Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. What is the difference between "Nissa, Amraat and Azwaj"

What is the difference between "Nissa, Amraat and Azwaj"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
256 Posts 17 Posters 18.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #230

    How about, "Those who hear and listen and pick up/select what suits them"

    Holiday! can you show me anywhere where this word is used for the meaning leaving them alone, In quran?

    siki

    Peace Siki,

    58 instances of the word along with examples set forth ( DaRaBa) on how to behave in Quran and you choose strike/beat them as in 812 smack them across the head and smash their every finger/tip?

    226
    260
    261
    273
    2273
    3112
    3156
    434
    494
    4101
    5106
    7160
    812
    850
    1317
    1424
    1425
    1445
    1674
    1675
    1676
    16112
    1748
    1811
    1832
    1845
    2077
    2273
    2431
    2435
    259
    2539
    2663
    2943
    3028
    3058
    3613
    3678
    3793
    3844
    3927
    3929
    435
    4317
    4357
    4358
    473
    474
    4727
    5713
    5921
    6610
    6611
    7320

    Read between the word and fit best meaning?

    so advise them (F) and desert/abandon them (F) in the place of lying down,
    waidriboohunna (F),
    so if they obeyed you, so do not oppress/transgress on them (F)
    a way/method, that God was/is high, mighty/great.

    If they do not get along/obey; what are examples set forth (daraba sunah) in Quran other than travel/ignore or leave them alone be kind divorce peacefully?

    3328 O you the prophet, say to your wives "If you were (F) wanting (F) the life the present/worldly life and its decoration/beauty, so come, I make you (F) enjoy, I divorce/free you (F), divorce/freeing gracefully (peaceful/quiet)."

    2229 The divorce (is) two times/twice, so holding/clinging/refraining (the marriage) with kindness/generosity or divorcing/releasing with goodness, and (it is) not permitted/allowed that you (M) to take/receive from what you gave them (F) a thing, except that they (B) fear that (they) do not take care of (B) God's limits/boundaries , so if you feared (that they) do not take care of (B) God's limits/boundaries , so no offense/sin on them (B) in what she ransomed/compensated with it. Those are God's limits/boundaries , so do not transgress/violate it, and who transgresses/violates God's limits/boundaries , so those are, they are the unjust/oppressive.

    2231 And if you divorced the women, so they reached their term/time, so hold/grasp them (F) with kindness/generosity or divorce/release them (F) with kindness/generosity, and do not hold/grasp them (F) harming to transgress/violate, and who makes/does that, so he had caused injustice/oppression (to) himself. And do not take God's verses/evidences mockingly , and mention/remember God's blessing on you, and what He descended on you from The Book and the wisdom , He advises/warns you with it, and fear and obey God, and know that God (is) with every thing knowledgeable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      siki
      wrote on last edited by
      #231

      Arabic is much more than picking a word of our suiting from the dictionary and replacing it in a verse according to what we think should be correct, had it been like that , life could have been very easy.

      I had asked you which meaning you think fits here other than strike/beat? and please prove it that it fits grammatically as well as in the context.

      what you are advocating is in the next verse, but beating stage is before that

      4-35 If a couple fears separation, you shall appoint an arbitrator from his family and an arbitrator from her family; if they decide to reconcile, GOD will help them get together. GOD is Omniscient, Cognizant.

      siki

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #232

        Arabic is much more than picking a word of our suiting from the dictionary and replacing it in a verse according to what we think should be correct, had it been like that , life could have been very easy.

        I had asked you which meaning you think fits here other than strike/beat? and please prove it that it fits grammatically as well as in the context.

        what you are advocating is in the next verse, but beating stage is before that

        4-35 If a couple fears separation, you shall appoint an arbitrator from his family and an arbitrator from her family; if they decide to reconcile, GOD will help them get together. GOD is Omniscient, Cognizant.

        siki

        Context/cross reference without contradiction less about the Arabic language of the messenger; Quran did not come with Hans Wehr dictionary.

