Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Quranists became Quranists because of their lack of understanding Quran.

Quranists became Quranists because of their lack of understanding Quran.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
219 Posts 21 Posters 12.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Thereformer1
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    The ?fundamentals of Islam? is never even discussed by the majority of the Muslims. Most Muslims are content running their lives under the ulema. Don?t speak in their name.

    No, it is . I think you should read the verse . By the way in arabic is too specific and with strong meanings, I imply that the language is the barrier for you .

    Quranists are NOT a new sect. You only need to lie to comfort your ego which is obviously unable to deal with us. We?ve been there from the beginning. Our leader was the Prophet himself.

    I don't need to lie to say that I'm right . The white page doesn't need someone to correct it, because there is nothing in it.
    If your leader was the prophet as you claimed what do you sayd about this

    1. With clear signs and Books (We sent the Messengers). And We have also sent down unto you (O Muhammad &#1605 the Dhikr , that you may explain clearly to men what is sent down to them, and that they may give thought."

    46/9 Say "I am no bringer of new-fangled doctrine among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you( . I follow but that which is revealed to me by inspiration

    this verse is for the Jewish and Christians and the non-believers .Because they have accused the prophet of bringing a new thing to prevent them for praying to their gods and to separate them from their families.

    He then made predictions about the future like nostradamous?! This is as bad as the flying donkey story. Btw, that?s what a buraq is, reformer. The Prophet wrote the buraq to heaven to meet Allah.

    I said respect the Angel Gabriel, he is the one who holds the prophet .And the word Buraq doesn't mean Donkey .
    and if you don't believe this story, well you have just denied what God said about this story Read

    1. Glorified (and Exalted) be He (All?h) Who took His slave (Muhammad &#1605 for a journey by night from Al-Masjid-al-Har?m (at Makkah) to Al-Masjid-al-Aqs? (in Jerusalem), the neighbourhood whereof We have blessed, in order that We might show him (Muhammad &#1605 of Our Ay?t (proofs, evidence, lessons, signs, etc.). Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer.

    Narrated J?bir bin ?Abdull?h that he heard All?h?s Messenger saying, "When the people of Quraish did not believe me , I stood up in Al-Hijr and All?h displayed Jerusalem in front of me, and I began describing it to them while I was looking at it. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol.5, Hadith No.226).

    Look at how this person twists the ayat of Allah. He should be ashamed of himself. The ayah says ?aqtasimoo bi hablillahi jami?a? (hold fast by the rope of Allah together? and this person says this means we join hands with the LARGEST GROUP.

    hhahahaha, do you know what the word means by " Bi Habli Lahii jamii'ah"? do you know the meaning of "Hable"(the rode)"? do you know what God means by the word "I'etasimo" ?

    I think the verse that you have stated is translated word by word, which is not allowed and which is not going to give you the real meanings of the words . well that's not a surprise for me , it is where exactely your lack of understanding of the words of Allah standing.

    Where is the largest group even mentioned here?!

    The point is do not be sects .

    Naturally? What?s so natural about it? At one point there were over 500 madhabs (consult Prof Mashood Baderin ? Human Rights and Islam) but it was the Abbasids who were trying to gain popular support who supported the Sunnis and allowed them to become the majority (consult The Formative Period of Islamic Thought by WM Watts).
    So how do we know who is splitting up from whom?

    Well, first of all when you are going to talk about History , please try to know the different stages of every nations that have passed and their reasons of being in that way or in the other way . The reason that Abbaseyine got supported is because they have made the sunnah alive again from the view of "Shoura" which has been deleted by the nation of Omaweying who they made the governor inhert the governor in governing . And this thing was not allowed in the existence of the prophet .

    Well lets first begin with 3/103
    3/103 tells us to cling to the rope of Allah and not be divided (wala tafarraqoo)
    This phrase ?and do not divide? also appears in 42/13 which tells us to establish ad-deen and ?and not be divided in it? (wala tatafarrqoo fihi). Therefore, the rope of Allah is realised by the establishment of ad-deen.
    How is ad-deen realised? By taking Allah as a judge (see 12/40 which links ibada with following the laws of Allah) and taking Allah as a lawmaker is done by accepting his fully explained book (6/114).
    6/159 talks about those who split their deen (farraqoo deenahum ? the opposite of 42/13 above). If the deen is fully detailed in the Book,, then splitting the deen must be ignoring parts of the book. These are the people mentioned in 30/31-32 who are happy with their sects.

