Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. why is shirk an unforgivable offence decreed by the creator?

why is shirk an unforgivable offence decreed by the creator?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
44 Posts 13 Posters 963 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Peace simple. Democrats are supposed to value and respect the opinion of all members of the community,and to better all the community (theoretically anyway.)....Im just going by the logic of your classification....
    I dont believe in this mushrik/kafir/believer categorisation/division of mankind...We all have traits of shirk,kufr and belief in us....every one of us...
    The division is at times arbitrary and unrealistic.....You have to take people as they are...I dont understand the need for such black and white,neat,conclusive theoretical divisions of people..I will just give people the benefit of the doubt before classifying them....Maybe people who dont work for all the communities benefit,are un-educated,or have their reasons for not doing so....it doesnt mean i condemn them to eternal punishment....Because unfortunately when you classify someone as a muslim or kafir,its very easy to demonise,oppress,or victimise him,or say he is doomed eternally if he doesnt change to your life-style.....
    And some who are classified as mushriks seem to be better in behaviour than muslims...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Peace simple. Democrats are supposed to value and respect the opinion of all members of the community,and to better all the community (theoretically anyway.)....Im just going by the logic of your classification....
      I dont believe in this mushrik/kafir/believer categorisation/division of mankind...We all have traits of shirk,kufr and belief in us....every one of us...
      The division is at times arbitrary and unrealistic.....You have to take people as they are...I dont understand the need for such black and white,neat,conclusive theoretical divisions of people..I will just give people the benefit of the doubt before classifying them....Maybe people who dont work for all the communities benefit,are un-educated,or have their reasons for not doing so....it doesnt mean i condemn them to eternal punishment....Because unfortunately when you classify someone as a muslim or kafir,its very easy to demonise,oppress,or victimise him,or say he is doomed eternally if he doesnt change to your life-style.....
      And some who are classified as mushriks seem to be better in behaviour than muslims...

      Lets see when People go on a spree killing looting (see sura 9) you have to classify those and sort them out as well , don't tell me that you are so forgiving you willforgive people like what they did in africa and in bosnia.

      So until they change for the better you cannot forgive them ever.

      you are confusing your self by using arabic words like muslim - stick to english Br.

      Bad, good ugly ...........so forth.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Peace simple. How does me classifying someone as a kafir/mushrik help me to stop them when they go on a 'killing spree'....? I see you are another person who thinks they can see if a person is confused or not through a computer screen...? Who are you to tell me what to stick to or not? Are you an arab linguist? And did no 'killing sprees' occur in the middle east or numerous places in the name of 'quranic' ideology...
        You talk about betterment for all society....make sure you dont fall into the mistake,you mentioned earlier,of only wanting to benefit your own 'quranicly defined' sect.
        peace all.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Peace simple. How does me classifying someone as a kafir/mushrik help me to stop them when they go on a 'killing spree'....? I see you are another person who thinks they can see if a person is confused or not through a computer screen...? Who are you to tell me what to stick to or not? Are you an arab linguist? And did no 'killing sprees' occur in the middle east or numerous places in the name of 'quranic' ideology...
          You talk about betterment for all society....make sure you dont fall into the mistake,you mentioned earlier,of only wanting to benefit your own 'quranicly defined' sect.
          peace all.

          Ha ha i got you hot!

          sorry wasn't done in any bad way ..just funning you are a great person.

          Lets see calling people , the killers as murderers is classifying them isn't it.

          Is that a good enough reason Br.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            savage_carrot
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Peace siki,

            You had two different threads about the same subject in two different categories which have now been merged.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              siki
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              thanks buddy .. probably a mistake ... you know a forum illitrate ,,, me, siki

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Peace simple. I appreciate certain relative classifications,yes,but not absolute,unrealistic ones...
                There are accidental manslaughters too,are these murders too?... Also shouldnt we have VERY,VERY realistic good evidence before we classify someone as a murderer? If a person commits a murder when he was 19,and then repents and turns his life around,is he still a murderer? There are ways of dealing with murderers,criminals,etc...But too go around calling them 'murderers,criminals etc...Is not always the most productive approach...better to imprison,educate and try to rehabilitate them....Yes/no?
                peace... group Ps;dont think im soft on crime...I have three boisterous sisters... elektro

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mquran
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Salaamun alaikum Siki and everyone,

                  Reading your post, your notion of shirik seems to be like putting statuettes on the altar, sorry if im wrong.

