Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Mohsannat? A new understanding(very imp)

Mohsannat? A new understanding(very imp)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
156 Posts 13 Posters 7.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Samia
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    what is the term for Married women in Arabic or Quran?

    peace

    siki

    Salaam siki

    The quran does not talk about married women/men, just as it does not talk about male/female orphans, simply because God does not dfferentiate between responsibilities, and thus rights, on gender basis. If you searcn the quraan, you will find that the only specificed job/task linked to a gendr is birth to women, and based on this she has extra rights.

    But I still see that you, and others, are studiously trying to explain "muhsanaat/MMA" as only feminine!

    Also, when God gave an example of "mu'minuun, and kafiruun, m.p" , the exampls were of women, a strong reminder to those who think, that females are always there in the address, and that grammatical gender is just a tool, not a reality.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Samia
      wrote on last edited by
      #61

      Salaam siki

      t is very important that there is no word or any prohibition in 4-24.

      It is wa-l muhsanaat. What does "wa and" serve? They are also prohibited. Just because this meaning does not accommodate your understanding of the term, is not a justification to twist universal grammar, not just Arabic.

      So try to work on another meaning.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W Offline
        W Offline
        warner
        wrote on last edited by
        #62

        Peace Samia

        All this and more categories are mentioned in the Quraan identifying genders separately.

        Husband, wife
        Son, daughter
        Brother, sister
        Mother, father
        Young girl, young boy
        Slave woman, slave man
        Believing men, believing women
        Zani, zania

        As for muminun and kafirun Quraan identifies them in separate genders also.

        From which verse did you derive MMA includes men ?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Samia
          wrote on last edited by
          #63

          Peace Samia

          All this and more categories are mentioned in the Quraan identifying genders separately.

          Husband, wife
          Son, daughter
          Brother, sister
          Mother, father
          Young girl, young boy
          Slave woman, slave man
          Believing men, believing women
          Zani, zania

          As for muminun and kafirun Quraan identifies them in separate genders also.

          From which verse did you derive MMA includes men ?

          You seem not to understand what I said. I mentioned the address mainly, and the rights and responsibilities

          How are the rights and responsibilities of mumin/aat different?

          Where is young girl and young boy mentiond in rights and responsibilities?

          What is the different treatment of the zani from the zania?

          I did not say the quraan did not mention feminine and masculine genders, I said it did not differentiate between their responsibilities and rights on the basis of their gender.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            siki
            wrote on last edited by
            #64

            Salaam siki

            It is wa-l muhsanaat. What does "wa and" serve? They are also prohibited. Just because this meaning does not accommodate your understanding of the term, is not a justification to twist universal grammar, not just Arabic.

            So try to work on another meaning.

            let,s first identify the problem then we will sort it out

            Is , only this" wa " creating trouble?

            peace

            siki

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #65

              let,s first identify the problem then we will sort it out

              Is , only this" wa " creating trouble?

              peace

              siki

              On the contrary. It's solving the problem. At least it helps us know that "almohsnaat" in this verse are prohibited; so we might as well take it from there .

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                siki
                wrote on last edited by
                #66

                Dear samia

                you are adding a word prohibited from your own side in this verse,

                why are Mohsinnat allowed everywhere else in Quran? please come up with a reason for this contradiction.

                peace

                siki

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W Offline
                  W Offline
                  warner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #67

                  Brother Siki

                  And/Wa is one problem , a major problem at that.

                  Also I listed 2 other problems in your analysis.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Samia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #68

                    Dear samia

                    you are adding a word prohibited from your own side in this verse,

                    why are Mohsinnat allowed everywhere else in Quran? please come up with a reason for this contradiction.

                    peace

                    siki

                    I am not adding anything. The "wa" is.

                    Because here the address changes from being to the general audience to being to the particular (i.e a particular group).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      siki
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #69

                      4-24 Wa almuhsanatu mina alnnisai illa ma malakat aymanukum kitaba Allahi AAalaykum waohilla lakum ma waraa thalikum an tabtaghoo biamwalikum muhsineena ghayra musafiheena fama istamtaAAtum bihi minhunna faatoohunna ojoorahunna fareedatan wala junaha AAalaykum feema taradaytum bihi min baAAdi alfareedati inna Allaha kana AAaleeman hakeeman

                      Now let us translate word by word .

