Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Website Comments / Observations
  3. Free-Minds.Org
  4. New Forum! Yaaayy

New Forum! Yaaayy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Free-Minds.Org
66 Posts 9 Posters 2.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LaythL Offline
    LaythL Offline
    Layth
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    Peace,

    Oh hey... what is the ranking for the stars?
    Tell me tell me

    Beginner/Inquirer 0-99
    Apprentice 100-499
    Truth Seeker 500-999
    Enlightned 1000-1999
    Wise One / Burnout 2000+

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      savage_carrot
      wrote on last edited by
      #55

      Peace Nadeem, all

      Thanks for the info, that would be great for some people, if you could be so kind as to operate away?

      I would also like to request the current spelling of 'enlightned' to be changed as it is incorrect. It should be 'enlightened'.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • WakasW Offline
        WakasW Offline
        Wakas
        wrote on last edited by
        #56

        number of posts (quantity) does not relate to quality

        that system of scoring is pointless.

        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • LaythL Offline
          LaythL Offline
          Layth
          wrote on last edited by
          #57

          Peace Wakas,

          I see no harm in having some light hearted references to go with the # of posts...Perhaps the ones I have chosen are a bit too serious and if you like we can use the star wars ones posted by savage

          1 star 0-99 posts (Speck/MidiChlorian?)
          2 stars 100-299 posts (Padawan/Sith Apprentice)
          3 stars 300-499 (Jedi? Sentinel)
          4 stars 500-999 (Jedi? Knight)
          5 stars 1000 and over (Jedi Master or Sith Lord?)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            savage_carrot
            wrote on last edited by
            #58

            Peace Layth, Wakas, all

            I think the one's we have currently are completely fine...and bro Wakas...we know its the quality that matters

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • WakasW Offline
              WakasW Offline
              Wakas
              wrote on last edited by
              #59

              peace Layth, SC, all,

              whilst i can appreciate the light-heartedness of the naming, if you can show this will be obvious to newcomers and bears no significance in terms of quality then i will agree to keep it.

              if you cannot, then i am against it.

              having said that, if its not possible to remove the star system, then stick with what you've got i suppose.


              Wakas

              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                savage_carrot
                wrote on last edited by
                #60

                Peace bro Wakas,

                A lot of forums use this type of 'classification'. Some have themes and some are arbitrary. Some I have seen personally are like 'veteran', 'novice' etc by default and some can change them by putting stuff up there as they choose. I think it's commonly known that it has nothing to do with quality but the number of posts and thus time spent at that particular forum.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  adley
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #61

                  Salaam Layth,

                  Just in case this one slipped from you. The link to the Arabic forum seems broken. Just informing you bro.

                  =adley=

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fahad1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #62

                    Beginner/Inquirer 0-99
                    Apprentice 100-499
                    Truth Seeker 500-999
                    Enlightned 1000-1999
                    Wise One / Burnout 2000+

                    peace all .
                    i dont like these ranking titles either . they are too serious .

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      adley
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #63

                      Salaam Saladin,

                      Hey, do you have any idea of a "not too serious" titles? ;D
                      Funny titles might be fun too I guess.

                      =adley=

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Z Offline
                        Z Offline
                        zenje
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #64

                        Actually I think the titles are funny. and appropriate. ;D

                        Don't take them too 'seriously'

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          nadeem
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #65

                          Peace everyone!

                          Don't take them too 'seriously'

                          I agree with Zenje.

                          Things are as serious as you take them -)

                          Nadeem.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Offline
                            D Offline
                            David
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #66

                            Peace all,

                            The stats and user preferences in this new forum are pretty nice.
                            I like the old emoticons better though. (

                            peace

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users