    I've met people that write something but they don't understand it, you're one of them . The only thing that was before is sunnah . who is the persons that splited up and became sects . the first one are Shi'a then after them are Khawareje then after them Al-Muatazila then after them the Quranists, the other sects mentioned before have not changed their opinions but the sect of Quranists that have showed themselves in the age of SHAFI'AI, have changed their opinions because they have been attacked by arguments and proofs from Quran and sunnah that what they did is a sin and a spliting of the way of Allah because they were arabic, so basically theu understand the arguments and the proofs, but for you gguys, you have took Islam in english language and it is full of distortion and mistranslation and misinterpreting of the verses, because you're in the 21th century where everyone wants to get famous and be with the ennmies of Islam because of money .

    So reformer, very sorry but it looks like the Quran doesn?t agree with your ?majority? theory. It has a very specific idea about who a sectarian. Anyone who ignores parts of the book and splits up is a sectarian. Much like your abrogation friends.

    Of course this post is right but for you, because we're the true Muslims that prophet left, you have showed yourself in the 21th century as free mind or the modernists of Quran, who they rejected the sunnah not because as they claimed contradict with the Quran but because it is a new projects of Satan and the ennemies of Islam to split up this great nation .But they will not win neither they can win, we are talking about 1.5 billion Muslim sunni in the world who they are in a great increase.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      Thereformer1
      wrote on last edited by
      #101

      Subhanallah POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK rotfl laugh

      that was not funny because there is no relation between the idiom and what we said (me and mazhar) . and I'm not accusing him, I explain to him his misunderstanding of majority .

      and one more thing I know that your mind is empty, so riding a donkey will not make you better than him.

      P.S Subhanallah is not a collocation .

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Ayisha
        wrote on last edited by
        #102

        If your leader was the prophet as you claimed what do you sayd about this

        1. With clear signs and Books (We sent the Messengers). And We have also sent down unto you (O Muhammad &#1605 the Dhikr , that you may explain clearly to men what is sent down to them, and that they may give thought."
          Muhammed recited the Quran, word for word as it was given to him, the Quran IS the explanation and the reminder. The Quran is clear, it does not say "And We have also sent down unto you (O Muhammad &#1605 the Dhikr , (and hadith) that you may explain clearly to men (with hadith) what is sent down to them (in hadith), and that they may give thought.(on hadith)"

        He (All?h) Who took His slave (Muhammad &#1605 for a journey by night from Al-Masjid-al-Har?m (at Makkah) to Al-Masjid-al-Aqs? (in Jerusalem), the neighbourhood whereof We have blessed, in order that We might show him (Muhammad &#1605 of Our Ay?t (proofs, evidence, lessons, signs, etc.). Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer.

        Narrated J?bir bin ?Abdull?h that he heard All?h?s Messenger saying, "When the people of Quraish did not believe me , I stood up in Al-Hijr and All?h displayed Jerusalem in front of me, and I began describing it to them while I was looking at it. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol.5, Hadith No.226).
        does this verse say 'by donkey'? Did they not know of 'dreams' back then or are dreams the devils work?

        hhahahaha, do you know what the word means by " Bi Habli Lahii jamii'ah"? do you know the meaning of "Hable"(the rode)"? do you know what God means by the word "I'etasimo" ?
        why dont you tell us instead of laughing arrogantly?

        I think the verse that you have stated is translated word by word, which is not allowed and which is not going to give you the real meanings of the words . well that's not a surprise for me , it is where exactely your lack of understanding of the words of Allah standing.

        nooo you cant say not allowed on this again, you still didnt explain the last time you used that where it says translating word for word is not allowed!

        The point is do not be sects .
        WE are not, YOU are.

