How many verses are there in the quran ?

unknownuser

Peace jonny,

JK- ALIF suras have to be IGNORED FOR THE MOMENT because we dont yet have any consistent mehtod of identifying alifs in every case. Sorry i posted the third part of the article. Here this should show you
http//19.org/index.php?aid=61

Why IGNORED, because not multiple, shall we ignore alif in ?
Simple letter pop ?alif into browser and search text.

That site is full of lies; already gave you the exact counts, tell us which are not correct and we can search together...

JK- YES but WHY do the only two chapters which have "qaf" as their initials have qafs EXACTLY EQUAL 57, thus totalling 114 and that as we know is coincidentally!?? the no. of chapters in the Q(qaaf)uran.

The same reason there are 57 Qaf in chapter 14
The same reason there are 133 (19x7) Qaf in chapter 26
The same reason there are 38 Qaf in chapter 32
The same reason there are 38 Qaf in chapter 47
The same reason there are 19 Qaf in chapter 61

IT MEANS NOTHING!

This is basic probability; choose any prevalent letter and you?ll get multiples.

JK- Youve ignored my main point but lets move down shall we?

You have no point only conjecture, why this, why that, why why. lol

JK- ARE THERE AN INFINITE NO OF WORDS IN ARABIC? ARABIC MAY HAVE AT BEST 1M ATTRIBUTES. MOREOVER ARE THERE MANY ARABIC ATTRIBUTES HAVING GVS GREATER THAN 2000? Show me if there are because i dodnt think so. Most attributes in Arabic have GVs less than 2000 IMO. Show me otherwise.

You still don't get it, the pool is infinite and you found a meaningless conjecture like someone giving all the combinations for lotto and you freak out in amazement that you won; the same with Qaf in chapter 50 -- BIG DEAL!

JK- NONSENSE. Bro Edip, myself and others are very critical of many claims of arbitary calcs. We differentiate between glass and diamond. Have you read Edip's debate with Ayman named "Intelligent ppls guide to code-19". If no i ask you to please do that first

Waste time reading that site full of lies and miscounts, the land of the clueless.

Have little respect for people who believe 1974 special although this sounds cool...lol

http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTiSzFp4arg

peace

jonny_k

Peace "eid",

Peace jonny,

Why IGNORED, because not multiple, shall we ignore alif in ?
Simple letter pop ?alif into browser and search text.

That site is full of lies; already gave you the exact counts, tell us which are not correct and we can search together...

JK- According to RK ALL alif intiialed suras occur in mutliples of 19. BUT we are honest enough to admit that the alif counts are controversial. You can play around with alif counts since there is no consistent method shown yet for their counts. Submission.org claims to have reanalysed the counts and states that the sets of alif initialed suras occur in xples of 19 just like the HM sets. HOWEVER this still needs independent verification.

The same reason there are 57 Qaf in chapter 14
The same reason there are 133 (19x7) Qaf in chapter 26
The same reason there are 38 Qaf in chapter 32
The same reason there are 38 Qaf in chapter 47
The same reason there are 19 Qaf in chapter 61

IT MEANS NOTHING!

JK- But sice those two chapters are initialed by "qaf" it means something. And also the initials of suras 19, 36, 42 occur in xples of 19. Reg HM you should check this out
serach for "orchestra" at http//19.org/index.php?aid=246
Regarding sura 68 or sura NOON yes indeed the initial noon is to be spelled noon waw noon. The reason is justified by a verse in the Quran which mentions "ZAN NOON" i.e. "posessor of noon"
2187 And Zan-Noon (Jonah, "the one with an `N' in his name&quot, abandoned his mission in protest, thinking that we could not control him. He ended up imploring from the darkness (of the big fish's belly) "There is no god other than You. Be You glorified. I have committed a gross sin."
NOW in sura 68/noon there is one reference to "Jonah" termed as "sahibal hoot"
6848 You shall steadfastly persevere in carrying out the commands of your Lord. Do not be like (Jonah) who called from inside the fish(sahibal hoot).
NOTICE GOD didnt call him yuNus but instead used a term without "N". Then in another sura He refers to the SAME PERSON calling him "posessor of NOON" i.e. the one noon tht wld make 132 to 133=19x7. One must be blind not to see this relation. Is all this coincidence? If so explain to me the 2187.

This is basic probability; choose any prevalent letter and you?ll get multiples.

You have no point only conjecture, why this, why that, why why. lol

You still don't get it, the pool is infinite and you found a meaningless conjecture like someone giving all the combinations for lotto and you freak out in amazement that you won; the same with Qaf in chapter 50 -- BIG DEAL!

