Hot/"ramadan" Answer

herbman

Peace Muse,

Welcome to the thread and I apologize for the rudeness of Progressive1993. Hopefully, you have read enough of the thread to understand his frustration.

I think that if one reads between the lines, one can see traces of the original timing amongst the corruption. Using Gregorian to Hijri converters, Muharam 1 of the first year of the new era converts to the first new moon crescent after the summer solstice. So originally the marker for the beginning of the year was the summer solstice. If the actual start of Muhrram was the scorching full-moon (shahr ramadhan) then indeed the Muslims would have fasted in the days leading up to and including the tenth of the first month (Muharram). At that time people would have still known the ramadhan/scorching full moon as the event marking the start of Muharram and not as the name of the month. Also, by its name ?Muharam? would make more sense as the first of the restricted period and not the third.

There was definitely no break between the Muslims and the Jews. The relationship soured during the Abbasid period and this is when those traditions about the Jews were invented. On the other hand, the Romans and the Jews themselves speak of a very strong alliance between the Jews and the Arabs well into the Umayyad period. For example, here is what the Jewish Rabbi Simon ben Yohai wrote around 680CE- describing the second king of the Arabs ('Umar I)

?The second king who arises from Ishmael will be a lover of Israel. He restores their breaches and the breaches of the Temple. He hews Mount Moriah, makes it level and builds a mosque (hishtahawaya) there on the Temple rock, as it is said "Your nest is set in the rock."? (Source Hoyland, Seeing Islam as Others Saw it).

Umar was clearly a champion of Zionism. The Romans equally talk in their writings about being invaded by an alliance between the Jews and the Arabs. They speak for example about the Jews and the Arabs upon defeating them and entering Jerusalem going to a place that the Romans used as a dump and cleaning it up and building two shrines side by side, one for the Arabs and one for the Jews. For all we know, Umar himself might have been an Arab-Jew who converted but still harbored Zionist ideas.

I think that the corruption of the timing can be understood in light of this relationship between the Jews and the Arabs (who reverted to their pagan tendencies after the death of the prophet). I briefly provided some thoughts here

http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9188.msg220236#msg220236

Peace,

Ayman

Regarding this piece of history, I read a historical document called "Story of Heraclius" written by a christian armenian writer of the 7 th century, this writer witnessed some events and related others. Anyway he relates about arab invasion of Jerusalem and Armenia, and he mentionned that the jews of Jerusalem went to the arabs showing them that they were "cousin" by the bible, and there were requesting Mohamad for help against the Romans. Which they did and could take Jerusalem.

here is a link of the translated document in french, originaly translated from armenian.

http//remacle.org/bloodwolf/historiens/sebeos/heraclius.htm

regards

herbman

Peace Nabil,

The great reading didn't descend on our lap from the sky. It came through Muhammed, the messenger of the god. I think that Farida is confused because I said that many of the so-called Sahaba probably didn't exist. Since she hero-worships those people, this made her confused. What I am saying is not something amazing or extra ordinary. For example, many researchers think that Abu Hurayra didn't exist and was invented by later generations.

From the document mentionned before "Story of Heraclius" some sahaba were mentionned and we can find that Othman for example died in a battle, in the arabic history it is not mentionned because they were so ashamed.

peace

ayman

Peace Eid,

http//facstaff.uww.edu/mccreadd/intro9.htm
As explained in the above article there are different theories on the full moon illusion and interesting Azimuth is derived from Arabic ('as-simt&#039, which means direction, referring...

Here is the title of the entire article that you refer to

Why the Moon Looks Big at the Horizon
and Smaller When Higher Up

So you admit that the solstice full-moon illusion is due to the full-moon taking a low path accross the horizon. Now use the following website and tell everyone the path that the full-moon took each month and tell us which TWO full-moons took the lowest path
http//aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/AltAz.php

The answer is that the TWO full-moons that took the LOWEST path are the full-moons BEFORE and AFTER the summer solstice. This fact is so indisputable that I don't even need to check the data through the link about. However, since you are doubting this then post the data and show me wrong.

FACT is your kill season and full moons "drift" after the solstice from June 21 to July 20...

FACT is your kill season is 100% arbitrary and drifts from January 1 to December 31.

