life. A deliberate act of practically and physically following is the result of will/decision and it can take physical execution only by retrieving data, information, instruction, injunction or saying already and previously saved in the memory.
A physical act by one's own will and decision/choice reflects and demonstrates his acceptance and liking of the concept and purpose which that act will or is expected to yield.
The perception and meanings infolded in the Root "ت ب ع" is the physical demonstration of executing that accepted thing in letter and spirit, exactly in the manner as is told; to follow and move step by step, dot by dot, word by word; move and follow on the footprints of the one being followed. Nothing should intervene including ones own passions, interests, preconceived notions, desires and conveniences between the follower and the followed, whereby one will satisfy and implement the perception of the Root and shall thus be the one who acted exactly on that which he had willfully and affectionately accepted.
Root "ط و ع" has a theoretical/ideological aspect while "ت ب ع" has practical/physical aspect/connotation. It means translating/implementing into action what was accepted. This will also show and prove to others the truthfulness and faithfulness and sincerity of the person that he had accepted that concept/idea/fact/saying/news/Book truly and wholeheartedly. In sequence/time frame "ت ب ع" is after "ط و ع" and not conversely.
-
Yes, ‘obey’ is mostly translated for the Arabic word ‘atheeu’.. I thought of it, then avoided when the English meaning of it did not satisfy with contexts of ‘atheeu’ that occur in Quran..
See how they differentiate ‘Obey and abide by’
"Obey" and "abide by" both involve following rules or instructions, but they differ in nuance. "Obey" generally implies a more immediate and direct compliance with a command or order, often from an authority figure. "Abide by" suggests a longer-term commitment to a set of rules, principles, or agreements.
Obey
Timeframe - Immediate, often a single action ...
Source of instruction - Command, order, authority figure ..
Emphasis - Compliance, following a direction ....
Formal/Informal - Can be formal or informal ...Abide by
Timeframe - Long-term, ongoing commitment
Source of instruction - Rules, laws, agreements
Emphasis - Acceptance, adherence to a principle
Formal/Informal - More formal, especially in legal contextsSo, Quranically ‘abide by’ is the best choice.. You are not just obeying the Divine, we need to ABIDE BY the Divine.. But still obey has coercive aspect too…
Meanwhile, turning towards the point of MESSENGER, and is never the choice.. as you all are aware, not only humans but Malak also chosen as Rasuls .. They are not mere MESSENGERS.. They are on MISSION when someone is on a mission, they can’t simply be Messenger.
When Rasuls came to Ibrahim they said ‘We have been dispatched’… that’s a mission.. and that too to destroy a nation full of Mujrim.. another example.. When a Rasul came to Maryam he said I am here to bestow you a child by the leave of the Divine.. on a mission…. But they all Rasul i.e. they dispatch what the Divine placed.. it can be anything, but on purpose and with a mission. Missions of various types.. Nuh built the ark and it is not the job of a Messenger.. Musa became a public performer, and that’s not a messenger.. Mohamed waged war, it is not the job of the Messenger.. Cus they were not messengers at all.. Messenger doesn’t befit (human or Malak) Rasuls at all.. Rasuls are on mission and accomplish it, and the least they should do is conveyance of the manifestation … that’s related with people, but they have more mission than that by the Divine.. Convey doesn’t mean dump. First, reach out with absolute awareness of the dispatch, thus attain its comprehensiveness, then deliver, and that’s to convey the manifestation..
Then, one can say why not make like a delegate or envoy.. Yes, fine, but I realized ‘dispatch’ root covers multi-purpose..No messenger..
No obey, No follow, No comply with (atheeu).. -
What is Al Kaaba?. reflecting of it, I was clueless throughout life, but not after the guidance reached.. You won’t get these translations by reading superficially, for that I don’t blame.. but the one who deeply immerses in these verses would comprehend it, still I believe it takes time to align, even you read these translation or Al Quran in Arabic..
594 O you, the ones who concurred! Certainly, the Divine is testing you with a thing, through the beneficence, aiming its persuasions to you, and your resistance in order for the Divine to reveal who remains cautious of Him with the extremity. So, whoever trespassed despite that, then for him, a painful humiliation.