        Let?s turn it around; prove it means beat/strike according to Quran without contradicting Quran?

        I showed evidences to live with them if no divorce and/or after divorce;

        ...so hold/grasp them (F) with kindness/generosity or divorce/release them (F) with kindness/generosity,

        ...and do not hold/grasp them (F) harming to transgress,

        ...and who makes/does that, so he had caused injustice (to) himself.

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          siki
          wrote on last edited by
          #233

          To beat is the meaning that most of the translators agree upon and that is how it is/was understood, it is you , who is coming out with something new(which i do not know what it is), so the burden of proof is upon you.

          so kindly suggest an alternate meaning, which fits in better than strike, and believe me i shall be the happiest person, and the first one to accept it.

          siki

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            Tlepsh
            wrote on last edited by
            #234

            To beat is the meaning that most of the translators agree upon and that is how it is/was understood, it is you , who is coming out with something new(which i do not know what it is), so the burden of proof is upon you.

            so kindly suggest an alternate meaning, which fits in better than strike, and believe me i shall be the happiest person, and the first one to accept it.

            siki

            Peace Siki,
            You are confronting Holiday with what the majority is doing.

            But Quran in 6.116 says
            "Now if you pay heed to, or get intimidated by majority of those who live on earth, they will lead you astray from God?s way. Most of the people follow nothing but conjecture and they only live by guesswork"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • W Offline
              W Offline
              wildguest1956
              wrote on last edited by
              #235

              To beat is the meaning that most of the translators agree upon and that is how it is/was understood, it is you , who is coming out with something new(which i do not know what it is), so the burden of proof is upon you.

              so kindly suggest an alternate meaning, which fits in better than strike, and believe me i shall be the happiest person, and the first one to accept it.

              siki

              See http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=7439.msg50832#msg50832

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                Tlepsh
                wrote on last edited by
                #236

                Salaam All,

                (&#1580 (zawj) Primarily signifies a sort of any thing or kind (that is one of a pair or couple)
                (&#1606 (zawjan) signifies a pair or couple. e.i. any two things paired or coupled together whether they be likes or contraries.
                (&#1580 (azwaj) is the plural of zawj.

                ( &#1605 (zawjan min hamam) means a pair of pigeons.
                (&#1606 (zawjayn) is used in Quran (11.40 and 23.27) meaning a male and female (a couple)

                1140 Thus it was until Our command came to pass. Waters gushed forth in torrents over the face of the land. Torrential rain began and the rivers started over flowing. We commanded Noah to take with him livestock, a couple each, and to take his family and followers with him. The rejecters, of course, were not to embark. The community of believers with Noah was small.

                ( &#1601 (zawjan min kheefaf) signifies a pair of boots.

                A man and his wife together are termed zawjan (&#1606

                And in Quran (39.6, 6.143, 6.144) ( &#1613 (thamaneeyata azwaj) means eight ones (of pairs or couples)
                Two sheep, one male and one female, two goats, one male and one female two camels, one male and one female, two cows, one male and one female. (Altogether 4 pairs)

                So zawj is one of the pairs. A left shoe is a zawj. A right shoe is a zawj. Both of them together are zawjayn.

                A husband is a zawj. A wife is a zawj (it is also called zawja). Both the husband and wife together are called zawjayn.

                The left shoe and the right shoe are equal. The right shoe can not be used instead of the left shoe and visa versa. They complete each other. One can not form a pair (zawjayn) of shoes from one left shoe and two ore more right shoes.

                A pair (zawjayn) is formed by one husband and one wife. One husband and two wives or one wife and two husbands can not form a (zawjayn) pair.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Samia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #237

                  Salaam All,

                  A husband is a zawj. A wife is a zawj (it is also called zawja). Both the husband and wife together are called zawjayn.

                  The left shoe and the right shoe are equal. The right shoe can not be used instead of the left shoe and visa versa. They complete each other. One can not form a pair (zawjayn) of shoes from one left shoe and two ore more right shoes.