                  Shirik, in the Quranic sense is in matters of hukm or legislation (whether legal or metaphysical) like in 18/26 which tells us 'laa YUSHRIKU fi hukmihi ahada' (he does not ASSOCIATE anyone in his hukm).

                  4/48 tells us

                  God ghafrs not that partners should be set up with Him; but He ghafrs anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with God is to devise a sin Most heinous indeed

                  What is to 'ghafr' which you translate as 'forgive' ? I am against 'forgive' because 'afaa' in Quranic vocab already points to that (like in 9/43). In Quranic language, 'ghafr' is used to denote antonymity to 'azab' or punish, suffering. Therefore, ghafr is the protection of this.

                  So the correct rendering of 4/48 is that Allah will no longer protect from harm or suffering anyone who associates his legislation. This includes committing crimes such as murder, mischief etc.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • LaythL Offline
                    LaythL Offline
                    Layth
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Peace,

                    In my opinoin the issue of Shirk is unforgivable becuase we are dealing with the subject of original sin (i.e. the idea that we are all here on Earth to redeem ourselves back in Gods favor, or risk the true punishment of Hell which was delays as part of Gods mercy).

                    This is why in some vesres you will note a reference to a previous exisitence

                    And your Lord took for the children of Adam from their backs, their progeny; and He made them witness over themselves Am I not your Lord?They saidYes, we bear witness. Thus you cannot say on the Day of Resurrection that you were unaware of this. (7172)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Fahad1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Peace,

                      In my opinoin the issue of Shirk is unforgivable becuase we are dealing with the subject of original sin (i.e. the idea that we are all here on Earth to redeem ourselves back in Gods favor, or risk the true punishment of Hell which was delays as part of Gods mercy).

                      This is why in some vesres you will note a reference to a previous exisitence

                      And your Lord took for the children of Adam from their backs, their progeny; and He made them witness over themselves Am I not your Lord?They saidYes, we bear witness. Thus you cannot say on the Day of Resurrection that you were unaware of this. (7172)

                      salam all .
                      is it necessarily from a previous existence ?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • LaythL Offline
                        LaythL Offline
                        Layth
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Peace,

                        is it necessarily from a previous existence ?

                        When reading the context of the vesre, I would say yes it is.

                        1. And your Lord took for the children of Adam from their backs, their progeny; and He made them witness over themselves Am I not your Lord? They said Yes, we bear witness. Thus you cannot say on the Day of Resurrection that you were unaware of this.
                        2. Nor can you Say It was our fathers who set up partners before and we were simply a progeny who came after them. Would You destroy us for what the innovators did?

                        The above happened clearly before we were born here on Earth, hence, a previous existence at least of the soul can be verified.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Dear all
                          Why does the creator insist upon shirk as the only unforgivable offence, if maintained till death? surely he is God almighty, the most powerful , far above the typical human egoistic attitudes. But this sounds like any man in power trying to prove his authority. If he plans judging the individual's performances fairly, he should not mind somebody thinking otherwise while he or she does correct things in this world, Buddies this assertion of God has puzzled me since long and I have not been able to make sense of it, but as he has stressed upon it so much, there has to be some thing very technical about it, which has nothing to do with this life, think about the phrase TILL DEATH.
                          Could somebody provide me the correct piece of jigsaw puzzle?
                          Sikandar

                          Peace mate

                          the answer is very simple, Allah only created us NOT TO BE MISHRIKOON, He would have been able easy to achive that but instead He gave us the freewill and put us in the driving seat instead of being compulsed to worship Him as many other creatures are (no freewill)

