Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Hijab and verse 24:31; explanation without extrapolation

Hijab and verse 24:31; explanation without extrapolation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
42 Posts 12 Posters 747 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    Israfeel
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    salaam brother

    How is a woman suppose to get dressed when going for hajj?

    salaam

    Wa alaikum as salaam

    In hajj women should not cover their face but if there are men who are nearby, then they can cover their face, but the fabric of veil shouldn't touch skin, it should be loosely drawn over, until the men have passed by. This is from an authentic Hadith from our mother of believers Aisha that they would do like this.

    Notice that in Hajj all men dawn the Ihram, which is two pieces of unstitched coarse garments, but women do not. This shows that women's modesty is extremely important, even more important than men's modesty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      farida
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      Wa alaikum as salaam

      In hajj women should not cover their face.....but if there are men who are nearby, then they can cover their face

      salaam

      Thank you

      salaam

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        diamantinehoneybunch
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        Where did the manner God is expecting out of us go?

        Despite having different and conservative or extremist opinions there is no use of bursting out in bad language like this.

        There are maybe even former Sunnis here who shared some of his thinking so it could be like cursing your previous self.

        Remember there is a human behind the nickname Israfeel and so far he behaves well despite his controversial ideas about religion. He says this or that about Quranists but he is at least fairly polite in doing so.

        He has a preconception that people want to look like Hollywood stars and he is entitled to his current state of mind. Putting myself in his place I can understand why he thinks some Quranist women seem like half-naked Hollywood stars and that Satan is driving them.

        No matter of religious view most people are going right to Hell and the derailing here is just another testament to that. This is just the behavior God warns about in His Book and which we must refrain from even for those we consider our "enemies".

        It does not matter if you are believing in God or not as long as you fail at parameter number three of the 'big criteria' you are most likely in bad trouble, ie by not being a righteous person. Yes, being misinformed is one thing. I think people can go to Heaven anyways as long as they fulfill the three criteria Belief in God, belief in eternal existence and being a righteous person. Sadly the third parameter many people forget about and superior knowledge in Quran or any other book cannot solve that unless the person lives as he teaches or is taught.

        Perhaps Israfeel is here to test your Faith. See it that way.

        God bless you that you may show the right islamic nature

        Salaam Man of Faith,

        I have noticed that since a few weeks ago you only find faults and bad qualities in me whenever you reply to me.
        Was everything that I posted before you posted this post useless?

        Regards,
        Yuliana

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          hawk99
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          Peace,

          The debate about 24/31 will continue until folks understand that a woman's modesty is
          cultural and not an injunction for all women to dress alike. The deliberate vagueness
          by God is an indication that 24/31 is not time bound forever but an overall instruction
          to behave and dress decently. I contend that the vagueness allows for cultural differences
          until the end of time.

          peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            huruf
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            I agree that what is acceptable and what is not is a cultural question, but still I think that the aya is amongst other things about modesty the first part which is similar to what is said to the male believers, the rest is nto about modesty but about vanity and self-esteem and self respect.

            Salaam

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Man_of_Faith
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Salaam Yuliana,

              No, I do not. I just reacted on the bad language and personal insults. No more than that. I know this is very common. And I had a feeling of obligation to remind. It has occurred that I have sometimes fallen prey to this trap too.

              God bless you

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                diamantinehoneybunch
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                Salaam Yuliana,

                No, I do not. I just reacted on the bad language and personal insults. No more than that. I know this is very common. And I had a feeling of obligation to remind. It has occurred that I have sometimes fallen prey to this trap too.

                God bless you

                Salaam,

                It's weird because you don't point faults, flaws and bad qualities in Israfeel.
                Why me and only me?

                Why does almost everyone including in real life only find my faults and flaws '( '( '(

                Regards with sadness,
                Yuliana '(

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  hawk99
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  Peace,

                  I agree that modesty in dress and behavior is the aim of 24/31 but each culture
                  of believers knows what is modest as far as their culture is concerned which includes
                  the directives of 24/30-31.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Man_of_Faith
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    Salaam Yuliana,

                    I have not talked about anything personal. It was a general advice I came out with. I noticed the language seemed a bit inappropriate coming from a Muslim's mouth (or fingers) and since I wish you all the best I pointed this out. This certain behavior gives a bad show of those people who have decided to only use the Quran for guidelines. The Quran teaches proper conduct in a very clear manner.

