Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Can you PROVE that God's previous scriptures have been corrupted?

Can you PROVE that God's previous scriptures have been corrupted?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
92 Posts 15 Posters 3.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Fahad1
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    what was the intention then ?

    To negate your understanding that all prophets received exactly the SAME ARABIC quran we read nowadays.

    did it negate that understanding ? if so , how ?

    also please quote where i said that "all prophets received exactly the SAME ARABIC quran we read nowadays" .

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      andy
      wrote on last edited by
      #82

      what was the intention then ?

      To negate your understanding that all prophets received exactly the SAME ARABIC quran we read nowadays.

      did it negate that understanding ? if so , how ?

      Because at least Allah has sent Torah.

      also please quote where i said that "all prophets received exactly the SAME ARABIC quran we read nowadays".

      You have thought on that understanding and you are still studying it, right?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        Fahad1
        wrote on last edited by
        #83

        what was the intention then ?

        To negate your understanding that all prophets received exactly the SAME ARABIC quran we read nowadays.

        did it negate that understanding ? if so , how ?

        Because at least Allah has sent Torah.

        the taurat , yes . not the OT of the jews .

        also please quote where i said that "all prophets received exactly the SAME ARABIC quran we read nowadays".

        You have thought on that understanding and you are still studying it, right?

        yes , i m studying what "al kitab" is . but i was not discussing "al kitab" here . i was discussing the existence of something you call "previous scriptures" .

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          andy
          wrote on last edited by
          #84

          the taurat , yes . not the OT of the jews .

          But it WAS, or what do you think?

          yes , i m studying what "al kitab" is . but i was not discussing "al kitab" here . i was discussing the existence of something you call "previous scriptures" .

          So what do you call them?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            Fahad1
            wrote on last edited by
            #85

            the taurat , yes . not the OT of the jews .

            But it WAS, or what do you think?

            no, it wasnt . i have read some verses of OT in Shaikh's booklets . OT looks like the work of a very evil person to me . on the other hand , Koran doesnt say that the taurat is corrupted or anything . but it commands to uphold the taurat . so the taurat should notbe corrupted . the OT never was the taurat .

            yes , i m studying what "al kitab" is . but i was not discussing "al kitab" here . i was discussing the existence of something you call "previous scriptures" .

            So what do you call them?

            there is no such thing . (464)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              andy
              wrote on last edited by
              #86

              Salaam saladin,

              no, it wasnt . i have read some verses of OT in Shaikh's booklets . looks like the work of a very evil person to me . on the other hand , Koran doesnt say that the taurat is corrupted or anything . but it commands to uphold the taurat . so the taurat should notbe corrupted . the OT never was the taurat .

              If somebody who knows nothing about Islam, and then he read this hadith below.

              Shahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3371

              Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him) 0 Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He said Yes, and added We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

              What do you think his opinion regarding prophet Muhammad will be? Of course he will think that Muhammad is rapist!

              The thing is don't just read what your mullah gave you. Read by yourself just like you read quran with open mind. I am not defending jews or christians here, I just want to be objective and not biased.

              http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5941.msg91117#msg91117

              So what do you call them?
              there is no such thing . (464)

              Bro ...I think it is better for me to let you study and research the topic first and then come back here in this forum after you make your mind. Because it seems to me that on one side you deny that Allah has sent any other scripture except ARABIC QURAN we read nowadays but on the other side you are not prepared to explain what Torah is and what Injeel is, etc.

              As I said, I had the same thought like you some time back but after some readings I find out that there are some unresolved problems if I maintain that all prophets received exactly the same arabic quran. OK bro, happy researching! )

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                Fahad1
                wrote on last edited by
                #87

                Salaam saladin,

                no, it wasnt . i have read some verses of OT in Shaikh's booklets . looks like the work of a very evil person to me . on the other hand , Koran doesnt say that the taurat is corrupted or anything . but it commands to uphold the taurat . so the taurat should notbe corrupted . the OT never was the taurat .

