Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Peacemaking and Peacemakers in the Great Reading

Peacemaking and Peacemakers in the Great Reading

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
120 Posts 19 Posters 4.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    Peace Herbman,

    The problem is with confusing forms II and IV. Form II carries the meaning of surrender. If this was the intended primary meaning then the god would have said

    instead of

    Not knowing the difference between Forms II and IV is why some people confuse in 271 with (without a medial Shadda) as we saw above.

    The primary meaning of the Masdar SaLAM// is "freedom of harm" and "peace" is implied as a meaning.

    Peace,

    Ayman

    Things seems to have been reversed.

    He was safe

    He made safe; he greeted.

    He surrendered, became subservient, allegiant; and nature of surrender is evident from the meanings of Root, pure and absolute, void of any reservation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      ayman
      wrote on last edited by
      #73

      Things seems to have been reversed.

      He was safe
      He made safe; he greeted.

      He surrendered, became subservient, allegiant; and nature of surrender is evident from the meanings of Root, pure and absolute, void of any reservation.

      004.065
      YUSUFALI But no, by the Lord, they can have no (real) Faith, until they make thee judge in all disputes between them, and find in their souls no resistance against Thy decisions, but accept them with the fullest conviction.
      PICKTHAL But nay, by thy Lord, they will not believe (in truth) until they make thee judge of what is in dispute between them and find within themselves no dislike of that which thou decidest, and submit with full submission.
      SHAKIR But no! by your Lord! they do not believe (in reality) until they make you a judge of that which has become a matter of disagreement among them, and then do not find any straitness in their hearts as to what you have decided and submit with entire submission.

      form II whose Masdar is of the pattern is used in 465 to mean surrender.

      Peace,

      Ayman

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #74

        form II whose Masdar is of the pattern is used in 465 to mean surrender. Aymen

        If one goes by these translators , they translate the same Form-II verb, though correctly here;

        008.043
        YUSUFALI Remember in thy dream Allah showed them to thee as few if He had shown them to thee as many, ye would surely have been discouraged, and ye would surely have disputed in (your) decision; but Allah saved (you) for He knoweth well the (secrets) of (all) hearts.
        PICKTHAL When Allah showed them unto thee (O Muhammad) in thy dream as few in number, and if He had shown them to thee as many, ye (Muslims) would have faltered and would have quarrelled over the affair. But Allah saved (you). Lo! He knoweth what is in the breasts (of men).
        SHAKIR When Allah showed them to you in your dream as few; and if He had shown them to you as many you would certainly have become weak-hearted and you would have disputed about the matter, but Allah saved (you); surely He is the Knower of what is in the breasts.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #75

          He made safe; he greeted. Mazhar

          024.027
          YUSUFALI O ye who believe! enter not houses other than your own, until ye have asked permission and saluted those in them that is best for you, in order that ye may heed (what is seemly).
          PICKTHAL O ye who believe! Enter not houses other than your own without first announcing your presence and invoking peace upon the folk thereof. That is better for you, that ye may be heedful.
          SHAKIR O you who believe! Do not enter houses other than your own houses until you have asked permission and saluted their inmates; this is better for you, that you may be mindful.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #76

            He made safe; he greeted. Mazhar

            024.061
            YUSUFALI But if ye enter houses, salute each other - a greeting of blessing and purity as from Allah.
            PICKTHAL But when ye enter houses, salute one another with a greeting from Allah, blessed and sweet.
            SHAKIR So when you enter houses, greet your people with a salutation from Allah, blessed (and) goodly;

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Offline
              P Offline
              Prince
              wrote on last edited by
              #77

              Based on my collective reading of different fields I lean towards islam being peace as well as it's associated words. I think some people are adamant on fixating a single word to islam and not seeing the bigger picture.

              Submission connotes a master slave relationship between our Creator whereas I see it as complete opposite based on our Creator giving us freedom to choose the paths we take in life....far from a submissive relationship I see

              PEACE

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #78

                Submission connotes a master slave relationship between our Creator whereas I see it as complete opposite based on our Creator giving us freedom to choose the paths we take in life....far from a submissive relationship I see

                The important field seems to have been missed in study

                And I did not create the groups of Jinn and Human beings except for the purpose that they should, by will and affection, submit to subservience/allegiance to Me .

