Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Abraham in the current quran and in the 1400 year old one.

Abraham in the current quran and in the 1400 year old one.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
8 Posts 4 Posters 22 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi Br's ,

    I am sure you know what it says in the current quran but here is what it says in the one that is supposed to be 1400 years old.

    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=7503.msg68913#msg68913

    Please help your vote decide for others.

    If a person doesn't have much knowledge of what its all about , then just ask yourself if God Allmighty or anybody for that matter asked you to slaughter your small child for a horrendous reason, what on earth would you say and do as a person full of Righteousness??

    I think that might be what our great leader Abraham might have done also.

    Thanks All.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      arnoldyasin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Salaam,

      I do not believe the Quran was changed, I believe people have blindly followed the Biblical story and thus neglected the Arabic words. Why would God repeat a story when it can be found in the Bible? No, God corrects the story by giving the real account that has nothing to do with religion or worship or senseless orders. God shows the real missions that were about liberating Mankind.

      37102 And when he was old enough to strive along with him, Abraham
      said, ?O My dear son! I have a vision that I must give you to a life of test
      and tribulation for a Noble cause (37107). So look, what do you think??
      He said, ?O My father! Do what you are commanded. God willing, you
      will find me of the steadfast.?

      37103 As both of them had surrendered themselves (to God), he made
      Ishmael prostrate on his forehead in gratitude.

      37104 We called unto him, ?O Abraham!
      37105 You have already affirmed the vision. We ? This is so - We must
      reward the doers of good.

      37106 This was a trial, clear in itself.

      37107 We exchanged his life for a Momentous Sacrifice.
      37108 And We left for him remembrance among the later generations.

      37103 uses Al-Jabin which generally means being a coward or weak-hearted. When people said Huwa Jabin Al-Kalb, it means "His dog is a coward." This refered you were a generous and friendly host as your dog did not growl or bark at the guests. It is cowardice created out of love for a person. Akhtar Sherazi says in his Tafseer that Al-Jabin also means to "kiss a person on the forehead out of love and affection as you are weakhearted to that person."

      To say Al-Jabin is to put someone on its forehead to slaughter the person is completely wrong I believe as this does not coincide with the root meaning.

      I agree myself with Akhtar Sherazi's understanding that Abraham grabbed his son by the temples to kiss him out of affection as this is Al-Jabin=The space between the temples near the hairline, affection, weakness out of love, cowardice out of affection.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Okay Br.

        Then please could you explain this;

        Appendix A4 Samarqand MSS VS 1924 Egyptian Edition

        Page #622

        -In line #8 the ?original? of Q3618 is without the mim which the modern version has.
        -In line #10 the ?original? of Q3623 has alif whereas the modern version does not.

        Page #684

        -In line #11 the ?original? of Q4081 is without stem which in the modern version is ya.

        Page #652

        -In line #2 the ?original? of Q37103 has waw then mim-alif, while the modern version has fa-lam-mim-alif (see p. 67 of main text)
        -In line #4 the ?original? of Q37105 is without sad which the modern version has, and it has alif while the modern version has ta.
        -In line #6 the ?original? of the same aya is without nun while the modern version has nun.
        -In line #7 while the ?original? of Q37106 is without waw the modern version has waw.
        -In line #8 the ?original? (same aya) is without ba which the modern version has.

        A better picture is here- check!

        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=7503.msg68913#msg68913

        Thanks Br.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          arnoldyasin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Salaam bro,

          It is always good to check other Quran Manuscripts, but must be very careful in any conclusions.

          Even if the FaLa would be a Waw, the meaning wouldn't change that much I believe, it will remain "And When" in 37103, the important word in this verse Jabin.

          With Sadaqta, you say it is just DaqA? I couldn't find a meaning for this word, plus does the Alif be part of the root?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Salaam bro,

            It is always good to check other Quran Manuscripts, but must be very careful in any conclusions.

            you are absolutely right - but pitty the only other oldest qurans is in turkey and they don't let anybody see it- i think.

            Even if the FaLa would be a Waw, the meaning wouldn't change that much I believe, it will remain "And When" in 37103, the important word in this verse Jabin.

            Are you sure Br.?

            check this

            Ma dalla sahibukum wamaghawa
            MA DdhL SsAHBKM WMA GhWY
            Your comrade erreth not, nor is deceived;
            | - what| - null| - your (p) companion/your friend | - null| - misguided/failed/became misguided/became failed |

            Wama yantiqu AAani alhawa
            WMA YNTtQ AoN ALHaWY
            Nor doth he speak of (his own) desire.

            unfortunately i am almost 100% on this Abrahams story (and his son! Moses).

            God Bless All.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              arnoldyasin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Salaam bro,

              As always I keep an open mind, but I agree with Shabbir and Sherazi that the words are misunderstood because of the Jewish influence. I need to see more proof before I can agree on this subject. But it is a good reminder we alos need to research all manuscripts.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                siki
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Peace All.

                Abraham's (so called satanic) dream has been troubling my mind since long, here are my thoughts.

                Abraham sees a dream in which he finds himself slaughtering/sacrificing his son.

                As most of the dreams are encrypted ,so actually what God meant by this dream for Abraham was to commit /give away/ dedicate his son in the way of Allah for propagating the Message.

                God never meant this dream to be literally interpreted

                Abraham ,who was a dedicated servant of God (but probably was not an expert in dream interpretation), took it literally and told his son about it.

                The son accepted and submitted.

                and when they were about to perform the misunderstood deed,,,,,,

                God saw their erred interpretation and absolute devotion,so he ransomed it with some other kind of "Sadqa" , preserved their story , chose them as "Nabieen" to carry out a very difficult task, and bestowed upon them the highest rank.

                does it solve the paradox?

                peace

                siki

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • LaythL Offline
                  LaythL Offline
                  Layth
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Salam,

                  My view

                  • Abraham`s vision was from God 37105;

                  • It was in responce to the prayer of Abraham for God to show them their rites made in 2128;

                  • The message was that the animal sacrifice is a great cornerstone in God`s system equivalent to giving the life of your own flesh and blood - hence the animal sacrifice in Hajj 2236.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Users