Is this fair to quote it ??
-
It is fair to post ANYTHING.
you can't really decide what is "polluting" or "nourishing" the "quranic atmosphere."
We don't disallow athiest articles on this site, why not allow people to post hadiths (whether or not they are good or not) and let members debate them. That might actually be the best way to see which approach to the quran is the better.
I would encourage hadith believers to post whatever they think is true and we'll debate it. And it would help if they were in ENGLISH and not Urdu. Although I can read urdu, I'm very bad at it.
peace -
It is based on content, and the subject matter. Needless to say, hearsay can have truth, but should never be taken as a source of law beside the Quran.
-
Yes. They cannot be baseless hadeeth, or hearsay, or conjecture and they must have full verification. It of course, depends on the subject matter. A hadeeth that said "water is wet" or "do unto others as you would like them to do unto you" is acceptable whereas a hadeeth that says "Muhammad jumped onto his magical flying horse all the way to the non-existant Al-Aqsa mosque and back" is baseless, conjecture, and hearsay.
-
Peace Leoxyz
I think anything is acceptable as long as it is in line with the quran. If one chooses to deviate they may accept other ahadeeth (besides those of Persian and Arab tradition).
Joe
The Question is wheather "this Idara" is quoting something "authenticated " or "unauthenticated"??
Why "unauthenticated " material is acceptable for the "Quranists""??? -
Yes. They cannot be baseless hadeeth, or hearsay, or conjecture and they must have full verification. It of course, depends on the subject matter. A hadeeth that said "water is wet" or "do unto others as you would like them to do unto you" is acceptable whereas a hadeeth that says "Muhammad jumped onto his magical flying horse all the way to the non-existant Al-Aqsa mosque and back" is baseless, conjecture, and hearsay.
My question is the Hadiths which are attributed to the Holy Prophet on this webpage, are really those of Holy Prophet ???
Why did Idara quote them -
It is fair to post ANYTHING.
you can't really decide what is "polluting" or "nourishing" the "quranic atmosphere."
We don't disallow athiest articles on this site, why not allow people to post hadiths (whether or not they are good or not) and let members debate them. That might actually be the best way to see which approach to the quran is the better.
I would encourage hadith believers to post whatever they think is true and we'll debate it. And it would help if they were in ENGLISH and not Urdu. Although I can read urdu, I'm very bad at it.
peacePeace Lobster,
I do not disagree with this, as I've always fought for considering all sources as per 3918.
What I was saying, was on the context of hadeeth's authority.
Nadeem
-
-
In the post before the one i quote, you weren't clear. Now that is clear. And i want to know to.
Idara Tolu-e-islam has quoted two hadiths on its webpage.
http//www.toluislam.com/Are these Hadiths true? If true what is authenticity?
ARe quranists in the habit of quoting unauthenticated material ? -
Ahh, so, to clarify
Quranists = Munkareen-e- Hadith = Temperers of the Quran
Where can I read about this group? Particulary what constitutes their "Eemaan"?
If you see someone
-Mocking the sayings of the prophet PBUH
-Showing brainlessness and lack of knowledge
-Tampering the meanings of the Holy Quran
-Knowing arabic only this much that translates "wash your feet " as "rub your feet"
-not knowing the difference of "giving the book /teaching the book
-showing double standard (whereever he wants takes the shelter of the Hadith/whereever wants rejects it )
-That who says that whole quran is metaphoricThink that he is Quranist and Munkareen-e-Hadith
-
If you see someone
-Mocking the sayings of the prophet PBUH
-Showing brainlessness and lack of knowledge
-Tampering the meanings of the Holy Quran
-Knowing arabic only this much that translates "wash your feet " as "rub your feet"
-not knowing the difference of "giving the book /teaching the book
-showing double standard (whereever he wants takes the shelter of the Hadith/whereever wants rejects it )
-That who says that whole quran is metaphoricThink that he is Quranist and Munkareen-e-Hadith
In other words you are saying Bukhari & Co were quranists?
-
If you see someone
-Mocking the sayings of the prophet PBUH
-Showing brainlessness and lack of knowledge
-Tampering the meanings of the Holy Quran
-Knowing arabic only this much that translates "wash your feet " as "rub your feet"
-not knowing the difference of "giving the book /teaching the book
-showing double standard (whereever he wants takes the shelter of the Hadith/whereever wants rejects it )
-That who says that whole quran is metaphoricThink that he is Quranist and Munkareen-e-Hadith
Thanks for the clarification. When you now use "Quranists" I will now know you are referring to those who fulfill the above criteria.
That is quite specific. I am unaware of such a group so cant really comment on your question(s). Good luck in your search.