                          therefore whoever violate the main objective of creating us must be doomed, it makes great sense to me, I will show you later where Allah told us that He created us for that reaosn only, not to enjoy this testing life indeed

                          Salam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Peace simple. I appreciate certain relative classifications,yes,but not absolute,unrealistic ones...
                            There are accidental manslaughters too,are these murders too?... Also shouldnt we have VERY,VERY realistic good evidence before we classify someone as a murderer? If a person commits a murder when he was 19,and then repents and turns his life around,is he still a murderer? There are ways of dealing with murderers,criminals,etc...But too go around calling them 'murderers,criminals etc...Is not always the most productive approach...better to imprison,educate and try to rehabilitate them....Yes/no?
                            peace... group Ps;dont think im soft on crime...I have three boisterous sisters... elektro

                            Br according to my understanding of the quran and 95, if the people change they are forgiven and no longer classed as criminals/murders.There isn't a permanant label - its only while such actions last or the people don't change or arn't willing to change.

                            But saying that you don't wipe off their records of the past they will remain for ever but as a records.And they will suffer in the hereafter if they havn't repented as they should have.

                            God Blessings.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Peace

                              118- And if your Lord had pleased He would certainly have made people a single nation, and they shall continue to differ.

                              119- Except those on whom your Lord has mercy; and for this did He create them; and the word of your Lord is fulfilled Certainly I will fill hell with the jinn and the men, all together.

                              (11

                              (119)

                              Salam

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                brook
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Fa-itha insalakha al-ashhuru alhurumu faoqtuloo almushrikeena haythu wajadtumoohum wakhuthoohum waohsuroohum waoqAAudoo lahum kulla marsadinfa-in taboo wa aqamoo alssalatawaata woo alzzakata fakhalloo sabeelahum innaAllaha ghafoorun raheemun

                                But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the shirkists wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

                                Are we sure that aqamoo als salawaat is their establishingregular prayers?

                                It is true that they repent now but repent only being active agressors. However, they do not repent being unbelievers; they are still unbelievers and they still refuse to pray like believers.

                                So how come we expect unbelievers to establish regular prayers despite the fact that they still deny that regular prayers are worth establishing?

                                Peace,
                                Hasan Akcay

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  peace

                                  how would you like to raise a child and do everything for that child, and find out in the end them thanking his mother, who was never there for him/her? Idol-worship is unfair, and those who commit it (even out of ignorance) are hiding a disease in their hearts (unless they repent and reform). They are not devoting themselves to God. They are praising dead messengers who can't hear or see anything.

                                  He cites for you herein an example from among yourselves Do you ever elevate your servants or subordinates to the level where they rival you, and to the point that you pay them as much allegiance as is being paid to you? We thus explain the revelations for people who understand.

                                  Perfect example of how unfair idol worshp is.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Fa-itha insalakha al-ashhuru alhurumu faoqtuloo almushrikeena haythu wajadtumoohum wakhuthoohum waohsuroohum waoqAAudoo lahum kulla marsadinfa-in taboo wa aqamoo alssalatawaata woo alzzakata fakhalloo sabeelahum innaAllaha ghafoorun raheemun

                                    But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the shirkists wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

                                    Are we sure that aqamoo als salawaat is their establishingregular prayers?

                                    It is true that they repent now but repent only being active agressors. However, they do not repent being unbelievers; they are still unbelievers and they still refuse to pray like believers.

                                    So how come we expect unbelievers to establish regular prayers despite the fact that they still deny that regular prayers are worth establishing?

                                    Peace,
                                    Hasan Akcay

                                    Salaat isn't a prayer but comittments/advices/discussions for the betterment and mushriks arn't those who say God has a son in this case but they are Thalimeen/wrongdoers/oppressers .

                                    But would love your opinion on Cristians and jews not being mushriks by label but if they do thalimeen acts only then are they mushriks-my above post.

