Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. What is the difference between "Nissa, Amraat and Azwaj"

What is the difference between "Nissa, Amraat and Azwaj"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
256 Posts 17 Posters 18.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Muslimtruthrevealed
    wrote on last edited by
    #227

    http//img301.imageshack.us/img301/5464/grammaticalbooknr0.th.jpg http//img99.imageshack.us/img99/7767/sura434grammaticalanalyhf6.th.jpg

    Excuse me, your kidding right?

    Its Hunna NOT 'antum'. I dont know where you see 'antum', because its NOT there.

    Im not sure why the ?? ?wau? is giving you folks so much grief, its merely a marker denoting the end of the intransitive verb and the pointer to the subject, Hunna . Just look at the other references to in the scan.

    When separate object pronouns (i.e. Hunna ) serve as direct object pronouns they must come BEFORE the verb. Hunna is NOT a direct object, thus it is NOT in the Accusative Case with these verbs

    Hunna is NOT a direct object because it comes AFTER the verb I?DRIBU , which is Intransitive and ONLY requires a Subject, Hunna

    Again, Active Verb, the action is directed outward from the subject (Hunna ), which means that the subject (Hunna ) performs the action but does not receive it.

    Thus, Hunna is the Subject and Agent of the verb I?DRIBU

    I believe the other verbs associated with the subject Hunna are Intransitive also

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #228

      Peace all --

      Browse Root and choose best meaning without contradicting rest of Quran.

      http//www.openburhan.net/ob.php?root=%D8%B6%D8%B1%D8%A8%0D

      Waidriboohunna

      And leave them (f) alone/be; believers do not hit their women and mother of their children whom they are entrusted to protect.

      3918
      Those who hear/listen (to) the word/opinion and belief so they follow its best, those are, those whom God guided them, and those, they are of the pure minds/hearts.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        siki
        wrote on last edited by
        #229

        Peace all --

        Browse Root and choose best meaning without contradicting rest of Quran.

        http//www.openburhan.net/ob.php?root=%D8%B6%D8%B1%D8%A8%0D

        Waidriboohunna

        And leave them (f) alone/be; believers do not hit their women and mother of their children whom they are entrusted to protect.

        3918
        Those who hear/listen (to) the word/opinion and belief so they follow its best, those are, those whom God guided them, and those, they are of the pure minds/hearts.

        How about, "Those who hear and listen and pick up/select what suits them"

        Holiday! can you show me anywhere where this word is used for the meaning leaving them alone, In quran?

        siki

        To travel, to get out 3156; 4101; 3844; 7320; 2273

        To strike 260,73; 7160; 812; 2077; 2431; 2663; 3793; 474

        To beat 850; 4727

        To set up 4358; 5713

        To give (examples) 1424,45; 1675,76,112; 1832,45; 2435; 3028,58; 3678; 3927,29; 4317; 5921; 6610,11

        To take away, to ignore 435

        To condemn 261

        To seal, to draw over 1811

        To cover 2431

        To explain 1317

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #230

          How about, "Those who hear and listen and pick up/select what suits them"

          Holiday! can you show me anywhere where this word is used for the meaning leaving them alone, In quran?

          siki

          Peace Siki,

          58 instances of the word along with examples set forth ( DaRaBa) on how to behave in Quran and you choose strike/beat them as in 812 smack them across the head and smash their every finger/tip?

          226
          260
          261
          273
          2273
          3112
          3156
          434
          494
          4101
          5106
          7160
          812
          850
          1317
          1424
          1425
          1445
          1674
          1675
          1676
          16112
          1748
          1811
          1832
          1845
          2077
          2273
          2431
          2435
          259
          2539
          2663
          2943
          3028
          3058
          3613
          3678
          3793
          3844
          3927
          3929
          435
          4317
          4357
          4358
          473
          474
          4727
          5713
          5921
          6610
          6611
          7320

          Read between the word and fit best meaning?

          so advise them (F) and desert/abandon them (F) in the place of lying down,
          waidriboohunna (F),
          so if they obeyed you, so do not oppress/transgress on them (F)
          a way/method, that God was/is high, mighty/great.

          If they do not get along/obey; what are examples set forth (daraba sunah) in Quran other than travel/ignore or leave them alone be kind divorce peacefully?

