Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Website Comments / Observations
  3. Free-Minds.Org
  4. New Forum! Yaaayy

New Forum! Yaaayy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Free-Minds.Org
66 Posts 9 Posters 2.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    adley
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Salaam,

    Oh hey... what is the ranking for the stars?
    Tell me tell me ;D

    =adley=

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      nadeem
      wrote on last edited by
      #53

      Peace Nadeem, all,

      I have heard that there can be a 'ignore' poster button feature of some kind that can be turned on? Does that hold true for this forum and can it be turned on for those that might like to refine their experience at this forum?!?

      Hi Savage Carrot,

      Yes, you're correct, however a mod has to be installed for this. However I could make a small incision in the index.php file, to exclude posts from persons who the view has chosen to ignore in the list here

      http//www.free-minds.org80/forum/index.php?action=profile;sa=pmprefs

      When the forum shows post, it ask's the database for post where the ID.TOPIC is set to the same id as the topic value in the urls, for this thread for example
      http//www.free-minds.org80/forum/index.php?topic=5556

      All I i have to do, is to program the forum to ask for posts that have the same ID.TOPIC and the author's name is not found in the viewers ignorelist.Sound simple eyh? -)

      Nadeem.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LaythL Offline
        LaythL Offline
        Layth
        wrote on last edited by
        #54

        Peace,

        Oh hey... what is the ranking for the stars?
        Tell me tell me

        Beginner/Inquirer 0-99
        Apprentice 100-499
        Truth Seeker 500-999
        Enlightned 1000-1999
        Wise One / Burnout 2000+

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          savage_carrot
          wrote on last edited by
          #55

          Peace Nadeem, all

          Thanks for the info, that would be great for some people, if you could be so kind as to operate away?

          I would also like to request the current spelling of 'enlightned' to be changed as it is incorrect. It should be 'enlightened'.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #56

            number of posts (quantity) does not relate to quality

            that system of scoring is pointless.

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • LaythL Offline
              LaythL Offline
              Layth
              wrote on last edited by
              #57

              Peace Wakas,

              I see no harm in having some light hearted references to go with the # of posts...Perhaps the ones I have chosen are a bit too serious and if you like we can use the star wars ones posted by savage

              1 star 0-99 posts (Speck/MidiChlorian?)
              2 stars 100-299 posts (Padawan/Sith Apprentice)
              3 stars 300-499 (Jedi? Sentinel)
              4 stars 500-999 (Jedi? Knight)
              5 stars 1000 and over (Jedi Master or Sith Lord?)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                savage_carrot
                wrote on last edited by
                #58

                Peace Layth, Wakas, all

                I think the one's we have currently are completely fine...and bro Wakas...we know its the quality that matters

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • WakasW Offline
                  WakasW Offline
                  Wakas
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #59

                  peace Layth, SC, all,

                  whilst i can appreciate the light-heartedness of the naming, if you can show this will be obvious to newcomers and bears no significance in terms of quality then i will agree to keep it.

                  if you cannot, then i am against it.

                  having said that, if its not possible to remove the star system, then stick with what you've got i suppose.


                  Wakas

                  All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    savage_carrot
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #60

                    Peace bro Wakas,

                    A lot of forums use this type of 'classification'. Some have themes and some are arbitrary. Some I have seen personally are like 'veteran', 'novice' etc by default and some can change them by putting stuff up there as they choose. I think it's commonly known that it has nothing to do with quality but the number of posts and thus time spent at that particular forum.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      adley
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #61

                      Salaam Layth,

                      Just in case this one slipped from you. The link to the Arabic forum seems broken. Just informing you bro.

                      =adley=

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        Fahad1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #62

                        Beginner/Inquirer 0-99
                        Apprentice 100-499
                        Truth Seeker 500-999
                        Enlightned 1000-1999
                        Wise One / Burnout 2000+

                        peace all .
                        i dont like these ranking titles either . they are too serious .

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          adley
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #63

                          Salaam Saladin,

                          Hey, do you have any idea of a "not too serious" titles? ;D
                          Funny titles might be fun too I guess.

                          =adley=

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z Offline
                            Z Offline
                            zenje
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #64

                            Actually I think the titles are funny. and appropriate. ;D

                            Don't take them too 'seriously'

                            Peace

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              nadeem
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #65

                              Peace everyone!

                              Don't take them too 'seriously'

                              I agree with Zenje.

                              Things are as serious as you take them -)

                              Nadeem.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Offline
                                D Offline
                                David
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #66

                                Peace all,

                                The stats and user preferences in this new forum are pretty nice.
                                I like the old emoticons better though. (

                                peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users