Evolutionary "scientists" claim tht rape is due 2
-
Khi- Salam. I understand tht u claim tht but evolutionists dont seem 2. They wld rather not punish such a person coz they claim it is genetically inherent. Thts the whole prob. We have no more morality tht way.
If you are consistent in keeping the naturalistic fallacy and prejudice out of your head, then you should not have been troubled.
Thornhill & Palmer, the scientists that studied rape in evolutionary terms in their book A Natural History of Rape, which may be the source of your erroneous claim that 'evolutionists say rape is okay', never said that rape is okay. Instead they propose ways to annihilate this tendency. Try reading the book yourself before passing premature judgement.
Morality is not from what's in our genes. I thought we have a book called the Qur'an that's supposed to be our source for morality?
It was you who started it in the first place.
Khi- Y r u afraid of talking 2 Dr. Kent on the ohone? GOD Bless!
I'm not in the US, international calls are expensive! Besides, the burden of proof is not mine but yours. I'm not the one who dragged Kent Hovind here.
-
Khi- Salam. Ur a scientist. Money shldnt be a prob 4 u. GOD Bless!
WTF?
I take that as a personal insult on my own dire financial circumstances evil
Scientists are not normally rich people you know. Evangelists, now that's a fat cat profession. No wonder Kent has millions of dollars to spare for prize money.
Hmm, maybe I should be a televangelist... then I can ask people to pay me to pray for them on TV... Then I'll be rich.
-
WTF?
I take that as a personal insult on my own dire financial circumstances evil
Scientists are not normally rich people you know. Evangelists, now that's a fat cat profession. No wonder Kent has millions of dollars to spare for prize money.
Hmm, maybe I should be a televangelist... then I can ask people to pay me to pray for them on TV... Then I'll be rich.
Khi- Salam. U mean 2 say tht u dont earn good money? Evolutionists usually earn a lot of money. They r even tax funded while Dr. Kent doesnt take a single penny from the tax money. Uve got 2 get the facts straight. Now ok lemme except maybe ur financial conditions r not tht good. But dont u have the money 4 a signle International Phone call. U can then ask him whether he cld call u back or chat on the net. Im sure he wld do tht if ur ready. GOD Bless!
-
I see Andya, Khizar still badgering you about evolution!
Khizar's aversion to evolution has become almost psycosomatic.
Khizar, I thought you are bringing one of Dr. Kent's disciple to debate with us?
Where is he?
Regards,
-
I see Andya, Khizar still badgering you about evolution!
Khizar's aversion to evolution has become almost psycosomatic.
Khizar, I thought you are bringing one of Dr. Kent's disciple to debate with us?
Where is he?
Regards,
Khi- Salam. Ive decided 2 post Dr. Kent's phone no. so tht u can call him urself. No one can explain his views better as the original person himself. GOD Bless!
-
Salam,
Some evolutionary scientists go so far as 2 argue that rape is a natural part of evolution!!!
http//seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~alex/education/hps/koterski.htm
So u see once again where this theory is leading us. GOD Bless!Do you know the "naturalistic fallacy" ?
The naturalistic fallacy is related to, and often confused with, the is-ought problem (as formulated by, for example, David Hume). As a result, the term is sometimes used loosely to describe arguments which claim to draw ethical conclusions from natural facts. Even more distantly, the term is used to describe arguments which claim to draw ethical conclusions from the fact that something is "natural" or "unnatural."
Many people use the phrase "naturalistic fallacy" to characterize inferences of the form "This behavior is natural; therefore, this behavior is morally acceptable" or "This behavior is unnatural; therefore, this behavior is morally unacceptable".
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
Peace