Praise Be to Muhammad rasool Allah
-
but was it 'Isa' in Aramaic? You said names are not translated into another language but they actually are, just in the same way GOD is translated to Allah or Elli or Deus or Aknatu, its still the same ONE.
Your name is Ayesha. It is Arabic word used as name of a lady. Do we translate it in English or Urdu? No, personal names are not translated. Personal names remain the same, one may only enquires as to what is the perception infolded in that name, but that perception or meanings of the word, does not change its status of being Proper Noun referring to a person. I am not entering into the debate whether a name is Hebrew or Aramic or Persian.
-
Ayisha
I think it is nearly impossible to have a productive discussion with you.
likewisePlease read this Verse not just with open eyes but open heart and mind,
follow the messenger, the gentile prophet , whom they find written in their Torah and Gospel.......
Is the verse about Past, present or future,? (at the time of revelation). It was already been decided in the greater plan of Allah, that a Person will come in Future, who will be Prophet of Allah, and to your and many's bad luck his name was "Muhammad" as called by Allah in Quran.
it is past as Torah and Gospel were before Quran, it says whom they find mentioned in, it does not say that his name was mentioned but that HE was mentioned, he was foretold about. Why is it my bad luck his name was Muhammed? raj you really are reading things into this that aren't there, as you always seem to.And your un answered questions?
What does Muhammad means?
answered, see aboveWhy Allah calls him by the name of Muhammad in Quran?
Answered,see aboveHow is that person predicted or written in Gospels as mentioned in Quran? (If you belkieve in this (ayt).
answered, see aboveWhere did you find 99 names of Allah in Quran?
answered, see aboveraj, just because an answer is not what you want it to say does not mean the question is not answered and needs to be repeated until you get the answer you want.
-
Your name is Ayesha. It is Arabic word used as name of a lady. Do we translate it in English or Urdu? No, personal names are not translated. Personal names remain the same, one may only enquires as to what is the perception infolded in that name, but that perception or meanings of the word, does not change its status of being Proper Noun referring to a person. I am not entering into the debate whether a name is Hebrew or Aramic or Persian.
Its actually Ayisha with an i not an e but malesh.
right so the name Muhammed (or Ahmed)was not given as a name in Torah or Gospel, but the 'perception infolded in that name' was mentioned in those books.
-
Ayisha to San
Good way to hide errors and humilation.
Ah! what a Chracter you are lady.....(shall i place a question mark at the end?)i'm mainly here for learning. i'm not the one to support the "hiding of errors", and i also see no point in trying "to humiliate".
What CHARACTER is there in a man who wish to humiliate other?
However deep my wish is to expose the ill traits of such man in public, i must remind myself to ask my Protector to protect me against such deterioration.
Peace.
-
Good way to hide errors and humilation.
im not humiliated raj, im not the one claiming one thing then another and demanding questions be answered again and again without answering any asked of you.Ah! what a Chracter you are lady.....(shall i place a question mark at the end?)
if its a question then yes, if its a statement then no.
I know I am and thank you ;D
-
Its actually Ayisha with an i not an e but malesh.
right so the name Muhammed (or Ahmed)was not given as a name in Torah or Gospel, but the 'perception infolded in that name' was mentioned in those books.
Did I give opinion about this? Or is it the inference you are drawing from the statement that names are not translated from say Hebrew to Arabic and from Arabic to English or Aramic? Or you interpret as above these words of Qur'aan
http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/007.%20Al%20Airaaf/Temp%2001%207.157f%20small.gif
-
And conversely you are not even trying to understand what I am saying. You perhaps even don't want to apply a little mind as to what a Judge means what to say of anything else. Judge does not go to other places to act like judge. Petitioners come to the judge. What I am saying is that a Judge is called and accepted as Judge all the time, twenty four hours, whether or not he is administering justice or performing/acting as judge.
No body is disputing that a judge should not be known/called as Mr justice out side his court, the matter is weather can he act out like a judge 24/7 out side his office ?
Same way , I have no problem identifying Mohammad ( pbuh ) as a messenger , but what you are not understanding is, "his messenger ship is restricted to the message"
When he is delivering Quran he is a messenger, but there are other human aspects to his life when he is not performing the duty as a messenger.