595 O you, the ones who concurred! Do not undermine the beneficence as you are imposed. Yet, whoever undermined it among you deliberately, then a recompense; a correspondence of what he undermined through the bestowal, adjudicating in its mutual justification among you, as point of initiative of the axis, or vindication of impetus of stagnancies, or justification of that of rehabilitation, in order that he experience disruptions of his affair. The Divine remitted of what had been foregone, yet whoever replicated, then the Divine avenges over him. And the Divine is mighty, possessor of vengeance.
596 Subjected to you the intervention of beneficence and its impetus—a facilitation for you, and for the state of conduct. Meanwhile, imposed upon you the transactionality of beneficence as long as you are in a state of imposition. Thus, conscientize the Divine, the One towards Him, you are gathering.
597 The Divine has placed the axis of the imposed awakening, undertaking for the people; as well, the imposed actions and the initiatives, and the conferral. Such is, so that you may realize that the Divine realizes what is through the assignments and what is through the thriving, while that the Divine, of everything, realizes.A central and divinely fixed axis around which awakening is forced to occur, directing the human soul to realign with truth, justice, and responsibility. It is not just a realization — it’s a universal pivot point in the moral-spiritual order, one that you are made to encounter, resist, and eventually revolve around.
So why “axis”? Because this imposed awakening isn’t random or chaotic — it is anchored in something fixed, universal, divinely set. It’s the designated place of pivoting where consciousness is forced to turn.
“Axis” expresses that awakening happens around a fixed point — not in abstraction.
Al Kabaa is never a physical place… it is just a cube of idol worship invented by an invented religion called Islam..
The one who understood exactly what al kaaba is in Al Quran, then he can perceive who invented a religion based on a physical Kaaba in modern day Mecca.. This one word (al kaaba) in its true form will expose what this religion is based on..Al kaaba = The axis... nothing on its own.. but it makes lot of sense in the context where it has been placed by the Divine in the couple of verses..
-
5101 O you, the ones who concurred! Do not ask about things that, if disclosed to you, would anguish you. Yet, if you are asking about it during the Resolution (Al Quran) being originated, it is to be disclosed to you. The Divine remitted about it; thus, the Divine is redeeming, tolerant.
5102 Established ones had already asked about it, well before you. Subsequently, they did transpire with it, rejected ones.
5103 The Divine did not place through a state of intercession, and not a state of asceticism, and not a state of communion, and not a state of interdiction; and nevertheless, the ones who rejected are fabricating against the Divine the manipulation, and a multitude of them are not reasoning.Here my argument is about verse 5103 and its untranslated words such as Bahira, Saibah, Wasila, Hami as if they are some pagan practices by names..
"If it was their ancestral practice, why call it 'fabrication' and then ‘manipulation’ and the verse ended ‘not reasoning’?"
Fabrication = Invention with intent, not mistake.
If these systems were inherited traditions, there would be no accusation of fabrication — just misguidance or ignorance.
But the Qur'an is exposing something deeper
-These aren’t merely inherited errors. They are strategic constructs
1..Designed to replace or rival Revelation
2..Invented and ascribed falsely to the Divine
3..Often serving elite control, guilt-based religiosity, or ritual systems
Thus, these are man-made religious frameworks
Deliberately built to seem holy
Claimed to be from the Divine
But actually meant to divert people from direct access to the Divine
Let’s work out what these four tools…
Intercession/Baheera (placing intermediaries as if they are holy to ask forgiveness and dua etc)
Asceticism /Saiba (self-denial as sanctity as if we are created outside of pleasure)
Communion / Wasila (ritual association or imagined closeness as exactly the word communion means ; the sharing or exchanging of intimate thoughts and feelings, especially on a mental or spiritual level. )
Interdiction / Hami (forbidding things in the Divine name.. self proclamation of forbidding)
These are constructed systems, human-devised spiritual schemes not rooted in Revelation, but imposed on Revelation. Then people fabricate divine authority to justify them.
5103 is well connected with 5101-102 and its assertion..
5101 warns Don’t project your assumptions into Revelation via questioning.
5102 shows a historical pattern people asked but could not accept truth that shattered their constructs.
5103 names the core constructs fabricated religious systems—intercession, rituals, ascetic frameworks—not from the Divine, but made to control, to posture sanctity, or avoid accountability.
When intellect is bypassed and doctrine replaces sincerity, people ask questions not to seek truth, but to confirm bias.. The challenge is to keep Revelation free from these added layers.Note Also the verse 5103, it intentionally uses "rejected" (كَفَرُوا / kafarū), not "those who ascribe partners" (mushrikūn) — and that distinction matters deeply. And not used even Kafireen i.e. labelled (the rejected ones) and never returning ones.. Rejected" is not a fixed group label, but a condition or action.