Not redundant, a few days is relative (i.e. a week, a month, a year) and to fast a month is not a big deal.

Great, invent an imaginery meaning for "ma'adoodat"/few (3-10) to match your preconception. As far as I remember, the dictionary didn't say that it is "relative" and that 100 million which is relatively small compared to a Billion can mean "few". What you are saying is nonsense in any language, not just Arabic. If you didn't have your preconception from the sectarian nonsense then you wouldn't be stuck and forced to invent a new illogical meaning.

Please address the question about full moon illusion last year, YES/NO and we can move on to the others.

As I said, post the elevation data for ALL the full moons from last year and tell us which TWO take the lowest path
http//aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/AltAz.php

Peace,

Ayman

ayman

Peace Progressive1993,

Why frustration?

Sry, didnt read the whole thing - didnt have much time,

The frustration and lack of patience that as you ADMITTED to Muse prevented you from reading her post properly. This is also the same thing that is preventing you from reading anything properly. The questions that you are asking have been addressed in my post and on PAGE 1 of this long thread. No sense repeating for someone who is not able to read properly no matter what. This is not just a problem on this thread but in all discussions that you participate in. I sincerely suggest that you get tested to see if you suffer from a learning disability so that you can correct it.

Peace,

Ayman

quickduck

Peace ayman,

I alredy advised him to take a I test.
I am not sure he did

Peace

No longer a Sunna-rejecter

The frustration and lack of patience that as you ADMITTED to Muse prevented you from reading her post properly. This is also the same thing that is preventing you from reading anything properly. The questions that you are asking have been addressed in my post and on PAGE 1 of this long thread. No sense repeating for someone who is not able to read properly no matter what. This is not just a problem on this thread but in all discussions that you participate in. I sincerely suggest that you get tested to see if you suffer from a learning disability so that you can correct it.

Thank you for your concern. I am delighted.
BTW, at least I can admit mistakes, and what I said about that post where Muse quoted some guy was true.
Instead of attacking me personally the whole time, you could have responded to the following

we count as follows night, day... night, day.. night, day... ... ... ... (one lunar cylcle finshed) - and so on. I hope you understood. BTW, you also have used markers, namely, the summer solstices - how are you going to do it without them? You accuse my arguement to be wrong/question it because I said that Muslims use the lunar cycles - this is clearly a double standard.

How is your system unique and 'the only one' that fits with 1712? Dont you have markers as well (ie. not only calculate the year with days), namely the summer solstices?

Also, what do you say about what is said in the Bible about fasting in the ninth month of the lunar calendar?

Peace ayman,

I alredy advised him to take a I test.
I am not sure he did )

Peace

That was 'guest' whom you told that.
We have seen your insightful, ayman-cheering posts

Also, ayman, you are showing very good and respectful arguementation skills by attacking me personally and nagging on this one thing I said about Muse's post, although the part about it being bogus is still true. I have understood and I have corrected what I have said - no need to continue on this. If you are willing to continue with the actual them of this taopic (ramadan), then I am happy to continue discussing.

ayman

Peace Progressive1993,

Thank you for your concern. I am delighted.
BTW, at least I can admit mistakes, and what I said about that post where Muse quoted some guy was true.

You are welcome. I would say the same advice to my own brother if he was not reading patiently and correctly. We all have weaknesses and the key is to indentify them so that one can cope with them by devising learning aids. For example, some people are more auditory than visual so reading out loud might help them to understand the text better and not skip things.

Instead of attacking me personally the whole time, you could have responded to the following
How is your system unique and 'the only one' that fits with 1712? Dont you have markers as well (ie. not only calculate the year with days), namely the summer solstices?

This is exactly what I am talking about. The way you read, you do not try to put yourself in the shoes of the author or go a layer deeper than superficial reading. You just read "summer solstice" and think that like you (using the moon) I am using a marker not mentioned in 1712, which only mentions "day and night". What you fail to see is that the "summer solstice" is just a convenient label but go a layer deeper and you will see that it stands for "longest day and shortest night". So per 1712, I am ONLY using the night and the day to determine the number of years.

Also, what do you say about what is said in the Bible about fasting in the ninth month of the lunar calendar?

