Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Mate of Adam

Mate of Adam

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
17 Posts 7 Posters 254 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andya_Primanda
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Salam

    Yusuf Ali
    411
    O mankind! reverence your Guardian-Lord, who created you from a single person, created, of like nature, His mate, and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women;- reverence Allah, through whom ye demand your mutual (rights), and (reverence) the wombs (That bore you) for Allah ever watches over you.

    Did mate of Adam was created from Adam?

    The verse doesn't even refer to Adam.
    single person = nafs wahidah
    created from "him" "his" mate = khalaqa minHA zaujaHA.

    My current inclination is to treat nafs wahidah as female.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      johan
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Salam Andya Primanda,

      This is a very interesting proposition you make
      I've also yet to see a person/archetype other than 3eesa be called by the direct name of his parents..and guess who it is, a female
      3eesa ibn maryam
      doesn't that coincide with the idea of maternal lineage system as per your background i would persume?
      as most cases of born unmarried MMA's would be easily identifieable by this system?
      now that would be a slap on the face of the paternal lineage system; and so the "death" of 3eesa AS on the cross..

      wallahua3lam

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H Offline
        H Offline
        huruf
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Nafsin whidatun, Nafs is feminine, therefore in Arabic, is not "his" mate, but "her" mate. Why in English it is made "his", I suppose because it is the generic when we do not know whther something is feminine or masculine, or because we want to mean both.

        But the Arabic does not lend itself to make of the nafs a male or a female. God chose "His" words wisely .

        Salaam

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          johan
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Nafsin whidatun, Nafs is feminine, therefore in Arabic, is not "his" mate, but "her" mate. Why in English it is made "his", I suppose because it is the generic when we do not know whther something is feminine or masculine, or because we want to mean both.

          But the Arabic does not lend itself to make of the nafs a male or a female. God chose "His" words wisely .

          Salaam

          talking about the twist and turn thing..well that's that..anyway here's another verse that talks about maternal lineage system that's worthy of mention by His Higness The Creator of All..
          7150

          o son of my mother..

          and afaik i haven't seen any verses that talked about o son of my father, etc..

          but the question is probably when was the paternalistic oriented society emerged in history?
          was it in the times of Moosa(Moses) AS or after, and i'd be interested to learn the sequence of the emergance of the prophet as per Quranic view..

          wallahua3lam

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            huruf
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            My choice of lineage would be both lineages. That is the logical thing. In fact in countries of Iberian stock both the mother and the father's family names are taken by the children. In old times, which came first was by choice, later around the three last centuries, "progress" demanded that the father's name came first. Now, in Spain at least people can change that order, although it is by request, which is unfair. In Portugal, however, I think choice has continued to be the rule.

            Now, excuse the digression, going back to Qur'an, I appreciate John's effort to watch this kind of thing, and I am sure that if doesn't always bring returns, it is necessary to extract from the Qur'an all its wealth of meanings and light for us. The Qur'an is unexhaustible, it always comes out with new insights. It is ashtounding.

            In this particular case, I do not exclude anything and it may be pointing to the mother's lineage, but also it may point to the fact that they have the same mother, but not they same father, or that they have the same mother and the same father, but there are other siblings who have a different mother. So that would set him apart from other siblings.

            Salaam

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              Bender
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Nafsin whidatun, Nafs is feminine, therefore in Arabic, is not "his" mate, but "her" mate. Why in English it is made "his", I suppose because it is the generic when we do not know whther something is feminine or masculine, or because we want to mean both.

              But the Arabic does not lend itself to make of the nafs a male or a female. God chose "His" words wisely .

              Salaam

              Salaam,

              I agree.

              917
              917 Wanafsin wama sawwaha

              As far as I know, HA is only for feminine things.
              Look at the translations of chapter 91, very weird. Every verse ends with HA but translators never use HER for HA, but they use HIS or IT.
              An exception is made by them only for 9113 and 14 were it's talking about "nakata Allahi" hmm

              And to the topic starter this verse is not about Adam.

