Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Kitab (k-t-b) : Does it really mean 'a book'?

Kitab (k-t-b) : Does it really mean 'a book'?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
49 Posts 10 Posters 939 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bkanwar2
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Salaam,

    Sorry, I confirm only with The Quran as reference. As far as I know William wright or LaneLexicon is not the author of the Quran and I can also not find a verse which states that we have to look into LaneLexicon/William wright to confirm the meanings of the words of The Quran.

    I realy don't understand your method, you take whole words split them in parts add some extra letters and make new meanings. If Allah wanted to split them in parts like you do then that is very easy for Him.
    As an example I can give you the word ALLAH. I know from your other post that you splitted this word like this
    allathi
    La
    illah .
    If Allah wanted to split it like you do then there would be not a single time ALLAH but everywhere those 3 words, just like in
    5922

    Besides this why don't you go further and also split into parts, you are flexibel with this stuff, I am sure you can do the same trick also for and after you splitted this into something new then you can split the new words again in parts and make new ones etc etc etc.

    Salaam,
    Bender

    ps Joe for offtopic -[

    Brother Bender, what everyone today thinks is Quran, is its translation. Which is not, what the real text is. The real text above this translation is what I am trying to understand and translate, irrespective of what translation or tradition has told us.

    Do you know basics of language? If not and you really want to understand the text in question. My humble suggestion would be to please try to learn the language. If you need help. I shall be happy to lend a hand as much as I can.

    Salam bkanwar
    please can you make a special topic?? it's very interesting. And please - if possible can you share those sites from William wright?
    Thank you )
    Salam

    What do you mean? Start a seperate thread for these so to called Huroof e Muqataat? If so I can. I have understood the meanings of most of these so called letters, except few, for long time now

    Here is a link for Wiiliam Wright's grammar book.

    http//www.ghazali.org/arabic/WrightArabicGrammarVol1.pdf

    Badar

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      mirjamnur
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      Salam bkanwar2

      What do you mean? Start a seperate thread for these so to called Huroof e Muqataat? If so I can. I have understood the meanings of most of these so called letters, except few, for long time now

      yes. I'm very curious. I have already received a variety of opinions from different members of this site, but for me is not completely satisfactory. So i wait for your explanation. Thanks and Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        Bender
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        Brother Bender, what everyone today thinks is Quran, is its translation. Which is not, what the real text is. The real text above this translation is what I am trying to understand and translate, irrespective of what translation or tradition has told us.

        Do you know basics of language? If not and you really want to understand the text in question. My humble suggestion would be to please try to learn the language. If you need help. I shall be happy to lend a hand as much as I can.Badar

        Salaam brother,

        RED Do you mean the arabic text of The Book is also a translation? If so, then please give a verse for this understanding to support your claim.

        BLUE nope I only now how to read a little bit.

        GREEN Thank you for your offer, inshaAllah I will accept it and inshaAllah I will learn from you, but on condition that you support every claim of yours with ONLY examples from The Quran.

        First I want to learn why you splitted the word ALLAH in those 3 part.
        5922 clearly disapproves for me your understanding as they are used in the same sentence.
        We can create a seperate topic for this as this is way off-topic.

        Salaam,
        Bender

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          bkanwar2
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          Salaam brother,
          First I want to learn why you splitted the word ALLAH in those 3 part.
          5922 clearly disapproves for me your understanding as they are used in the same sentence.
          We can create a seperate topic for this as this is way off-topic.

          Salaam,
          Bender

          Please read my write up at the bottom. You will find your answer. It written in simple English with readers in mind who are not familiar with the language. If you still have questions about it. Please feel free to ask.

          http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599853.50

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            bkanwar2
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            By the way, the write up/break down of so to called word/noun, Allah, has been on this forum and several others for over 2 years. I hate to use word challenge, but it is like a linguistic challenge from Quran and its language. There has been no objection to it except for one that is already addressed in this link; citing its use, both in language and current translation of Quran, as well, from books of the language with due references.