          3328 O you the prophet, say to your wives "If you were (F) wanting (F) the life the present/worldly life and its decoration/beauty, so come, I make you (F) enjoy, I divorce/free you (F), divorce/freeing gracefully (peaceful/quiet)."

          2229 The divorce (is) two times/twice, so holding/clinging/refraining (the marriage) with kindness/generosity or divorcing/releasing with goodness, and (it is) not permitted/allowed that you (M) to take/receive from what you gave them (F) a thing, except that they (B) fear that (they) do not take care of (B) God's limits/boundaries , so if you feared (that they) do not take care of (B) God's limits/boundaries , so no offense/sin on them (B) in what she ransomed/compensated with it. Those are God's limits/boundaries , so do not transgress/violate it, and who transgresses/violates God's limits/boundaries , so those are, they are the unjust/oppressive.

          2231 And if you divorced the women, so they reached their term/time, so hold/grasp them (F) with kindness/generosity or divorce/release them (F) with kindness/generosity, and do not hold/grasp them (F) harming to transgress/violate, and who makes/does that, so he had caused injustice/oppression (to) himself. And do not take God's verses/evidences mockingly , and mention/remember God's blessing on you, and what He descended on you from The Book and the wisdom , He advises/warns you with it, and fear and obey God, and know that God (is) with every thing knowledgeable.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            siki
            wrote on last edited by
            #231

            Arabic is much more than picking a word of our suiting from the dictionary and replacing it in a verse according to what we think should be correct, had it been like that , life could have been very easy.

            I had asked you which meaning you think fits here other than strike/beat? and please prove it that it fits grammatically as well as in the context.

            what you are advocating is in the next verse, but beating stage is before that

            4-35 If a couple fears separation, you shall appoint an arbitrator from his family and an arbitrator from her family; if they decide to reconcile, GOD will help them get together. GOD is Omniscient, Cognizant.

            siki

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #232

              Arabic is much more than picking a word of our suiting from the dictionary and replacing it in a verse according to what we think should be correct, had it been like that , life could have been very easy.

              I had asked you which meaning you think fits here other than strike/beat? and please prove it that it fits grammatically as well as in the context.

              what you are advocating is in the next verse, but beating stage is before that

              4-35 If a couple fears separation, you shall appoint an arbitrator from his family and an arbitrator from her family; if they decide to reconcile, GOD will help them get together. GOD is Omniscient, Cognizant.

              siki

              Context/cross reference without contradiction less about the Arabic language of the messenger; Quran did not come with Hans Wehr dictionary.

              Let?s turn it around; prove it means beat/strike according to Quran without contradicting Quran?

              I showed evidences to live with them if no divorce and/or after divorce;

              ...so hold/grasp them (F) with kindness/generosity or divorce/release them (F) with kindness/generosity,

              ...and do not hold/grasp them (F) harming to transgress,

              ...and who makes/does that, so he had caused injustice (to) himself.

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                siki
                wrote on last edited by
                #233

                To beat is the meaning that most of the translators agree upon and that is how it is/was understood, it is you , who is coming out with something new(which i do not know what it is), so the burden of proof is upon you.

                so kindly suggest an alternate meaning, which fits in better than strike, and believe me i shall be the happiest person, and the first one to accept it.

                siki

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Tlepsh
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #234

                  To beat is the meaning that most of the translators agree upon and that is how it is/was understood, it is you , who is coming out with something new(which i do not know what it is), so the burden of proof is upon you.

                  so kindly suggest an alternate meaning, which fits in better than strike, and believe me i shall be the happiest person, and the first one to accept it.

                  siki

                  Peace Siki,
                  You are confronting Holiday with what the majority is doing.

                  But Quran in 6.116 says
                  "Now if you pay heed to, or get intimidated by majority of those who live on earth, they will lead you astray from God?s way. Most of the people follow nothing but conjecture and they only live by guesswork"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • W Offline
                    W Offline
                    wildguest1956
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #235

                    To beat is the meaning that most of the translators agree upon and that is how it is/was understood, it is you , who is coming out with something new(which i do not know what it is), so the burden of proof is upon you.

                    so kindly suggest an alternate meaning, which fits in better than strike, and believe me i shall be the happiest person, and the first one to accept it.

                    siki

                    See http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=7439.msg50832#msg50832

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Tlepsh
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #236

                      Salaam All,

                      (&#1580 (zawj) Primarily signifies a sort of any thing or kind (that is one of a pair or couple)
                      (&#1606 (zawjan) signifies a pair or couple. e.i. any two things paired or coupled together whether they be likes or contraries.
                      (&#1580 (azwaj) is the plural of zawj.

