Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Hafs or Warsh

Hafs or Warsh

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
99 Posts 7 Posters 3.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Noon_waalqalami
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    Peace, last post need to take a break...

    2187

    Why do I think this verse is indicating to us how to spell the letter N in 681?
    There are 14 different initial letters used in Qoran, this verse is screaming N the initial

    681 noon wal-qalami/and the pen and what yasurna/they write being (i.e. writing)

    Furthermore, does not spell N (noon) rather parse the word ?

    2187 l-nuni/the noon being

    the
    N (noon)
    being (i.e. so-called)

    Likewise, see example ?

    4917 yamunnna/favored being ... yamunnu/favored

    What is your theory, understanding on these differences?

    Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

    482 do so not they reflecting the qur?an/recitation and in case be from near/with other than the god surely found they of in it ikhtilafan/divergences of (single occurrence) kathiran/much of (3+)

    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/50/vers/29?handschrift=163

    https//i.postimg.cc/nL6Rn8s7/ch50v14-34.jpg

    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/50/vers/29?handschrift=32

    https//i.postimg.cc/0j9CN996/ch50v26-43.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      good_logic
      wrote on last edited by
      #86

      Peace Noon.
      Common brother, the "being" word is made up here i
      2187 l-nuni/the noon being

      the
      N (noon)
      being (i.e. so-called)

      So-called what? There is no word "being" in the verse. The word in the verse just means the letter N .
      There is no relation to 4917 yamunnna/favored being ... yamunnu/favoured.

      Enjoy your break brother.
      GOD bless you.
      Peace.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Offline
        I Offline
        ibn_a
        wrote on last edited by
        #87

        Salaam,

        Peace, last post need to take a break...

        Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

        482 do so not they reflecting the qur?an/recitation and in case be from near/with other than the god surely found they of in it ikhtilafan/divergences of (single occurrence) kathiran/much of (3+)

        When you have time, please share what you consider as consistent "oldest manuscripts" that you are referring to.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Noon_waalqalami
          wrote on last edited by
          #88

          When you have time, please share what you consider as consistent "oldest manuscripts" that you are referring to.

          Peace gave numerous examples including ten consistently spelled not half spelled (same word).

          1. 1317 the examples

          2. 1425 the examples

          3. 1445 the examples

          4. 1674 the examples

          5. 1748 the examples

          6. 259 the examples

          7. 2435 the examples

          8. 2539 the examples

          9. 2943 the examples

          10. 5921 the examples

          1317 l-amthla/the examples
          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/13/vers/17?handschrift=13
          https//i.postimg.cc/j2r4kf5J/ch13v12-v23.jpg

          1674 l-amthla/the examples
          UNESCO ?Memory of the World? Program ?San?a Manuscripts CD First AH 1673-89
          https//i.postimg.cc/SQCBN0Bm/ch16v73-89.jpg

          1748 l-amthla/the examples
          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/17/vers/49?handschrift=107
          https//i.postimg.cc/YqZJ2nh6/ch17v46-56.jpg

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            ibn_a
            wrote on last edited by
            #89

            Salaam,

            peace gl, your infatuation with nineteen is making you lose sense of basic logic.
            it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

            NOT consistent extra alif 130140500130 in current manuscript/s and should be...

            1317 ... yaribu/striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
            1425 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
            1445 ... waarabn/and strike we of for you l-amthla/the examples
            1674 so not tarib/thou strike ye of to god l-amthla/the examples
            1748 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of

            These verses consistent in current manuscript/s (no extra alif) as in oldest manuscripts...

            259 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of
            2435 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
            2539 ... arabn/strike we of to him l-amthla/the examples
            2943 and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind and not understand them except the knowing
            5921 ... and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind perhaps they reflecting

            Some examples of differences in the spelling of words from what you call " consistent oldest manuscripts".