            Regards

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mirjamnur
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              Salam bkanwar

              i read the article but i have a question. the article states

              Let us turn to Qur'an itself for evidence. In Arabic script as well in the Qur'an, where a preposition ?Lee? is added in to a word containing a definite article ?Al? . Alif is dropped and so Lam of the definite article ?Al? joins with ?Lam? of preposition. Let us illustrate this point with some word examples from Qur'an itself.

              1. 21 Alif of ?Al? gone, lam is present and preposition ?Lee? added.

              2. 47 and 432, is the word same concept.

              but lil- muttaqin ( li+al+ muttaqin) and lil-rigal (li+al+rigal) is not the same as al mutaqin and al rigal. the second (al rigal) yes, is lam schamseia it becomes arrigal- for the idhram. but the word in the Quran is not ALILRIGAL is lil rigal (li+al+ rigal= lialrigal what is impossible to pronouncing so lilrigal 'for' the men as in 2.1 'for' the muttagin

              i don't know what has this to do with Al + ilah= Allah? alilah? here we have AL ILAHA not LILAHA confused

              so please you can explain??
              thank you and Salam

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                bkanwar2
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Salam bkanwar

                i read the article but i have a question. the article states

                Let us turn to Qur'an itself for evidence. In Arabic script as well in the Qur'an, where a preposition ?Lee? is added in to a word containing a definite article ?Al? . Alif is dropped and so Lam of the definite article ?Al? joins with ?Lam? of preposition. Let us illustrate this point with some word examples from Qur'an itself.

                1. 21 Alif of ?Al? gone, lam is present and preposition ?Lee? added.

                2. 47 and 432, is the word same concept.

                but lil- muttaqin ( li+al+ muttaqin) and lil-rigal (li+al+rigal) is not the same as al mutaqin and al rigal. the second (al rigal) yes, is lam schamseia it becomes arrigal- for the idhram. but the word in the Quran is not ALILRIGAL is lil rigal (li+al+ rigal= lialrigal what is impossible to pronouncing so lilrigal 'for' the men as in 2.1 'for' the muttagin

                i don't know what has this to do with Al + ilah= Allah? alilah? here we have AL ILAHA not LILAHA confused

                so please you can explain??
                thank you and Salam

                These two examples are given to high light the point, as well to differentiate the difference between two kinds of "Al" used in Quranic text. In both as well . The particle "Al" is different than used in word . In former two words, it is "Al" for making these words Marafa i.e, to make Nakra/common noun as definite/Marafa noun.

                When the preposition "lee" is prefixed to words which are made definite due prefixing of particle "Al"; according to rule of the language "Alif/Hemza" of definite particle "Al" is dropped, whereas, "lam" is retained in the script. However, we find this not to be the case for word in the Quranic script. Therefore, "Al" in case of word Allah can not be the definite particle "Al"; as it completely disappears in the Quranic text, when particle "lee" is prefixed to it. This proves the point that it is a different particle not governed by rules of definite particle "Al"

                Which leads to conclusion that other word similar to definite article "Al" is a contraction of . Since this contraction is different from the definite article "Al". Hence, rule governing definite particle "Al" of only dropping the "alif/Hemza" shall not apply. Therefore, whole of this contraction of word is dropped when preposition "lee" is added to "Allah" and it is written as , instead of two "Lams" at the beginning. Which should have been the case had this first "Al" would have been a definite particle "Al".

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mirjamnur
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  Salam bkanwar

                  These two examples are given to high light the point, as well to differentiate the difference between two kinds of "Al" used in Quranic text. In both as well . The particle "Al" is different than used in word . In former two words, it is "Al" for making these words Marafa i.e, to make Nakra/common noun as definite/Marafa noun.

