Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. WHY NO ACTION IS TAKEN AGAINT DANISH?

WHY NO ACTION IS TAKEN AGAINT DANISH?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
79 Posts 11 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    What so problematic? Can you or can you not respond or was your quote above a hoax?

    If I didn't feel confident enough to enter the dialogue, I would have not posted the initial post of the recent archaeological discoveries.

    What recent archaeological discoveries are you talking about? Have they found the specific Firaun mentioned in the Quran? Did you browse the link I provided?

    The issue is not whether I can or can't repsond. The issue is that you're ego is too big to retract your disrespectful statement, making you look smaller and smaller with each subsequent post.

    The issue is that you either won't or can't bring about the "evidence" of what you stated in your own quote as clearly seen and hence making all kinds of excuses on my person to divert this subject. What a hoot really? Very typical of members who can't stand me for my criticisms.

    As mentioned earlier
    THE ONLY WAY TO END A WAR, IS TO END IT, NOT BEND IT. AND THE ONLY WAY TO DISCUSS MATTERS, IS TO DISCUSS THEM, NOT CUSS THEM.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #49

      I'm happy you deleted the disrespectful comment in your last post and rephrased your question more peacefully. This makes me want to engage in dialogue with you instead of defending my character. Bravo for the visible improvement. I'd only hope that you continue to take your own advice

      As mentioned earlier
      THE ONLY WAY TO END A WAR, IS TO END IT, NOT BEND IT. AND THE ONLY WAY TO DISCUSS MATTERS, IS TO DISCUSS THEM, NOT CUSS THEM.

      As for the evidence, kindly research the name Mineptah to discover how archaelogists believe he was killed and how his body was saved from the irreversible damages of saltwater.

      Before you jump to reply, I did read the thread you provided that discredited Bucaille with no evidence. Now you have the burden to show me where all the other pharaohs are that supposedly drowned as well and how you concluded that Bucaille is a fake. Being a doctor of a King is something called correlational evidence at best. Is everyone who is in contact with a king you don't like guilty by association? Or do we take what they say on their own merit?

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        mquran
        wrote on last edited by
        #50

        Absolutely. The ONLY way you and your ilks like Ahmed can win over my criticisms is by abuse, threats and condemnation. A typical nature anchored in your brains. And that's how Islam began. Study the Quran's historicity and then read and understand it thoroughly. It is neither divine nor for all times. PERIOD.

        The fact that an abusive yet cowardly moron like you says that about AQ only proves AQ's divine nature. It wasn't meant to be understood by people with dung on the brains. Take a look at yourself Danish, you once told us that worshipping AQ is an obstacle to worshipping Allah and now you reject even God himself! That's a mark of what - stability? You need to be committed...and FAST.

        DanishYou are not worth it as already witnessed and proven several times in the past and as recent as seen on this thread itself. Any discussion with a madman, an insane ayatullah (aka prophet of doom) is impossible.

        Lol, I thought so. Tell you what, if the moderators pronounce me unfit for discussion then I will leave. How bout that ? I'm more than happy to put my membership on the line because I'm confident in AQ. If you're confident in yourself, what's the problem?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #51

          As for the evidence, kindly research the name Mineptah to discover how archaelogists believe he was killed and how his body was saved from the irreversible damages of saltwater.

          If it wasn't for the research already done, I wouldn't have provided you with the link (and other links within it) where members debated this issue. Besides, I doubt that you read or understood it thoroughly. Anyhow, here are some points to ponder and do your own research

          1. Merenptah is not Firaun.
          2. Merenptah died a NATURAL DEATH at an OLD AGE.
          3. Merenptah was mummified just like any other. In historic times, it was a sacred burial custom to do so.
          4. There are abundance of mummified Pharoah found from various regions of the world that lived even long before Moses's time.
          5. Animal mummies have also been found.
          6. Did Allah forget to mention Merenptah in the Quran?
          7. The story of sea splitting apart by a stick is ludicrous and simply a myth.

          http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merenptah
          http//www.touregypt.net/featurestories/merenptah.htm
          http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummies
          http//news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/09/0915_040915_petmummies.html

          Now then, did Firaun and his soldiers got washed away in sea or were they preserved by their people, has yet to be answered? A clear contradiction. Besides, the repetitious story of Moses spread throughout the Quran is very inconsistent. This only tells me and as accurately as per Quranic compilation history and as well as 8015, that the Quran is a collection of stories by several people put together.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mquran
            wrote on last edited by
            #52

