Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. caliph umar converts dumping ground into a "holy" site

caliph umar converts dumping ground into a "holy" site

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
133 Posts 10 Posters 4.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    thegod
    wrote on last edited by
    #108

    Nonetheless, it seems difficult to set aside the long-established view that Greek words using the root betyl or baityl reflect variant transliterations of the Semitic-language term bethel (BTL), meaning house of El (god). This conception in itself gains some force from the fact that the term seems now to be attested on an Aramaic inscription from the Roman Imperial period, found at the village of El-Mal in southern Syria, some 40 km south-west of Damascus. The inscription, which dates from 7/6 bc, seems to record that someone built a house of god (BNH BYT LH), that is, a temple. Though there were Jewish settlements in this region, bordering on Gaulanitis (the Golan Heights), the context is surely pagan. However, it is clear that what is referred to here is not a betyl as understood by Philo, and taken as a general conception by moderns, that is, a stone housing a divine spirit, but a building, no doubt one of those small rural sanctuaries so well attested over large parts of the Near East.

    For the above, please refer to "The Roman Near East, 31 B.C.-A.D. 337" by millar; p 14.

    ma'a salaam.

    God bless all.

    al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      belH
      wrote on last edited by
      #109

      For the above, please refer to "The Roman Near East, 31 B.C.-A.D. 337" by millar; p 14.

      ma'a salaam.

      God bless all.

      al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

      thegod, I would appreciate it if you comment in my last post, especially about Moses, Jesus, David, Salomon's Focal Point...is it Mecca or Jerusalem?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        thegod
        wrote on last edited by
        #110

        belh-

        Moses existed before solomon & the temple of jerusalem.

        The jews consider the rock in the temple their focal point. How many times should it be said that temple/rock is in jerusalem, while those tombs which u talk about are in hebron? Please read my last post regarding the tombs & the rock, & clarify whether it is hebron or jerusalem that u take as ur focal point.

        ma'a salaam.

        God bless all.

        al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Samia
          wrote on last edited by
          #111
          • Family can be swapped with household; I didn't know u would be caught unaware.

          Answer my first question Who are in 3333?

          Now stop making empty claims, & provide some reference for ur invention that "bayt can't be empty". Not that "concept" makes more sense, but words cannot be invented on the whims & fancy of any & every nobody; the meanings "house" & "household" are established, provide some reference for bayt = concept.

          Although it's illogical to ask someone to prove a negative, but here is a verse 2429 There's no sin on you to enter uninhabited houses ...
          The underlined expression shows that otherwise bayt(s) is necessarily inhabited unless otherwise stated.
          As for the house of God (2125; 2226) He asks that it has to be purified for the . Where ? Is it still empty? Where are the going to do this "i3tikaf"?

          And please be decent in your language. Stick to the topic and do not take it to a personal level.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            thegod
            wrote on last edited by
            #112

            samia-Answer my first question Who are in 3333?

            • Read one of my earlier posts, I already gave an answer.

            Let me say it again they are the "ahl" associated with the bayt, the way ahl alkitaab are the "ahl" associated with the kitaab. If u have ur own answer, please put it in words.

            -but here is a verse 2429

            2429 An offense/guilt/sin is not on you that you enter houses/homes not resided in/inhabited, in it (is) enjoyment for you, and God knows what you show, and what you hide/conceal.

            The fact that an uninhabited place has been called "bayt" is proof in itself against ur conjecture that an uninhabited place cannot be called "bayt".

            For those comfortable with english, the word "house" denotes a place of habitation, & an uninhabited house is still called a house.

            -And please be decent in your language. Stick to the topic and do not take it to a personal level.

            • Don't be presumptuous, u are not exempted from observing decency

            samia-If you cannot read my post, no wonder you cannot understand the quraan.

            The "topic" was umar converting a dumping ground into a holy city.

            Let us recap

            1. I have shown using quraan & inscriptional evidence that bayt is a physical place.

            2. & u have shown using the quraan that an uninhabited place is called bayt.

            A remark -- u have not been able to provide any evidence in support of ur conjectures.

            ma'a salaam.

            God bless all.

            al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'alaameen

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              Bigmo
              wrote on last edited by
              #113

              I think the issue of Jerusalem is clear in the Koran. It refers to it as the holy land or the blessed land. So I believe the verse about Isra and Mi'raj is talking Jerusalem and the Temple of David and Solomon. Since it says that We have blessed. I am not sure the Koran uses that reference to anyother area. I think it uses Haram for Mecca.

              But,

              Whether that is the same spot as the Aqsa we have today is not clear and I would be skeptical. There was huge politics during the Ummayids.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Samia
                wrote on last edited by
                #114

                samia-Answer my first question Who are in 3333?

                • Read one of my earlier posts, I already gave an answer.

                Let me say it again they are the "ahl" associated with the bayt, the way ahl alkitaab are the "ahl" associated with the kitaab. If u have ur own answer, please put it in words.

                Which bayt and how are they associated with it?

                -but here is a verse 2429

                The fact that an uninhabited place has been called "bayt" is proof in itself against ur conjecture that an uninhabited place cannot be called "bayt".