                  When the preposition "lee" is prefixed to words which are made definite due prefixing of particle "Al"; according to rule of the language "Alif/Hemza" of definite particle "Al" is dropped, whereas, "lam" is retained in the script. However, we find this not to be the case for word in the Quranic script. Therefore, "Al" in case of word Allah can not be the definite particle "Al"; as it completely disappears in the Quranic text, when particle "lee" is prefixed to it. This proves the point that it is a different particle not governed by rules of definite particle "Al"

                  Which leads to conclusion that other word similar to definite article "Al" is a contraction of . Since this contraction is different from the definite article "Al". Hence, rule governing definite particle "Al" of only dropping the "alif/Hemza" shall not apply. Therefore, whole of this contraction of word is dropped when preposition "lee" is added to "Allah" and it is written as , instead of two "Lams" at the beginning. Which should have been the case had this first "Al" would have been a definite particle "Al".

                  i start to see the picture --- ) but please can you give me more examples??

                  English is a foreign language for me as arabic too - for such linguistic explanations a hindrance if I do not exactly understand everything.
                  Sorry but I would like to understand it. Thank you.

                  in german "gutes Ding will Weile haben

                  peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    bkanwar2
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    Salam bkanwari start to see the picture --- ) but please can you give me more examples??

                    Please explain what examples or in which respect?

                    English is a foreign language for me as arabic too - for such linguistic explanations a hindrance if I do not exactly understand everything.
                    Sorry but I would like to understand it. Thank you.

                    We both are in the same boat, both of these languages are foreign for me as well. So do not worry. If one has a will the hurdles could be over come with efforts.

                    in german "gutes Ding will Weile haben

                    peace

                    Do you speak German? Is that your mother tongue? Man if you do, you can compliment lot of my efforts. There is so much work by German scholars in Classic Arabic language, which is still inaccessible to us none speakers of the language.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mirjamnur
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      Salam bkanwar2

                      Please explain what examples or in which respect?
                      for the given explanation. there are examples in the Quran?? As the example from Allah- i need to SEE and to REFLECT about other examples. thanks ;D

                      We both are in the same boat, both of these languages are foreign for me as well. So do not worry. If one has a will the hurdles could be over come with efforts.

                      Do you speak German? Is that your mother tongue? Man if you do, you can compliment lot of my efforts. There is so much work by German scholars in Classic Arabic language, which is still inaccessible to us none speakers of the language.

                      Yes it's my mother tongue- as Swiss German also If i can help anything, let me know!
                      peace - and i;m still waiting for your post (ALM- ALMR- SAD_ HM- etc etc........)
                      Thank you and peace peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        Let us turn to Qur'an itself for evidence. In Arabic script as well in the Qur'an, where a preposition ?Lee? is added in to a word containing a definite article ?Al? . Alif is dropped and so Lam of the definite article ?Al? joins with ?Lam? of preposition. Let us illustrate this point with some word examples from Qur'an itself.

                        1. 21 Alif of ?Al? gone, lam is present and preposition ?Lee? added.

                        2. 47 and 432, is the word same concept.

                        Salamun alaiki,

                        In the second case Prep does not join with L but with R in pronunciation. First example has Jezm on Lam and second has no jezm over it. It is about division of alphabets what are termed Sun and Moon letters.

                        "Al" is used to put the word in determinate state. In Allah and ArRehman it is not article but integral part of the Names.

                        You can read a good and comprehensive article on this Article in wikipedia
                        http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          bkanwar2
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          Salam bkanwar2
                          Yes it's my mother tongue- as Swiss German also If i can help anything, let me know!
                          peace - and i;m still waiting for your post (ALM- ALMR- SAD_ HM- etc etc........)
                          Thank you and peace peace

                          The German, language should be great asset for you. Most initial work of translation of Arabic grammar was done into German. Even William Wright is mostly translated from Caspari's work into English. You could study and help out.

                          I am at a place where I do not have access to written Quran. Online versions leave out some marks. For example initially, I missed Shadda over Miim in Alif Lam Miim. It was due to pointing out of a reader that I looked it up in written book version. I shall be indebted to him for rest of the life as it confirmed this to be 9th form of verb.

                          If you like please start the thread of other Huroof e Muqtaat as written in print version. I will keep adding my 2 cents as time will permit. I am going back today where I shall be very busy and find little time for any other activity, besides work.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Users