                If somebody who knows nothing about Islam, and then he read this hadith below.

                Shahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3371

                Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him) 0 Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He said Yes, and added We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

                What do you think his opinion regarding prophet Muhammad will be? Of course he will think that Muhammad is rapist!

                i think it is no different than the bible . what has this got to do with the topic?

                So what do you call them?
                there is no such thing . (464)

                Bro ...I think it is better for me to let you study and research the topic first and then come back here in this forum after you make your mind. Because it seems to me that on one side you deny that Allah has sent any other scripture except ARABIC QURAN we read nowadays but on the other side you are not prepared to explain what Torah is and what Injeel is, etc.

                whatever taurat and injeel is, there is no indication in the Koran that they are corrupted . that is only something which you are insisting on .

                i m already researching . you should also be . you havent made up your mind either , because sometimes you say al kitab is the Koran . then u say al kitab is "previous scriptures" , then u say that taurat and injeel are "previous scriptures" which are corrupted ...

                peace.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  andy
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #88

                  Salaam saladin,

                  whatever taurat and injeel is, there is no indication in the Koran that they are corrupted . that is only something which you are insisting on .

                  I agree with what your statement above (somebody please bring some verses if I miss them). So I really don't understand why you say I insist that according to quran, taurat and injeel are corrupted. I conclude that Bible is corrupted from my own reading and not from quran. This is the reason why I believe previous scriptures are partially preserved.

                  http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5941.msg91117#msg91117

                  i m already researching . you should also be . you havent made up your mind either , because sometimes you say al kitab is the Koran . then u say al kitab is "previous scriptures" , then u say that taurat and injeel are "previous scriptures" which are corrupted ... )

                  OK my pleasure ...btw, I understand the word Kitab from the context so don't be too surprised that "sometimes" I say A, B, C, etc )

                  Wassalam,

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fahad1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #89

                    ok. salam.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      lowtech
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #90

                      no, it wasnt . i have read some verses of OT in Shaikh's booklets . OT looks like the work of a very evil person to me . on the other hand , Koran doesnt say that the taurat is corrupted or anything . but it commands to uphold the taurat . so the taurat should notbe corrupted . the OT never was the taurat .

                      well I guess it still depends on which version you are looking at. The old testament that christians read is very different than what the jews read. The christians added a lot of stuff also to prove their point that jesus is god by adding to the old testament and then saying look at the old testament its prophesized right here.

                      By the way what the jews read...they call it the torah, so if its not the same as what allah is referring to in the quran, then it has been corrupted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        Fahad1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #91

                        i m already researching . you should also be . you havent made up your mind either , because sometimes you say al kitab is the Koran . then u say al kitab is "previous scriptures" , then u say that taurat and injeel are "previous scriptures" which are corrupted ...

                        OK my pleasure ...btw, I understand the word Kitab from the context so don't be too surprised that "sometimes" I say A, B, C, etc

                        by the way , i dont think it is the right way to understand things , because Koran uses different words for "quran", "kitab" and "taurat/injeel" . so "kitab" should not be mixed with "quran" or "taurat","injeel" etc.

                        salam.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          andy
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #92

                          Salaam brother saladin,

                          i m already researching . you should also be . you havent made up your mind either , because sometimes you say al kitab is the Koran . then u say al kitab is "previous scriptures" , then u say that taurat and injeel are "previous scriptures" which are corrupted ... )

                          OK my pleasure ...btw, I understand the word Kitab from the context so don't be too surprised that "sometimes" I say A, B, C, etc )

                          by the way , i dont think it is the right way to understand things , because Koran uses different words for "quran", "kitab" and "taurat/injeel" . so "kitab" should not be mixed with "quran" or "taurat","injeel" etc.

                          I think using the context is OK ...See the discussion on the meaning of salat. The context is used to "find" the meaning.

                          But of course, it would be really interesting to research "Kitab", "quran", "taurat", and "injeel" ...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Users