Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. A refutation to Bro Yaseen - Polygamy is allowed in 4 23

A refutation to Bro Yaseen - Polygamy is allowed in 4 23

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
202 Posts 20 Posters 13.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    sarah2505
    wrote on last edited by
    #168

    doesn't always mean AND, see for example
    3112
    They shall be smitten with abasement wherever they are found unless they are protected by a covenant with Allah or by a covenant with men.

    are you sure that it is OR and not AND in 3112?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      afridi220
      wrote on last edited by
      #169

      then why AND instead of OR

      Salam Sara
      What [423} sys

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W Offline
        W Offline
        warner
        wrote on last edited by
        #170

        I think ?AND? here is reasonable use to convey the message since just as in English language ?And? is used in Arabic to mean ?also/ as well as? as you can see the use in the following verses and also in few other places in the Quran.

        337 And when We took from the prophets their covenant, "wa"/and from you, "wa"/and from Noah, and Abraham, and Moses, and Jesus the son of Mary; We took from them a strong covenant.

        5568 In them are fruits "wa"/and date palms, "wa"/and pomegranate.
        "Fruits" includes "pomegranates" even though they are separated by "wa"/and.

        So possibly ?And? covers men in all 3 situations of having 2, 3 and 4 wives together.

        But with 423 and 4129 do you still think polygamy is not allowed ?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          san
          wrote on last edited by
          #171

          Peace,

          But with 423 and 4129 do you still think polygamy is not allowed ?

          But with 4129 do you still think polygamy is encouraged ?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            sarah2505
            wrote on last edited by
            #172

            What reason can there be to allow already married men to marry those women, when there are single men available?

            I would assume that there was an excess of available men compared to the number of available women considering the possible demographic of that region.

            Please see my other thread for details.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              afridi220
              wrote on last edited by
              #173

              What reason can there be to allow already married men to marry those women, when there are single men available?

              I would assume that there was an excess of available men compared to the number of available women considering the possible demographic of that region.

              Please see my other thread for details.

              The reason polygamy already existed at that time, now why are youj ealous??

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W Offline
                W Offline
                warner
                wrote on last edited by
                #174

                Peace San

                4129 is clear indication of polygamy but it refers to the case of being unfair to one which sould not be the case. 43 instructs if you can not be fair not to marry more than one.

                Peace Sarah

                From which verse did this single men come from ? Any way the assumption of single men being available is information outside the Quran which you can not use as argument against the clear message allowing polygamy in the Quran.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  san
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #175

                  Peace San

                  4129 is clear indication of polygamy but it refers to the case of being unfair to one which sould not be the case. 43 instructs if you can not be fair not to marry more than one.

                  And you will never be able to be equal between the ladies... That'd always be the case with polygamy, if i were to read 4129 literally. The rest of the verse suggest the best compromise one can take. Then...

                  4130 And if they separate, Allah will enrich each from His abundance. And ever is Allah Encompassing and Wise.

                  If it weren't for the children (btw yatama means "fatherless" and not "parents-less"--please contrast that of 43 to that of 4127 where yataman-nisa is specifically addressed) then i had no idea why one should get into polygamy in this world.

                  Oh yeah. Pretty youth is one of the most common reasons--at least that's what i usually see...

                  Peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    sarah2505
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #176

                    From which verse did this single men come from ? Any way the assumption of single men being available is information outside the Quran which you can not use as argument against the clear message allowing polygamy in the Quran.

                    Did you even read my other thread? I am not referring to verses, I am asking a question about the possible demographic of that area.

                    There were high rates of maternal mortality, right?

                    There was female infanticide, right?

                    What do you think is the result?

                    Is it a 'clear' message that polygamy is allowed for any individual with the exception of the Prophet Muhammad? And if it were, why is it also discouraged?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      sarah2505
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #177

                      Oh yeah. Pretty youth is one of the most common reasons--at least that's what i usually see...

                      Peace

                      ???

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        san
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #178

                        ???

                        You know what i mean.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          warner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #179

                          Peace Sarah

                          I couldn't read your other thread still. Will read it soon.

                          Why do you say excluding the Prophet ?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            sarah2505
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #180

                            Peace Sarah

                            I couldn't read your other thread still. Will read it soon.

                            Why do you say excluding the Prophet ?

                            because there is a verse in the Quran (don't remember where), where it refers to the 'wives' (plural) of the Prophet

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              sarah2505
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #181

                              Any way the assumption of single men being available is information outside the Quran which you can not use as argument against the clear message allowing polygamy in the Quran.

                              False. There is a verse in the Quran (don't remember where) that says that they should not kill their female children. That indicates it was common practice, and even if not common, it happened often enough to warrant a verse condemning it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • W Offline
                                W Offline
                                warner
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #182

                                Peace San

                                Good argument. But the problem I see is that the clause is qualified by...even if it is your ardent desire( were very careful),...

                                and continued with ..."; so do not sway too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. "

                                If the verse ended with " you will never be able to be equal between the ladies" then your argument is valid but it has a qulaifier and a continuation. One can take up the argument

                                Clueless on the pretty youth

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  sarah2505
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #183

                                  You know what i mean.

                                  I honestly don't ???

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    warner
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #184

                                    Sarah,

                                    Its the verse "Oh wives of the Prophet"...it occurs more than once

                                    Killing the women does not mean less women. We can use outside factors only if the message in the Quran can not be understood. But polygamy is clearly allowed in the Quran . So outside assumption even if it is correct can not over rule the clear verse.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      warner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #185

                                      Peace San

                                      What is your evidence to say that Orphan means fatherless and not parentless ?

                                      Need something better than the distorted dictionary

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        afridi220
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #186

                                        orphans and widows are terms used to describe paragraph spacing in word-processing.

                                        If a paragraph runs onto two pages the lines on the bottom of the first page are referred to as orphans and the lines on the top of page two are referred to as widows.

                                        Any way orphan mean a motherless or fatherless or parentless police

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          sarah2505
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #187

                                          Killing the women does not mean less women.

                                          yeah

                                          Say there are 52 boys born, and 48 girls. Of those 48 girls, say 5 are killed as infants. The kids then grow up and are now in their twenties. Do you not have more boys than girls?
                                          This is very simple arithmetic.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users