will it be possible for any other country to land on moon.
-
Hi,
If this is what you call evidence, then I can not only prove for you the moon landing, but also the monster of loch ness, aliens, santa, dragons, etc.
You might be correct Ben, my Charavarty farmas theory might go wrong but what about the quraninc verses
-
Read this Did Prophet Muhammad really split the moon according to the Glorious Quran and the Hadiths? Noble Verse 1759 says no he didn't!
http//www.answering-christianity.com/did_prophet_muhammad_split_moon.htm
you easily jump out of the topic , LITW
in order to prove your numeric theory to be correct , first you have the prove that moon landing was not a hoax .first prove that and pl dont give a link .i want your own conclusions and proofs .it is better to be original rather being a a parrot -
you easily jump out of the topic , LITW
in order to prove your numeric theory to be correct , first you have the prove that moon landing was not a hoax .first prove that and pl dont give a link .i want your own conclusions and proofs .it is better to be original rather being a a parrotWait... You believe in the unseen but when I post you an undeniable proof from the Qur'an itself about the Moon landing you says LALALALLALALALA.
For the sake of the argument I will concede you man never moon-landed.
Then EXPLAIN why exactly there are 1389 verses and not, 1207 or 235.
Science suport me "In 2012, images were released showing five of the six Apollo missions' American flags erected on the Moon still standing (the Apollo 11 flag was accidentally blown over by the takeoff rocket's exhaust, but is still there)" ---> https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories
Why people aren't there, in Moon right now? you ask... Because what is the interest?!
-
Salam, somehow moon landing conspiracy became related to anti western dogma. Yes western world did a lot of wrong things in the past, but going to the moon was a scientific achievement. I have friends in NASA and SPACEX. It is scientifically possible and engineering wise feasible to send any living creature to moon. The only thing they don't go to the moon again is the safety because of prior mission risks.
-
Salam, somehow moon landing conspiracy became related to anti western dogma. Yes western world did a lot of wrong things in the past, but going to the moon was a scientific achievement. I have friends in NASA and SPACEX. It is scientifically possible and engineering wise feasible to send any living creature to moon. The only thing they don't go to the moon again is the safety because of prior mission risks.
Yes it's no longer a "Rocket Science" regarding the technicality on how to send human or other earth natived living animal to the moon.
Besides the risk the other component to the equation is cost..
If you want to lower the risk then the cost will goes up exponentially..Sending lightweight probe / robot (which doesn't require Oxygen, Water or Food) to moon / space / other planet is much better due to it's much lower cost. And they can do many many things which is impossible for human to do..
Plus there is no need for a return trip to earth..The same thing goes on exploration to the (deep) sea.. rather than building a costly submarine to carry human to the depth of the sea, it's better and cheaper to send robot or undersea probe to explore the deep sea.
-
Yes it's no longer a "Rocket Science" regarding the technicality on how to send human or other earth natived living animal to the moon.
Except for the flat earth society. hmm
-
Wait... You believe in the unseen but when I post you an undeniable proof from the Qur'an itself about the Moon landing you says LALALALLALALALA.
For the sake of the argument I will concede you man never moon-landed.
Then EXPLAIN why exactly there are 1389 verses and not, 1207 or 235.
If you want stick to your by hook or by crook logic then my answer is .......
Quran is a true guidance from the ALLAH subhnavtala and it always guides us to a correct path . this coincidence signals us about the hoax moon landing by US rather it is not proving the moon landing itself and it can treated as sign of aakhira .
one more thing to ponder about this ayah 54.01 is that ,right now we have two views about moon landing. is it this split regarding the moon the ayah was talking about ? ......well this is my wild speculation -
If you want stick to your by hook or by crook logic then my answer is .......
Quran is a true guidance from the ALLAH subhnavtala and it always guides us to a correct path . this coincidence signals us about the hoax moon landing by US rather it is not proving the moon landing itself and it can treated as sign of aakhira .
one more thing to ponder about this ayah 54.01 is that ,right now we have two views about moon landing. is it this split regarding the moon the ayah was talking about ? ......well this is my wild speculationThere is no coincidences in the Qur'an, every word and sentence have his significance.
Even if the man never landed in the Moon, it still be a prophecy.