                                    Salaams.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Peace simple. Agree with most of your reply to my post br... bravo yay
                                      One question though...Is the hearafter just after we die,or is akhirah applied to any future time/consequences (including before death.)...?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        arnoldyasin
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        Peace,

                                        Dear Siki, are you well again? I hope so. To me idol-worship is a sin as it is the greatest lie on earth. It is not that God is jaleous, but that you will form your deeds based on the idols, and so will live a real lie. This is the crime you commit to yourself. Shirk is denying reality. It is like saying you have ten arms, instead of two, because of this, you will never make full use of the two you have. All the laws of this creation are based on that there is only One God as authority, if you don't follow this truth, you cannot fully grasp all the truth's of this creation. It was like when people believed the earth is flat, all of their maps and inventions were based on this idea and so caused them to be 'stuck' because of this false-hood. They didn't make any progress. Only after they acknowledged the earth being round and not the center of the universe did the people make inventions and maps that worked and created progress. So shirk is based on living the truth for your own benefit as 'le illeh il Allah' is the biggest truth of this Reality. When you base your life and understanding on this, you will be on the road of progress.....

                                        Read this little article on shirk which i agree with

                                        MEANING OF 'SHIRK' CHANGED

                                        'Shirk' is a comprehensive term. Idol worship is its
                                        simplest form. In fact, people worship idols because
                                        they think these got the power to changes their
                                        destiny. However, it is an inferior thinking of man.
                                        God has created man as superior being among many of
                                        His creatures (1770). It is not proper for him to
                                        submit to anyone who are either inferior to him (idols
                                        or his lowly desires) or who are mortal beings like
                                        him self (priest and rulers). Man should submit
                                        himself to the authority of God alone. He is the
                                        creator and He knows what the purpose of man's
                                        creation is? (6714). Therefore, no one could think
                                        better than God what is best for man. When Quran says;
                                        " authority belongs to God..." (657) or when God
                                        condemn 'Shirk' as the biggest and un-pardonable crime
                                        (3113;44, it does not mean that God dislikes
                                        deities and asserts Himself as a sovereign. He is far
                                        above emotions and far above what we associate with
                                        Him. If man associates hundreds of deities, it does
                                        not affect God's sovereignty in the universe.
                                        Secondly, He Himself has condemned compulsion in
                                        'Al-Deen' (2256). So, how could He threat or force
                                        human beings against their will, to follow a
                                        particular path? Actually, these admonitions are meant
                                        to inculcate the truth that man can accomplish his
                                        goals by no other means except God's laws. He can
                                        reach his destination by following God's path alone.
                                        Therefore, the real 'shirk' is not the worship of
                                        idols or deities but it is the following of paths
                                        other than the one, which God has recommended. These
                                        paths (in other words, various man-made systems)
                                        misguide man and take him far away from his
                                        destination (4116). Values and principles in man-made
                                        systems are not enough to guide man in the right
                                        direction. By following man-made systems, he cannot
                                        emancipate from animal-instincts and lowly desires; He
                                        cannot rise to become a noble and dignified human
                                        being. It is possible only by following the value
                                        system of the Quran (2885). It is stated in the
                                        Quran

                                        "God wants to raise man to the exalted ranks of
                                        humanity through the value system of the Quran. But,
                                        man follows the earthly desires which eventually
                                        brings him low to the position of beasts and worse."
                                        (7176). This downfall is exclusively attributed to
                                        'Shirk' in another verse, which reads as follow;

                                        "Hunafaa lillahe ghaira Mushrikeena beh - Being true
                                        in faith to God, and never assigning partners to Him -
                                        Wa manyushrik billahe - if anyone assigns partners to
                                        God - Fa ka ann ma kharra minusamai - he is as if he
                                        had fallen from heavens - Fa takhtafh-o-tairo au
                                        tahvee behir reeho fi makanin saheeq - and been
                                        snatched up by birds, or the wind had swooped and
                                        thrown him into a far-distant place." (2231)

                                        God's given value system grooms human personality. It
                                        imparts enlightenment, and excellence of taste through
                                        intellectual and aesthetic training. It provides him
                                        protection against the spontaneous forces of nature
                                        and the society.