            Example

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/218/handschrift/163
            line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/7/vers/56/handschrift/163
            line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/73/handschrift/163
            line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/30/vers/50?handschrift=107
            line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

            -- Compare to

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/107?handschrift=163
            line 21 - Mercy / Grace of God

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/39/vers/53?handschrift=163
            line 23-24 - Mercy / Grace of God

            Example

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/8/vers/38?handschrift=163
            line 20-21 - Way (of) the former (people)

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/35/vers/43?handschrift=163
            line 19-20 - Way (of) the former (people)

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/40/vers/85?handschrift=163
            line 19-20 ( the) Way (of) Allah

            -- Compare to

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/15/vers/13?handschrift=163
            line 9 - Way (of) the former (people)

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/18/vers/55?handschrift=163
            line 3 - Way (of) the former (people)

            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/33/vers/38?handschrift=107
            last line ( the) Way (of) Allah


            I think that the particular spelling of some words in the Quran we have today is not inconsistent, it is for a purpose and in time the purpose will be revealed by God.

            Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

            There is no logique in saying that the scribes changed the spelling of the word Ibraheem only in chapter 2 and not in the rest of the Quran, they must have had a source for these particular spellings.

            Cautious when saying "inconsistent" about the current manuscript especially when in condradiction with Quran veses referring to the the preservation of the Quran by God.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #90

              Some examples of differences in the spelling of words from what you call " consistent oldest manuscripts".

              Example

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/218/handschrift/163
              line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/7/vers/56/handschrift/163
              line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/73/handschrift/163
              line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/30/vers/50?handschrift=107
              line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

              -- Compare to

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/107?handschrift=163
              line 21 - Mercy / Grace of God

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/39/vers/53?handschrift=163
              line 23-24 - Mercy / Grace of God

              peace, same in ?new? manuscripts slight distinction verb & verbal noun from root raima/mercy

              3938 ? biramatin/in mercy its shall they with-holders ramatihi/mercy his ?

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/39/vers/38/handschrift/163

              https//i.postimg.cc/ZKkw3BwB/ch39v33-44.jpg

              Example

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/8/vers/38?handschrift=163
              line 20-21 - Way (of) the former (people)

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/35/vers/43?handschrift=163
              line 19-20 - Way (of) the former (people)

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/40/vers/85?handschrift=163
              line 19-20 ( the) Way (of) Allah

              -- Compare to

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/15/vers/13?handschrift=163
              line 9 - Way (of) the former (people)

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/18/vers/55?handschrift=163
              line 3 - Way (of) the former (people)

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/33/vers/38?handschrift=107
              last line ( the) Way (of) Allah

              again same in ?new? manuscripts slight nuance/distinction ?

              1777 sunnata/manner from hence sent we of before you from messengers ours and not thou find lisunnatina/to manner its ours turning

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/17/vers/77/handschrift/163

              https//i.postimg.cc/Dzqvvbpr/ch17v67-79.jpg

              Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

              likewise it was already shown to you numerous times that the oldest manuscripts "consistently" spelled abraham (same word/person) in all chapters and chapter 2 "inconsistency" appears ~200+ years afterwards and likewise the new verse arrangement separating 18 of ?29? initialed chapters into separate verses, etc.

              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/124?handschrift=163

              https//i.postimg.cc/XYL4G0ch/ch2v121-132.jpg

              1. 21 alif lam meem such the book not doubt in it guidance for the righteous
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/1?handschrift=116

              2. 31 alif lam meem the god not deity except he the alive the sustainer
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/1/handschrift/116

              3. 71 alif lam meem saad book descends to you so not beeth in breast your critical from it to thou warn with it and reminder to the believers
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/7/vers/1/handschrift/163

              4. 101 alif lam ra those signs the book the wise

              5. 111 alif lam ra book are perfected signs/verses its furthermore explained from one who wise aware

              6. 121 alif lam ra those signs the book the clear

              7. 131 alif lam meem ra those signs the book and the which descends to you from lord your the truth and however more the humankind not believing

              8. 141 alif lam ra book descends we it to you that thou evict the humankind from the darkness to the light by permission lord theirs to path the mighty the praiseworthy

              9. 151 alif lam ra those signs the book and qur?an/recitation clear

              10. 191 kaaf ha ya ain saad remembrance mercy lord your devotee his zakariyya
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/19/vers/1/handschrift/163

              11. 201 ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an/recitation that thou agonize
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1/handschrift/163

              12. 261 ta seen mim those signs the book the clear
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/26/vers/1/handschrift/163