        Well, first of all when you are going to talk about History , please try to know the different stages of every nations that have passed and their reasons of being in that way or in the other way . The reason that Abbaseyine got supported is because they have made the sunnah alive again from the view of "Shoura" which has been deleted by the nation of Omaweying who they made the governor inhert the governor in governing . And this thing was not allowed in the existence of the prophet .
        did that answer the question asked? Not asking transformer but someone with a brain

        I've met people that write something but they don't understand it, you're one of them .
        and you're another one! rotfl

        The only thing that was before is sunnah . who is the persons that splited up and became sects . the first one are Shi'a then after them are Khawareje then after them Al-Muatazila then after them the Quranists, the other sects mentioned before have not changed their opinions but the sect of Quranists that have showed themselves in the age of SHAFI'AI, have changed their opinions because they have been attacked by arguments and proofs from Quran and sunnah that what they did is a sin and a spliting of the way of Allah because they were arabic, so basically theu understand the arguments and the proofs, but for you gguys, you have took Islam in english language and it is full of distortion and mistranslation and misinterpreting of the verses, because you're in the 21th century where everyone wants to get famous and be with the ennmies of Islam because of money .
        So, if the first was 'sunnah' that would have been the same path Muhammed was on which was the path of Allah as detailed in Quran. Muhammed followed 'sunnatAllah', the sunnah of Allah as described in Quran, and so did his companions (most of them), then there were splits after his death, shia, sunni etc. So WE are actually following the 'sunnah' as Muhammed did and YOU have split into sects and follow another 'sunnah' other than 'sunnatAllah and YOU are misinterpretting the verses and having petty fights about toilet usage and nose washing. YOU are in fact an enemy of Islam! http//foolstown.com/sm/obm.gif

        Of course this post is right but for you, because we're the true Muslims that prophet left, you have showed yourself in the 21th century as free mind or the modernists of Quran, who they rejected the sunnah not because as they claimed contradict with the Quran but because it is a new projects of Satan and the ennemies of Islam to split up this great nation .But they will not win neither they can win, we are talking about 1.5 billion Muslim sunni in the world who they are in a great increase.

        yes satan increases his army against Allah, but we will win bravo

        Just to remind you that YOU belong to a SECT, WE Dont

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Ayisha
          wrote on last edited by
          #103

          that was not funny because there is no relation between the idiom and what we said (me and mazhar) . and I'm not accusing him, I explain to him his misunderstanding of majority .

          and one more thing I know that your mind is empty, so riding a donkey will not make you better than him.

          P.S Subhanallah is not a collocation .

          so now 'majority' doesnt mean what it says? hypno

          Hadithists became hadithists because of their lack of understanding Quran. If they DID understand Quran they wouldnt say you need hadith to EXPLAIN it rotfl

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            Thereformer1
            wrote on last edited by
            #104

            Muhammed recited the Quran, word for word as it was given to him, the Quran IS the explanation and the reminder. The Quran is clear, it does not say "And We have also sent down unto you (O Muhammad &#1605 the Dhikr , (and hadith) that you may explain clearly to men (with hadith) what is sent down to them (in hadith), and that they may give thought.(on hadith)"
            does this verse say 'by donkey'? Did they not know of 'dreams' back then or are dreams the devils work?
            why dont you tell us instead of laughing arrogantly?
            nooo you cant say not allowed on this again, you still didnt explain the last time you used that where it says translating word for word is not allowed!
            WE are not, YOU are.
            did that answer the question asked? Not asking transformer but someone with a brain
            and you're another one! rotfl
            So, if the first was 'sunnah' that would have been the same path Muhammed was on which was the path of Allah as detailed in Quran. Muhammed followed 'sunnatAllah', the sunnah of Allah as described in Quran, and so did his companions (most of them), then there were splits after his death, shia, sunni etc. So WE are actually following the 'sunnah' as Muhammed did and YOU have split into sects and follow another 'sunnah' other than 'sunnatAllah and YOU are misinterpretting the verses and having petty fights about toilet usage and nose washing. YOU are in fact an enemy of Islam! http//foolstown.com/sm/obm.gif
            yes satan increases his army against Allah, but we will win bravo
            Just to remind you that YOU belong to a SECT, WE Dont

            I said do not disturb me . I'll wait his reply .