                This is acceptance of Master slave relationship by excericising free will which is the cause of creation of everything.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  ayman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #79

                  If one goes by these translators , they translate the same Form-II verb, though correctly here;

                  The Arabic was quoted first before the translators for the very reason that form II in 465 meaning "surrender"/"give in" is immediately apparent to an Arabic speaker. There is no need for over-complication. In mundane normal Arabic usage an average Arabic speaker would clearly understand "sallam sela7h" to mean surrendered/gave in his weapon and not saved or saluted the weapon in this context. So depending on the context is the appropriate word to use for conveying "surrender/giving in" any object xxxx and therefore should have been used instead of in if surrendering his xxxx was the intended meaning. The confusion is caused by forcing a meaning from Form II on Form IV.

                  Peace,

                  Ayman

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #80

                    The Arabic was quoted first before the translators for the very reason that form II in 465 meaning "surrender"/"give in" is immediately apparent to an Arabic speaker. There is no need for over-complication. In mundane normal Arabic usage an average Arabic speaker would clearly understand "sallam sela7h" to mean surrendered/gave in his weapon and not saved or saluted the weapon in this context. So depending on the context is the appropriate word to use for conveying "surrender/giving in" any object xxxx and therefore should have been used instead of in if surrendering his xxxx was the intended meaning. The confusion is caused by forcing a meaning from Form II on Form IV.

                    Peace,

                    Ayman

                    Merely by one omission of these translators Form-II cannot be considered to denote what is signified by form-IV. At all other places of occurrence of Form-II they have translated it as save, protect and salutation, greeting, as I have quoted three examples.

                    surrender, yield, submit, succumb to, give in. ( &#1591

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Prince
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #81

                      The important field seems to have been missed in study

                      And I did not create the groups of Jinn and Human beings except for the purpose that they should, by will and affection, submit to subservience/allegiance to Me .

                      This is acceptance of Master slave relationship by excericising free will which is the cause of creation of everything.

                      I prefer a better interpretation of the word 'serve' NOT 'subservience/allegiance' in your quote of 5156. Serving God doesn't still prove to me its a master slave relationship between us and God. The very freedom of choices we have as humans is more strong empirical evidence for me that we are not slaves to God.

                      I guess it comes down to how we both interpret the word slave in english. I guess in one meaning of the word we are slaves of God as we are His property but we do have the freedom He has bestowed on us to follow whatever path.

                      PEACE

                      PEACE

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #82

                        The words are "they should, by will and affection, submit to subservience/allegiance to Me". The mood of the verb is subjunctive, therefore, "should" may be read as "may". Freedom of choice is indicated therein. "serve" connotes perception of a servant.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          Eiliyah
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #83

                          I prefer a better interpretation of the word 'serve' NOT 'subservience/allegiance' in your quote of 5156. Serving God doesn't still prove to me its a master slave relationship between us and God. The very freedom of choices we have as humans is more strong empirical evidence for me that we are not slaves to God.

                          I guess it comes down to how we both interpret the word slave in english. I guess in one meaning of the word we are slaves of God as we are His property but we do have the freedom He has bestowed on us to follow whatever path.

                          I agree with you, all depends on how we interpret the word slave in a way I think we are all submitted indeed, we are all forced to obey Gods laws, (even non-believers) I am thinking on the natural laws for example like gravity law... in other matters we received freedom of choice to obey Him and submit to Him or not. And here something else is playing a role. Even when we submit/obey willingly, in free-choice, what is the intention, what is the motivation of this submission? A slave will simply obey out of fear for punishment or for possible reward, while in other way someone else will obey simply of knowledge that this is the best to do even because of Love for God. In the second possibility I don't think the subject sees himself as a slave!!

                          Peace.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            ayman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #84

                            Merely by one omission of these translators Form-II cannot be considered to denote what is signified by form-IV. At all other places of occurrence of Form-II they have translated it as save, protect and salutation, greeting, as I have quoted three examples.
                            surrender, yield, submit, succumb to, give in. ( &#1591

                            There is no point in arguing about a fact that every translator and Arabic speaker knows independent of any specific text and is easily verifiable. Go ask any neutral person on this forum or anywhere who knows Arabic how they would translate

                            1. surrendered/gave in his weapon
                              OR
                            2. saved or saluted his weapon

                            Once you understand the unbiased person answer then you will know that form II definitely has the connotation of surrender and form IV definitely has the connotation of peacemaking.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #85

                              Go ask any neutral person on this forum or anywhere who knows Arabic how they would translate

                              1. surrendered/gave in his weapon
                                OR
                              2. saved or saluted his weapon

                              Where to find a neutral person, more neutral than the writers/compiles of Classical Arabic lexicons. Your problem is the English version of the above sentence since for weapon we have to use in English the word "surrendered" and from there you are not ready to accept all the Arabic lexicons.

