It's probably a decent idea but bear in mind many have issues posting on reddit.

As long as this forum remains readable/searchable that's fine.

peace all,

I have written an important article, with AI collab.
https://mypercept.co.uk/articles/Evaluating-Quranic-Arguments.html

https://www.academia.edu/169425869/A_Framework_for_Evaluating_Quranic_Arguments

Over many years discussing Quran related topics I often find people committing logical fallacies and misunderstanding strengths of different types of evidence. People often treat all forms of evidence as if they carry equal weight. They do not. Some things can decisively refute a claim, some merely weaken it, and some contribute little or nothing to determining whether a claim is true.
A helpful framework with examples:

1. Strong Evidence (Can Potentially Refute or Overturn a Claim)
   These are the highest-value forms of evidence.
   Direct Contradiction
   A claim is shown to conflict with established facts, or the text itself.
   Example:
   If someone claims a verse says X, but the verse (or another verse) says not-X.
   Death for Apostasy: https://misconceptions-about-islam.com/misconception.php?id=1
   Internal Inconsistency
   A position contradicts itself.
   Example:
   A method used to prove one conclusion is abandoned when that same method leads to a conflicting conclusion elsewhere. (unless an evidence-based reason can be provided)
   Contradiction with Multiple Clear Passages
   A proposed interpretation conflicts with other clearer statements.
   The more clear passages that must be reinterpreted away, the weaker the interpretation becomes. If a verse is reinterpreted, its consequences must then be checked in other verses and so on.
   Example: there is no regular/timed/finite salat to uphold. This requires explaining away multiple verses (e.g. 2:238-239, 4:101-103, 4:43, 5:6, 5:106, 9:54, 62:9-10).
   Empirical Evidence
   Observable evidence [see 41:53] conflicts with a claim. Depending on strength may disprove a claim.
   Example:
   Archaeological, linguistic, historical, or scientific evidence.
   https://misconceptions-about-islam.com/misconception.php?id=49
   Logical Impossibility
   The conclusion cannot follow from the premises. (e.g. non sequitur)
   Example: we are told to give zakat in many verses which means we must give 2.5% of our wealth annually.
   Grammatical Impossibility
   An interpretation that requires grammar, morphology or syntax that Arabic does not permit is seriously weakened and may be refuted if that grammatical claim is essential to the interpretation, e.g.
   Someone claims the “it” in 17:79 refers to a night salat BUT salat is a feminine noun and the “it” refers to a masculine noun (e.g. quran/recital, in the prior verse) = “And from the night so remain awake with it additionally for yourself...”
   Demonstrated Methodological Failure
   The method produces absurd, contradictory, or arbitrary results when applied consistently. A method that can prove almost anything proves nothing.
   Falsification by Counterexample
   One valid counterexample can destroy a universal claim.
   Example:
   Claim: "The word always means X." (e.g. sujud always means prostration)
   Counter example: One clear occurrence where it means Y. (e.g. 2:58, 4:154, 7:161)

Quran based articles written in conjunction with AI. Some of my content included

https//independent.academia.edu/NazeefMuhammad2

If you know of others post them here.