                      ( &#1605 (zawjan min hamam) means a pair of pigeons.
                      (&#1606 (zawjayn) is used in Quran (11.40 and 23.27) meaning a male and female (a couple)

                      1140 Thus it was until Our command came to pass. Waters gushed forth in torrents over the face of the land. Torrential rain began and the rivers started over flowing. We commanded Noah to take with him livestock, a couple each, and to take his family and followers with him. The rejecters, of course, were not to embark. The community of believers with Noah was small.

                      ( &#1601 (zawjan min kheefaf) signifies a pair of boots.

                      A man and his wife together are termed zawjan (&#1606

                      And in Quran (39.6, 6.143, 6.144) ( &#1613 (thamaneeyata azwaj) means eight ones (of pairs or couples)
                      Two sheep, one male and one female, two goats, one male and one female two camels, one male and one female, two cows, one male and one female. (Altogether 4 pairs)

                      So zawj is one of the pairs. A left shoe is a zawj. A right shoe is a zawj. Both of them together are zawjayn.

                      A husband is a zawj. A wife is a zawj (it is also called zawja). Both the husband and wife together are called zawjayn.

                      The left shoe and the right shoe are equal. The right shoe can not be used instead of the left shoe and visa versa. They complete each other. One can not form a pair (zawjayn) of shoes from one left shoe and two ore more right shoes.

                      A pair (zawjayn) is formed by one husband and one wife. One husband and two wives or one wife and two husbands can not form a (zawjayn) pair.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Samia
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #237

                        Salaam All,

                        A husband is a zawj. A wife is a zawj (it is also called zawja). Both the husband and wife together are called zawjayn.

                        The left shoe and the right shoe are equal. The right shoe can not be used instead of the left shoe and visa versa. They complete each other. One can not form a pair (zawjayn) of shoes from one left shoe and two ore more right shoes.

                        A pair (zawjayn) is formed by one husband and one wife. One husband and two wives or one wife and two husbands can not form a (zawjayn) pair.

                        This is a very simple, correct and to the point explanation! Thank you Tlepsh. I hope this puts poly-zawj in a couple to rest

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          siki
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #238

                          ;D I guess shoes are in business these days, specially size 10,

                          How can you derive deductions of your own suiting being in knowledge of verse , 4-23, specially you samia ?

                          Ladies! you have biases so deep entrenched, that you would not care, even if it amounts to defying God's clear verdicts/commandments. Exactly like that, you would not care if father of your children commits adultery and hence may be doomed to Hell ultimately, you can reconcile with this, provided he does not marry her.

                          What a pity , what a shame? I am terribly disappointed, (

                          4-23...................Wa un Tajammao , bainul Akhtain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and do not collect two sisters at a time,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

                          siki

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            afridi220
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #239

                            AThe left shoe and the right shoe are equal. The right shoe can not be used instead of the left shoe and visa versa. They complete each other. One can not form a pair (zawjayn) of shoes from one left shoe and two ore more right shoes.

                            A pair (zawjayn) is formed by one husband and one wife. One husband and two wives or one wife and two husbands can not form a (zawjayn) pair.

                            hmm How on earth left sandle and right shoe can be equal, one is high and the other is laugh

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Samia
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #240

                              ;D I guess shoes are in business these days, specially size 10,

                              How can you derive deductions of your own suiting being in knowledge of verse , 4-23, specially you samia ?

                              4-23...................Wa un Tajammao , bainul Akhtain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and do not collect two sisters at a time,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

                              siki

                              Verse 4-23 does not contradict my opinion about polygamy as being restricted to a specific condition This already restricted condition is further restricted If the mother of the fatherless child (whom you are allowed to marry even if you are married) happens to be a sister of your wife, do not marry her.

                              Ladies! you have biases so deep entrenched, that you would not care, even if it amounts to defying God's clear verdicts/commandments. Exactly like that, you would not care if father of your children commits adultery and hence may be doomed to Hell ultimately, you can reconcile with this, provided he does not marry her.