                    Of course we wish to show we are better than those who are sectarian and thus we have to behave better without being arrogant.

                    Aggression is clearly a negative trait of those who believe as well as many other such similar ones as we can see by a little study of Quran.

                    As it seemed, Israfeel only got reasons to despise "Quranists". His arguments must be met with shrewdness not blunt force.

                    God bless you

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mmmm
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      Again I didn't get an answer...if this is about behavior why are certain categories included? Why would you "show off" to your father?
                      Someone said"It is about vanity and self respect, and not about sexual mores.."
                      If this was true would it be logical that there are certain categories in front of whom you don't have to have these good qualities?
                      It is as for example to say don't lie but you can do it to certain categories? Wouldn't this be illogical?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Offline
                        H Offline
                        hawk99
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        Where in Quran it says bestiality is forbidden? Only Hadith has forbidden bestiality, not Quran. So if you reject Hadith and follow Quran, then you can have sex with animals. Is that logical? This why we need Hadith.

                        The eel is not a fish so we can't eat it. Hadith only gives permission for fish.

                        Peace Israfeel,

                        You reason like a Madman, the Quran also does not forbid choking cats to death or
                        having sex with inanimate objects.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          SarahY
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #39

                          A reminder for everyone to stay on topic!

                          Where in Quran it says bestiality is forbidden? Only Hadith has forbidden bestiality, not Quran. So if you reject Hadith and follow Quran, then you can have sex with animals. Is that logical? This why we need Hadith.

                          The eel is not a fish so we can't eat it. Hadith only gives permission for fish.

                          Where does it say it is allowed? if you're trying to be logical, how is it logical to assume it is allowed because it's not written in the way you want? notice the flaws in your questioning. You don't need the Quran to tell you bestiality is forbidden. You'll know what is permissible by understanding nikkah.

                          You don't need hadith to tell you that moreover hadith does NOT have an answer to every question.

                          If you wish to discuss issues with Quran/Hadith please start a new thread/topic and don't make a mockery of Quran because of your bias

                          Salam.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            huruf
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #40

                            Again I didn't get an answer...if this is about behavior why are certain categories included? Why would you "show off" to your father?
                            Someone said"It is about vanity and self respect, and not about sexual mores.."
                            If this was true would it be logical that there are certain categories in front of whom you don't have to have these good qualities?
                            It is as for example to say don't lie but you can do it to certain categories? Wouldn't this be illogical?

                            It makes sense. People with whom you live are not impressed by any showing off one may put up, because at any rate they know one too well and too intimately to be susceptible or impressed by that kind of thing coming from a person with whom they have intimacy. As they saying goes nobody is an extraordinary person in front of his butler. On the other hand women are also forbidden to show off in front of other women who are not familiar, which goes to show that it is not about arousing men, that is, it is not about sexual mores. Unless it is thought that it is meant for homosexuals but in that case men should also be adviced not to show off in front of men, since they would be enticing them sexually. But not showing off in front of women is about avoiding vanity, provokation and competing. Or, if it were about sexual mores and covering this or that part of the body, why should be commanded the same degree of sexual caution in front of women as in front of men. What is, for a woman, in uncovering most of the body in fron of other women? Would other women be aroused, while intimate women wouldn't?

                            Salaam

                            Salaam

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Complex
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #41

                              Peace,

                              The debate about 24/31 will continue until folks understand that a woman's modesty is
                              cultural and not an injunction for all women to dress alike. The deliberate vagueness
                              by God is an indication that 24/31 is not time bound forever but an overall instruction
                              to behave and dress decently. I contend that the vagueness allows for cultural differences
                              until the end of time.

                              peace

                              This is the perfect answer.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Complex
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #42

                                Peace Israfeel,

                                You reason like a Madman, the Quran also does not forbid choking cats to death or
                                having sex with inanimate objects.

                                Don't bother with him. What I've noticed is 'hadithist' need everything spoon fed to them. It is like they've never heard of common sense.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users