JK- THE POOL IS NOT INFINITE. There is NEVER an infinite amount of words in any language. Suppose there are 1B attributes. HOW MANY of those would have GVs = 2698. Perhaps 10.

Waste time reading that site full of lies and miscounts, the land of the clueless.

Ayman easily took you out and have little respect for people who believe 1974 special although this sounds cool...lol

http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTiSzFp4arg

peace

JK- Where did Ayman take me out? I addressed all his points regarding this issue and so did brother Edip. GOD Bless!

kn

Peace all,

Dera Kn where you get Bidha? from???? Please clarify.

Dear Alen

Please review the following. I am also trying to learn, so help us God.

304Within ten years! God?s is the Command in the past and in the future. On that day the believers too will have cause to rejoice.

( from ourbeacon.com )

Bidha = denoting less in number in single digit, and Sineen = years so any thing between about 3 to 9, word Bidha can be used as is written in this Ayat in connection with Sineen (years,) meaning less than 10. ( May God forgive me for possibly misspelling Bidha in English script here)

Just like Saba has been used do denote seven ( meaning several) Bidha has been used in above Ayat to denote a single digit number of years.

unknownuser

Peace jonny,

JK- According to RK ALL alif intiialed suras occur in mutliples of 19. BUT we are honest enough to admit that the alif counts are controversial.

No they are not controversial and he knowingly lied simple as that.

You can play around with alif counts since there is no consistent method shown yet for their counts.
I'm not playing, you are the ones manipulating; simply count alif.

Submission.org claims to have reanalysed the counts and states that the sets of alif initialed suras occur in xples of 19 just like the HM sets. HOWEVER this still needs independent verification.

It's obvious they are liars like their idol.

JK- But sice those two chapters are initialed by "qaf" it means something.

That SOMETHING is only (illa) in your head. lol

And also the initials of suras 19, 36, 42 occur in xples of 19.

NO THEY DO NOT! Instead of parroting lies check and verify?

19 KHYAS 137 + 175 + 334 + 117 + 26 = 789 NOT MULTIPLE!

36 YS 231 + 48 = 279 NOT MULTIPLE!

42 HMAySQ 53 + 300 + 98 + 54 + 57 = 562 NOT MULTIPLE!

Reg HM you should check this out
serach for "orchestra" at http//19.org/index.php?aid=246

More clueless stuff about 1974; wast of time.
Already told you NONE of the initialed chapters are multiple only one.

Regarding sura 68 or sura NOON yes indeed the initial noon is to be spelled noon waw noon.
Manipulation to make nineteen; changing adds another initial
ww

Is all this coincidence? If so explain to me the 2187.

Conjecture and nothing to explain the pen 681 has little to do with 2187

JK- THE POOL IS NOT INFINITE. There is NEVER an infinite amount of words in any language. Suppose there are 1B attributes. HOW MANY of those would have GVs = 2698. Perhaps 10.

You still don?t get it; you conjectured and found a combination GV = 2698; with 28 letters there are close to INFINITE combinations with GV=2698, no reason to freak out that you found one. lol

JK- Where did Ayman take me out?

It?s obvious you did not even bother to count. Here is chapter 36 YS simply do a search

y? mu?jamah gv=10 (total 211)
y? muhmalah gv=10 (total 20)

211 + 20 = 231

sn gv=60 (total 4

231 + 48 = 279 NOT MULTIPLE!

361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683

unknownuser

Forgot to include (y hamza) gv =10 changes count although still not multiple.

19 KHYAS 137 + 175 + 349 + 117 + 26 = 804 NOT MULTIPLE!

36 YS 242 + 48 = 290 NOT MULTIPLE!

y hamza gv=10 (total 11 )
y? mu?jamah gv=10 (total 211)
y? muhmalah gv=10 (total 20 )

11 + 211 + 20 = 242

sn gv=60 (total 4

unknownuser

I see no reply to the above.

Alright, had time to waste look at this 2698 stuff plastered on the web.
http//www.quran.org/math.htm

Dr. Cesar Adib Majul, in his book "The Attributes of Allah in Relation To The Mathematical Structure of Quran" discovered the following two facts

Only four attributes of God have gematrical (numerical) values that are a multiple of 19, i.e. Wahed, Zul fadlil 'azeem, Majeed, and Jami'.
The numerical values of these four attributes correspond exactly to the frequency of the four words of "basmalah," in the Quran; that is, 19, 2698, 57, and 114.