            DanishIf it wasn't for the research already done, I wouldn't have provided you with the link (and other links within it) where members debated this issue. Besides, I doubt that you read or understood it thoroughly. Anyhow, here are some points to ponder and do your own research

            This pendu seldom fails to make me laugh. He calls something 'research' because he reads about it. It never occurs to him that 'research' is something questionable. He only questions AQ due to his self-hate which makes him a biased fool.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #53

              Danish is nothing but a low grade confused enemy of God

              He does not understand that his barbie contradiction has been refuted

              he was ranting about 3 verses that contradict one verse, and clearly this has been refuted now he is rabting about reserving bodies

              he does not fail to make me laugh, Hahahahahahah

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #54

                Wow, this is retarded. Im happy to see everyone so loyal to the teachings of their scriptures and apparent ethics. Everybody is spinning what eachother says, and this is therefore nothing close to a debate but.

                http//rvforsaleguide.com/trip/top20/LkPowell-mud4.JPG

                and im happy that yalls says yous smiling like the kids in the photo.

                http//www.ondmis.dk/billeder/forumpics/arguing.jpg

                YOUVE ALL WON. CONGRANTULATIONS!

                http//www.olganon.org/images/stupid_thread.gif

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #55

                  Hello Danish

                  Mummification was the ancient religious form of a proper burial. Are you trying to tell me that if someone was killed or died of unnatural causes they would leave them to rot on the shore?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #56

                    Are you trying to tell me that if someone was killed or died of unnatural causes they would leave them to rot on the shore?

                    What?? LOL! Where did you get that idea from? I'm afraid to say, that you really didn't understand what we have been talking about all along or perhaps not properly following through???? Read the points carefully again please, specially the last paragraph which is the main concern

                    If it wasn't for the research already done, I wouldn't have provided you with the link (and other links within it) where members debated this issue. Besides, I doubt that you read or understood it thoroughly. Anyhow, here are some points to ponder and do your own research

                    1. Merenptah is not Firaun.
                    2. Merenptah died a NATURAL DEATH at an OLD AGE.
                    3. Merenptah was mummified just like any other. In historic times, it was a sacred burial custom to do so.
                    4. There are abundance of mummified Pharoah found from various regions of the world that lived even long before Moses's time.
                    5. Animal mummies have also been found.
                    6. Did Allah forget to mention Merenptah in the Quran?
                    7. The story of sea splitting apart by a stick is ludicrous and simply a myth.

                    http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merenptah
                    http//www.touregypt.net/featurestories/merenptah.htm
                    http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummies
                    http//news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/09/0915_040915_petmummies.html

                    Now then, did Firaun and his soldiers got washed away in sea or were they preserved by their people, has yet to be answered? A clear contradiction. Besides, the repetitious story of Moses spread throughout the Quran is very inconsistent. This only tells me and as accurately as per Quranic compilation history and as well as 8015, that the Quran is a collection of stories by several people put together.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #57

                      Peace Danish

                      Why is it an either/or statement? Why does it have to be that he either drowned OR he was preserved? Couldn't he have been killed in the sea and subsequently found and taken to have a proper religious burial by his people, hence mummified?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #58

                        Peace Danish

                        Why is it an either/or statement? Why does it have to be that he either drowned OR he was preserved? Couldn't he have been killed in the sea and subsequently found and taken to have a proper religious burial by his people, hence mummified?

                        My dear, who are you talking about now, Firaun or Merenptah? We have already dicussed Merenptah, so shall we put this one aside and move on or are you still not satisfied even after presenting you with the stated factual points? And please don't make assumptions as to whether Firaun and his accomplices were swept away into sea or mummified or both or whether it was just Firaun and not his accomplices? The question of either/or statement IS the real concern making the specific verses either contradictory or inconsistent relevant to other similar verses. Besides, your question was already stated by mquran, so why repeat this again. I've talked about this and given enough evidence otherwise. Unless you bring about some real solid evidence of Firaun being killed at sea, drowned and swept away into sea and then somehow was found or fished out and lastly mummified, I am not buying such fanciful stories. The contradiction and inconsistencies to Moses stories remains intact.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #59

                          ..................
                          One difference. The UN is a paper tiger while our mods have the power. They just choose not to use it. In my view, the Quranic response would be to eliminate troublemakers (defined as ppl who are out to insult and mock without ever having discussed anything) from this forum.
                          ..................

