Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 165.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #670

    Quote
    Quote from Mazhar on Today at 050121 PM
    It is NOT masculine plural.
    Please take some little time to study about broken plurals.

    http//corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=233#(22333)

    It is incorrect entry. Kais has poor knowledge of Arabic grammar. He is simply computer expert. Hundreds of mistakes I corrected for him.

    Correct your perception, read about it in the Article at Para 29

    http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

    Have you corrected your understanding about this noun. Unless you study about nouns in Arabic, pronouns, Relative nouns, gender is singular nouns and gender in plural nouns, and then learn anaphora resolution, till then you will keep wandering.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #671

      Now it is total mockery.

      Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

      It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

      IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
      IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
      IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
      IF 3+ daughters they get 2/3
      2/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

      now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

      I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

      walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        Noon_waalqalami
        wrote on last edited by
        #672

        "To the male the share of the two females" (also for patriarchal reasons?) where is it in your table ?

        peace, doesn't say male always gets twice each female rather to the male/s = exactly two females (hence two have to be present to apply)

        https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

        https//i.postimg.cc/D0vSsLwp/inheritance1.jpg

        https//i.postimg.cc/XYf0Mh8F/inheritance2.jpg

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #673

          Quote from Mazhar on Today at 052319 AM
          Now it is total mockery.

          Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

          It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

          IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
          IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
          IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
          IF 3+ daughters they get 2/3
          2/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

          now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

          I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

          walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

          What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            Noon_waalqalami
            wrote on last edited by
            #674

            What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

            as predicted clueless ran away/dodged simple question to allocate parents and daughter?

            2233
            not made to suffer parent (maternal) biwaladiha/in (due to) child hers
            and not parent (paternal) to him biwaladihi/in (due to) child his

            411
            and to parents two his (said person) to each one of them dual the sixth (1/6) from what left if be for him walad/child
            so if not beeth for him (said person) walad/child and inherit him parents dual his so to mother his the third (1/3)

            6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad/offspring and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

            1977 have so seen thou the one reject in signs ours and said surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring of

            3133 O you the humankind heeds ye of lord yours and fears ye of day of not availed parent about waladihi/offspring his

            723 and indeed he exalted majesty lord ours not has taken companion his and not waladan/offspring of

            again, by translating walad/son (erroneous!) you ignorantly attributed to the almighty having daughters!

            peace!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #675

              Quote from Mazhar on Today at 123126 PM
              What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

              as predicted clueless ran away/dodged simple question to allocate parents and daughter?

              2233
              not made to suffer parent (maternal) biwaladiha/in (due to) child hers
              and not parent (paternal) to him biwaladihi/in (due to) child his

              411
              and to parents two his (said person) to each one of them dual the sixth (1/6) from what left if be for him walad/child
              so if not beeth for him (said person) walad/child and inherit him parents dual his so to mother his the third (1/3)

              6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad/offspring and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

              1977 have so seen thou the one reject in signs ours and said surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring of

              3133 O you the humankind heeds ye of lord yours and fears ye of day of not availed parent about waladihi/offspring his

              723 and indeed he exalted majesty lord ours not has taken companion his and not waladan/offspring of

              again, by translating walad/son (erroneous!) you ignorantly attributed to the almighty having daughters!

              peace!

              Is it ran away by me or you.

              You explain not what you mean by child and which Arabic word you have translated as child.

              child
              /tld/
              noun
              a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.
              "she'd been playing tennis since she was a child"
              synonyms youngster, young one, little one, boy, girl; More
              a son or daughter of any age.
              "when children leave home, parents can feel somewhat redundant"
              an immature or irresponsible person.
              "she's such a child!"