                      4-24 AND MOHSANNAT OUT OF NISA EXCEPT MMA GOD?S BOOK IS OVER YOU

                      AND LAWFUL FOR YOU BESIDES THOSE THAT YOU SEEK WITH YOUR

                      WEALTH IN A FAIR RELATIONSHIP NOT MUSAAFIHEEN THEN WHAT

                      BENEFIT YOU DERIVE WITH IT FROM THEM THEN GIVE THEM THEIR

                      DOWERS AS APPOINTED AND NO BLAME UPON YOU WHAT YOU

                      MUTTALLY AGREE WITH

                      peace

                      siki

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        brook
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #70

                        And your Defintion/Description of Independent Women is ...? (almarh0m)

                        Women who can decide for themselves in terms of personal matters such as marriage. Widows are independent.

                        And why do you think to propose to MMA ( "Dependent Women" - your description), has to be done Indirectly or through their Guardian?

                        Because that is what God says in al-nisa 25 Marry them then with their people?s leave...

                        As for the Mohsanat, it is clear why you cannot marry them, and why you can approach directly the "Widowed" and the "Divorced" for marriage.

                        You surely can marry the mohsanat in al-nisa 25.

                        Sorry I don?t understand the underlined part of your sentence. Will you please explain.

                        Does a man have to ask permission from the people of Ma Malakat Aymanakum before he unprotects (expose) his private parts on her? (warner)

                        Certainly. If he is NOT married to her. But if he is married to her, as is indicated in 235-6 and 7029-30, it is natural that he does not have to ask for permission.

                        Does a man have to ask permission from the people of Mohsanat before he unprotects(expose) his private parts on her?

                        Again it depends on whether he is married with them or not.

                        Peace,
                        Hasan Akcay

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          warner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #71

                          Peace Brook

                          Can you kindly translate and define Ma Malakt Aymanakum

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            siki
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #72

                            peace warner

                            I would like to read your idea regarding the term "Mohsinnat"

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W Offline
                              W Offline
                              warner
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #73

                              Peace Siki

                              Currently it is based on the following.

                              My opinion is we must not look only at Mohsanat but the
                              term which it is used in .

                              Peace be with you

                              I have told my self not to post on Mohsanat unless there is something new to add or question.

                              I think one major problem in analyzing Mohasanat is we have been analyzing the word Mohsanat independently. Whereas we should analyze the following terms in which the word Mohsanat is used in different connections and contexts.

                              1 Al Muhsanati ( 244 and 425)

                              2 Al Muhsanatu min al Nisa ( 424 )

                              3 Al Muhsanati al Muminati (425 )

                              4 Al Muhsanati min al Muminati ( 55 )

                              5 Al Muhsanatu min Allatheena utoo al kitaba (55)

                              For instance although the word Mohsanat is used in both 424 and 425 we can see two different words Nisa and Muminati are used after Mohsanat in the terms which should give two different meanings to the 2 terms . The two different meanings should justify the very obvious contradiction.

                              I am not forcing any theories and like to hear your opinion on this.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                brook
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #74

                                Peace Brook

                                Can you kindly translate and define Ma Malakt Aymanakum

                                Ma malakat ayman ukum are those whom your oaths have.

                                They are of two types

                                (1)those whom you wow to marry (236, 3350, 3352, 7030).
                                (2)those whom you wow to keep under your custody (43, 424, 425, 2431, 2433, 2458, 3355)

                                The ones whom you wow to have under custody may be male (2433) or female (43).

                                Peace,
                                Hasan Akcay

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  warner
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #75

                                  Peace Brook

                                  You missed the following verses. Which category are they?

                                  30 28
                                  Yusuf Ali He does propound to you a similitude from your own (experience) do ye have partners among those whom your right hands possess to share as equals in the wealth We have bestowed on you? Do ye fear them as ye fear each other? Thus do We explain the Signs in detail to a people that understand.

                                  16 71
                                  Yusuf Ali Allah has bestowed His gifts of sustenance more freely on some of you than on others; those more favored are not going to throw back their gifts to those whom their right hands possess so as to be equal in that respect. Will they then deny the favors of Allah?

                                  Don?t you think 43, 424; 425 are connected to marriage.

                                  Also according to 425 you need to get permission to MARRY from the people of ?Those whom you wow to marry?. That means you have already wowed/promised to marry before seeking permission i.e. the relationship of MMA has started before asking for permission to marry according to the verse. Since the permission is for marriage and relationship of MMA has started before this , a person can expose his private parts to a MMA according to 236 and 7030 . For this purpose permission is not required from the people of the MMA.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    brook
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #76

                                    Peace warner.

                                    The ma malakat ayman ukum in 3028 and 1671 are the ones whom you have under your custody since you are not supposed to share with them the possessions your family have. If they were your wives, you would.

                                    Don?t you think 43, 424; 425 are connected to marriage.

                                    No.

                                    43 is about your marrying off your orphan women and ma malakat ayman each to a man. You are not supposed to marry them yourself.