This was already answered by me as well as Rami. You are free to agree or disagree but repeating the same thing and expecting a different result only demonstrates that you have not understood our answers and have nothing further to say. Unlike you, I will not repeat the same thing and expect different results and I will not waste time on providing more info when you have not understood the first ones.

Also, ayman, you are showing very good and respectful arguementation skills by attacking me personally and nagging on this one thing I said about Muse's post, although the part about it being bogus is still true. I have understood and I have corrected what I have said - no need to continue on this. If you are willing to continue with the actual them of this taopic (ramadan), then I am happy to continue discussing.

But we can't continue to discuss if you are not able to read what I ALREADY wrote. I would suggest that you reread what I wrote while trying to put yourself in my shoes and read with a sense of depth. Afterwards, start by making a list of the things that make sense to you from reading what I wrote (doesn't matter if you agree with them or not). Next, make a list of the things that don't make sense to you. Finally, put together the two lists and see if the things that make sense to you can explain what doesn't make sense. If something still doesn't make sense then ask and I will gladly answer. This has nothing to do with agreeing or not agreeing with me. At this stage, it is clear that you don't even understand what I wrote so you are in no position to agree or not agree and this is why you keep going in circles. This is the advice that I would sincerely give to my own brother if he was in your situation.

Peace,

Ayman

No longer a Sunna-rejecter

But we can't continue to discuss if you are not able to read what I ALREADY wrote. I would suggest that you reread what I wrote while trying to put yourself in my shoes and read with a sense of depth. Afterwards, start by making a list of the things that make sense to you from reading what I wrote (doesn't matter if you agree with them or not). Next, make a list of the things that don't make sense to you. Finally, put together the two lists and see if the things that make sense to you can explain what doesn't make sense. If something still doesn't make sense then ask and I will gladly answer. This has nothing to do with agreeing or not agreeing with me. At this stage, it is clear that you don't even understand what I wrote so you are in no position to agree or not agree and this is why you keep going in circles.

I will take your advice and do that.

peace

noble

Peace herbman
and The God rewards you,

I saved the article, it is a very good one, and being a fluent french speaker, I will read it
and God willing benefit from it.

Salam
Nabster

From the document mentionned before "Story of Heraclius" some sahaba were mentionned and we can find that Othman for example died in a battle, in the arabic history it is not mentionned because they were so ashamed.

peace

ayman

Peace Herbman,

Regarding this piece of history, I read a historical document called "Story of Heraclius" written by a christian armenian writer of the 7 th century, this writer witnessed some events and related others. Anyway he relates about arab invasion of Jerusalem and Armenia, and he mentionned that the jews of Jerusalem went to the arabs showing them that they were "cousin" by the bible, and there were requesting Mohamad for help against the Romans. Which they did and could take Jerusalem.
here is a link of the translated document in french, originaly translated from armenian.
http//remacle.org/bloodwolf/historiens/sebeos/heraclius.htm

Thank you for poviding this interesting link. Here is the same info in English for those who are interested

http//rbedrosian.com/seb1.htm

What I find most interesting is his accounts of the very strong alliance between the Jews and the Arabs completely contradicting the traditional accounts, which have erased all references to this important alliance and the critical role that it played in the conquests and instead made Jews the enemies. I also find interesting his brief account of the Arab civil wars which also contradicts traditional accounts.

Peace,

Ayman

afridi220

Peace every one
We should refrain ourselves from throwing verses on others and calling them rejecters these verses are not for us but for those who rejected Gods command different opinions and interpretation does not make one rejecter are Mushrik. angel

farida

Peace every one
We should refrain ourselves from throwing verses on others and calling them rejecters these verses are not for us but for those who rejected Gods command different opinions and interpretation does not make one rejecter are Mushrik. angel

Peace Afridi,

So this thread is for you to post silly characters and pictures in the middle of a serious discussion. Have you contributed anything worthwhile so far?

Muse had been fed lies by Neal Robinson as well as Ayman, so what is wrong if I post a very relevant reminder from the Qur?an. 496 O you who believe, if a wicked person comes to you with any news, then you shall investigate it. Lest you harm a people out of ignorance, then you will become regretful over what you have done.