"those who rejected" as those who could have followed, but chose manipulation over submission. It’s a subtle yet powerful warning against building religious structures or restrictions not rooted in revelation but in human control, ego, or tradition falsely sanctified.5103 is a powerful statement on traditional Islam.. or even any religion that is based on human invention but still claiming to be from the Divine..
This is not a critique of another religion — it’s a warning about what is being developed under the name of Divine but not from Divine. Yes. They weren’t coming in opposition to God — they were co-opting the Divine name. This is why it’s so dangerous.. That's why in verse592 it clearly indicated 'beware' even after stating 'Abide by the Divine, while abiding by the dispatcher, yet beware'.. so crucial here..
-
5101 O you, the ones who concurred! Do not ask about things that, if disclosed to you, would anguish you. Yet, if you are asking about it during the Resolution (Al Quran) being originated, it is to be disclosed to you. The Divine remitted about it; thus, the Divine is redeeming, tolerant.
5102 Established ones had already asked about it, well before you. Subsequently, they did transpire with it, rejected ones.
5103 The Divine did not place through a state of intercession, and not a state of asceticism, and not a state of communion, and not a state of interdiction; and nevertheless, the ones who rejected are fabricating against the Divine the manipulation, and a multitude of them are not reasoning.Here my argument is about verse 5103 and its untranslated words such as Bahira, Saibah, Wasila, Hami as if they are some pagan practices by names..
"If it was their ancestral practice, why call it 'fabrication' and then ‘manipulation’ and the verse ended ‘not reasoning’?"
Fabrication = Invention with intent, not mistake.
If these systems were inherited traditions, there would be no accusation of fabrication — just misguidance or ignorance.
But the Qur'an is exposing something deeper
-These aren’t merely inherited errors. They are strategic constructs
1..Designed to replace or rival Revelation
2..Invented and ascribed falsely to the Divine
3..Often serving elite control, guilt-based religiosity, or ritual systems
Thus, these are man-made religious frameworks
Deliberately built to seem holy
Claimed to be from the Divine
But actually meant to divert people from direct access to the Divine
Let’s work out what these four tools…
Intercession/Baheera (placing intermediaries as if they are holy to ask forgiveness and dua etc)
Asceticism /Saiba (self-denial as sanctity as if we are created outside of pleasure)
Communion / Wasila (ritual association or imagined closeness as exactly the word communion means ; the sharing or exchanging of intimate thoughts and feelings, especially on a mental or spiritual level. )
Interdiction / Hami (forbidding things in the Divine name.. self proclamation of forbidding)
These are constructed systems, human-devised spiritual schemes not rooted in Revelation, but imposed on Revelation. Then people fabricate divine authority to justify them.
5103 is well connected with 5101-102 and its assertion..
5101 warns Don’t project your assumptions into Revelation via questioning.
5102 shows a historical pattern people asked but could not accept truth that shattered their constructs.
5103 names the core constructs fabricated religious systems—intercession, rituals, ascetic frameworks—not from the Divine, but made to control, to posture sanctity, or avoid accountability.
When intellect is bypassed and doctrine replaces sincerity, people ask questions not to seek truth, but to confirm bias.. The challenge is to keep Revelation free from these added layers.Note Also the verse 5103, it intentionally uses "rejected" (كَفَرُوا / kafarū), not "those who ascribe partners" (mushrikūn) — and that distinction matters deeply. And not used even Kafireen i.e. labelled (the rejected ones) and never returning ones.. Rejected" is not a fixed group label, but a condition or action.
"those who rejected" as those who could have followed, but chose manipulation over submission. It’s a subtle yet powerful warning against building religious structures or restrictions not rooted in revelation but in human control, ego, or tradition falsely sanctified.5103 is a powerful statement on traditional Islam.. or even any religion that is based on human invention but still claiming to be from the Divine..
This is not a critique of another religion — it’s a warning about what is being developed under the name of Divine but not from Divine. Yes. They weren’t coming in opposition to God — they were co-opting the Divine name. This is why it’s so dangerous.. That's why in verse592 it clearly indicated 'beware' even after stating 'Abide by the Divine, while abiding by the dispatcher, yet beware'.. so crucial here..