                                        Accordingly, we conclude that real 'Shirk' is to
                                        follow values and principles, which are against the
                                        Quran. The real 'Shirk' is to follow the systems,
                                        which are based on non-Quranic values and principles.
                                        Quran has emphatically stated

                                        "La yushrik fi hukmehee ahada - God does not share His
                                        Command (values & principles) with anyone whatsoever".
                                        (1826)

                                        This definition of 'Shirk' is much more important and
                                        practically related with the welfare of the society.
                                        If understood rightly and taken care of, it would have
                                        liberated the masses from the evil's systems, which
                                        exploit national resources and man's labor to
                                        safeguard the interests of privileged classes against
                                        the common man's interests. The masses would have
                                        never submitted to such systems because submission to
                                        these man-made systems is no less a big crime than
                                        'Shirk'. But the religious scholars did not pay due
                                        attention on this concept and laid undeserved emphasis
                                        in condemning idol's worship as a form of 'Shirk'.
                                        They diverted the focus of attention of the people
                                        from a dangerous and fatal form of 'Shirk' towards a
                                        simple and harmless form of 'Shirk'. Consequently, as
                                        earlier said, the Muslim masses can tolerate and bow
                                        their heads before any evil ruler no matter how much
                                        his rule is against the rule of God's Will; they can
                                        live in any man-made system no matter how much its
                                        values and principles are degraded and against the
                                        noble values of the glorious Quran, but they would
                                        never tolerate bowing before an idol. They hated
                                        idol's worship like they hate pigs whereas idols has
                                        no power either to harm or to benefit them. The
                                        religion's opium has worked rightly on them. They
                                        forgot their primary obligations to strive hard
                                        against ignorance, poverty, and undemocratic values.
                                        They never realized that idols of human desires are
                                        worst than stone's idols. These noble ideas never
                                        touched them but they dream to be known as
                                        'Butshikan'. They have become the true embodiment of
                                        what the Quran said in this verse

                                        "And most of them believe not in God without
                                        associating (others as partners) with Him". (12106)

                                        MEANING OF 'IBADAH' CHANGED

                                        When 'illah' came to be misinterpreted; "The one who
                                        is worshiped", instead of, "The one who is the ruler",
                                        and 'Shirk' came to be misinterpreted; "To associate
                                        idols in the worship of God", instead of, "To
                                        associate others in the rule of God" then, naturally,
                                        the meaning of 'ibadah' has to be misinterpreted; "The
                                        worship of God", instead of, "The rule of God". This
                                        change in the meanings of words along with the
                                        introduction of other non-Quranic concepts such as
                                        'The concept of recitation' and 'The concept of five
                                        pillars' had played a key role in the transformation
                                        of 'Al-Deen' into religion.

                                        The Quran has given a very clear concept of 'ibadah'.
                                        It simply means "obedience to God's command". In
                                        verse (18110) it says; "wa la yushrik be-ibadateh
                                        rabbehe ahada - nor does he associate anyone in
                                        'ibadah' of his God. And in verse (1826) it says; "wa
                                        la yushrik fi hukmehe ahada"- nor does He share His
                                        Command with any person whatsoever". These verses have
                                        clearly defined the relation between 'hukm' and
                                        'ibadah' and left no room for confusing 'ibadah' with
                                        worship. Neither God wants to share His Command with
                                        anyone nor His Messenger like to obey anyone except
                                        God.

                                        The concept of worship (Ibadah) is alien to 'Al-Deen'.
                                        It is a creation of religion. 'Al-Deen' is a
                                        goal-oriented system, which follows certain rules and
                                        principles. It is not a dogma but a guide to practice.
                                        Whatever, it claims or promises for the welfare of
                                        people that is concrete and achievable in this world.
                                        On the contrary, religion consists of beliefs and
                                        dogmas based on wistful thinking of those people who
                                        fail to establish God's Authority against the
                                        authority of oppressive forces in the society. While
                                        the followers of 'Al-Deen' sacrifice their persons and
                                        goods to win the blessings and the pleasure of God
                                        (9111) the religious folks have nothing to please Him
                                        in this world except to offer their praises and
                                        prayers (worship).

