Suggestion for Layth and Mods : Moderated Debates
-
peace
thanks to mquran for your answer about the justifications.
and
those expressions related to the last episode of the digestion + the ' you no integrity and decency.. etc ' stuff is what the mods had to delete and send some lines to the user reminding the rules of etiquette needed online and offline. -
Peace Elena and all. There are two main offenders when it comes to using questionable phraseology,and questioning of integrity etc........im sure the fourm knows who these two are...Im not really too concerned what they say to me,i can overlook that....But it annoys me when they persistently use this bad language/questioning of others beliefs routine, with others who disagree with them. (and they even argue with each other ).)....And then some of the mods/admins have the audacity to sweep the jaxal/dq/banning issues under the carpet,while letting others,and these two get away with persistent offenses...Is that quranic justice?...Thats why i say some of the mods/admins are not professional,or competent...No offense... ) Just saying it like it is...
peace all. ps;these are not the only two offenders... i think the forum needs more tolerance,and more of this; group -
Peace all. By the way,i dont really want anyone banned....Just a bit more civil behaviour would be nice.....Especially from guys advocating 'quranic' justice......Ask idol-free for ideas on 'behaviour modifications' and peaceful behaviour........That brother knows what hes talking about... bravo
-
salaam
I really don't care. But to the best of my ability, I will challenge your campaign of misinformation
.Surely then you dont need the moderators. Let people judge for themselves as to who is truthful.
And then some of the mods/admins have the audacity to sweep the jaxal/dq/banning issues under the carpet,while letting others,and these two get away with persistent offenses...Is that quranic justice?...Thats why i say some of the mods/admins are not professional,or competent...No offense... Just saying it like it is...
I agree with you on this
think the forum needs more tolerance,and more of this;
and I think most would on this
regards
-
What do you call of behaviour of people who make statements , commit others to answering but runs and hides thereafter?
I call it the "master/student syndrome with a touch of leyla/majnu play".
As for your subjective opinions you pass on me,danish and lote-tree....Well i dont think we are going to loose much sleep over someone criticising our characters from the vantage point of a computer....
But to the best of my ability, I will challenge your campaign of misinformation.So far you've done nothing but bicker and sob.
Also, I really didn't expect you, Danish or Lote-tree to EVER step up for debate. It's not just your ability to be honest and decent. People like you will always hide and never be upfront.
Take the "de" and "dis" out of debate and discuss, and you'll find your established mindframe which makes people like me 'hit and run'.
Islam's peace comes AFTER conflict and victory over mischief, not as a result of lying down and taking fecal matter from the likes of you.
You and Ahmed seem to be enjoying the flavour the most.
-
LOL
I guess this thread turned to be entertaining, thanks a lot boys and girls
-
And by the way, Mr. mquran, since you are promulgating the debate issue, I'll bet that the first ones to deviate and debar prospective and deligent discussions will be you and Ahmed along with a few encroachments that barge in from time to time.
-
LOL
You're a classic Danish, and sure lucky that I like you
-
Not true. Idolfree has shown clear biased with members who do not agree with his own views. Search and find out the truth. Savage Carrot would be fair and unbiased Moderator.
But you may be biased in suggesting SC D
So we can take this route to ad infinitum -)
-
If both agree on SC, sure why not. Same goes for idolfree1, TheNabi and Wakas... I think their views are balanced and fair, but as LT said, I might be biased in saying that also. I just thought of idolfree in this particular case because, I know mq doesn't mind, and if I'm not mistaken, enquirer was just complementing him as well.
......Ask idol-free for ideas on 'behaviour modifications' and peaceful behaviour........That brother knows what hes talking about... bravo
Peace.
-
Peace,
While Jaxal was a "playful puppy", in contrast, Dhulqarnain (aka Priest_Bokmei) always displayed a keen interest in Quranic injunctions with diligence and contemplation, UNLESS PROVOKED. Though my views on Quran has recently changed, I would love to have my good 'ol friend back, perhaps he can better discuss the issues penned by me, rather than mquran and Ahmed having thoughtless, disturbing and defamed views.
Dhulqarnain's apologetic response and willinging to come back was crystal clear
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4993.0http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4520.0
-
Peace all,
By the way, my all-out vote for moderating goes to "enquirer", a fine resilient and methodical candidate.
-
Peace Danish,,
Peace,
While Jaxal was a "playful puppy", in contrast, Dhulqarnain (aka Priest_Bokmei) always displayed a keen interest in Quranic injunctions with diligence and contemplation, UNLESS PROVOKED. Though my views on Quran has recently changed, I would love to have my good 'ol friend back, perhaps he can better discuss the issues penned by me, rather than mquran and Ahmed having thoughtless, disturbing and defamed views.
Dhulqarnain's apologetic response and willinging to come back was crystal clear
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4993.0http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=4520.0
Are you sure you wanted to post this post under this thread? I thought that your post belongs more to the other one
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5762.0I was looking forward to your comment regarding the banning. But have you not thought that maybe DQ has changed his views too!? In any case, I would like to know where he has arrived in his understanding.
-
Are you sure you wanted to post this post under this thread? I thought that your post belongs more to the other one
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5762.0Certainly TAJ, you are right. My bad, I should have posted on the 'banning' thread. Perhaps the moderators can swing it there.
I was looking forward to your comment regarding the banning. But have you not thought that maybe DQ has changed his views too!? In any case, I would like to know where he has arrived in his understanding.
I honestly do not have the faintest idea of what DQ's current views are, since his last post on this forum. I do not know him personally and neither spoken to him, except for a few pm's back then.
-
Not true. Idolfree has shown clear biased with members who do not agree with his own views. Search and find out the truth. Savage Carrot would be fair and unbiased Moderator.
Exactly bro
and I'm one of those members
cheers
-
Not true. Idolfree has shown clear biased with members who do not agree with his own views. Search and find out the truth. Savage Carrot would be fair and unbiased Moderator.
Exactly bro
and I'm one of those members
cheers
He challenged me many times by coming after me because he did not like what I said. I avioded that because did not want any debate with no logic and sense. I am on for the debate. Thanks to you and the brother I will miss on this forum TG.