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              Thereformer1
              wrote on last edited by
              #105

              so now 'majority' doesnt mean what it says? hypno

              Hadithists became hadithists because of their lack of understanding Quran. If they DID understand Quran they wouldnt say you need hadith to EXPLAIN it rotfl

              Well, I think you like playing games. I'm not the type of guys that you would like to play with him.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Ayisha
                wrote on last edited by
                #106

                Well, I think you like playing games. I'm not the type of guys that you would like to play with him.

                Oh I dont know, I think you're great fun group

                and you didnt tell me not to disturb you, and you dont have to reply if you cant or dont want to, but you will not stop me posting what I want, when I want, so give up ordering me about, mahshy ya mufti?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #107

                  http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/047.%20Muhammad%20Salla%20Allah%20alaih%20wassalm/47.03.gif
                  This is because of the reason that those who refused to accept/believe they consciously made themselves to follow the conjecture and scum
                  http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/047.%20Muhammad%20Salla%20Allah%20alaih%20wassalm/47.03a.gif
                  and that those who accepted/believed they made themselves follow, in letter and spirit, the Absolute Fact from the Sustainer Lord of them.
                  http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/047.%20Muhammad%20Salla%20Allah%20alaih%20wassalm/47.03b.gif
                  Like it/in this manner Allah quotes/strikes/narrates for the people their examples/similitude.

                  What is Al Haqq which they wholeheartedly followed?

                  http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/047.%20Muhammad%20Salla%20Allah%20alaih%20wassalm/Temo%2001%2047.02.gif
                  and they acknowledged/accepted which has gradually been sent/communicated to Muhammad Sal'lallaa'hoalaih'wa'salam,
                  http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/047.%20Muhammad%20Salla%20Allah%20alaih%20wassalm/Temo%2001%2047.02c.gif
                  and that is the statement of proven fact from their Sustainer Lord;

                  Shapter47

                  Reformer, dear here two types of people are contrasted, you did not comment, though you keep naming me here and there.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    afridi220
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #108

                    that was not funny because there is no relation between the idiom and what we said (me and mazhar) . and I'm not accusing him, I explain to him his misunderstanding of majority .

                    and one more thing I know that your mind is empty, so riding a donkey will not make you better than him.

                    P.S Subhanallah is not a collocation .

                    Yes you are right on that my mind is not loaded with crap

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Thereformer1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #109

                      Reformer, dear here two types of people are contrasted, you did not comment, though you keep naming me here and there.

                      I didn't want to comment your post because you know that I disgust your translation of the verses , you distorted them.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Thereformer1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #110

                        Yes you are right on that my mind is not loaded with crap )

                        When I said your mind is emty, know that neither the crap is in it .

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Leyna
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #111

                          you know that I disgust your translation of the verses , you distorted them.

                          ... says the person who posts Muhsin-Khan translations. rotfl

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #112

                            ... says the person who posts Muhsin-Khan translations. rotfl

                            Mushsin Khan did not add his own understanding in quran rather the certified one, thats the difference dear sister.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Offline
                              T Offline
                              Thereformer1
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #113

                              ... says the person who posts Muhsin-Khan translations. rotfl

                              Muhsin khan is the best translation from all the translation that I have seen .

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Leyna
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #114

                                Mushsin Khan did not add his own understanding in quran

                                No? Then tell me why he translated juyubihinna with "their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms"? rotfl

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Ayisha
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #115

                                  Muhsin khan is the best translation from all the translation that I have seen .

                                  yes because it actually ADDS the hadith to the verses so changing the word of God just like the Jews and Christians did. Well done Mr Khan bravo

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Ayisha
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #116

                                    No? Then tell me why he translated juybihinna with "their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms"? rotfl

                                    because thats what God meant to say and left those details to be filled in by hadith hypno

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Leyna
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #117

                                      Muhsin khan is the best translation from all the translation that I have seen .

                                      The terrorists love it too. hmm

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #118

                                        even if the details were added in the book still you would have similar misunderstanding. yes

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #119

                                          The terrorists love it too. hmm

                                          oh you live in the same world where terrorists live hmm

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users