Advice to you Parvez I strong advice you to register to a more appropriate Forum for people who believe in flat earths.... You will join people who have an affinity with the great scholars of this Ummah, like Albani, Baaz, ibn al-Uthaymn, Taimiyya , etc like this one http//www.salafitalk.com/forum.php
-
The same thing goes on exploration to the (deep) sea.. rather than building a costly submarine to carry human to the depth of the sea, it's better and cheaper to send robot or undersea probe to explore the deep sea.
aww i remember, i was watching a documentry deep sea creatures it was amazing , before 1970 it was almost impossible for human to go under deep sea where the pressure of water weight will mess you up, so after advancement in tecnology they achieve it and they feel really scared while exploring deep sea where spectrum of light cannot cross, but here i must say subhanAllah there are creations(aquqatic animals) there that produce their own light , i was amazed , the creatures i see i only say one thing at that time, its only Allah who can make these creatures, when the first mission of deep sea happen they was thhinking no sign of life can exist under sea becoz due to the pressure of water underneath, but they see lot of living creatures with tremendous features,
-
675
Walaqad zayyanna alssamaa alddunya bimasabeeha wajaAAalnaha rujooman lilshshayateeni waaAAtadna lahum AAathaba alssaAAeeri
And certainly We have beautified the heaven nearest with lamps, and We have made them (as) missiles for the devils, and We have prepared for them punishment (of) the Blaze.
-
What kind of missiles, HP_TECH? And who are those devils?
-
675
Walaqad zayyanna alssamaa alddunya bimasabeeha wajaAAalnaha rujooman lilshshayateeni waaAAtadna lahum AAathaba alssaAAeeri
And certainly We have beautified the heaven nearest with lamps, and We have made them (as) missiles for the devils, and We have prepared for them punishment (of) the Blaze.
Hi,
675 "...We have made them..."
I read it like this "...We made her..." where "her = samaa"
-
675
Walaqad zayyanna alssamaa alddunya bimasabeeha wajaAAalnaha rujooman lilshshayateeni waaAAtadna lahum AAathaba alssaAAeeri
And certainly We have beautified the heaven nearest with lamps, and We have made them (as) missiles for the devils, and We have prepared for them punishment (of) the Blaze.
Exactly HP_T ,this was the verse that is mention in that video in my post below
;;;;;;;;;
watch this video(click) at least for 10 mins and you will wonder about the mention of the verse 55.35.i think this is mention at 9.20th minute
-
There is no coincidences in the Qur'an, every word and sentence have his significance.
Even if the man never landed in the Moon, it still be a prophecy.
It is a coincidence. Understand, there are newsworthy events every day. There are a lot of verses in the Quran. With such a high sample size, coincidences are bound to happen.Moreover .in the same year ,Russia made 5 unsuccessful lunar unmanned landings and one successful unmanned landing .your so called manned lunar landing was not the only one . do you have any connection regarding all these 7 landing in Quran .Just give me another verse to support all these seven lunar missions .
Advice to you Parvez I strong advice you to register to a more appropriate Forum for people who believe in flat earths.... You will join people who have an affinity with the great scholars of this Ummah, like Albani, Baaz, ibn al-Uthaymn, Taimiyya , etc like this one http//www.salafitalk.com/forum.php
your advice worth rotfl
i somehow have a feeling that you are brand ambassador for all salafi links you keep on posting here on this forum .you simply spam each and every of your post by a salafi link .i think, if i am correct your salafi inks may exceed your number of posts you made here .
watch out this formula
salafi links posted by you > 167 (your total number of posts here on FM).....keep it on ....good job LITW bravo -
It is a coincidence
Yeah, surely )
Understand, there are newsworthy events every day. There are a lot of verses in the Quran. With such a high sample size, coincidences are bound to happen. Moreover .in the same year ,Russia made 5 unsuccessful lunar unmanned landings and one successful unmanned landing .your so called manned lunar landing was not the only one . do you have any connection regarding all these 7 landing in Quran .Just give me another verse to support all these seven lunar missions .your advice worth rotfl
Who says that the Qur'an must contains verses related to every lunar missions? I think that with one is more than enough
rotfl
-
word zeena derived from zeenat which means decorated, beautified, adorn,
for urdu speakers, zeenat mean, araish, husun o singhar, banawat, etc something like that.
peace
-
word zeena derived from zeenat which means decorated, beautified, adorn,
for urdu speakers, zeenat mean, araish, husun o singhar, banawat, etc something like that.
peace
Imran are you Pakistani? I thought you was Egyptian wow
-
You read it wrong.
What you say makes absolutely no sense.
I don't get why you are trying to reword this very clear ayaat...
Hi,
To be exact it is referring to "alssamaa alddunya"
675
RED HA is in terms of mas/fem a feminine word/expression and singular. There are not much options to choose from than "alssamaa alddunya".
Still not agreeing?
peace