                                    424 and 425 are about your ways of proposing to dependent and independent women, with a possibility for the ones in 424 to be Christian or Jewish.

                                    Also according to 425 you need to get permission to MARRY from the people of ?Those whom you wow to marry?. That means you have already wowed/promised to marry..

                                    No. They are other people?s ma malakat ayman, not yours. When their people give them permission to marry you, they will become like the other independent women in terms of their status.

                                    The ones mentioned in 236 and 7030 have already married with you through your oaths. That is why you are not blamed if you show your private parts to them. The ones in 3350 and 3352 are the Prophet's wives through his oath.

                                    Hasan Akcay

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      warner
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #77

                                      Peace Brook

                                      It is THEIR MMA and NOT someone else?s MMA.

                                      425 ma_ malakat aima_nukum whom your right hand posses

                                      23 6 ma_ malakat aima_nuhum whom their right hand posses

                                      2431 ma_ malakat aima_nuhun na whom their right hands possess

                                      Due to this, according to your theory a man can expose his private parts to MMA (engaged girl) without permission since permission is only for marriage and not even for engagement.

                                      Sometimes people give their entire wealth to adopted children .Some even to their pets. We see this happening quite often. Giving wealth to a adopted son or daughter or treating them as equal is very common unless you want to challenge Allahs example.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        siki
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #78

                                        Dear Warner and Samia.

                                        let me try and explain one more time The Mohsinnats in 4-24

                                        4-22, bans nikah with the women who were previously married to one's father,

                                        4-23, bans any sexual contant with 13 kind of women with the word hurmat

                                        both verses conclude the issue by saying , except what is preceded.

                                        and now 4-24

                                        "AND MOHSANNAT OUT OF NISA EXCEPT MMA GOD?S BOOK IS OVER YOU AND LAWFUL FOR YOU BESIDES THOSE THAT YOU SEEK WITH YOUR WEALTH IN A FAIR RELATIONSHIP NOT MUSAAFIHEEN THEN WHAT BENEFIT YOU DERIVE WITH IT FROM THEM THEN GIVE THEM THEIR DOWERS AS APPOINTED AND NO BLAME UPON YOU WHAT YOU MUTTALLY AGREE WITH"

                                        consider either of the two possibilities listed below

                                        1. After listing the prohibited , God starts discussing the rest of the women by saying

                                        "And the MOhsinnats" except MMa
                                        God decrees a law , that for the rest, you must seek them in a proper contract/relationship before sexual contact

                                        (The MMA stay as an exception to this universal law)

                                        Now if you still insist upon connecting 4-24 with 4-23 and continue to link the banning, with Mohsinnats in 4-24

                                        consider the following option

                                        1. 4-22 bans wives of your fathers,

                                        4-23 bans sexual contact with 11, unconditionally and bans 2 more under certain conditions
                                        (a)collection of two sisters,
                                        (b) gone in a women, the daughter banned for ever, married or you had
                                        sexual contact with the women short of penetration, you may change your
                                        mind , divorce the mother, and marry the daughter.

                                        4-24 continues the ban for the rest of women , and allows sexual contact with them only under a condition, a law decreed by God(God's book is over you), which is

                                        seek them with your money in proper contract , before sexual contact
                                        Not for fornication.

                                        And MMA stay as an exception to this rule

                                        peace

                                        siki

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          siki
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #79

                                          Mohsinaats of al Nissa

                                          All halal good/chaste/righteous women(minus the prohibited 14 as in 4-22, 23 . and known fahishas or zanis, and of course not an ailien Female because she has to be from Nissa )

                                          Mohsinnat al mominat (halal)

                                          The Red,, but sub categorised to believing

                                          mohsinnat minal zin o auu-to -ul kitab(Halal)

                                          The Red,, but sub categorised to the women who are followers of the previous scriptures.

                                          Mohsinnat al mushriQat (Haram for marriage only)

                                          The Red ,, but sub categorised to Mushriqs.(Allowed for marriage, only in a situation for a believer, if she/he is a Zani, 24-3)

                                          MME might consist of the following women

                                          Mohsinnat al mominat, mohsinnat of the believing category, mohsinnat of the mushriqat, and the prohibited 14 as described in 4-22 and4-23, who will not be Mohsinnats.

                                          we would call any maiden belonging to all the above categories as a fatayat,

                                          Ones own young daughter/sister/in law (etc) would be fatayats but not mohsinnats

                                          some body out of prohibited 14 might make it into your MME, who can not be categorised as Mohsinnats,

                                          According to my knowledge, All the verses which talk of mohsinnats , go in line with the above mentioned explanations. Any contradiction or problem in understanding, please point out , i shall be most willing to discuss.

                                          peace

                                          siki

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users