                              The above situation is described in Lane's lexicon also--.
                              Read page 1412 vol-IV entry 2 and move to page 1413, may be your confusion gets over, Allah willing.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                ayman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #86

                                Where to find a neutral person, more neutral than the writers/compiles of Classical Arabic lexicons. Your problem is the English version of the above sentence since for weapon we have to use in English the word "surrendered" and from there you are not ready to accept all the Arabic lexicons.
                                The above situation is described in Lane's lexicon also--.
                                Read page 1412 vol-IV entry 2 and move to page 1413, may be your confusion gets over, Allah willing.

                                Yielding is in fact a synonym of giving in/surrendering and not of "save or salute" but maybe you need a neutral English person too to confirm this for you. So the English and Arabic neutral persons will perfectly agree but still the problem is that you did not like it and can't change.

                                When you find a neutral Arabic person you may also ask them about the difference of form II "massak"/"gave to hold" and form IV "amsak"/"held". In this case too, form II has the giving aspect while Form IV has the aspect of making.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  Prince
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #87

                                  I agree with you, all depends on how we interpret the word slave in a way I think we are all submitted indeed, we are all forced to obey Gods laws, (even non-believers) I am thinking on the natural laws for example like gravity law... in other matters we received freedom of choice to obey Him and submit to Him or not. And here something else is playing a role. Even when we submit/obey willingly, in free-choice, what is the intention, what is the motivation of this submission? A slave will simply obey out of fear for punishment or for possible reward, while in other way someone else will obey simply of knowledge that this is the best to do even because of Love for God. In the second possibility I don't think the subject sees himself as a slave!!

                                  Peace.

                                  I agree with your comment I've highlighted also to add.....religions teach fear to serve God and not islam hence why I never see relationship between humans and God as a master slave relationship in the deen of islam.

                                  PEACE

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #88

                                    Yielding is in fact a synonym of giving in/surrendering and not of "save or salute" but maybe you need a neutral English person too to confirm this for you. So the English and Arabic neutral persons will perfectly agree but still the problem is that you did not like it and can't change.

                                    When you find a neutral Arabic person you may also ask them about the difference of form II "massak"/"gave to hold" and form IV "amsak"/"held". In this case too, form II has the giving aspect while Form IV has the aspect of making.

                                    Yielding

                                    Yielding is a form of social etiquette, with one person allowing access to another person or persons.

                                    In political elections, a losing candidate may yield to the other candidate. This process is known as concession. Preferably this is to be done after the votes are counted.

                                    In traffic, drivers entering a larger road are usually required to yield to cars in the larger road to avoid a fiery collision.

                                    bookmark email print tweet facebook

                                    Computed Synonyms yielding
                                    Rank Intensity Word Synonyms Synonyms of synonym
                                    1 227.0596 yielding yield give in, produce, cede, return, relinquish
                                    2 81.0092 yielding produce yield, make, create, bear, cause
                                    3 70.0092 yielding give yield, donate, render, present, bestow
                                    4 63.0092 yielding compliant docile, pliable, tractable, pliant, obedient
                                    5 58.0093 yielding sell vend, to sell, carry, dispose of, yield
                                    6 58.0093 yielding present gift, offer, introduce, give, current
                                    7 57.0092 yielding flexible pliable, supple, elastic, lithe, versatile
                                    8 55.0091 yielding supple flexible, pliable, pliant, lithe, elastic
                                    9 55.0091 yielding pliable pliant, flexible, supple, lithe, elastic
                                    10 54.0091 yielding soft tender, gentle, mild, limp, sweet
                                    11 54.0091 yielding proffer offer, present, perform, act, play
                                    12 51.3095 yielding giving give, yield, hand over, render, provide
                                    13 50.0091 yielding carry take, bear, to carry, convey, bring
                                    14 49.0093 yielding return go back, turn, returns, yield, bring back
                                    15 49.0092 yielding bear carry, endure, bore, abide, bearing

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • H Offline
                                      H Offline
                                      herbman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #89

                                      Peace all,

                                      just to clarify because arguments are good from both side

                                      from one side we have

                                      FORM II

                                      He made safe; he greeted.