                How do "bayt" and "uninhabited bayt" give the same meaning?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  thegod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #115

                  samia-

                  Don't start dancing again. It was ur entreaty that u be shown a verse where bayt is physical I responded to ur plea, & also provided other evidence. Provide similar evidence that it cannot be a physical place, or admit that u made yet another mistake.

                  ma'a salaam.

                  God bless all.

                  al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Offline
                    T Offline
                    thegod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #116

                    The jews call their temple "Bet HaMikdash," which shows the application of the word "bayt" in hebrew.

                    ma'a salaam.

                    God bless all.

                    al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Samia
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #117

                      samia-

                      Don't start dancing again. It was ur entreaty that u be shown a verse where bayt is physical I responded to ur plea, & also provided other evidence. Provide similar evidence that it cannot be a physical place, or admit that u made yet another mistake.

                      ma'a salaam.

                      God bless all.

                      al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                      You rephrased (people of the house people associated with the house) but my question was what is the meaning of ahl albayt.
                      And I did not say it cannot be a physical place.
                      And stop being rude.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T Offline
                        T Offline
                        thegod
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #118

                        samia-And I did not say it cannot be a physical place.

                        samia-Show me "bayt" in the quraan not referring to household when physical.

                        Read that. Now admit a third mistake -- that u made a claim, & then pretended to have never made that claim.

                        ma'a salaam.

                        God bless all.

                        al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Samia
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #119

                          samia-And I did not say it cannot be a physical place.

                          samia-Show me "bayt" in the quraan not referring to household when physical.

                          Read that. Now admit a third mistake -- that u made a claim, & then pretended to have never made that claim.

                          This line (underlined) does not mean bayt cannot be a physical place
                          Moreover, this is my first post regarding this topic

                          There's no "house". A house is a physical structure that can be empty (like the black room in Makkah), but a "bayt" can't be empty, and is not necessarily a physical structure, otherwise, how many rooms are there in the bayt of "al albayt"? So, no physical place either. The "bayt" of God is the main concept of His system and his whereabouts is where there's "no shirk" (6151-153).

                          Now, are you telling me that (is not necessarily a physical structure) has the same meaning as (cannot be a physical place)?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            thegod
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #120

                            samia-This line (underlined) does not mean bayt cannot be a physical place

                            • What does it mean? That u were unsure about its application in the quraan? & If u knew, like u seem to imply from ur quote, why did u ask for a verse to prove it?

                            -Now, are you telling me that (is not necessarily a physical structure) has the same meaning as (cannot be a physical place)?

                            • I considered it, & found ur statement (to be) ambiguous, which is why I waited till u came up with "Show me "bayt" in the quraan not referring to household when physical."

                            ma'a salaam.

                            God bless all.

                            al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              belH
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #121

                              belh-

                              Moses existed before solomon & the temple of jerusalem.

                              The jews consider the rock in the temple their focal point. How many times should it be said that temple/rock is in jerusalem, while those tombs which u talk about are in hebron? Please read my last post regarding the tombs & the rock, & clarify whether it is hebron or jerusalem that u take as ur focal point.

                              ma'a salaam.

                              God bless all.

                              al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                              thegod, I know that Moses came before David.
                              My Question is, if these Prophets and Messengers (Moses, Jesus, David, Salomon, Yahia, Zakria) are moslems (as you said and I agreed), why did they Choose a Focal Point that is not Mecca?
                              The point about hebron and Jerusalem will be dealt with after we finish with the above point.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Offline
                                T Offline
                                thegod
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #122

                                belh-

                                Then u would know that the temple of solomon did not exist until moses. Then the temple of jews could not have been his focal point; do u agree?

                                ma'a salaam.

                                God bless all.

                                al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  belH
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #123

                                  belh-

                                  Then u would know that the temple of solomon did not exist until moses. Then the temple of jews could not have been his focal point; do u agree?

                                  ma'a salaam.

                                  God bless all.

                                  al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                                  as I told you before, the Temple of David has nothing to do with the Focal Point...even David Himself did not take his temple as a Focal Point, after all He was a True moslem.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    thegod
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #124

                                    belh-the Temple of David has nothing to do with the Focal Point...even David Himself did not take his temple as a Focal Point, after all He was a True moslem.

                                    I am not aware of a temple built by david even in the bible.

                                    ma'a salaam.

                                    God bless all.

                                    al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      thegod
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #125

                                      thegod - Then u would know that the temple of solomon did not exist until moses. Then the temple of jews could not have been his focal point; do u agree?

                                      The above should read

                                      Then u would know that the temple of solomon did not exist at the time of moses. Then the temple of jews could not have been his focal point; do u agree?

                                      al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        belH
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #126

                                        belh-the Temple of David has nothing to do with the Focal Point...even David Himself did not take his temple as a Focal Point, after all He was a True moslem.

                                        I am not aware of a temple built by david even in the bible.

                                        thegod, can you answer my main question

                                        My Question is, if these Prophets and Messengers (Moses, Jesus, David, Salomon, Yahia, Zakria) are moslems (as you said and I agreed), why did they Choose a Focal Point that is not Mecca?
                                        The point about hebron and Jerusalem will be dealt with after we finish with the above point.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          thegod
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #127

                                          belh-

                                          Can u clarify this temple of david?

                                          ma'a salaam.

                                          God bless all.

                                          al'hamd li Allaah Rabb al'aalameen

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users