                  A pair (zawjayn) is formed by one husband and one wife. One husband and two wives or one wife and two husbands can not form a (zawjayn) pair.

                  This is a very simple, correct and to the point explanation! Thank you Tlepsh. I hope this puts poly-zawj in a couple to rest

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    siki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #238

                    ;D I guess shoes are in business these days, specially size 10,

                    How can you derive deductions of your own suiting being in knowledge of verse , 4-23, specially you samia ?

                    Ladies! you have biases so deep entrenched, that you would not care, even if it amounts to defying God's clear verdicts/commandments. Exactly like that, you would not care if father of your children commits adultery and hence may be doomed to Hell ultimately, you can reconcile with this, provided he does not marry her.

                    What a pity , what a shame? I am terribly disappointed, (

                    4-23...................Wa un Tajammao , bainul Akhtain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and do not collect two sisters at a time,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

                    siki

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      afridi220
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #239

                      AThe left shoe and the right shoe are equal. The right shoe can not be used instead of the left shoe and visa versa. They complete each other. One can not form a pair (zawjayn) of shoes from one left shoe and two ore more right shoes.

                      A pair (zawjayn) is formed by one husband and one wife. One husband and two wives or one wife and two husbands can not form a (zawjayn) pair.

                      hmm How on earth left sandle and right shoe can be equal, one is high and the other is laugh

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Samia
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #240

                        ;D I guess shoes are in business these days, specially size 10,

                        How can you derive deductions of your own suiting being in knowledge of verse , 4-23, specially you samia ?

                        4-23...................Wa un Tajammao , bainul Akhtain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and do not collect two sisters at a time,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

                        siki

                        Verse 4-23 does not contradict my opinion about polygamy as being restricted to a specific condition This already restricted condition is further restricted If the mother of the fatherless child (whom you are allowed to marry even if you are married) happens to be a sister of your wife, do not marry her.

                        Ladies! you have biases so deep entrenched, that you would not care, even if it amounts to defying God's clear verdicts/commandments. Exactly like that, you would not care if father of your children commits adultery and hence may be doomed to Hell ultimately, you can reconcile with this, provided he does not marry her.

                        If one of us has to go to hell, let the rat be the one. Why would I and the children go to hell so that he might get married again, and for no reason as stated in the verse? He should learn to control his desires. Just like the logic of covering women so that men do not "sin with their eyes". I say again, I am covering no head or hair, and if they do not learn how to cast their eyes, let them go to hell.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Offline
                          T Offline
                          Tlepsh
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #241

                          ;D I guess shoes are in business these days, specially size 10,

                          How can you derive deductions of your own suiting being in knowledge of verse , 4-23, specially you samia ?

                          Ladies! you have biases so deep entrenched, that you would not care, even if it amounts to defying God's clear verdicts/commandments. Exactly like that, you would not care if father of your children commits adultery and hence may be doomed to Hell ultimately, you can reconcile with this, provided he does not marry her.

                          What a pity , what a shame? I am terribly disappointed, (

                          4-23...................Wa un Tajammao , bainul Akhtain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and do not collect two sisters at a time,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

                          siki

                          Peace Siki,

                          Will you please show me where is the expression ?at a time? in verse 4.23?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            siki
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #242

                            Verse 4-23 does not contradict my opinion about polygamy as being restricted to a specific condition This already restricted condition is further restricted If the mother of the fatherless child (whom you are allowed to marry even if you are married) happens to be a sister of your wife, do not marry her.
                            If one of us has to go to hell, let the rat be the one. Why would I and the children go to hell so that he might get married again, and for no reason as stated in the verse? He should learn to control his desires. Just like the logic of covering women so that men do not "sin with their eyes". I say again, I am covering no head or hair, and if they do not learn how to cast their eyes, let them go to hell.

                            let us assume for a while, that other woman happens to be mother of an orphan, how would it change your situation of so called being in hell?

                            siki

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              siki
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #243

                              Peace Siki,

                              Will you please show me where is the expression ?at a time? in verse 4.23?