Removing 9128-129 is ONLY (illa) fitna and here are more "attributes" also multiples...

3152 ?and God full of grace on the believers.
waAllahu thoo fadlin AAala almu/mineena

700 + 6 + 80 + 800 + 30 + 70 + 30 + 10 + 1 + 30 + 40 + 10 + 40 + 50 + 10 + 50 = 1957 / 19 = 103

3163 and God seeing with what they do.
waAllahu baseerun bima yaAAmaloona

(2 + 90 + 10 + 200) + (2 + 40 + 1) + (10 + 70 + 40 + 30 + 6 + 50) = 551 / 19 = 29

866 and God (is) with the patient.
waAllahu maAAa alssabireena

40 + 70 + 1 + 30 + 90 + 1 + 2 + 200 + 10 + 50 = 494 / 19 = 26

1219 and God knowledgeable with what they make/do.
waAllahu AAaleemun bima yaAAmaloona

70 + 30 + 10 + 40 + 2 + 40 + 1 + 10 + 70 + 40 + 30 + 6 + 50 = 399 / 19 = 21

Peace,

jonny_k

Peace "eid",

Peace jonny,
No they are not controversial and he knowingly lied simple as that.

JK- They ARE CONTROVERSIAL and you not knowing this just shows your ignorance on the subject. If you look at the manuscripts in ciculation today youll find hell lot more alifs filled in which you wont find in the older manuscripts mostly indicating a "hamza" pronounciation. You can look this up for yourself. Eg in 2132 we have "wa Awsa" with alif in warsh and "wawasa" WITHOUT alif in hafs.

I'm not playing, you are the ones manipulating; simply count alif.

JK- If it were that simple then why dont you accept the counts revised by submission.org as of now
http//www.submission.org/miracle/alif.html
In that case the alif lam meem sets act just like the HM sets. YET im not claiming these counts are correct for they still require independent verification. Bro Edip would tell you the same. So it aint all that clear is it?

It's obvious they are liars like their idol.

JK- "Liar" means one who delibaretely puts up false information. This is a big accusation your hurling at them and hence your appealing to emotions rather than reason.

That SOMETHING is only (illa) in your head. lol

JK- Ok i get it your claiming it to be non significant whilst i clearly dont.

NO THEY DO NOT! Instead of parroting lies check and verify?

19 KHYAS 137 + 175 + 334 + 117 + 26 = 789 NOT MULTIPLE!

JK- I believe you ignored the subtle "ya"s as in "la-In" in 1946 for example. The auto count wont give you that easily. http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-19.htm

36 YS 231 + 48 = 279 NOT MULTIPLE!

JK- http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-36.htm

42 HMAySQ 53 + 300 + 98 + 54 + 57 = 562 NOT MULTIPLE!

JK- http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-42.htm
MAN these counts have BEEN VERIFIED BY BRO LAYTH AND OTHERS AS WELL. Your not paying attention to the subtle "ya"s. Here check this too
http//www.free-minds.org/sites/default/files/19.pdf

More clueless stuff about 1974; wast of time.
Already told you NONE of the initialed chapters are multiple only one.

JK- You must be using a wrong counter or some other manuscript. Check the above article carefully.

Manipulation to make nineteen; changing adds another initial
ww

JK- The "waw" is justified from "Zan NOON" which has "noon" spelled as "noon WAW noon" in it. He is the "posessor of Noon waw Noon".

Conjecture and nothing to explain the pen 681 has little to do with 2187

JK- It has little to do? Then why does chapter 68 have exatly one less noon than 133 which is ZMN and at the same time in another chapter we find GOD talking about a "POSESSOR OF NOON WAW NOON"? Is this coincidence? Explain to me the significance of 2187 then.

You still don?t get it; you conjectured and found a combination GV = 2698; with 28 letters there are close to INFINITE combinations with GV=2698, no reason to freak out that you found one. lol

JK- There are IFNINTE RANDOM COMBINATIONS YES BUT NOT REAL ARABIC WORDS. Thats what your not getting so either your fooling around with me by not addressing this or you didnt get my point.

It?s obvious you did not even bother to count. Here is chapter 36 YS simply do a search

y? mu?jamah gv=10 (total 211)
y? muhmalah gv=10 (total 20)

211 + 20 = 231

sn gv=60 (total 4

231 + 48 = 279 NOT MULTIPLE!