If you study all the Koranic ayahs where it is being conveyed that, " Take what messenger gives you , or follow the messenger ", It is always the word "messenger" used, never , Follow Muhammad "the person"
I sincerely hope that you can grasp this difference.
siki
-
Your name is Ayesha. It is Arabic word used as name of a lady. Do we translate it in English or Urdu? No, personal names are not translated.
Huh? Personal names are being translated all the time. ???
Btw., Turks don't use Ayisha, they say Aye, and it's pronounced differently.
-
Huh? Personal names are being translated all the time. ???
Btw., Turks don't use Ayisha, they say Aye, and it's pronounced differently.
English people cannot pronounce certain sounds of Arabic consonants, and similarly Arabs cannot pronounce certain sounds of consonants of Urdu. And they adjust it accordingly? Does this, in your language, means translation while we are presuming so far that translation means to put the meanings of some word of a language into another language.
-
Same way , I have no problem identifying Mohammad ( pbuh ) as a messenger , but what you are not understanding is, "his messenger ship is restricted to the message"
When he is delivering Quran he is a messenger, but there are other human aspects to his life when he is not performing the duty as a messenger.
If you study all the Koranic ayahs where it is being conveyed that, " Take what messenger gives you , or follow the messenger ", It is always the word "messenger" used, never , Follow Muhammad "the person"
I sincerely hope that you can grasp this difference.
Strange philosphy. The word Messenger itself means a PERSON who delivers the message. Why forget, Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and I don't find "messenger ship" in dictionary. He is the Messenger of Allah all the time.
-
Strange philosphy. The word Messenger itself means a PERSON who delivers the message. Why forget, Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and I don't find "messenger ship" in dictionary. He is the Messenger of Allah all the time.
It's not a strange philosophy, yes the messenger is the messenger of Allah all the time but he's not delivering the message all the time so I don't see how you can't understand what Siki is saying. A Judge is always known as a Judge or Mr Justice but when he comes to dinner and there is a dispute he is not asked to make a legal ruling about who carves the meat. In the same way everything the messenger said is not part of the message he was to deliver so when he said 'wife cook my dinner' he was acting as a husband, which again he is all the time, but not acting as the messenger and this is not part of the message he was to deliver.
-
It's not a strange philosophy, yes the messenger is the messenger of Allah all the time but he's not delivering the message all the time so I don't see how you can't understand what Siki is saying. A Judge is always known as a Judge or Mr Justice but when he comes to dinner and there is a dispute he is not asked to make a legal ruling about who carves the meat. In the same way everything the messenger said is not part of the message he was to deliver so when he said 'wife cook my dinner' he was acting as a husband, which again he is all the time, but not acting as the messenger and this is not part of the message he was to deliver.
If for a little while one is not haunted by the hadithists, things will become conveniently understandable. Why get worried by daily engagements of the Messenger, asking for cooking and eating. His personal activities neither change his status and position during any activity nor that means message. Message is the one he delievered to people orally and in writing, the Qur'aan. His wives are directed to stand for him since he is the Messenger of Allah.
-
If for a little while one is not haunted by the hadithists, things will become conveniently understandable. Why get worried by daily engagements of the Messenger, asking for cooking and eating. His personal activities neither change his status and position during any activity nor that means message. Message is the one he delievered to people orally and in writing, the Qur'aan. His wives are directed to stand for him since he is the Messenger of Allah.
I am not haunted by hadithists but it seems there is something blocking your understanding of this very simple 'philosophy'.
I assume you agree that Mr Justice wouldn't be granting legal rulings (acting in his capacity as a Judge, performing his duty as a Judge) while dining with friends as his job which gives the title Mr. Justice is restricted to court matters. In the same way the Messengers job was to deliver the message and when he was doing that he was performing his job as messenger, but in other instances of daily life he wasnt. he was still the messenger of Allah but his duty was to deliver the message.
-
siki
Same way , I have no problem identifying Mohammad ( pbuh ) as a messenger , but what you are not understanding is, "his messenger ship is restricted to the message"
When he is delivering Quran he is a messenger, but there are other human aspects to his life when he is not performing the duty as a messenger.
If you study all the Koranic ayahs where it is being conveyed that, " Take what messenger gives you , or follow the messenger ", It is always the word "messenger" used, never , Follow Muhammad "the person"
I sincerely hope that you can grasp this difference.Firstly That Messenger happens to be "Muhammad".