              Just clarify and stupidities will start emerging.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #676

                It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

                IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
                IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
                IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
                IF 3+ daughters they get 2/3
                2/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

                now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

                I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

                walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

                The bold is allocation by you NOT by Qur'an. See what Qur'an allocated to One Female.

                http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11o.gif

                And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half of that which the deceased has left is allocated for her. (Refer 411)

                I advised you to study about nouns and Anaphor resolution.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Noon_waalqalami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #677

                  topic is beyond your comprehension (femalemale ratios) peace and good bye!

                  Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

                  https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                  Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

                  https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #678

                    Noon. sorry now you have lost your balance. You have understood how stupid idea you have been following for many years..

                    You are not able to clarify one point which you stupidly thought the premises. What is Child in your table. Is it is she, or is it he, is it minor, or grown up.

                    Answer and avoid nonsense.

                    Re Inheritance according to Qur�an
                    ? Reply #670 on Yesterday at 112816 AM ?
                    Quote
                    Quote from Mazhar on Yesterday at 052319 AM
                    Now it is total mockery.

                    Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

                    It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

                    IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
                    IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
                    IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
                    IF 3+ daughters they get 2/3
                    2/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

                    now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

                    I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

                    walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #679

                      What is Child in your table. Is it is she, or is it he, is it minor, or grown up.

                      definition 411 awladikum/offspring/children (any age) yours; walad (offspring/child any age)

                      6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad (offspring/child) and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

                      man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                      $120K inheritance allocate since you are smart?

                      http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #680

                        definition 411 awladikum/offspring/children (any age) yours; walad (offspring/child any age)

                        6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad (offspring/child) and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

                        man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                        $120K inheritance allocate since you are smart?

                        http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                        You are gone into deep confusion.

                        The broken plural means children which can be plural number of daughters and sons. And grammatically it can be used for reference as singular feminine, but NOT singular masculine.

                        You are avoiding resolving your problem about child.

                        In the same table you say child 1/3 and then say daughter half of 2/3=1/3. You need to clear your mind what is "child" in your table, a boy or a girl/daughter or a son.

                        Take my advice. Find time to study about nouns, their gender, and plurality.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #681

                          In the same table you say child 1/3 and then say daughter half of 2/3=1/3.

                          411 the children are together (i.e. mixed ratios) male/s and female/s 2, 3+, 1

                          we are waiting for you/Mazhar to allocate $120K inheritance since you are smart?
                          man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                          http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                          Take my advice. Find time to study about nouns, their gender, and plurality.

                          2233 not made to suffer mother biwaladiha/in (due to) offspring/child (masculine noun) hers
                          1977 surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring (masculine noun) of
                          3133 not availed parent about waladihi/offspring (masculine noun) his

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #682

                            411 the children are together (i.e. mixed ratios) male/s and female/s 2, 3+, 1

                            we are waiting for you/Mazhar to allocate $120K inheritance since you are smart?
                            man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                            http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                            2233 not made to suffer mother biwaladiha/in (due to) offspring/child (masculine noun) hers
                            1977 surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring (masculine noun) of
                            3133 not availed parent about waladihi/offspring (masculine noun) his

                            In the first sentence there are two females and a male in the Aulaad. Their internal distribution is given. Not the share/fraction of what is left by the deceased parent.

                            Pl read Para 26-43 and try to rebut any point.

                            http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #683

                              Pl read Para 26-43 and try to rebut any point.

                              http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

                              rebuttal http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                              let me break it down since you're beginner top critique among nonbelievers with marrying 9 year-old and wife beating.
                              no idea why you wrote inheritance article and you are clueless to allocate simple spouse, parents, and daughters?

                              according to you walad/son (erroneous!) and daughters are alone (erroneous! numerous contradictions!)

                              411
                              if three+ daughters they get 2/3
                              if no son and parents mother 1/3

                              already max no clue what to give father!

                              412
                              if no son husband 1/2
                              if no son wife gets 1/4

                              likewise clueless what to give spouse!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #684

                                rebuttal http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                                let me break it down since you're beginner top critique among nonbelievers with marrying 9 year-old and wife beating.
                                no idea why you wrote inheritance article and you are clueless to allocate simple spouse, parents, and daughters?