Every verses posted was relevant to the topic. You know what is the biggest problem with you people? You see the Quran as a guidance for Mushrik and rejecters not for yourselves and when you are reminded you feel offended although the reminder is directed at the believers!
Read this is a a reminder for people who believe
2951 Is it not enough for them that We have sent down to you the Scripture, being recited to them? In that is a mercy and a reminder for people who believe.

peace

afridi220

Peace Afridi,

So this thread is for you to post silly characters and pictures in the middle of a serious discussion. Have you contributed anything worthwhile so far?

Muse had been fed lies by Neal Robinson as well as Ayman, so what is wrong if I post a very relevant reminder from the Qur?an. 496 O you who believe, if a wicked person comes to you with any news, then you shall investigate it. Lest you harm a people out of ignorance, then you will become regretful over what you have done.

Every verses posted was relevant to the topic. You know what is the biggest problem with you people? You see the Quran as a guidance for Mushrik and rejecters not for yourselves and when you are reminded you feel offended although the reminder is directed at the believers!
Read this is a a reminder for people who believe
2951 Is it not enough for them that We have sent down to you the Scripture, being recited to them? In that is a mercy and a reminder for people who believe.

peace

And what is this is this a reminder for believers most wise and knowledgable Farida.
And we place shields over their hearts, that they should not understand it, and a deafness in their ears. And if you mention your Lord in the Qur'an alone, they run away turning their backs in aversion.
that is what you are conributed. ???

farida

And what is this is this a reminder for believers most wise and knowledgable Farida.
And we place shields over their hearts, that they should not understand it, and a deafness in their ears. And if you mention your Lord in the Qur'an alone, they run away turning their backs in aversion.
that is what you are conributed. ???

Salaam
Yes this is a very chilling reminder for the believers not to slump to that stege, ahh if only you would pay heed to the warning.

We never annihilate any community without sending warners.
By way of a reminder, and We were never unjust

peace

unknownuser

Peace Afridi,

So this thread is for you to post silly characters and pictures in the middle of a serious discussion. Have you contributed anything worthwhile so far?

Muse had been fed lies by Neal Robinson as well as Ayman, so what is wrong if I post a very relevant reminder from the Qur?an. 496 O you who believe, if a wicked person comes to you with any news, then you shall investigate it. Lest you harm a people out of ignorance, then you will become regretful over what you have done.

Every verses posted was relevant to the topic. You know what is the biggest problem with you people? You see the Quran as a guidance for Mushrik and rejecters not for yourselves and when you are reminded you feel offended although the reminder is directed at the believers!
Read this is a a reminder for people who believe
2951 Is it not enough for them that We have sent down to you the Scripture, being recited to them? In that is a mercy and a reminder for people who believe.

peace

1753 And say to My servants (that) they speak that which is best; surely the Shaitan sows dissensions among them; surely the Shaitan is an open enemy to man.

http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat17_files/17_53.gif

4134 And not alike are the good and the evil. Repel (evil) with what is best, when lo! he between whom and you was enmity would be as if he were a warm friend. )
http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat41_files/41_34.gif

ayman

Peace Farida and Afridi, all,

4724 Do they not then earnestly seek to understand the Qur'an, or are their hearts locked up by them?

I actually think that it is great that you have stopped arguing and instead have been posting those very touching passages. At least this is far more useful and I encourage everyone to ponder on those passages regardless of who posted them. Only those with pure hearts not locked by traditions and preconceptions can understand the great reading. This is a very relevant passage that applies directly to this thread and the issue of timing. If one starts from a pure heart, a clean sheet, without preconceptions then one cannot in a million years reach the sectarian calendar based on understanding the great reading. I admit that I am guilty of trying to find out the timing without preconceptions and based purely on earnestly seeking to understand the great reading. If I say what I am saying here on this thread in the middle of Mecca, I would probably be arrested and put to trial (this is if I don't get stoned to death by an angry "pious" mob first). Since you are the only lawyer I know on this thread, what would you say in my defense? I really would like to know. Would you even take my case or would you join the mob?

I wish you peace,

Ayman

farida

Peace Farida
Since you are the only lawyer I know on this thread, what would you say in my defense? I really would like to know. Would you even take my case or would you join the mob?

I wish you peace,

Ayman

Peace Ayman

Sorry you will never be able to hire me I am way beyond your reach.