Secondly it might help in the discussion if you tell us What are the duties of the Messenger?For example
Quran calls Muhammad as "Mercy for all the worlds" (sorry if it hurts any body)
If he is part time Messenger than while delivering the Messege he is "Mercy" and when in his real life he is "what?".A judge to be comapred with Messenger of Allah, who is for all the worlds, and the Last one, does not make any sense.
What Mazhar was saying is that A Judge is a Judge 24 Hours, he gets same protocol from the Government and civilians, weather on duty or not.
Now read this the word of Allah
And know that the messenger of Allah is among you. If he were to obey you in much of the government, ye would surely be in trouble..Therefore it is very clear that when not delivering the Message, and dealing with daily to daily affairs he is still guided by Allah, and .....
-
Ayisha
it is past as Torah and Gospel were before Quran, it says whom they find mentioned in, it does not say that his name was mentioned but that HE was mentioned, he was foretold about.
So you agree that Allah had a plan for a Prophet to come, Thanks Allah.
That was my question to you, how is he mentioned/foretold?, and you passed it on to me, as usual.And the name of that prophet was Muhammad, as Allah calls him in Quran.
YOU CANNOT DENY THIS FACT.and when you will Know the meaning of MUhammad, you will further know why, Praise is to be Muhammad Rasul Allah.
-
san
i'm mainly here for learning. i'm not the one to support the "hiding of errors", and i also see no point in trying "to humiliate".
What CHARACTER is there in a man who wish to humiliate other?
However deep my wish is to expose the ill traits of such man in public, i must remind myself to ask my Protector to protect me against such deterioration.
Peace.
Ayisha
None of this is of course relevant to any of this discussion, its that raj has gone off on a tangent to 'prove me wrong' in whatever I say so im just following him
Quote
all good funYour post becomes irrelevant after the post of Ayisha, where she admits that she is doing it on purpose, and on the other hand by reading her posts its evident that she was asking the answer from Mazhar and not me.
-
Ayisha
So you agree that Allah had a plan for a Prophet to come, Thanks Allah.
That was my question to you, how is he mentioned/foretold?, and you passed it on to me, as usual.
Where have I ever said there was no plan for another messenger after Jesus? Nowhere raj, again thats in your mind and again you are arguing over something I have not said.And the name of that prophet was Muhammad, as Allah calls him in Quran.
YOU CANNOT DENY THIS FACT.
And you cannot deny that his name was Muhammed from BIRTH, before prophethood and that is why Allah calls him by his name! He would hardly call hi RAAJAH would he if his name was Muhammed! Use your brain.and when you will Know the meaning of MUhammad, you will further know why, Praise is to be Muhammad Rasul Allah.
Praise be to ALLAH Lord of the Worlds.
Raj stop idolizing Muhammed, it is not what Allah or Muhammed asks of you.
-
san
AyishaYour post becomes irrelevant after the post of Ayisha, where she admits that she is doing it on purpose, and on the other hand by reading her posts its evident that she was asking the answer from Mazhar and not me.
Doing what on purpose raj? answering your questions? because thats all I have done and still not one answered by you, as always )
-
san
AyishaYour post becomes irrelevant after the post of Ayisha, where she admits that she is doing it on purpose, and on the other hand by reading her posts its evident that she was asking the answer from Mazhar and not me.
If you don't think it's relevant to you, then why even bother to reply?
-
Where have I ever said there was no plan for another messenger after Jesus? Nowhere raj, again thats in your mind and again you are arguing over something I have not said
.You just assume too much, I did not argued, I just thanked Allah that you believe in a Messenger to come is mentioned in Torah and Gospels. You were not able to tell how? is another story.
And you cannot deny that his name was Muhammed from BIRTH, before prophethood and that is why Allah calls him by his name! He would hardly call hi RAAJAH would he if his name was Muhammed! Use your brain.
His calling him Muhammad and not Raaajah confirms that this is the name Allah has Chosen for his beloved Messenger.
You are not using your brain dear.
- It was decided that a Prophet has to come.
- Therefore he was a prophet since his birth, (it is only that he was informed about his messengership at 40 Years of age)
- Allah choses the names of his messengers
The angels said, "O Mary, GOD gives you good news a Word from Him whose name is `The Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary. He will be prominent in this life and in the Hereafter, and one of those closest to Me.'
Raj stop idolizing Muhammed, it is not what Allah or Muhammed asks of you.
No one is Idolizing, I am praising him as Allah has praised him in various verses of Quran, put forward by me and Mazhar. to Which you have turned your eyes blind.