                                according to you walad/son (erroneous!) and daughters are alone (erroneous! numerous contradictions!)

                                411
                                if three+ daughters they get 2/3
                                if no son and parents mother 1/3

                                already max no clue what to give father!

                                412
                                if no son husband 1/2
                                if no son wife gets 1/4

                                likewise clueless what to give spouse!

                                Only slanders. You have totally exposed yourself that you lack even basic knowledge of Arabic. How sentences are structured to put meanings in them is far beyond your brain. Sorry to note that you do not even know types of noun and still have self assumed to be a scholar on Qur'aan.

                                http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11m.gif

                                This sentence is beyond your comprehension. You see only words. Sentence is far more than sum total of words. Do you know what type of sentence is this? How many are grammatical units in it? What is its tone.

                                If you know not these basic things avoid spreading your foolish ideas imagined.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Noon_waalqalami
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #685

                                  It's obvious to everyone reading that you are clueless on allocating even basic shares e.g. father and daughter/s?
                                  This thread is on inheritance distributions which you are hijacking advertising dumb article on your website. If you don't like my distributions (it's there for the benefit of others) open your own thread stop hijacking this one go debate these guys who'll tear you to pieces since you lack even basic logic and cannot distribute anything!

                                  http//www.sillyallah.com/2007/11/inheritance-mistake-in-detail-part-1.html

                                  http//www.sillyallah.com/2007/11/inheritance-mistake-in-detail-part-2.html

                                  http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #686

                                    Only slanders. You have totally exposed yourself that you lack even basic knowledge of Arabic. How sentences are structured to put meanings in them is far beyond your brain. Sorry to note that you do not even know types of noun and still have self assumed to be a scholar on Qur'aan.

                                    http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11m.gif

                                    This sentence is beyond your comprehension. You see only words. Sentence is far more than sum total of words. Do you know what type of sentence is this? How many are grammatical units in it? What is its tone.

                                    If you know not these basic things avoid spreading your foolish ideas imagined.

                                    What is hampering to talk about the basic part of the discourse on inheritance. Are you clueless, or afraid that you whole story will fall.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Offline
                                      N Offline
                                      Noon_waalqalami
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #687

                                      summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

                                      411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
                                      applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

                                      Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

                                      ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                                      Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

                                      ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

                                      13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

                                      peace all the best to everyone! peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #688

                                        Noon, can you move with me step by step. You are at liberty to accept or rebut by evidence NOT by gossip.

                                        Part-I. Definition of inheritance; Arabic Root for semantic domain of inheritance and Roots that collocate

                                        1. Inheritance is the practice of passing on the property, movable and immovable assets, debts and obligations upon the death of an individual. The concept of inheritance is embedded in Root . Ibn Faris stated

                                        ( &#1577

                                        . .

                                        That it refers to the thing owned by persons which thereafter is turned towards later generation by lineage/kinship and/or for some other reason.

                                        1. It thus denotes inheritance, transfer of sustenance to heirs called they who inherit (money, property, heritage) as an heir at the death of previous holder. They can be only those who are for the deceased plural noun (three or more) meaning kinsfolk, or beneficiaries for some other reason, like under patronage person (in common parlance adopted son). It stems from Root . According to Ibn Faris its primarily signification is

                                        .

                                        That it leads to the perception of nearness; adjacent.

                                        Dear can you deny these facts?

                                        If we proceed logically we can better revisit and evaluate the accuracy of what we have been understanding. Let us learn.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_Sardar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #689

                                          summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

                                          411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
                                          applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

                                          https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

                                          Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

                                          ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                                          Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

                                          ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                                          https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

                                          https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

                                          13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

                                          peace all the best to everyone! peace

                                          Salam/Peace Noon, i hope that does not mean you are leaving or something? By the way, i agree with you on this Inheritance issues is due to Hadith involvement of translation.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users