I wish you luck. P

farida

belH

So you admit that the solstice full-moon illusion is due to the full-moon taking a low path accross the horizon. Now use the following website and tell everyone the path that the full-moon took each month and tell us which TWO full-moons took the lowest path
http//aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/AltAz.php

Peace,

Ayman this fact is known to all...Now, if we follow your theory and Fast During the Solstice Moon, do we have to disobey our Lord and Count 13 Moon Per Year in order to Fast every year in the Solstice Moon Period?

Great, invent an imaginery meaning for "ma'adoodat"/few (3-10) to match your preconception. As far as I remember, the dictionary didn't say that it is "relative" and that 100 million which is relatively small compared to a Billion can mean "few". What you are saying is nonsense in any language, not just Arabic. If you didn't have your preconception from the sectarian nonsense then you wouldn't be stuck and forced to invent a new illogical meaning.

Ayman, as we have told you before, Madoodat Means Counted...It Does Not Mean 3-10 nor 30 nor 100...it does not mean few, as well...Simply, COUNTED.

Peace

unknownuser

Peace Ayman,

Here is the title of the entire article that you refer to

Why the Moon Looks Big at the Horizon
and Smaller When Higher Up

So you admit that the solstice full-moon illusion is due to the full-moon taking a low path accross the horizon. Now use the following website and tell everyone the path that the full-moon took each month and tell us which TWO full-moons took the lowest path
http//aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/AltAz.php

The answer is that the TWO full-moons that took the LOWEST path are the full-moons BEFORE and AFTER the summer solstice. This fact is so indisputable that I don't even need to check the data through the link about. However, since you are doubting this then post the data and show me wrong.

You did not even read the article and all the different theories;
here is the one from last year BIG ILLUSION before the solstice again....
http//science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/16jun_moonillusion.htm

There are other explanations, too.
http//facstaff.uww.edu/mccreadd/

The scientific challenge has been to explain why those equal angular sizes look unequal.

This article is long for three reasons.

It advances the relatively new idea (1965, 1970, 1985, 1986) that, for most people, the moon illusion begins as an angular size illusion which has several possible outcomes.
It reviews in detail the very few explanations of the illusion that vision scientists are paying the most attention to (and still researching). These theories are not simple.
It reviews in detail the latest theory (1985, 1986, 1989) that the moon illusion is an example of the less familiar, but ubiquitous, "size" illusion known as oculomotor micropsia/macropsia. Explanations for oculomotor micropsia then are reviewed.
For the moment, it seems to be the most satisfactory explanation.

Introduction and Summary. (Loading these links may take several seconds)
Section I. New Description of the Moon Illusion
Section II. Conventional Versus New Descriptions
Section III. Explaining the Moon Illusion
Section IV. Explaining Oculomotor Micropsia
Bibliography and McCready VITA
Appendix A. The (New) Theory
Appendix B. Analysis of the Murray, Boyaci & Kersten (2006) Experiment

The initial version of this article was placed on this web site in May, 1999 .
Major revisions were made in December 2002.
This entire article was revised on November 10, 2004.

Then, extremely important research on visual angle illusions was published in March 2006 in Nature Neuroscience. The article is, ?The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex,? by Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006).
It fully supports the approach advocated here, so it is reviewed in the "Technical Note added June 7, 2006., in the Introduction and Summary Section,

It is analyzed in detail in Appendix B (posted February 5, 2007).

FACT THERE WAS NO FULL MOON ILLUSION AFTER THE SOLSTICE ON JULY 18, 2008!

FACT You did NOT witness a full moon illusion after sunset last year on JULY 18, 2008!

FACT No one saw a full moon illusion (they called it a regular full moon) which was NOT even full after sunset!

http//www.timeanddate.com/calendar/moonphases.html?year=2008&n=263
Data for July 18, 2008 http//aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/AltAz.php

