Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Article on Angels

Article on Angels

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
38 Posts 12 Posters 762 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    sonnie
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    but , than I now believe 100% that Malaika = Communicators

    I think, this is the best definition I have heard so far. It makes the most sense to me. Thanks!
    God knows best
    Salaam

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      Jack
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      I think, this is the best definition I have heard so far. It makes the most sense to me. Thanks!
      God knows best
      Salaam

      Controllers or controlling forces of nature, etc..

      1795 can't abide on earth?
      351... as messengers?
      2275 messengers are both human and in malayka form.

      Insightful posts/threads
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8122.15
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8122.msg19564#msg19564
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9428.msg37654#msg37654

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        loxbox13
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Controllers or controlling forces of nature, etc..

        1795 can't abide on earth?
        351... as messengers?
        2275 messengers are both human and in malayka form.

        Insightful posts/threads
        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8122.15
        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8122.msg19564#msg19564
        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9428.msg37654#msg37654

        Peace

        RASSOUL = Receivers and not messengers, a messenger in the quran is called MABAOUTH. someone sent.

        RASSOUL ALLAH = RECEIVERS OF THE LAW.
        RASSOUL = RECEIVER
        RISSALA = A RECEPTION , always mentioned is pluriel RISSALATE , ( RECEPTIONS ) , if it was message, we know that the message is only one, but rissalate is pluriel, therefore rissalates is receptions
        KITAB = MESSAGE / CONTENT
        MABAOUTH. = Messenger
        NABI = INFORMER
        ANBAA = Informations
        NABAA = information

        MALAIKA = Communications with the word of Allah in them. communications receivers , Kalam is a synonym of malak
        malaika are all the communications, between matter and law of nature.
        exemple, equations are malaika , kalam is a small part of malaika , that we can accept or reject.

        ALLAH KNOWS BEST

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Someone
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Salaam Someone,

          How will reply to the above reply # 5 about malaika?

          And where did you get the idea of Adam being humans from? Adam is singular not plural.

          May Allah guide us all to His only path pr
          Mohammed M. Khan

          Peace mmkhan,

          Anyone of us can be considered as an "Adam", especially considering the development of our intelectual abilities from complete ignorance and a state of hapiness when children in this big garden Earth, then we accumulate knowledge about our environment for sometime, then we face tests during our adult life... In many ways, we are similar to Adam.

          Peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mmkhan
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            I seek refuge in Allah from Shaitaan alrajeem

            Please translate for me the following aayaats

            RASSOUL = Receivers and not messengers, a messenger in the quran is called MABAOUTH. someone sent.

            622

            RASSOUL ALLAH = RECEIVERS OF THE LAW.
            RASSOUL = RECEIVER

            933

            RISSALA = A RECEPTION , always mentioned is pluriel RISSALATE , ( RECEPTIONS ) , if it was message, we know that the message is only one, but rissalate is pluriel, therefore rissalates is receptions

            567

            Also used singular in 567, 6124, 779, etc.

            KITAB = MESSAGE / CONTENT
            MABAOUTH. = Messenger

            255
            256

            MALAIKA = Communications with the word of Allah in them. communications receivers , Kalam is a synonym of malak
            malaika are all the communications, between matter and law of nature.
            exemple, equations are malaika , kalam is a small part of malaika , that we can accept or reject.

            4251

            Kalam is a synonym of malak

            Is the below synonym correct as per your understanding?

            Baraqa = Qaraba
            Baqara = Raqaba
            Balagha = Ghalaba

            Just to quote the few and like to your understanding.

            May Allah guide us all to His only path pr
            Mohammed M. Khan

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mmkhan
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Salaam Someone,

              Peace mmkhan,

              Anyone of us can be considered as an "Adam", especially considering the development of our intelectual abilities from complete ignorance and a state of hapiness when children in this big garden Earth, then we accumulate knowledge about our environment for sometime, then we face tests during our adult life... In many ways, we are similar to Adam.

              Peace

              Can you please quote me some of the aayaats from which you extract the meaning of Adam?

              "this big garden Earth" it is called "Duniya" a derivative of "Adna" in Arabic.

              May Allah guide us all to His only path pr
              Mohammed M. Khan

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                peace mmkhan,

                And where did you get the idea of Adam being humans from? Adam is singular not plural.

                What do you make of

                And We created you (plural), then We shaped you (plural), then We said to the Angels "Submit to Adam;" so they submitted except for Iblees, he was not of those who submitted.

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W Offline
                  W Offline
                  warner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Peace

                  I have few doubts on using 711 to cite Adam being plural.

                  In 711 ?Thumma? can be ?then? as well as ?and? so the creating, fashioning and prostrating to Adam does not have to be in a sequence to mean that it was to Adam that the early part of the verse is referring to. Also, does khalaqnakum (creation) and sawwarnakum ( fashioning) have to be two independent actions from each other or these actions can be related and simultaneous ?