              13. 271 ta seen those signs the qur?an/recitation and book clear

              14. 281 ta seen mim those signs the book the clear
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/28/vers/1?handschrift=107

              15. 291 alif lam meem do calculate the humankind that left they of that speaketh they of believe we of and they not tested being
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/29/vers/1/handschrift/107

              16. 301 alif lam meem ghalabat/triumph the romans
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/30/vers/1/handschrift/107

              17. 311 alif lam meem those signs the book the wise
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/31/vers/1/handschrift/107

              18. 321 alif lam meem revelation the book not doubt in it from lord the world?s inhabitants
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/32/vers/1/handschrift/107

              19. 361 ya seen and the qur?an/recitation the wise
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/36/vers/1/handschrift/107

              20. 381 saad and the qur?an/recitation owner the reminder

              21. 401 ha meem revelation the book from the god the mighty the knower
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/40/vers/1?handschrift=163

              22. 411 ha meem revelation from the almighty the merciful
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/41/vers/1/handschrift/163

              23. 421 ha meem ayn seen qaf like such inspired to you and toward the ones from before you the god the mighty the wise
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/42/vers/1/handschrift/163

              24. 431 ha meem and the book the clear
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/43/vers/1?handschrift=163

              25. 441 ha meem and the book the clear
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/44/vers/1/handschrift/163

              26. 451 ha meem revelation the book from the god the mighty the wise
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/45/vers/1/handschrift/163

              27. 461 ha meem revelation the book from the god the mighty the wise
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/46/vers/1/handschrift/163

              28. 501 qaf and the qur?an/recitation the glorious

              29. 681 noon wal-qalami/and the pen and what they write being

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Offline
                I Offline
                ibn_a
                wrote on last edited by
                #91

                Salaam,

                it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

                • I gave you some examples of differences in spelling of words from what you consider" consistent oldest manuscripts"

                • The particular spelling in current manuscript and in some older manuscripts is for a purpose and is not the result of inconsistency,
                  otherwise this would condradict with Quran verses referring to the the preservation of the Quran by God.

                likewise it was already shown to you numerous times that the oldest manuscripts "consistently" spelled abraham (same word/person) in all chapters and chapter 2 "inconsistency" appears ~200+ years afterwards and likewise the new verse arrangement separating 18 of 29 initialed chapters into separate verses, etc.

                There is no logique in changing the spelling only in chapter 2 for the word Ibraheem,
                and changing the arrangement of the initialed chapters only in 19 chapters and not in the rest of the 29 initialed chapters,
                they must have had a source for these particular spellings and arrangement of verses.

                Allah knows best.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I Offline
                  I Offline
                  ibn_a
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #92

                  Salaam,

                  Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

                  Another example of what you consider " inconsistent" from what you consider "consistent oldest manuscripts"

                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/27?handschrift=163

                  Manuscript line 7

                  Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma naraka illa basharan mithlana wama naraka ittabaAAaka illa allatheena hum arathiluna badiya alrra/yi wama nara lakum AAalayna min fadlin bal nathunnukum kathibeena

                  So said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved from his people, "Not we see you but a man like us, and not we see you followed except those who (are) the lowest of us immature in opinion. And not we see in you over us any merit; nay, we think you (are) liars."

                  compare to

                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/23/vers/24?handschrift=163

                  Manuscript line 2 with an extra Waw between the letter Laam and the letter Alif

                  Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma hatha illa basharun mithlukum yureedu an yatafaddala AAalaykum walaw shaa Allahu laanzala mala-ikatan ma samiAAna bihatha fee aba-ina al-awwaleena

                  But said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved among his people, "This is not but a man like you, he wishes to assert (his) superiority over you, and if Allah had willed surely He (would have) sent down Angels. Not we heard of this from our forefathers.

                  I believe that the current manuscript with the particular spelling of some words is the same as the original manuscript.
                  And that in some other manuscripts some of this particular spelling was lost by some scribes thinking that the same words should be spelled the same way,
                  not aware that this particular spelling was intended for a purpose.
                  Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                  Allah knows best.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #93
                    • I gave you some examples of differences in spelling of words from what you consider" consistent oldest manuscripts"

                    peace, again you gave examples same root slight nuance of words spelled consistently the same in the oldest and newest manuscripts ? and again, see usage each word slightly distinct in the same verse.