                                      FORM IV

                                      He surrendered, became subservient, allegiant

                                      so, we have

                                      form II means "save" as in 843
                                      form II means salute/greeting as in 2427 see also 2461

                                      form IV means "submit"


                                      at the other side we have the opposite meaning

                                      FORM II

                                      He surrendered, became subservient, allegiant

                                      FORM IV

                                      He made safe;

                                      form II whose Masdar is of the pattern is used in 465 to mean surrender.

                                      form II means "surrender" as in 465

                                      465

                                      YUSUFALI But no, by the Lord, they can have no (real) Faith, until they make thee judge in all disputes between them, and find in their souls no resistance against Thy decisions, but accept them with the fullest conviction.
                                      PICKTHAL But nay, by thy Lord, they will not believe (in truth) until they make thee judge of what is in dispute between them and find within themselves no dislike of that which thou decidest, and submit with full submission.
                                      SHAKIR But no! by your Lord! they do not believe (in reality) until they make you a judge of that which has become a matter of disagreement among them, and then do not find any straitness in their hearts as to what you have decided and submit with entire submission.

                                      formIV means "to make peace/safe"


                                      From the above I can say one thing

                                      In the example of form II meaning "greeting", it is maybe important to notice the form II is used with the particule 'ala "", I think it is important because a particule can change completly the meaning of a word whatever form he has.
                                      example in english to GIVE and to GIVE UP does not mean the same.
                                      The same can be applied in arabic for exemple with DARABA and DARAB 'ALA.

                                      maybe the same apply to Aslamu li e.g. 2112, 2131

                                      could have another meaning with the same form II! Don't you think?

                                      Conclusion, if we remove the salam 'ala and salama li , what remains are the 2 above examples

                                      form II means "surrender" as in 465
                                      vs
                                      form II means "save" as in 843

                                      a deeper study with other form II example is therefore needed
                                      sallama vb. (2)
                                      perf. act. 2233, 843
                                      impf. act. 465, 2427
                                      impv. 2461, 3356
                                      n.vb. 465, 3322, 3356
                                      pcple. pass. f. 271, 492, 492


                                      what about axample of form IV

                                      I think more example of form IV can help determining its meaning.

                                      from PRL
                                      perf. act. 2112, 2131, 320, 320, 320, 383, 4125, 544, 614, 2744, 37103, 4914, 4917, 7214
                                      impf. act. 671, 1681, 3122, 4066, 4816
                                      impv. 2131, 2234, 3954
                                      n.vb. 319, 385, 53, 6125, 974, 3922, 4917, 617
                                      pcple. act. 2128, 2128, 2132, 2133, 2136, 352, 364, 367, 380, 384, 3102, 5111, 6163, 7126, 1072, 1084, 1090, 1114, 12101, 152, 1689, 16102, 21108, 2278, 2731, 2738, 2742, 2781, 2791, 2853, 2946, 3053, 3335, 3335, 3912, 4133, 4369, 4615, 5136, 665, 6835, 7214

                                      Peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #90

                                        FORM II

                                        He made safe; he greeted.

                                        FORM IV

                                        He surrendered, became subservient, allegiant

                                        at the other side we have the opposite meaning

                                        FORM II

                                        He surrendered, became subservient, allegiant

                                        FORM IV

                                        He made safe;

                                        form II whose Masdar is of the pattern is used in 465 to mean surrender.

                                        form II means "surrender" as in 465

                                        Good effort herbman;

                                        If one accepts this,

                                        He made safe;

                                        then he is suggesting that the act or effect of the verb is moving to someone else. And as such he is declaring this verb of Form-IV as transitive verb; while the fact is that there are very few verbs in Form-IV which are INTRANSITIVE and is one such verb.

                                        One of the meanings associated with Form-IV pattern is that of "finding the subject to have accepted an attribute, or as we say to become something/becomming" referred by the term .

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          ayman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #91

                                          then he is suggesting that the act or effect of the verb is moving to someone else. And as such he is declaring this verb of Form-IV as transitive verb; while the fact is that there are very few verbs in Form-IV which are INTRANSITIVE and is one such verb.

                                          Why single out as the excpetion to the clear meaning implied by Form-IV?

                                          Peace,

                                          Ayman

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users