              Salaam,
              Bender

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Offline
                C Offline
                ccamurad
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Salam

                Yusuf Ali
                41
                O mankind! reverence your Guardian-Lord, who created you from a single person, created, of like nature, His mate, and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women;- reverence Allah, through whom ye demand your mutual (rights), and (reverence) the wombs (That bore you) for Allah ever watches over you.

                Did mate of Adam was created from Adam?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  ccamurad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Salam

                  Yusuf Ali
                  411
                  O mankind! reverence your Guardian-Lord, who created you from a single person, created, of like nature, His mate, and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women;- reverence Allah, through whom ye demand your mutual (rights), and (reverence) the wombs (That bore you) for Allah ever watches over you.

                  Did mate of Adam was created from Adam?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bender
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Salaam,

                    As per my current knowledge NO

                    Salaam,
                    Bender

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Offline
                      C Offline
                      ccamurad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      salam

                      What is talking about verse 41?

                      please clear it

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        loxbox13
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        salam

                        What is talking about verse 41?

                        please clear it

                        I understand this verse, that it is talking about a NAFS / Beign, and not a person, it"s ralking about a cell , it get divided to get it's mate
                        a cell is directly called Sulala in the quran

                          • 12 -

                        and we created men from a cell from tuning

                          • 8 -

                        and we made it's clone from a cell of a despised matter

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          johan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          salam

                          What is talking about verse 41?

                          please clear it

                          salam
                          genesis of the human race from the prespective of ins,
                          now what is ins, i'm yet to understand it thoroughly..
                          what i can understand from a glance is that ins is different from jin
                          was made out of sulalalh (@loxbox13 interesting how selular is almost identical to sulalah without the r )

                          perhaps you might want to share your view on it

                          wallahua3lam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Shirin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Salam Andya Primanda,

                            This is a very interesting proposition you make )
                            I've also yet to see a person/archetype other than 3eesa be called by the direct name of his parents..and guess who it is, a female )
                            3eesa ibn maryam
                            doesn't that coincide with the idea of maternal lineage system as per your background i would persume?
                            as most cases of born unmarried MMA's would be easily identifieable by this system?
                            now that would be a slap on the face of the paternal lineage system; and so the "death" of 3eesa AS on the cross..

                            wallahua3lam

                            Isa was born without a father, so obviously that's why he is referred as "son of Maryam".

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              johan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Isa was born without a father, so obviously that's why he is referred as "son of Maryam".

                              ahh how obvious
                              and why was 3eesa had no father i wonder?
                              would Allah SWT be playing dirty tricks? sub7anallah 3amma ya9ifoon

                              and why has the Quran never mentioned of a say sulayman ibn dawood..?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Shirin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                ahh how obvious
                                and why was 3eesa had no father i wonder?
                                would Allah SWT be playing dirty tricks? sub7anallah 3amma ya9ifoon

                                and why has the Quran never mentioned of a say sulayman ibn dawood..?

                                Because Allah swt wanted so. Simple, no?
                                What are these dirty tricks you're talking about?

                                You mean Qur'an never mentions prophet Sulayman? Sorry, I don't quite understand, English is not my native language and obviously, neither is yours. So, please explain. Thanks.

                                Salaams.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  johan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Because Allah swt wanted so. Simple, no?

                                  that doesn't convince me, there must be an intelligible explanation to that
                                  rabbana ma khalaqta hadza bathilan sub7anaka faqina 3azaabannar

                                  What are these dirty tricks you're talking about?

                                  the dirty trick is on behalf of the patriarch oriente system
                                  the patriarch oriented system has deviated from the path somehow
                                  and Allah SWT is trying to correct it through the concept of 3eesa AS

                                  You mean Qur'an never mentions prophet Sulayman? Sorry, I don't quite understand, English is not my native language and obviously, neither is yours. So, please explain. Thanks.

                                  Salaams.

                                  where in the Quran does it mention "Sulayman ibn dawood"?
                                  i see "3eesa ibn maryam"
                                  and "ibn ummi"

                                  salaam

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Users