                    1777 sunnata/mannerism ... lisunnatina/to manner it ours
                    3938 biramatin/in mercy its ... ramatihi/mercy it his

                    Furthermore these are consistent and spelled exactly the same each occurrence.

                    the examples
                    abraham (again spelled consistently with ch 2 in oldest manuscripts)

                    Likewise clear looking at oldest manuscripts preserved in German, French, and British Library?s etc., that verse # s are ?man-made? i.e. no consistency and probably used by scribes back then as check-sum arrangement/s.

                    The British Library?s oldest Qur?an manuscript now online
                    http//britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/asian-and-african/2016/04/the-british-librarys-oldest-quran-manuscript-now-online.html

                    http//www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=or_2165_fs001r

                    https//i.postimg.cc/8cVXRQc2/ch35v40-ch36v4.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #94

                      Another example of what you consider " inconsistent" from what you consider "consistent oldest manuscripts"

                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/27?handschrift=163

                      Manuscript line 7

                      Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma naraka illa basharan mithlana wama naraka ittabaAAaka illa allatheena hum arathiluna badiya alrra/yi wama nara lakum AAalayna min fadlin bal nathunnukum kathibeena

                      compare to

                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/23/vers/24?handschrift=163

                      Manuscript line 2 with an extra Waw between the letter Laam and the letter Alif

                      Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma hatha illa basharun mithlukum yureedu an yatafaddala AAalaykum walaw shaa Allahu laanzala mala-ikatan ma samiAAna bihatha fee aba-ina al-awwaleena

                      Allah knows best.

                      likewise perhaps study/read carefully less counting stuff you'll see it is correct.
                      qur'an to write "they" trailing alif dropped insert (done for numerous words).

                      https//free-minds.org/quran/A/23#24

                      https//quran.com/23/24?translations=20

                      1127 so said the council of the ones reject they of from folk his
                      2324 so said the council they of the ones reject they of
                      2333 and said the council of from folk his the ones reject they of

                      https//i.postimg.cc/XNcpySrb/ch23v23-35.jpg

                      peace!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Offline
                        I Offline
                        ibn_a
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #95

                        Salaam,

                        likewise perhaps study/read carefully less counting stuff you'll see it is correct.
                        qur'an to write "they" trailing alif dropped insert (done for numerous words).

                        https//free-minds.org/quran/A/23#24

                        https//quran.com/23/24?translations=20

                        1127 so said the council of the ones reject they of from folk his
                        2324 so said the council they of the ones reject they of
                        2333 and said the council of from folk his the ones reject they of

                        For me the current manuscript is correct, preserved by God, and the particular spelling is intended for a purpose

                        I think that the particular spelling of some words in the Quran we have today is not inconsistent, it is for a purpose and in time the purpose will be revealed by God.

                        Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                        There is no logique in saying that the scribes changed the spelling of the word Ibraheem only in chapter 2 and not in the rest of the Quran, they must have had a source for these particular spellings.

                        Cautious when saying "inconsistent" about the current manuscript especially when in condradiction with Quran veses referring to the the preservation of the Quran by God.

                        It was your claim about inconsistencies

                        it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                        Why do you consider this with an extra alif NOT consistent

                        it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                        NOT consistent extra alif 130140500130 in current manuscript/s and should be...

                        1317 ... yaribu/striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                        1425 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                        1445 ... waarabn/and strike we of for you l-amthla/the examples
                        1674 so not tarib/thou strike ye of to god l-amthla/the examples
                        1748 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of

                        These verses consistent in current manuscript/s (no extra alif) as in oldest manuscripts...