ع ل و this root is never meaning ‘COME’ in Quran.. it is ridiculous to use it as ‘Come’, perhaps translators are obsessed with modern day usage of come.. but this root here means ‘ascend/rise up’. It means elevate yourself by following the Divine path alone.. It’s a call to overcome their clinging path to their nourishers by abiding only in the Divine path.. Don’t be selective..
Using “come” gives the impression that God is calling outsiders or disbelievers or Ascribing ones to embrace the revelation. Not the case here unfortunately.. The root of this word has nothing to do with ‘come’.. surprise surprise..
But “rise up to what the Divine has originated” is a call to insiders, who believes in the Divine but are selective in following path of the Divine, thus who are misaligned, ending as rejectors. That’s what beautifully described by the Divine in the following verse..
5104 Yet, when it is stated to them, ‘rise up toward what the Divine has originated, thus towards the dispatcher.’ They stated, ‘Our perception is, what we found upon it our nourishers.’ Is it even if their nourishers were not realizing a thing, then they guide not?
To get a better picture, read from 5101 onwards.. The Divine is asking this group of people who believes in the Divine 'to RISE UP'.. and not a new invitation to disbelievers..
you can only rise up if you are low, or lacking, or fallen in some way. These people are fallen to a trap of nourishers.. so call is for them to 'RISE UP'
It's not aimed at those who outright deny the Divine — it targets those who claim belief but refuse to align fully with Divine revelation, choosing instead the perception of their nourishers (آبَاء).They are not rejecting the Divine — they are replacing revelation with tradition, and clinging low when asked to rise.
That’s why the word 'rise up' is spot-on
They are selective in revelation — comfortable in inherited interpretation — and thus called to rise, not simply “come.”
Now any intelligent person can deduce how the religion of traditional Islam is originated and through what source.. Yes by these people who refused to align with the Divine path but believed in the Divine and kept nourishers above the Divine revelations, never RISEN UP / ASCENDED when the Divine called them..
-
5106 O you, the ones who concurred! The state of testimony is a manifestation of you, when came to pass one of you the demoralization, in the process of transferal; a couple of mutual justifications among you, or two others from outside of you, given that you are struck through the thriving, thus you are succumbed into a state of disappointment of the demoralization. You retain both of them, well after the obligations, then let them vow by the Divine if you had suspected, ‘Not we exchange with it an assessment, even if he were to be a member of attachment, thus not we shroud the Divine testimony. Verily, then we are among the flawed ones.’
5107 Then, if both stumbled on that, it justified failure. Then two others, keeping their position, from the ones who deserved to be over them—the associated ones; yet let them vow by the Divine, ‘Surely our testimony is truer than their testimony while we have not trespassed; in that case, then certainly we are among the wronged ones.’
5108 Such is proximate that they bring forth by the testimony on its objective, or they would be cautious that oaths are vacillated despite their oaths. Thus, conscientize the Divine, yet heed; and the Divine does not guide the established of the renounced ones.Well, 5106 is one of those verses that all translators corrupted its purity, knowing nothing of it, and totally aligned with their ritualistic religion, attempting to translate words like ‘sala’ in the verse as ‘ritual prayer’ and making a total mess of the verse. In a nutshell, sheer meaningless ..
5106 well connected with 2282.. the latter is the initiation of the bargaining or contract, its procedure, and the former is when such bargaining collapsed and lost trust and thus demoralized and its procedure.. all are spiritual guidance through the materialistic world and not how to do business..Theme - 2282 (Initiation)
Context - Beginning of transaction
Focus - Clarity, documentation, foresight
Spiritual Emphasis - Prevent injustice through structure
Witness Role - Chosen and formal
Divine Conscience - Foundation of processTheme - 5106 (Collapse)
Context - Collapse/demoralization phase
Focus - Integrity, recovery, truth preservation
Spiritual Emphasis - Revive justice through integrity
Witness Role - Possibly external, responsive, correctiveDivine Conscience - Final safeguard when systems fail
Integrity is not proven by agreement, but by truthfulness in collapse.
-
I have completely translated chapter 05 and here is the link for anyone who is interested to read..
https//rifkyy2020.wixsite.com/expressandlearntruth/post/divinity-05
Please remember that my translation is not the ultimate truth, nor is it beyond improvement. However, I have rendered it with utmost honesty and precision, and most significantly with pure human to the Divine connection and not AI. Take it as a starting point, but do not rely solely on my work. Research independently and seek guidance from Allah alone. After all, these are Divine words—I’ve merely conveyed them in English to the best of my ability, guided by my understanding.
