To Obey the Prophet(PBUH) is obligatory to every Muslim
-
Salaam Warner,
But since there maybe a situation where I could have misunderstood you please be good enough to tell me how do you define ?saying? and ?speech?.
There is no point in discussing the english words when we are discussing the Arabic words of the Qur'an. However, I use "Saying" for QAWL and KALAM for speech. Mainly, I allow saying to be more than spoken words, while keep speech as spoken words.
Hussein
-
The Rasool is indeed just a "postman", the prophet on the otherhand, was someone living 1400 or so years ago appointed by the god to lead his particular followers with the quran, In a couple of more words, the prophet explained it to his followers and he implemented it to the best of his human abillity at that time.
Important point( take note leo), the quran NEVER proscribed its followers to "Obey the prophet".
The rasool is not "just" a post man, this is ill mentality.
GOD and His angels help and support the prophet. O you who believe, you shall help and support him, and regard him as he should be regarded.
Shame on anyone who calls himself as a Muslim and disobeys the clear Sign of Allah.
-
The rasool is not "just" a post man, this is ill mentality.
GOD and His angels help and support the prophet. O you who believe, you shall help and support him, and regard him as he should be regarded.
Shame on anyone who calls himself as a Muslim and disobeys the clear Sign of Allah.
Peace,
Z Before giving us your opinion, it would be wise for you to first learn the difference between a rasool and a prophet (nabi).
Peace
-
Shame on anyone who calls himself as a Muslim and disobeys the clear Sign of Allah.
Indeed.
Which Hadith, other than this, do they uphold?
These are GOD's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than GOD and His revelations do they believe?
Have they not looked at the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all the things GOD has created? Does it ever occur to them that the end of their life may be near? Which Hadith, beside this, do they believe in?
Turn unto Him alone then, and be mindful of Him, and establish the Divine System and be not of the Mushrikeen (idolaters) who ascribe ?partners? to Him. Those who split up their religion becoming sects, each sect delighting in whatever beliefs they have.
-
Peace,
Z Before giving us your opinion, it would be wise for you to first learn the difference between a rasool and a prophet (nabi).
Peace
Would you please throw light on it so that all "illiterate " must know it.
Any one who is claiming to be "Rasool" or "Nabi" after the Holy Prophet PBUH is a "Kaafir" without any reservation.
-
Peace Leoxyz,If you don't mind please provide proof via quran.
Thanks peace
So you think that Any Prophet and Rasool come.Any such concept is againt the quranic teaching;
A muslim is bound to believe
-whatever is revealed before the prophet PBUH
-What is revealed on the Prophet PBUH
Proof
24There is no such provision which states that muslims should believe "anyone" claiming to be Prophet after the Holy Prophet PBUH.
If there is such thing bring the proof from the Quran .Now it is your turn to bring the proof -
Thanks Tay. )
Leoxyz,
I'm still waiting for the proof for;
Any one who is claiming to be "Rasool" or "Nabi" after the Holy Prophet PBUH is a "Kaafir" without any reservation.
This is a very serious and powerful statement. If you can back it up with a verse, or two, I'd appreciate it. If not, please accept and admit that you have no proof of such. Simple.
-
Peace Leo,
You didn't address the "...is a "Kaafir" without any reservation" part of your statement.
peace
Yes I believe any thought which is against the Quranic teaching is "Kufar".
You may believe otherway round that any thought which is against the quranic teaching is "Islam".
I cannot enforce anyone. -
Thanks Tay. )
Leoxyz,
I'm still waiting for the proof for; This is a very serious and powerful statement. If you can back it up with a verse, or two, I'd appreciate it. If not, please accept and admit that you have no proof of such. Simple.
Any thing which is against Quranic teaching is "Not islam= Kufar"
Either you have to prove revelation is still there after the Prophet PBUH or you have to admit that it Non -Quranic /Non islamic concept.
Revelation was = Before the Prophet PBUH
Revelation on the Holy Prophet PBUH
Afterwards =No revelation
Quran says
24
So anyone who believes that revelation is Possible after the Holy Prophet PBUH is not a muslim (Kaafir). -
Peace "leo",
I do not know why you people cannot understand a simple question.You always put cart before the horse.