                        259 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of
                        2435 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                        2539 ... arabn/strike we of to him l-amthla/the examples
                        2943 and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind and not understand them except the knowing
                        5921 ... and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind perhaps they reflecting

                        and consider this with an extra Waw consistent

                        Salaam,

                        Another example of what you consider " inconsistent" from what you consider "consistent oldest manuscripts"

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/27?handschrift=163

                        Manuscript line 7

                        Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma naraka illa basharan mithlana wama naraka ittabaAAaka illa allatheena hum arathiluna badiya alrra/yi wama nara lakum AAalayna min fadlin bal nathunnukum kathibeena

                        So said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved from his people, "Not we see you but a man like us, and not we see you followed except those who (are) the lowest of us immature in opinion. And not we see in you over us any merit; nay, we think you (are) liars."

                        compare to

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/23/vers/24?handschrift=163

                        Manuscript line 2 with an extra Waw between the letter Laam and the letter Alif

                        Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma hatha illa basharun mithlukum yureedu an yatafaddala AAalaykum walaw shaa Allahu laanzala mala-ikatan ma samiAAna bihatha fee aba-ina al-awwaleena

                        But said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved among his people, "This is not but a man like you, he wishes to assert (his) superiority over you, and if Allah had willed surely He (would have) sent down Angels. Not we heard of this from our forefathers.

                        I believe that the current manuscript with the particular spelling of some words is the same as the original manuscript.
                        And that in some other manuscripts some of this particular spelling was lost by some scribes thinking that the same words should be spelled the same way,
                        not aware that this particular spelling was intended for a purpose.
                        Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                        Allah knows best.

                        7228

                        LiyaAAlama an qad ablaghoo risalati rabbihim waahata bima ladayhim waahsa kulla shayin AAadadan

                        That He may make evident that indeed, they have conveyed (the) Messages (of) their Lord; and He has encompassed what (is) with them and He takes account (of) all things (in) number."

                        Allah knows best.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #96

                          For me the current manuscript is correct, preserved by God, and the particular spelling is intended for a purpose
                          and consider this with an extra Waw consistent

                          7228

                          peace, not sure which quran (or from which numerology site) you are using since current and oldest manuscripts spell it correctly and grammatically etc., already explained and you ignore.

                          https//free-minds.org/quran/A/23#24

                          https//quran.com/23/24?translations=20

                          1127 so said the council of the ones reject they of from folk his
                          2324 so said the council they of the ones reject they of
                          2333 and said the council of from folk his the ones reject they of

                          Those infatuated with number want to use simpleton numerology/mindless counting to change the text and ignore and/or override the preserved record from close to the time of revelation? another example.

                          https//i.postimg.cc/Kv0Y2VGD/ch23v14-24.jpg

                          https//i.postimg.cc/Qt9kr1Zj/ch72v18-ch73v9.jpg

                          have nice life!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • I Offline
                            I Offline
                            ibn_a
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #97

                            Salaam,

                            When you say " current manuscript/s not consistent ".

                            it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                            NOT consistent extra alif 130140500130 in current manuscript/s and should be...

                            1317 ... yaribu/striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                            1425 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                            1445 ... waarabn/and strike we of for you l-amthla/the examples
                            1674 so not tarib/thou strike ye of to god l-amthla/the examples
                            1748 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of

                            These verses consistent in current manuscript/s (no extra alif) as in oldest manuscripts...

                            259 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of
                            2435 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                            2539 ... arabn/strike we of to him l-amthla/the examples
                            2943 and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind and not understand them except the knowing
                            5921 ... and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind perhaps they reflecting

                            Peace, not hafs/warsh rather compare oldest manuscripts to new (obvious consistency errors).

                            3182 such in what have set forth hands yours and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness (with alif) to the devotees?

                            851 such in what have set forth hands yours and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness (no alif?) to the devotees?

                            Then you have to come up with a logical explanation for this

                            159 Indeed, We We have sent down the Reminder, and indeed, We of it (are) surely Guardians.

                            4141 Indeed, those who disbelieve in the Reminder when it comes to them. And indeed, it (is) surely a Book mighty.
                            4142 Not comes to it the falsehood from before it and not from behind it. A Revelation from (the) All-Wise, (the) Praiseworthy.

                            5677 Indeed, it (is) surely, a Quran noble,
                            5678 In a Book well-guarded

                            7228 So as to make manifest that they have delivered the messages of their Lord, and He encompasses all that is with them, and He has counted everything in numbers.