                              I am not going to teach you the basics, please find yourself what does Tajammaou" means/ conveys.

                              siki

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Offline
                                T Offline
                                Tlepsh
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #244

                                Salaam Samia and all,

                                4.23 Forbidden for you are ????.. and the wives (halail) of your sons that are from your seed, ??.
                                ( &#1618

                                33.37 ??.. there is no wrongdoing for the believers in marrying the wives (azwaj) of their adopted sons if their relationship is ended??.
                                ( &#1575

                                In almost all the translations of the Quran the word ?halail? is translated as ?wives?. Is it correct?
                                Not only the wife of one?s son but the wives of all are forbidden in marriage.
                                So what is the difference between (halail) and (azwaj)?

                                In verse 4.23 it says ?sons that are from your seed? ( &#1605. So this means one can have sons who are not from his seed (adopted sons). Ad?iyaikum (&#1618 are adopted sons.
                                From the above can we understand that the expression ?abnaikum? (your sons) includes your sons from your seed and your adopted sons?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Samia
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #245

                                  Salaam Samia and all,

                                  4.23 Forbidden for you are ????.. and the wives (halail) of your sons that are from your seed, ??.
                                  ( &#1618

                                  33.37 ??.. there is no wrongdoing for the believers in marrying the wives (azwaj) of their adopted sons if their relationship is ended??.
                                  ( &#1575

                                  In almost all the translations of the Quran the word ?halail? is translated as ?wives?. Is it correct?
                                  Not only the wife of one?s son but the wives of all are forbidden in marriage.
                                  So what is the difference between (halail) and (azwaj)?

                                  In verse 4.23 it says ?sons that are from your seed? ( &#1605. So this means one can have sons who are not from his seed (adopted sons). Ad?iyaikum (&#1618 are adopted sons.
                                  From the above can we understand that the expression ?abnaikum? (your sons) includes your sons from your seed and your adopted sons?

                                  I think "halail" includes wives when the marriage has not been consummated (lowest limit).
                                  May be there's a difference between awlaad and abnaa', ab and waalid, um and waalida

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Samia
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #246

                                    let us assume for a while, that other woman happens to be mother of an orphan, how would it change your situation of so called being in hell?

                                    siki

                                    Do you read my posts carefully enough?

                                    If one of us has to go to hell, let the rat be the one. Why would I and the children go to hell so that he might get married again, and for no reason as stated in the verse? He should learn to control his desires. Just like the logic of covering women so that men do not "sin with their eyes". I say again, I am covering no head or hair, and if they do not learn how to cast their eyes, let them go to hell.

                                    Moreover, I did not say (mother of an orphan). I said (mother of a fatherless child).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Tlepsh
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #247

                                      I think "halail" includes wives when the marriage has not been consummated (lowest limit).
                                      May be there's a difference between awlaad and abnaa', ab and waalid, um and waalida

                                      Thankyou for your quick reply

                                      What is the singular of Halail in verse 4.23?
                                      Is it ?Halal? or ?Haleel? or

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Samia
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #248

                                        Thankyou for your quick reply

                                        What is the singular of Halail in verse 4.23?
                                        Is it ?Halal? or ?Haleel? or

                                        haleel (like zawj, can be used for both wife and husband)
                                        also Haleela is used for wife

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          Tlepsh
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #249

                                          May be there's a difference between awlaad and abnaa', ab and waalid, um and waalida

                                          As I can understand from verse 2.233

                                          ?Walida? is the biological mother
                                          ?Walad? is the biological child
                                          ?Mowlud lahu? or ?walid? is the biological father
                                          ?Walideyn? are the biological parents.

                                          4.23

                                          And as I can understand from verse 4.23

                                          ?Um? is a mother (either biological or not)
                                          ?Ab? is a father (either Biological or not)
                                          (Abnaa?) are children (either biological or adapted)

                                          If I am, correct does this mean that verse 33.40 tells us that Muhammad was not a father of either a biological or an adopted child.

                                          33.40

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users