Do you believe that Holy Prophet has the authority to explain "Kitaab".JK- A big fat NO! I know exactly that you sunnis/shia have misinterpreted the term "bayinna" which the Quran clearly uses as an antonymn of the term "katama(to hide)". Here an example
GOD took a covenant from those who received the scripture "You shall proclaim it(tubayyinahu) to the people, and never conceal(la taktumoohu) it." But they disregarded it behind their backs, and traded it away for a cheap price. What a miserable trade.
The Prophet was infact FORBIDDEN from explaining the Quran
Do not move your tongue to hasten it.
...
Then it is We who will explain it.All other questions stem from this basic theme.
If you do not consider him PBUH as authority to explain the "BOOK" ,how can you discuss the authenticity of narrations.
It becomes a useless discussion .Because even if the authenticity of those narration is proved ,you will not accept it in the absence of His PBUH authority of explaining the book.You might have realized what is the value of
1Allah
2The HOLY Prophe PBUH
3The Holy Quran
OPF clearly mocked and attacked their integrity .
Look at this one what he said]Are you sure this is a language of a "Muslim"
Can any muslim even think about it??JK- Yes the Prophet was only an authority from GOD in regards to His Message i.e. the Quran and nothing else as is evident from 3337 as well. GOD Bless!
-
Peace "leoxyz",
ANOTHER CAT IS OUT OF BAG
So Qadianis are also operational over here.All anti-islam stuff is accumulated to
-Attack Allah and Quran
-To attack authority of the Prophet PBUH
-To Tamper the quran
-To attack finality of prophethood of Muhammad PBUHJK- What did your arguments run out? Couldnt you find any more support from GOD's Word i.e. Quran so that you now have to resort to these kind of statments? And where did we ever attack Allah or the Quran? Your doing this by twisting meanings and getting fooled by fake hadith for whose authenticity theres ZERO evidence. The authrority of the Prophet is ofcourse no more since he died and is no longer amongst us and even during his lifetime as per 3337 he was not to be obeyed on daily life issues but only those things he brought as a messenger which was not 24/7 of his speech. That which was is in the Quran. We do not tamper with the Quran. The Quran is not a book between two covers as sunni/shia assert. It is a mathematically coded book and ive discussed this many times over. Last but not least we never disputed the finality of Muhammad's prophethood BUT that of his final MESSENGERSHIP. Why does the Quran in the same verse call him a messenger of GOD but then only calls him final prophet but according to you sunnis forgets to mention him as the final messenger? GOD Bless!
-
Peace "leo",
Translate the Aya which I put it again
24No revelation after the Holy Prophet(PBUH).Anyone who believes contrary to it does not believe in Quran ---------------> Kaafir
If you have proof bring forward.JK- Do you dare to claim that the "ka(you)" in "ilaika" referes uniquely to Muhammad? You gotta rid yourself of this sunni/shia bias. It can equally refer to any messenger and that which was revealed before him. Remeber a rasool will not come to bring a new divine law or scripture which is why we accept that Muhammad is the last Nabi i.e. bringer of new news but not the last messenger i.e. one who tranfers the message i.e. existing or new, to other humans through various methods inspired by GOD like code-19 fror example in RKs case. GOD Bless!
-
It's so difficult to admit that your statement has no basis whatsoever?
Naturally who do not understand Quran ,how can they grasp this simple concept
Quran is the "Guidance" for Muttaqin.
22Those who do not want to get guidance ,Quran clearly indicates
26
(26) As for those who have rejected *9 (these things), it is all the same to them whether you warn them or do not warn them they are not going to believe.
.27
(27) Allah has sealed up their hearts and ears and a covering has fallen over their eyes, *10 and they have incurred the severest punishment.So no surprise for me.
-
The Prophet was infact FORBIDDEN from explaining the Quran
Do not move your tongue to hasten it.
...
Then it is We who will explain it.JK- Yes the Prophet was only an authority from GOD in regards to His Message i.e. the Quran and nothing else as is evident from 3337 as well. GOD Bless!
JK, why is the "We" capitalized in 7519? It was no other than Muhammad himself who said it. I see no logic of an "almighty god" to choose one person just to deliver 'His' message, threatening others not to move their tongues and championing that 'He' (which becomes We) will explain it to the entire world. This "god" displays weakness indeed.