Verify everything through the Arabic Quran. If Allah wills, and you attain that pure Divine guidance, you may recognize that I have conveyed the truth of the Quran to the extent of my capacity. Verification is always with the Arabic Quran and not with AI and human to the Divine connection alone..
If the Divine caused, He would awaken whoever reaches out.. Good luck..
-
I have completely translated chapter 05 and here is the link for anyone who is interested to read..
https//rifkyy2020.wixsite.com/expressandlearntruth/post/divinity-05
Please remember that my translation is not the ultimate truth, nor is it beyond improvement. However, I have rendered it with utmost honesty and precision, and most significantly with pure human to the Divine connection and not AI. Take it as a starting point, but do not rely solely on my work. Research independently and seek guidance from Allah alone. After all, these are Divine words—I’ve merely conveyed them in English to the best of my ability, guided by my understanding.
Verify everything through the Arabic Quran. If Allah wills, and you attain that pure Divine guidance, you may recognize that I have conveyed the truth of the Quran to the extent of my capacity. Verification is always with the Arabic Quran and not with AI and human to the Divine connection alone..
If the Divine caused, He would awaken whoever reaches out.. Good luck..
I was seriously wondering while I was translating with deep reflection and root words and context, and logic behind them of the verse 5110
5110 As the Divine stated, ‘O Eisa, son of Maryam! Consider my blessings upon you, even upon your mother, as I have influenced you with the sanctified force of life, instructing the people during the novice, yet fully-fledged. Yet, when I revealed to you the ordainment and the judgment, and the Enlightenment (al Torah), and the Injeel (al Injeel), thus as you share through the disposition, in line with practicalities of the disciple, by My leave, and as you invigorate him, so he takes flight by My leave, and as you disown the indoctrinations and the blemishes by My leave, and as you drive out the insanity by My leave. And when I curbed constituents of transitioning ones from you, as you affected them with the manifestations, then stated the ones who rejected among them, that this is except manifest sorcery.
I was wondering, what! then how come the Christians' faith and whatever is written in the Bible align with the traditional Muslim translation of this verse.. Raising the dead to life, leper cured bla bla.. Then why do I feel different about this verse.. I realized how Christians at the very early time took their Injeel verses literally and dumped into the Bible by the Greeks, so it immensely assisted in making Jesus to some grand level.. And this religion of early Christianity had a lot to offer to the man-made religion of Islam as well.. The Divine has placed the same information as what happened with Eisa truly, son of Maryam.. but interpretation turned everything upside down.. And these traditional people blindly adhered to their take, either not knowing or intentionally, they had ironed out the true meaning and presented a forged meaning out of it..
Imagine, why should Allah allow Eisa, son of Maryam to create a shape of a bird by clay and let it become a real bird and let some people witness and say 'wow' wow or say sorcery... So, they immediately believe in the Divine or reject.. Nope.. it won't help and never did the Divine so.. and it is not the way to guide people.. But if you read my translation, it is the reality.. No miracle.. But impossible matters made possible by the Divine leave..
-
It is good see one or two is reading chapter 05 translation as they questioned me.. why 538 is not gender (male and female)? .. lol
"No point of showing two genders of thieves"
– Because exploitation isn’t gendered; it’s institutional.- Exploiters (active not biological gender)
- The "State of Exploitation" (system where exploiters approach)
- Enablers ("influences/appeals"
One has to read all the way from 527 to 539 to understand 538 in its precise nature.. cus too closely connected.
538 Thus, the exploiters, along with the state of exploitation, then dismantle their influence, a recompense for what they exerted as epitome from the Divine, yet the Divine, mighty, judging.
539 But whoever reoriented even after his wronging, thus reformed, then verily the Divine orients upon him. Indeed, the Divine is redeeming, compassionate.No chopping hands and orienting, and then the Divine redeeming.. Why does one need the Divine redemption for just stealing bread after chopping off the hands? The Divine is not so cheap to explain some cheap info like that..
What is so profound in commanding to 'chop hands' as if no one on the earth knew to do that or rather no one in the earth already were practicing that while the command is given.. Many nations practiced even before Quran revelations of this verse as legal punishment of 'chopping hands' for theft brutally.. nothing new and nothing great to come from the Divine..