                              If one of us has to go to hell, let the rat be the one. Why would I and the children go to hell so that he might get married again, and for no reason as stated in the verse? He should learn to control his desires. Just like the logic of covering women so that men do not "sin with their eyes". I say again, I am covering no head or hair, and if they do not learn how to cast their eyes, let them go to hell.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Offline
                                T Offline
                                Tlepsh
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #241

                                ;D I guess shoes are in business these days, specially size 10,

                                How can you derive deductions of your own suiting being in knowledge of verse , 4-23, specially you samia ?

                                Ladies! you have biases so deep entrenched, that you would not care, even if it amounts to defying God's clear verdicts/commandments. Exactly like that, you would not care if father of your children commits adultery and hence may be doomed to Hell ultimately, you can reconcile with this, provided he does not marry her.

                                What a pity , what a shame? I am terribly disappointed, (

                                4-23...................Wa un Tajammao , bainul Akhtain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and do not collect two sisters at a time,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

                                siki

                                Peace Siki,

                                Will you please show me where is the expression ?at a time? in verse 4.23?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  siki
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #242

                                  Verse 4-23 does not contradict my opinion about polygamy as being restricted to a specific condition This already restricted condition is further restricted If the mother of the fatherless child (whom you are allowed to marry even if you are married) happens to be a sister of your wife, do not marry her.
                                  If one of us has to go to hell, let the rat be the one. Why would I and the children go to hell so that he might get married again, and for no reason as stated in the verse? He should learn to control his desires. Just like the logic of covering women so that men do not "sin with their eyes". I say again, I am covering no head or hair, and if they do not learn how to cast their eyes, let them go to hell.

                                  let us assume for a while, that other woman happens to be mother of an orphan, how would it change your situation of so called being in hell?

                                  siki

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    siki
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #243

                                    Peace Siki,

                                    Will you please show me where is the expression ?at a time? in verse 4.23?

                                    I am not going to teach you the basics, please find yourself what does Tajammaou" means/ conveys.

                                    siki

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Tlepsh
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #244

                                      Salaam Samia and all,

                                      4.23 Forbidden for you are ????.. and the wives (halail) of your sons that are from your seed, ??.
                                      ( &#1618

                                      33.37 ??.. there is no wrongdoing for the believers in marrying the wives (azwaj) of their adopted sons if their relationship is ended??.
                                      ( &#1575

                                      In almost all the translations of the Quran the word ?halail? is translated as ?wives?. Is it correct?
                                      Not only the wife of one?s son but the wives of all are forbidden in marriage.
                                      So what is the difference between (halail) and (azwaj)?

                                      In verse 4.23 it says ?sons that are from your seed? ( &#1605. So this means one can have sons who are not from his seed (adopted sons). Ad?iyaikum (&#1618 are adopted sons.
                                      From the above can we understand that the expression ?abnaikum? (your sons) includes your sons from your seed and your adopted sons?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Samia
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #245

                                        Salaam Samia and all,

                                        4.23 Forbidden for you are ????.. and the wives (halail) of your sons that are from your seed, ??.
                                        ( &#1618

                                        33.37 ??.. there is no wrongdoing for the believers in marrying the wives (azwaj) of their adopted sons if their relationship is ended??.
                                        ( &#1575

                                        In almost all the translations of the Quran the word ?halail? is translated as ?wives?. Is it correct?
                                        Not only the wife of one?s son but the wives of all are forbidden in marriage.
                                        So what is the difference between (halail) and (azwaj)?

                                        In verse 4.23 it says ?sons that are from your seed? ( &#1605. So this means one can have sons who are not from his seed (adopted sons). Ad?iyaikum (&#1618 are adopted sons.
                                        From the above can we understand that the expression ?abnaikum? (your sons) includes your sons from your seed and your adopted sons?

                                        I think "halail" includes wives when the marriage has not been consummated (lowest limit).
                                        May be there's a difference between awlaad and abnaa', ab and waalid, um and waalida

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Samia
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #246

                                          let us assume for a while, that other woman happens to be mother of an orphan, how would it change your situation of so called being in hell?

                                          siki

                                          Do you read my posts carefully enough?

                                          If one of us has to go to hell, let the rat be the one. Why would I and the children go to hell so that he might get married again, and for no reason as stated in the verse? He should learn to control his desires. Just like the logic of covering women so that men do not "sin with their eyes". I say again, I am covering no head or hair, and if they do not learn how to cast their eyes, let them go to hell.

                                          Moreover, I did not say (mother of an orphan). I said (mother of a fatherless child).

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users