                  Moreover, in the next verse 712 Adam is referred to in singular (him) twice.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • WakasW Offline
                    WakasW Offline
                    Wakas
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    peace warner,

                    I dont mind your hypothesis, but as I requested Mazhar in a previous thread, what is the evidence for it. Ideally, several, or at least one, Quranic reference where a seemingly sequential verse is not so.

                    Also, in my view, I have no problem with "adam" being addressed in the singular and the plural, as he is both individual and collective simultaneously, as I have discussed previously.

                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mmkhan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Salaam Wakas,

                      peace mmkhan,

                      What do you make of

                      And We created you (plural), then We shaped you (plural), then We said to the Angels "Submit to Adam;" so they submitted except for Iblees, he was not of those who submitted.

                      To me 711 is addressing to us all initially then referring to Adam as singular. You can also look at 7172 and 237-38.

                      7172

                      237
                      238

                      Hope this helps inshaAllah.

                      May Allah guide us all to His path pr
                      Mohammed M. Khan

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        238

                        mmkhan, the point you are makin might be supported also by this "dual". Personal names like "Adam" represent and refer to ONLY one person.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jack
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          238

                          mmkhan, the point you are makin might be supported also by this "dual". Personal names like "Adam" represent and refer to ONLY one person.

                          http//www.tnellen.com/cybereng/lit_terms/allegory.html

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Offline
                            L Offline
                            loxbox13
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Salaam Wakas,

                            To me 711 is addressing to us all initially then referring to Adam as singular. You can also look at 7172 and 237-38.

                            7172

                            237
                            238

                            Hope this helps inshaAllah.

                            May Allah guide us all to His path pr
                            Mohammed M. Khan

                            Hello my friend
                            There is nothing that say Adam is not equal man in the quran
                            Adam is a word that translated in the 19th century in my coutry to HOMO
                            Adam isn't a name of a single person, but a name of a kind ( us ) modern name HuMan, in the quran, we're still caled adam, and our parents, direct parents are called adam, ya bani Adam , meaning oh Son of Man.

                            the story of the earliest adam is the same that is repeating today to you and to me and to everybody, we don't realise because we don't understand the quran

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W Offline
                              W Offline
                              warner
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              Peace Wakas

                              Now that we agree that 711 is not sufficient evidence for the plurality of adam, can you please point a verse fom the Al quran which supports this opinion ?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • WakasW Offline
                                WakasW Offline
                                Wakas
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                peace warner,
                                Nowhere did I agree that. I am not saying 711 by itself is 100% proof of the viewpoint I highlighted. I think it is significant and asked for your explanation of it, to which you responded by saying "thumma" can also mean "and". Fair enough. It does not seem to read like that, but it is possible.

                                From PRL
                                thumma - then, afterwards, moreover, mostly used as a conjunction indicating a sequence in line or order to be rendered as then/thereafter, also used as a more simple conjunction - and.

                                For me, there does seem to be an interplay between the individual and collective, due to the story of adam being an allegory/parable.

                                Also see 20123
                                He said "Descend from this, all, some of you (plural) are to others enemy. So, when My guidance comes to you (plural), then, whoever follows (singular) My guidance, he (singular) will not go astray nor suffer."

                                Also see part 10 of this book
                                http//www.scribd.com/doc/37354743/Understanding-Quran-Themes-and-Style-by-Abdel-Haleem

                                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  Also see 20123
                                  He said "Descend from this, all, some of you (plural) are to others enemy. Wakas

                                  the pronoun is for dual, both of you

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    warner
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    Peace Wakas

                                    Please direct me to any discussion on support of allegorical nature of the story of adam.

                                    In my opinion 20123 may refer to

                                    1. Adam and his partner, satan and his group (the jinns, since he was one of those)
                                      or
                                    2. The symbolic reference to paradise lost for all mankind, due to the actions of their first father and mother ( again, single father, adam)

                                    Both cases above can justify the use of plurals in 20123.

                                    Also if mazhar is correct on the use of the pronoun for dual the argument is stronger.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WakasW Offline
                                      WakasW Offline
                                      Wakas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      peace,

                                      I already linked you to a book that dedicates a part to this topic. You can opt to read it or not.

                                      Yes it is dual for that verb, but the rest Mazhar did not comment on. See corpus.quran.com for the grammar.

                                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • W Offline
                                        W Offline
                                        warner
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        Peace Wakas

                                        I already started reading the book.

                                        Thanks for the recommending the corpus.quran. Great tool.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          Yes it is dual for that verb, but the rest Mazhar did not comment on. See corpus.quran.com for the grammar. Wakas

                                          Word by word Analysis of 20123

                                          Word by word Analysis of 236

                                          Difference between imperative command, and a general pronouncement giving information applicable to all in future needs to be noted.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users