Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. A refutation to Bro Yaseen - Polygamy is allowed in 4 23

A refutation to Bro Yaseen - Polygamy is allowed in 4 23

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
202 Posts 20 Posters 13.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    afridi220
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    What reason can there be to allow already married men to marry those women, when there are single men available?

    I would assume that there was an excess of available men compared to the number of available women considering the possible demographic of that region.

    Please see my other thread for details.

    The reason polygamy already existed at that time, now why are youj ealous??

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W Offline
      W Offline
      warner
      wrote on last edited by
      #174

      Peace San

      4129 is clear indication of polygamy but it refers to the case of being unfair to one which sould not be the case. 43 instructs if you can not be fair not to marry more than one.

      Peace Sarah

      From which verse did this single men come from ? Any way the assumption of single men being available is information outside the Quran which you can not use as argument against the clear message allowing polygamy in the Quran.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        san
        wrote on last edited by
        #175

        Peace San

        4129 is clear indication of polygamy but it refers to the case of being unfair to one which sould not be the case. 43 instructs if you can not be fair not to marry more than one.

        And you will never be able to be equal between the ladies... That'd always be the case with polygamy, if i were to read 4129 literally. The rest of the verse suggest the best compromise one can take. Then...

        4130 And if they separate, Allah will enrich each from His abundance. And ever is Allah Encompassing and Wise.

        If it weren't for the children (btw yatama means "fatherless" and not "parents-less"--please contrast that of 43 to that of 4127 where yataman-nisa is specifically addressed) then i had no idea why one should get into polygamy in this world.

        Oh yeah. Pretty youth is one of the most common reasons--at least that's what i usually see...

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          sarah2505
          wrote on last edited by
          #176

          From which verse did this single men come from ? Any way the assumption of single men being available is information outside the Quran which you can not use as argument against the clear message allowing polygamy in the Quran.

          Did you even read my other thread? I am not referring to verses, I am asking a question about the possible demographic of that area.

          There were high rates of maternal mortality, right?

          There was female infanticide, right?

          What do you think is the result?

          Is it a 'clear' message that polygamy is allowed for any individual with the exception of the Prophet Muhammad? And if it were, why is it also discouraged?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            sarah2505
            wrote on last edited by
            #177

            Oh yeah. Pretty youth is one of the most common reasons--at least that's what i usually see...

            Peace

            ???

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              san
              wrote on last edited by
              #178

              ???

              You know what i mean.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W Offline
                W Offline
                warner
                wrote on last edited by
                #179

                Peace Sarah

                I couldn't read your other thread still. Will read it soon.

                Why do you say excluding the Prophet ?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  sarah2505
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #180

                  Peace Sarah

                  I couldn't read your other thread still. Will read it soon.

                  Why do you say excluding the Prophet ?

                  because there is a verse in the Quran (don't remember where), where it refers to the 'wives' (plural) of the Prophet

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    sarah2505
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #181

                    Any way the assumption of single men being available is information outside the Quran which you can not use as argument against the clear message allowing polygamy in the Quran.

                    False. There is a verse in the Quran (don't remember where) that says that they should not kill their female children. That indicates it was common practice, and even if not common, it happened often enough to warrant a verse condemning it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W Offline
                      W Offline
                      warner
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #182

                      Peace San

                      Good argument. But the problem I see is that the clause is qualified by...even if it is your ardent desire( were very careful),...

                      and continued with ..."; so do not sway too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. "

                      If the verse ended with " you will never be able to be equal between the ladies" then your argument is valid but it has a qulaifier and a continuation. One can take up the argument

                      Clueless on the pretty youth

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        sarah2505
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #183

                        You know what i mean.

                        I honestly don't ???

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          warner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #184

                          Sarah,

                          Its the verse "Oh wives of the Prophet"...it occurs more than once

                          Killing the women does not mean less women. We can use outside factors only if the message in the Quran can not be understood. But polygamy is clearly allowed in the Quran . So outside assumption even if it is correct can not over rule the clear verse.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W Offline
                            W Offline
                            warner
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #185

                            Peace San

                            What is your evidence to say that Orphan means fatherless and not parentless ?

                            Need something better than the distorted dictionary

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              afridi220
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #186

                              orphans and widows are terms used to describe paragraph spacing in word-processing.

                              If a paragraph runs onto two pages the lines on the bottom of the first page are referred to as orphans and the lines on the top of page two are referred to as widows.

                              Any way orphan mean a motherless or fatherless or parentless police

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                sarah2505
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #187

                                Killing the women does not mean less women.

                                yeah

                                Say there are 52 boys born, and 48 girls. Of those 48 girls, say 5 are killed as infants. The kids then grow up and are now in their twenties. Do you not have more boys than girls?
                                This is very simple arithmetic.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  sarah2505
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #188

                                  orphans and widows are terms used to describe paragraph spacing in word-processing.

                                  If a paragraph runs onto two pages the lines on the bottom of the first page are referred to as orphans and the lines on the top of page two are referred to as widows.

                                  offtopic

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    sarah2505
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #189

                                    We can use outside factors only if the message in the Quran can not be understood. But polygamy is clearly allowed in the Quran . So outside assumption even if it is correct can not over rule the clear verse.

                                    nope, it isn't. If it was, it wouldn't be debatable, and you wouldn't have so many verses discouraging it, that can be taken as something that was common practice/ traditional at that time, without being Quranically justified, like the verses telling people to 'free the slaves.'

                                    It doesn't mean that slavery is 'allowed but discouraged' in the Quran, but it's setting a precedent to bring about, over time, a situation where slavery is eradicated.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      warner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #190

                                      Peace Afridi

                                      Thanks for the update on the WP jargon.

                                      An Orphan has to be parentless (i.e. without both father and mother)since the issue of guardianship will not arise even if one parent was living.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • W Offline
                                        W Offline
                                        warner
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #191

                                        There are other factors as men having a lower life expectancy than women due to various reasons such as war, travel, bad life style habits, natural causes etc...this might lead to more women than men in a society.
                                        Again these factors can not over rule the Quran.

                                        I would say Polygamy is allowed with checks, it is not encouraged or discouraged, certainly not promoted or celebrated as it happend to be the case in these societies where the permission for polygamy was certainly misused.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          san
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #192

                                          Peace San

                                          and continued with ..."; so do not sway too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. "

                                          Now is that called the equal (al-`adl, as in perfect balance) or is that an approach to get closer to the equal?

                                          Peace San

                                          But the problem I see is that the clause is qualified by...even if it is your ardent desire( were very careful),...

                                          and continued with ..."; so do not sway too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. "

                                          If the verse ended with " you will never be able to be equal between the ladies" then your argument is valid but it has a qulaifier and a continuation. One can take up the argument

                                          Please elaborate on what qualifier you meant.

                                          What part of "You can never be equal to the ladies even if it is your ardent desire" (i.e. were very careful as per your comment)
                                          can possibly negates the statement
                                          "You can never be equal to the ladies"?

                                          And what part of "so do not sway too greatly and leave her as one hanging in a void. "
                                          can possibly negates the statement
                                          "You can never be equal to the ladies"?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users