                            8521 Nay! It (is) a Quran Glorious,
                            8522 In a Tablet, Guarded.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #98

                              Then you have to come up with a logical explanation for this

                              159 Indeed, We We have sent down the Reminder, and indeed, We of it (are) surely Guardians.

                              4141 Indeed, those who disbelieve in the Reminder when it comes to them. And indeed, it (is) surely a Book mighty.
                              4142 Not comes to it the falsehood from before it and not from behind it. A Revelation from (the) All-Wise, (the) Praiseworthy.

                              5677 Indeed, it (is) surely, a Quran noble,
                              5678 In a Book well-guarded

                              7228 So as to make manifest that they have delivered the messages of their Lord, and He encompasses all that is with them, and He has counted everything in numbers.

                              8521 Nay! It (is) a Quran Glorious,
                              8522 In a Tablet, Guarded.

                              Peace not about guarding text which anyone can change, edit, delete, etc. at any time or guarding text ?before it? is written (irrational!) rather ?the reminder? does not contain falsehood ?before it? i.e. pertaining to prior events mentioned and neither future events ?behind it? foretold to occur.

                              Likewise not about infactuation with certain ?number/s? which are counteless.

                              92 naturally occurring elements
                              2.98 * (10^4) = 29,800 meters/sec speed of the earth in orbit floating around the sun
                              2 * (10^5) = 200,000 meters/sec speed solar system in orbit around milky way galaxy

                              2130-33 do they not see the ones reject they of anna (i.e. ?an inna?/that indeed) the heavens and the land be dual sewn of so ripped we them dual and made we of from the water each thing live then so not believing and made we of in the land firm peaks that shake with them and made we of therein ravine of paths of perhaps they guided being and made we of the heaven/sky roof of safeguard of and they about signs its away turning and he the one creation of the night and the daytime and the sun and the moon each (i.e. all prior mentioned above) in vessel sailing/floating

                              http//d1jqu7g1y74ds1.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/tumblr_mj0vvcqnZx1qdlh1io1_400.gif

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • I Offline
                                I Offline
                                ibn_a
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #99

                                Salaam,

                                Peace not about guarding text which anyone can change, edit, delete, etc. at any time or guarding text ?before it? is written (irrational!) rather ?the reminder? does not contain falsehood ?before it? i.e. pertaining to prior events mentioned and neither future events ?behind it? foretold to occur.

                                Likewise not about infactuation with certain ?number/s? which are counteless.

                                • Other translations for " bayni yadayhi " before it / openly / presently

                                • Doesn't the red text contradict the blue text ?
                                  If no certainty about the preservation of the text, how to be certain about the events it mentions ? ( change, edit, delete, etc.)

                                Likewise not about infactuation with certain ?number/s? which are counteless.

                                92 naturally occurring elements
                                2.98 * (10^4) = 29,800 meters/sec speed of the earth in orbit floating around the sun
                                2 * (10^5) = 200,000 meters/sec speed solar system in orbit around milky way galaxy

                                2130-33 do they not see the ones reject they of anna (i.e. ?an inna?/that indeed) the heavens and the land be dual sewn of so ripped we them dual and made we of from the water each thing live then so not believing and made we of in the land firm peaks that shake with them and made we of therein ravine of paths of perhaps they guided being and made we of the heaven/sky roof of safeguard of and they about signs its away turning and he the one creation of the night and the daytime and the sun and the moon each (i.e. all prior mentioned above) in vessel sailing/floating

                                It would be more relevant to share your translation of these verses

                                159 Inna nahnu nazzalna alththikra wa-inna lahu lahafithoona

                                4141 Inna allatheena kafaroo bialththikri lamma jaahum wa-innahu lakitabun AAazeezun.
                                4142 La ya teehi albatilu min bayni yadayhi wala min khalfihi tanzeelun min hakeemin hameedin

                                5677 Innahu laqur-anun kareemun,
                                5678 Fee kitabin maknoonin.

                                7228 LiyaAAlama an qad ablaghoo risalati rabbihim waahata bima ladayhim waahsa kulla shayin AAadadan.

                                8521 Bal huwa qur-anun majeedun,
                                8522 Fee lawhin mahfoothin.

                                Allah knows best.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users