                          Salam mq,

                          Like what I call bananas institutions/gov., this forum moderators/administrators are also bananas. If it was not the joke posted on their main website about God and HIS path ONLY, I would not have cared about their banana administrating/moderating (if any because I have not seen them moderating anything with the exception of moving a thread here and there and remove other threads here and there).
                          Anyway, let's the mockery continue and witness that the trash will generate only the trash as per the Quran. So stay away from the devil. Peace. Myr

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #60

                            Anyway, let's the mockery continue and witness that the trash will generate only the trash as per the Quran. So stay away from the devil. Peace. Myr

                            Exactamundo!!! "Heeeeere comes Johnny" the miscreant again calling for continued aggression. yay

                            Peace all. Seriously though, some people are just too weak, afraid, abusive and live their lives to instill terror. People are simply frightened to ask questions or criticise a book named Quran. I ask you Why? For pete's sake, its a book and that too an ancient one, not a venomous cobra or a rattle snake that will kill you instantly. I am so glad and thankfull to the UK and Pakistani authorities to stop the malicious terror plot about to generate. These are the very Islamic fascists, extremists and bigoted thugs who force Quranic rules in the name of Allah down people's throat in much the same way a few people here demonstrate. They are trying extremely hard to devolve humanity from advancing and keep them in their dungeons with zesty bananas. Its about time people sobre up and realise the beauty of nature and live in reality as humans and not as fearful fanatics. must change their thoughts and compromise with all non-Muslims to achieve the unity everyone deserves. You must avoid living by the stringent rules of once-upon-a-time days in FEAR and DISGUISE and at the same time shake hands with others. That just won't happen. Sorry guys, had to blow this one out. -[

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #61

                              Peace Danish

                              Firun is not a name. Firun = pharoah (any pharoah) in arabic. In Egypt you'll hear anyone say el feruun ramsis, el feruun tut aankhamun, el feruun mubarak ;D

                              just means the pharoah so-and-so. so Mineptah, having a temple and was mummified must have been royalty i.e. a pharoah (or firuun if you're saying it in arabic).

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Offline
                                E Offline
                                Elena
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #62

                                Peace

                                the kid in the photo is not 'retarded', he's is not even 'a disabled/handicapped person' but, as the correct, respectful words we should use, he is a 'person with mental/learning disability'. Person, the first.

                                Just to fix the disrespect showed placing the word 'retarded' under his image.

                                http//www.ondmis.dk/billeder/forumpics/arguing.jpg

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  salgan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #63

                                  Peace Elena

                                  As we can see in to days world a lot of poloticians and religious leaders,show they have a mental/learning disability and I would not class the child as one .I would use the term special needs instead.

                                  Peace Salim

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #64

                                    Peace

                                    the kid in the photo is not 'retarded', he's is not even 'a disabled/handicapped person' but, as the correct, respectful words we should use, he is a 'person with mental/learning disability'. Person, the first.

                                    Just to fix the disrespect showed placing the word 'retarded' under his image.

                                    http//www.ondmis.dk/billeder/forumpics/arguing.jpg

                                    Witness mquran on British marathon trackfield. bravo rotfl

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      Elena
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #65

                                      Peace Salgan

                                      Peace Elena
                                      As we can see in to days world a lot of poloticians and religious leaders,show they have a mental/learning disability and I would not class the child as one .I would use the term special needs instead.

                                      yes, I recommended the terms used in the psychology field in UK, but yes, sounds better.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #66

                                        peace Elena

                                        In Denmark where political corectness hasnt poluted our communication that much yet. The kid is retarded. The very difinition of the word retareed suggest what you just said yourself. Retarded is not a bad word just because you and a bunch of moralists think so. My best freinds brother is retarded, and none of us, or him for that matter, has a problem with him being so.

                                        death to political corectness

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          Elena
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #67

                                          Peace Magi,

                                          "death to political corectness" yeah, death

                                          the comment was not against you but the people who created the joke,

                                          and if the word retarded is not insulting /disrespectful, why was it used to moke people that argue on the net?

                                          About the word being correct in Denmark, it is a bit strange for me, I know it is not correct at all in Spain, UK, Sweden and Canada. Could you check if it is really as you say there? in the psychology field, please, not in moralist fields -)

                                          Peace
                                          Elena

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users