Time Altitude Azimuth Fraction Illuminated
0000 27.0 177.4 1.00
0010 27.0 179.9 1.00
0020 27.0 182.4 1.00
0030 26.9 184.9 1.00
0040 26.7 187.4 1.00
0050 26.5 189.9 1.00
0100 26.1 192.4 1.00
0110 25.7 194.8 1.00
0120 25.2 197.2 1.00
0130 24.6 199.6 1.00
0140 24.0 202.0 1.00
0150 23.3 204.3 1.00
0200 22.5 206.5 1.00
0210 21.6 208.8 1.00
0220 20.7 211.0 1.00
0230 19.7 213.1 1.00
0240 18.7 215.2 1.00
0250 17.6 217.2 1.00
0300 16.4 219.3 1.00
0310 15.2 221.2 1.00
0320 14.0 223.1 1.00
0330 12.7 225.0 1.00
0340 11.4 226.8 1.00
0350 10.0 228.6 1.00
0400 8.6 230.4 1.00 FULL MOON July 18TH @359 AM
0410 7.2 232.1 1.00
0420 5.7 233.8 1.00
0430 4.2 235.4 1.00
0440 2.8 237.0 1.00
0450 1.3 238.6 1.00
0500 -0.1 240.2 1.00
0510 -2.3 241.7 1.00
0520 -4.0 243.2 1.00
0530 -5.6 244.7 1.00
0540 -7.3 246.1 1.00
0550 -9.0 247.6 1.00
0600 -10.8 249.0 1.00

1900 -11.2 108.0 1.00
1910 -9.4 109.4 1.00
1920 -7.6 110.8 1.00
1930 -5.9 112.3 1.00
1940 -4.1 113.7 1.00
1950 -2.4 115.2 1.00
2000 -0.1 116.7 0.99
2010 1.4 118.2 0.99 NOT FULL MOON AFTER SUNSET!
2020 2.9 119.7 0.99
2030 4.5 121.3 0.99
2040 6.1 122.9 0.99
2050 7.7 124.5 0.99
2100 9.2 126.2 0.99
2110 10.7 127.9 0.99
2120 12.2 129.7 0.99
2130 13.7 131.5 0.99
2140 15.1 133.3 0.99
2150 16.4 135.2 0.99
2200 17.8 137.2 0.99
2210 19.1 139.2 0.99
2220 20.3 141.2 0.99
2230 21.5 143.3 0.99
2240 22.6 145.5 0.99
2250 23.7 147.7 0.99
2300 24.7 149.9 0.99
2310 25.6 152.2 0.99
2320 26.5 154.6 0.99
2330 27.3 157.0 0.99
2340 28.0 159.5 0.99
2350 28.7 162.0 0.99

FACT THE ONLY FULL MOON ILLUSION EVERYONE SAW LAST YEAR WAS BEFORE THE SOLSTICE!

Image taken Jun. 18, 2008 LocationWeilimdorf, near Stuttgart, Germany

http//spaceweather.com/submissions/pics/s/Stefan-Seip-spaceweather080618a_1213833046.jpg

Image taken June 18, 2008 Location Manchester, Maryland.

http//science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/images/moonillusion/Kasaitis1_strip.jpg

Image taken June 18, 2008 Location Greece.
http//spaceweather.com/swpod2008/19jun08/Elias-Chasiotis1_strip2.jpg

Image taken Jun. 18, 2008 Location Terre Haute, Indiana

http//spaceweather.com/submissions/pics/r/Robin-Smith-9-007_1213868025_med.jpg

http//spaceweather.com/submissions/pics/r/Robin-Smith-9-010_1213868025_med.jpg

FACT YOU ARE FASTING ON THE WRONG HOT MOON!

FACT YOU HAVE BEEN PROVEN WRONG AND STILL POST ABOUT ILLUSIONS!

Now, you want to admit that full moon illusion has ZERO to do with this and move on to the next question or do you want to say that you or anyone else saw a full moon illusion last year July 18 after the solstice?

quickduck

Peace belH

Peace,

Ayman this fact is known to all...Now, if we follow your theory and Fast During the Solstice Moon, do we have to disobey our Lord and Count 13 Moon Per Year in order to Fast every year in the Solstice Moon Period?

this one is easy, let the cheerleader captain answer No we count 12 full moons/not months between 2 summer solstices. And eventually skip counting the 13th full moon/not months to keep in sync with seasons.

Ayman, as we have told you before, Madoodat Means Counted...It Does Not Mean 3-10 nor 30 nor 100...it does not mean few, as well...Simply, COUNTED.

i don't agree , look for any arabic text with the word "ma3doodaat" in it. then ask any arabic speaker to tell you how many does "ma3doodat" in that context means.
if i tell you that your days are COUNTED/ma3doodat, it means that there's something you should worry about.