                                        We may not know when? And where? The transformation of
                                        'Al-Deen' into religion took place because social and
                                        cultural changes are evolutionary in nature and
                                        difficult to monitor. These are, like a clock's hour
                                        needle, remain in motion invisibly for a long period
                                        of time before they become mature and attain
                                        perfection. However, in the light of above discussion,
                                        we are certain that Islam is no more 'al-Deen'.
                                        Although, we call it 'Al-Deen' but everywhere it is
                                        practiced as religion.

                                        A religion cannot prove its truthfulness nor it can
                                        prove its superiority over other religions. Firstly,
                                        all religions are based on fear and ignorance.
                                        Secondly, they do not have concern with the management
                                        of worldly affairs such as politics and economy. The
                                        primary subject of religion is spirituality. In this
                                        regard, in order to see which one is true and
                                        superior, one has to wait till doomsday. On the
                                        contrary, a system has to prove its worth in this
                                        world. It is based on well-defined principles and
                                        policies. Its results and achievements are concrete
                                        and comparable. For example, when a system promises
                                        social justice it has to deliver it. Islam as a system
                                        had remained very successful. Islamic state was the
                                        embodiment of peace and justice. It had delivered all
                                        the goods to its people. But when Islam reduced to
                                        religion it became a pandemonium of chaos, confusion,
                                        and contradictions. It failed badly to deliver what it
                                        claimed. This situation persisted till now and will
                                        continue to persist till Islam is redefined as a
                                        system.

                                        We have pointed out earlier that there are many
                                        contradictions found in Islam. Muslims believe in
                                        unity but they are the most disunited folks in the
                                        world. They believe in fraternity but they are not
                                        fraternal to each other. They believe in peace but
                                        known to others as terrorists. They believe in human
                                        equality and dignity but these noble values are
                                        nowhere found in Muslims' societies. These and many
                                        other contradictions are found in Islam because it is
                                        not practiced as a values system. What the Muslims are
                                        practicing in the name of Islam that is purely a
                                        religion consisting mostly of biblical dogmas and
                                        Zoroastrian junk. It has very little, if any,
                                        teachings from the Quran or the life of the Prophet
                                        (pbuh). Therefore, when we talk about the failure of
                                        Islam, in fact, we talk about the failure of Islam as
                                        a religion.

                                        Dear Readers; this is just a brief review of a Great
                                        Tragedy. A tragedy which turned a system of great
                                        values and principles into dust of religious dogmas
                                        and rituals. This unwanted transformation brought in
                                        its fold many drastic consequences to the Muslims
                                        world. The most prominent was the curse of
                                        factionalism and sectarianism. Al-Deen-al-Islam, which
                                        during the first half-century of its foundation, have
                                        worked as a coherent and dominant system on the map of
                                        the world got divided into secular Islam and religious
                                        Islam. This division never stopped. The secular Islam
                                        got further divided into various political and
                                        cultural factions and the religious Islam got divided
                                        into various religious sects such as sunni, and shia.
                                        Clash of Interests, which is an essential outcome of
                                        sectarianism, took them into its bloody grip and the
                                        scourge of mutual vengeance became their destiny.
                                        (665)

                                        To sum up, I would say that if the Muslims want to
                                        redeem the past glory of Islam; if they want to see
                                        Islam triumphant in the world; if they want to enjoy a
                                        self-satisfied life under Islam then they have to
                                        redefine Islam as a system. For, it is the system,
                                        which can deliver these good to them - not religion.

                                        Wa ma 'alaina illal balagh

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          TAJ
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          Peace Siki, All

                                          If one has full fainth in Allah, then that question of "why shirk is the only unforgivable sin" would make sense to him/her.. IF they are half-heartedly have faith in Allah and the rest of their "crooked" trust they would put in a god of their own making, then why should they care what is Allah's position of Shirk? As they have already put their trust in a god they made because trust cannot be divided.
                                          It is such a daring act to face Allah with. What is the excuse of the mushrik? Have you ever asked a mushrik for his reason to turn his back to Allah?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users