361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683

JK- Check 19-fact or fiction above. These counts have been VERIFIED. GOD Bless!

jonny_k

Peace "eid",
Remember when your coutning "ha" you need to include "ta marboota" and the count of "ya" is also a bit difficult for one needs to look at the subtle "ya"s as well(as in "BiduaIk" in 194 contains a subtle "ya&quot. The auto count makes this almost impossible and hence this letter shld be counted manually. ALSO I beleive you excluded the count of the initials in the BISMILLAHS whilst ive specifically told you before that whilst counting initials they have been CONSISTENTLY included. Here are the counts of those suras listed again
http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-19.htm
http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-36.htm
http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-42.htm
You may check the other HM chapters as well by just typing in "v-x" where x is sura no at the above address.
http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-68.htm
Check them carefully. GOD Bless!

jonny_k

Peace again "Eid",
Here I'm just going to point out the mistakes you probably made in your counts of initials in sura 19. Your counts of kaf, ain and sad are correct. Your net count of ha also came out to be correct even though i suspect you didn't count the one in the BISM. This is probably because you falsely inlcuded the "ha" of "rahmat" in verse 192 which in the original manuscript is spelled out "ra Ha meem TA" NOT "ra Ha meem ha/ta marboota". Lastly your count of ya is FALSE. There are 343 yas in total. You made quite a few mistakes here. First you didnt include the ya of the BISMILLAH. Then you probably didnt count the ya of "fanadaaha" and "'ataniya" in 1924 and 1930 respectively. Lastly you probably forgot to include the 6 undotted yas with hamza on top. Those include the yas of the terms "biduaika", "jita", "la-in", "ulaaika", "faulaaika" and "jitum" each having one ya.

Thus we get 313 yas (dotted) + 22 yas (undotted) + 6 yas (hamza on top and undotted) + 1 ya (1924 fanadA(YA)ha) + 1 ya (1930 ?atA(YA)niya) = 343 yas.

This makes the total of the initials in sura 19 equal 137 + 175 + 343 + 117 + 26 = 798 = 19 X 42

GOD Bless!

jonny_k

Peace again "Eid",
Rearding the "initial" waw i want to make a comment i didnt do above. Waw is NOT an initial of itself. It's the letter NOON which is spelled out so as to give it's pronounciation. Without "waw" how would you say "possesor of Noon"? You cant say "zan NN" for that is not the correct pronounciation of NOON. This doesnt make waw into an initial of its own. Think of sura 68 having ONLY ONE INITIAL SPELLED OUT AS PRONOUNCED. GOD Bless!

unknownuser

Peace jonny,

JK- They ARE CONTROVERSIAL and you not knowing this just shows your ignorance on the subject.

Yes I am fully aware of their need to manipulate hamza and alif to manipulate the count and people who believe nineteen are the most ignorant on the planet.

JK- "Liar" means one who delibaretely puts up false information. This is a big accusation your hurling at them and hence your appealing to emotions rather than reason.

INSTEAD OF BEING A PARROT -- COUNT!

JK- I believe you ignored the subtle "ya"s as in "la-In" in 1946 for example. The auto count wont give you that easily. http//www.submission.org/quran/reader/arabic/v-19.htm

DO YOU EVER READ WHAT PEOPLE POST?

NOTHING from submission.org is reliable -- they are known manipulators and liars!

Forgot to include (y hamza) gv =10 changes count although still not multiple.

19 KHYAS 137 + 175 + 349 + 117 + 26 = 804 NOT MULTIPLE!

36 YS 242 + 48 = 290 NOT MULTIPLE!

y hamza gv=10 (total 11 )
y? mu?jamah gv=10 (total 211)
y? muhmalah gv=10 (total 20 )

11 + 211 + 20 = 242

sn gv=60 (total 4

MAN these counts have BEEN VERIFIED BY BRO LAYTH AND OTHERS AS WELL. Your not paying attention to the subtle "ya"s.

JK- You must be using a wrong counter or some other manuscript.

Here I've color coded the different ya's simply COUNT!!!

19 K H Y A S 137 + 175 + 349 + 117 + 26 = 804 NOT MULTIPLE!

191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998

unknownuser

Peace jonny,

Waw is NOT an initial of itself.

Why NOT, you want to change N the pen to fit that stupid code of the ignorants.

JK- There are IFNINTE RANDOM COMBINATIONS YES BUT NOT REAL ARABIC WORDS. Thats what your not getting so either your fooling around with me by not addressing this or you didnt get my point.

Again -- DO YOU READ WHAT PEOPLE POST?

ARE THESE NOT REAL ARABIC WORDS FROM QUR'AN?